Screening help.

Crosswindphoto · Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:18 pm

Turned the sharpening down and exported at a smaller size: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... b04dddbb43

airkas1 · Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:28 pm

Looks alright to me.

Crosswindphoto · Thu Feb 21, 2019 6:46 pm

Kas,
Was that you who rejected my Challenger shot and left the comment?
If so, that was a nice comment! is the eraser tool in Lightroom though?

airkas1 · Thu Feb 21, 2019 7:17 pm

Yeah that was me

If you don't do so already, try to sharpen in layers. That way, you can easily use the eraser to eliminate any jaggies that may occur. If you're unsure how, I have a YT tutorial; shoot me a PM if you want the link. The eraser tool in Photoshop is located in the sidebar. In Lightroom it should be under brushes or something, but I'm not exactly sure.

Crosswindphoto · Thu Feb 21, 2019 7:42 pm

PM sent.
Or at least I think so, I typed it, hit submit but can’t see it in my outbox.
If it’s just user error, then it’s my fault.

Crosswindphoto · Fri Feb 22, 2019 6:37 pm

Can I get this shot pre-screened please?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 90881dc989
Thanks.

Runway28L · Sat Feb 23, 2019 6:39 pm

Background could use some noise reduction IMO.

Crosswindphoto · Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:21 pm

Pre-screen?
I think this may be up-loadable at 1920px, but please do say if it isn't.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 6c5b216806

jelpee · Sun Feb 24, 2019 1:41 am

Airtransat is showing a bit of jaggies on the main titles and trailing edge of vertical stabilizer. I think it would look better smaller as well since at this size flaws are magnified.
Quality for the C130 looks fine for me. Check the level though...judging from the far edge of the runway, perhaps some CW rotation? I'd have to rotate it and see to say for sure. I was unable to download the image as a jpeg to check.

Cheers.

Jehan

Crosswindphoto · Sun Feb 24, 2019 11:11 am

Hey Jehan,
Air Transat is already at 1280px. Would it be wiser just to desharpen it a little bit regrade then size it down more?
Have a great day,
Tim

jelpee · Sun Feb 24, 2019 2:35 pm

Hi Tim,
RE. the Air Transat, I would apply the sharpening on a background layer and then erase those areas that show jaggies. I would leave the size at 1280 pixels. Sorry, my bad: I thought it looked larger than 1280 pixels!

Jehan

Crosswindphoto · Sat Mar 02, 2019 8:42 pm

Hey guys,
I would like a pre-screen on this photo: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 15944bf587
I ticked the "military" category, is this correct?
Tim

spompert · Sat Mar 02, 2019 9:17 pm

Hi, the black stripes have jaggies on my screen so I would say oversharpened. Greets Stefan

jelpee · Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:01 am

Little bit of jaggies on the tail/rudder line and the registration number, but otherwise OK for me.

Jehan

Crosswindphoto · Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:10 am

Thanks too the both of you. Are the jaggies passable?

jelpee · Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:46 pm

Passable for me, but cant say for another screener. IMO, those kinds of jaggies are hard to avoid.

Jehan

airkas1 · Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:52 pm

Not seeing too significant jaggies. If it's military operated, then that category indeed applies.

Crosswindphoto · Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:05 pm

It is owned by the Police, would it be government or military?

airkas1 · Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:20 pm

In that case government.

Crosswindphoto · Sun Mar 03, 2019 8:25 pm

PC12 info wil be updated, in the meantime, will the pylons cause a rejection in this photo? (https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... d9c4f477ae)
If you notice anything else about the photo that may cause a rejection do say so.
Thanks,
Tim.

Crosswindphoto · Thu Mar 07, 2019 5:35 pm

Can I get a pre-screen on this photo?
Does the special scheme category apply?
Tim
EDIT: you know maybe it would make sense to add the photo *facepalm*: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 7a7c3cd620

HarryLi · Sat Mar 09, 2019 6:09 am

Hi,
Yes, this one needs Colorful/Special Paint category. But the image looks blurry to me especially the rear and the tail area in this case.

Regards,
Harry

Crosswindphoto · Sat Mar 09, 2019 11:15 am

Would l coming it down to say 1100px work?

jelpee · Sat Mar 09, 2019 6:44 pm

The whole image looks blurry...also visible in the main titles and nose area and the window line. No way t judge if it will work at 1100 pixels until I can see it. Perhaps another image from your series might have a sharper constitution.

Jehan

Crosswindphoto · Sun Mar 17, 2019 6:34 pm

This photo was just rejected for oversharpened, blurry, and quality. https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 69bbce2c3e
Is it fixable?
I’m not sure how it can be blurry though, it was at 1/1000 and I held the camera steady.

jelpee · Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:28 pm

I'm pretty sure I screened and rejected this image...sorry

. Blurriness is visible towards the front of the fuselage (titles and nose). The larger issue is the over sharpening: jaggies are visible on the titles and also the outer edge of cockpit/nose and also along the window line . Re. blurriness, it can be caused by camera shake or by sections of the aircraft being out of focus. In your case, it is that the front of the aircraft is out of focus (possible a depth of filed issued) compared to the rear half. If you think it was too harsh a screening, you can try an appeal.

Cheers,

Jehan

Crosswindphoto · Mon Mar 18, 2019 10:09 am

I don't think i'll appeal it, i have re-edited it with less sharpening, and at a smaller size, and will reupload when I have time today.

Crosswindphoto · Tue Mar 26, 2019 4:10 pm

Hey guys,
This photo (https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 141a8fb700) was reject for too high, and noise, After appeal i was told that the tail counts too, fine, Is this crop correct? (https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... a0e0ecc029)
Also, while i'm here, can I get a pre-screen on this photo please?:https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/4/7/5462743.jpg?v=v4ed8c101bec
Tim

jelpee · Tue Mar 26, 2019 5:20 pm

Hey there Tim, From this 3/4 rear perspective, the tail dominates the composition and therefore should be used to balance the aircraft. IMO placing the aircraft lower will also reduce more of the visible unsightly fence in the foreground. Your second crop looks better.

The image that you requested pre-screening: Looks OK but I'm not on my screening monitor right now so I'm unable to offer detailed feedback.

Jehan

Crosswindphoto · Tue Mar 26, 2019 5:22 pm

Thanks Jehan!

jelpee · Tue Mar 26, 2019 10:58 pm

Tim: I checked out your second Cargo Jet. At this size, I see some noise under the wing and in the shadow areas.. I recommend either uploading at a smaller size or applying some NR in those areas. Otherwise it should be fine.

Jehan

Crosswindphoto · Wed Mar 27, 2019 10:28 am

Hi Jehan,
Roger, will do.
Tim.

Crosswindphoto · Tue Apr 02, 2019 4:16 pm

Can I get a pre-screen on this photo?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 6165d54384
I noticed in other photos of this aircraft that the lines are red, but they are gold in my photo, even in the RAW. (https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... b769e0ccce )
Tim

jelpee · Thu Apr 04, 2019 12:21 am

Looks good to me Tim.

Jehan

airkas1 · Thu Apr 04, 2019 10:21 am

Not great, but can't quite put my finger on it. But passable I guess. The difference in color of the line could be the type of paint, which shows different colors in different light.

Crosswindphoto · Thu Apr 04, 2019 4:02 pm

Thanks Kas and Jehan.
Can I get a pre-screen on this shot as well?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... f9e9f17261
Tim

airkas1 · Thu Apr 04, 2019 4:20 pm

Marginal for size. I'd go 1600px wide.

Crosswindphoto · Thu Apr 04, 2019 4:56 pm

Better now?: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 17dc5220cd

airkas1 · Thu Apr 04, 2019 5:24 pm

Crosswindphoto · Sat Apr 06, 2019 10:11 am

Can I get a pre-screen on this photo please?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... e68af07485
Thanks!
Tim

fsx98 · Sat Apr 06, 2019 3:55 pm

This photo could use a little CW rotation, but other than that, the photo looks fine, unless if anyone else wants to chime in on other imperfections.

jelpee · Sat Apr 06, 2019 8:31 pm

Agree on the need for CW rotation. Otherwise OK

Jehan

Crosswindphoto · Sun Apr 07, 2019 10:12 am

Will do.

Crosswindphoto · Mon Apr 08, 2019 4:09 pm

Can I get a pre-screen on this shot please?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 07b397a084
Tim

airkas1 · Mon Apr 08, 2019 4:11 pm

Blurry, oversharpened, quality. Will not make it, sorry.

Crosswindphoto · Mon Apr 08, 2019 4:32 pm

I thought so, thanks kas!

Crosswindphoto · Wed Apr 10, 2019 4:16 pm

Can I get a pre-screen on this shot? https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 46a4bd7880
if it is acceptable, Can i have some help with the info, I selected Helicopter as the main subject is that the right thing to do?.
Thanks
Tim

airkas1 · Wed Apr 10, 2019 5:48 pm

I'd crop closer on the left, right to the wingtip of the Cessna. It's also a bit too bright/OE. The helicopter as main subject is fine.

Crosswindphoto · Wed Apr 10, 2019 7:49 pm

Thanks Kas!

Crosswindphoto · Thu Apr 11, 2019 4:10 pm

This better now?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 65a0e29f9d
Thanks,
Tim

Who is online

Popular Searches On Airliners.net