Can I have some comments / feedback on the below? Would this be accepted nowadays?
GJZHLJET2B738STN18042018 by Simon Nicholls, on FlickrCheers
Simon
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
-
- Airplanepics
- Posts: 2610
- Joined:
Pre-Screening - Old user looking to upload again!
Evening All
Can I have some comments / feedback on the below? Would this be accepted nowadays?
GJZHLJET2B738STN18042018 by Simon Nicholls, on Flickr
Cheers
Simon
Can I have some comments / feedback on the below? Would this be accepted nowadays?
GJZHLJET2B738STN18042018 by Simon Nicholls, on FlickrCheers
Simon
-
- kann123air
- Posts: 1661
- Joined:
Re: Pre-Screening - Old user looking to upload again!
When I click on the link, it tells me that I don't have permission to view the full size photo.
Nice panning, though!
Nice panning, though!
-
- Airplanepics
- Posts: 2610
- Joined:
Re: Pre-Screening - Old user looking to upload again!
Ooops! I set the Flickr link to private -
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d5572fa4cc
Hopefully that's better
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d5572fa4cc
Hopefully that's better
Re: Pre-Screening - Old user looking to upload again!
Hi Simon,
Not bad at all, but the nose and tail look a little soft/blurry. I think it should work with some extra sharpening in those areas, combined with a size that is a step smaller than this.
Not bad at all, but the nose and tail look a little soft/blurry. I think it should work with some extra sharpening in those areas, combined with a size that is a step smaller than this.
-
- Airplanepics
- Posts: 2610
- Joined:
Re: Pre-Screening - Old user looking to upload again!
Cheers Kas!
Just uploaded a new, smaller version with a a slightly more aggressive sharpen.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 712ebf9c0b
Cheers
Just uploaded a new, smaller version with a a slightly more aggressive sharpen.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 712ebf9c0b
Cheers
Re: Pre-Screening - Old user looking to upload again!
Yeah, that looks passable to me. Nice shot!
-
- Airplanepics
- Posts: 2610
- Joined:
Re: Pre-Screening - Old user looking to upload again!
Hi Kas & All,
The panning shot got rejected for Noise, Soft and underexposed - all 3 rejection reasons probably couldn't be helped due to the type of shot! is it worth appealing?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 712ebf9c0b
I also had this one rejected due to "Soft" and "underexposed" - It looks ok on my monitor?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... fe9bb2720c
Cheers
Simon
The panning shot got rejected for Noise, Soft and underexposed - all 3 rejection reasons probably couldn't be helped due to the type of shot! is it worth appealing?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 712ebf9c0b
I also had this one rejected due to "Soft" and "underexposed" - It looks ok on my monitor?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... fe9bb2720c
Cheers
Simon
-
- Airplanepics
- Posts: 2610
- Joined:
Re: Pre-Screening - Old user looking to upload again!
Well I appealed the Jet 2 and it got rejected for all 3 again and quality! Kind of frustrating but onto the next one I guess ...
Re: Pre-Screening - Old user looking to upload again!
Sorry for the failed advice. I guess it's a little noisy and the brightness could be improved, but I disagree on soft.
-
- Airplanepics
- Posts: 2610
- Joined:
Re: Pre-Screening - Old user looking to upload again!
No worries Kas! It's not the best image I agree but I liked the motion blur.
Just invested in a 100-400L so hope to be able to replicate these over the summer!
Just invested in a 100-400L so hope to be able to replicate these over the summer!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests