• 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
 
User avatar
Wordpress
Posts: 59
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2018 6:07 pm

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Wed Nov 21, 2018 2:28 pm

Runway28L wrote:
More rejection help.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... a331da742c
Rejected for Blurry, OS, Overexposed

Again, not seeing any blur in the original file. I even had someone suggest that this image was underexposed before I added it to the queue.

Seems like there’s been a ton of blurry rejections recently. :?

I'd wait for Kas, but me personally, I don't see blur or OS. I do agree with it being overexposed though, turn it down a couple notches.
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7010
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Wed Nov 21, 2018 2:46 pm

It's a bit too sharp and the whites of the fuselage look overexposed. Not seeing an unpassable amount of blur though.
 
User avatar
Runway28L
Topic Author
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:35 pm

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Wed Nov 21, 2018 4:50 pm

Thanks guys. I’ll go ahead and make changes. I’ll note the blur in a comment.
Greetings from KPIT! Check out my photos here: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=45 ... teAccepted
 
User avatar
Runway28L
Topic Author
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:35 pm

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Wed Nov 28, 2018 9:33 pm

The Alaska B738 got rejected yet again for Blurry.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... f1be7d97a7

Still having a very hard time seeing any, if it's even there, in the full size photo.

FWIW this is the EXIF data of the image above:

Nikon D3300
70-300mm f/4.0-5.6
6000 x 4000 * 5.90 MB JPEG

ISO 200 105mm f/8.0 1/1000 sec
Greetings from KPIT! Check out my photos here: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=45 ... teAccepted
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7010
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Wed Nov 28, 2018 10:35 pm

It's on the sharp side, but not really blurry.
 
User avatar
Runway28L
Topic Author
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:35 pm

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Thu Nov 29, 2018 12:20 pm

Thanks Kas for confirming. Just had it accepted on appeal.
Greetings from KPIT! Check out my photos here: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=45 ... teAccepted
 
User avatar
Runway28L
Topic Author
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:35 pm

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Fri Nov 30, 2018 9:05 pm

The American ERJ that originally got rejected for OE got rejected again. I'm really dumbfounded with this one. :ouch:
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... be1a58af6c

-Blurry
-Heat haze
-Underexposed
-PM "Nose"

How come the reasons completely changed from the initial rejection? Also, how is heat haze an issue when it was 40 degrees Fahrenheit the day I took this? Issue with resizing?
Greetings from KPIT! Check out my photos here: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=45 ... teAccepted
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7010
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Sat Dec 01, 2018 11:55 am

It's not too bad. Let me know when you appeal, so I can try to catch it.


Runway28L wrote:
Also, how is heat haze an issue when it was 40 degrees Fahrenheit the day I took this?

Heat haze can occur at any time and is coupled with the difference between the air and surface temperature. So a cold day (temperature-wise) is not necessarily a gaurantee for no heathaze.

Heat haze, also called heat shimmer, refers to the inferior mirage experienced when viewing objects through a layer of heated air; for example, viewing objects across hot asphalt or through the exhaust gases produced by jet engines. When appearing on roads due to the hot asphalt, it is often referred to as a highway mirage.

Convection causes the temperature of the air to vary, and the variation between the hot air at the surface of the road and the denser cool air above it creates a gradient in the refractive index of the air. This produces a blurred shimmering effect, which affects the ability to resolve objects, the effect being increased when the image is magnified through a telescope or telephoto lens.
A hot-road mirage, "fake water" on the road, the most common example of an inferior mirage

Light from the sky at a shallow angle to the road is refracted by the index gradient, making it appear as if the sky is reflected by the road's surface. The mind interprets this as a pool of water on the road, since water also reflects the sky. The illusion fades as one gets closer.

On tarmac roads it may look as if water, or even oil, has been spilled. These kinds of inferior mirages are often called "desert mirages" or "highway mirages". Both sand and tarmac can become very hot when exposed to the sun, easily being more than 10 °C hotter than the air one meter above, enough to create conditions suitable for the formation of the mirage.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirage
 
User avatar
Runway28L
Topic Author
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:35 pm

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Sat Dec 01, 2018 5:21 pm

Hi Kas. I just appealed the image and sent you a PM letting you know.

Thank you for providing that explanation. Interesting to read. Although I just find it strange how I still don't see any haze in the full size file and no other images taken on that day had any either (many of which were accepted without issue).
Greetings from KPIT! Check out my photos here: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=45 ... teAccepted
 
User avatar
Runway28L
Topic Author
Posts: 1133
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:35 pm

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Sun Dec 09, 2018 7:28 pm

Hello guys. Just had this priority upload rejected for blurry and quality.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 19eb7e4f45

Is this even salvageable or should I bin it?
Greetings from KPIT! Check out my photos here: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=45 ... teAccepted
 
User avatar
fsx98
Posts: 357
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:57 am

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Mon Dec 10, 2018 12:26 am

The upper part of the fuselage and tail are blurry; best to either downsize it (my personal preference, depending on size of rejected photo) or bin the photo.
Aviation junkie + computer expert!
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7010
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Improvements and Opinions

Tue Dec 11, 2018 8:49 pm

Doesn't look super blurry, but the sky and fuselage are overexposed. Light definitely not doing you any favors, not sure if can be salvaged.
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos