Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
airkas1 wrote:The Flair Air is absolutely horribly cropped and should have been rejected for that. Will ask the photographer for a reupload.
scbriml wrote:airkas1 wrote:The Flair Air is absolutely horribly cropped and should have been rejected for that. Will ask the photographer for a reupload.
I suspect it was accepted as a priority upload for first shot of that plane/livery. Not saying the crop shouldn't be better, just that I understand why it was accepted.
dutchspotter1 wrote:So how is the rejected Egyptair any different from this one that got accepted just a month ago?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 227963.jpg
Kaphias wrote:dutchspotter1 wrote:So how is the rejected Egyptair any different from this one that got accepted just a month ago?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 227963.jpg
It isn't. Just another example of the inconsistent screening which we all experience.
JakTrax wrote:Crops that are way too tight I think look worse than those with perhaps too much breathing space... yet there doesn't appear to be much in the way of a rule governing too tight crops.
JakTrax wrote:But that's always been an issue here: the 'sacrosanct' rules of yesteryear seem to be something which which no-one dares interfere.
dutchspotter1 wrote:Here is another interesting example I just came across (again not mine):
JKPhotos wrote:A good example for a): Stab fully included
- A motive rejection will be given if the horizontal stabilizer is clipped (unless the photo looks balanced).
dutchspotter1 wrote:No cut stabilizers unless cropped close to the fuselage?