Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
airkas1 wrote:As for the WN, the second image is definitely better, but I tend to agree that it looks a little blurry/marginal. This should've been mentioned upon first screening though and I'm sorry we wasted your time by failing to do that.
airkas1 wrote:I corrected the Gulfstream for you, so no need for action from your side. As for the JB, it would seem maskable at a smaller size, but if it has been rejected 2 or 3 times already, perhaps it's better to leave it then.
HarryLi wrote:
airkas1 wrote:United: I'd add some more contrast.
Delta: Looks passable, although hazed.
Spirit: Passable for me.
airkas1 wrote:The light just isn't doing you any favors there, so likely the aircraft will always be underexposed and the sky overexposed/blown. Honestly I would bin it and try again another time.
airkas1 wrote:Regarding the HIF, the original edit looks to be the best and not too HIF at all. But since it got rejected for this, the 3rd attempt seems to be the runner-up.
airkas1 wrote:Regarding the CW, original does look CW and the re-edit looks good.
Runway28L wrote:And one more... rejected for Soft, High Contrast, and Underexposed:
Original: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... e1e49cf218
New edit: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a04b22ac6f
HarryLi wrote:I'm sorry that it still looks pretty underexposed besides, the colour looks bit of cyan and also looks slight blurry to me.
airkas1 wrote:Passable for me.
Runway28L wrote:airkas1 wrote:Passable for me.
Thanks Kas but unfortunately it was just rejected again for High in Frame (?), Noise, Oversharpened, and Underexposed.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7f2017d6fc
Not sure why it’s noisy and OS all of a sudden. And the plane is lower in the center of the frame than in the first image I submitted.