Hello everyone,
I've been on the site for years (since 2004 or so probably), but only recently finally got a good camera and lenses to go with it. My acceptance rate is pretty low atm, around 20%, so I was hoping to get some post/pre screen feedback on a few shots.
Rejected:
1. https://i.imgur.com/XPp4c86.jpg - overexposed/noise. I'm guessing overexposed on the nose, but I don't see a whole lot of noise here. (I'd quite like to resubmit this one)
2. https://i.imgur.com/MAlzs4G.jpg - soft/noise. To be fair i wasn't really pleased with this one but figured i'd give it a shot. Again I don't see a whole lot of noise here.
Being Screened:
1. https://i.imgur.com/Br2HiXa.jpg - Is this too soft?
2. https://i.imgur.com/5DZpKfq.jpg
3. https://i.imgur.com/qMHwq82.jpg
Not yet uploaded:
1. https://i.imgur.com/joYGJfB.jpg
2. https://i.imgur.com/Ml7qbZ0.jpg - alternative to the first Etihad shot, underside might be a bit dark but the rest seems ok to me.
Thanks in advance,
-Mikhail
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Re: Photo Feedback
AS B738: Sky is very blotchy and there's quite a bit of haloing around the aircraft (might be some sort of compression?)
WN B73G: Sky is also blotchy, high in frame, green/cyan cast
UA B752: Very hazed (note the uneven lines on the wing and engine nacelles)
EY B789: Sky a bit blotchy in certain areas. Could use a bit more contrast.
LH B748: Same as above
AF A380: Needs a tighter crop in front of the nose.
EY B789: Tighten the crop slightly near the nose, lift the shadows by 15-20%, and reduced the exposure a bit
WN B73G: Sky is also blotchy, high in frame, green/cyan cast
UA B752: Very hazed (note the uneven lines on the wing and engine nacelles)
EY B789: Sky a bit blotchy in certain areas. Could use a bit more contrast.
LH B748: Same as above
AF A380: Needs a tighter crop in front of the nose.
EY B789: Tighten the crop slightly near the nose, lift the shadows by 15-20%, and reduced the exposure a bit
Re: Photo Feedback
Don't really see halos on the AS, it is a bit noisy, as is the WN, which also looks soft, and potentially heat hazed/blurry in spots. UA 752 has significant heat hazed as mentioned. EY is minorly blotchy (thinking maybe thats imgur at this point), contrast is okay imo. LH is a bit overexposed, contrast is fine imo. AF is off center but that may be passable, borderline there and on exposure. If from the same day, the EY will be a double rejection. Second EY is a little overexposed and has shadowing issues.
Re: Photo Feedback
Yea the EY shot is from the same sequence. I only submitted one, just wanted an opinion on the 2nd. Either way I pulled both it and LH for a redo. Thanks for the comments.
Re: Photo Feedback
I would say the UA has very little chance of making it due to the heat haze, I’d advise pulling it too. Sorry to bring bad news
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests