Pre-screening

yousaf465 · Fri Jan 26, 2018 12:20 pm

HarryLi wrote:
It looks oversharpened to me. Very obvious jaggys there. The upper right angle looks very dark,which makes me conside "Vignette" Reason.

airkas1

Thanks

OS, Vignetting, Noise are all understandable.

I can't understand the quality issue.

HarryLi · Fri Jan 26, 2018 12:42 pm

yousaf465 wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
It looks oversharpened to me. Very obvious jaggys there. The upper right angle looks very dark,which makes me conside "Vignette" Reason.

airkas1

Thanks

OS, Vignetting, Noise are all understandable.

I can't understand the quality issue.

"Quality" reason was given base on other reasons.

airkas1 · Fri Jan 26, 2018 1:05 pm

Exactly. In general, the quality is insufficient. I use 'quality' to indicate that I don't think the image is salvagable.

yousaf465 · Fri Jan 26, 2018 1:12 pm

Not good enough ?

airkas1 · Fri Jan 26, 2018 2:24 pm

The wing seems blurry/out of focus. Sharpening to compensate blur will end up looking like your edit.

yousaf465 · Fri Jan 26, 2018 3:29 pm

Over Lahore.

airkas1 · Fri Jan 26, 2018 3:30 pm

Green cast, oversharpened and also kinda poor quality. Plus window reflections in the top right corner and not that much of an interesting view, sorry.

yousaf465 · Fri May 04, 2018 10:20 am

DC-3 requesting clearance for take-off. Any issues ?

yousaf465 · Fri May 04, 2018 10:59 am

This one might have a few issues, please enlist any.

yousaf465 · Sat May 05, 2018 11:20 am

Requesting Uploading.... Good enough for Airliners.net ?

HarryLi · Sun May 06, 2018 10:27 am

The light behind the building has glare which is not accepted i think. Besides, sky part was grainy i think.

airkas1 · Mon May 07, 2018 11:48 am

The DC-3 needs a closer crop. Second photo is high in frame. The Eagle needs some CCW and the flare is kinda killing the shot. All 3 aren't great, so not sure what the screening results will be.

yousaf465 · Sun May 13, 2018 4:34 am

good enough ?

yousaf465 · Sun May 13, 2018 2:33 pm

Tighter crop

HarryLi · Mon May 14, 2018 1:28 pm

Hi Yousaf,
I am sorry that both of them are suffering from Flare (Glare issue).

Cheers,
Harry

airkas1 · Tue May 15, 2018 8:58 am

Flares are kinda killing in both. First one (Sabre?) has a strong yellow/green cast, but centering is OK.

yousaf465 · Fri Mar 01, 2019 5:36 am

any issues? another long exposure , another night shot.

airkas1 · Sun Mar 03, 2019 3:01 pm

It needs a bit tighter crop on the right and it's a bit high in frame.

yousaf465 · Tue Mar 05, 2019 8:47 am

Cropped and fixed. Good enough for upload?

yousaf465 · Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:35 am

any comments?

airkas1 · Tue Mar 12, 2019 5:04 pm

The most recent edit should be fine.

yousaf465 · Sun Mar 15, 2020 6:11 pm

good enough for upload

Crosswindphoto · Mon Mar 16, 2020 12:29 pm

Unfortunately, it is blurry, and very backlit. Not fixable.

Tim

HarryLi · Wed Mar 18, 2020 4:12 am

I think it has little chance to make it due to its very poor sunlight angle and the poor overall quality. It is obvious to observe halo surrond the a.c and vignettings at corners. Also as Tim mentioned above that it's very blurry at some parts. Sorry.

Regards,
Harry

yousaf465 · Sun Apr 12, 2020 9:26 am

Qatar A330 requesting prescreen, while she burns some rubber

DHL 767 requests prescreen while kissing the sun

Crosswindphoto · Sun Apr 12, 2020 12:03 pm

1: Extremely OS, sun glare/motive, crop to loose, a touch OE.

2: Glare/dots at the nose not great, also OS.

Tim

jelpee · Sun Apr 12, 2020 4:29 pm

Spot on Tim!

Jehan

Crosswindphoto · Sun Apr 12, 2020 6:05 pm

jelpee wrote:
Spot on Tim!

Jehan

yousaf465 · Mon Apr 13, 2020 6:03 am

Crosswindphoto wrote:
1: Extremely OS, sun glare/motive, crop to loose, a touch OE.

2: Glare/dots at the nose not great, also OS.

Tim

Thanks Tim.
I have edited another frame instead. Please comment on this anybody.

Crosswindphoto · Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:20 am

Better, but still blurry around the back of the A/C, crop could be a bit tighter, ad the sun glare is also still at the back of the A/C.

Tim

yousaf465 · Mon Apr 13, 2020 7:46 am

Crosswindphoto wrote:
Better, but still blurry around the back of the A/C, crop could be a bit tighter, ad the sun glare is also still at the back of the A/C.

Tim

Some glare is allowed, isn't it? Found one such example in the latest upload.
https://www.airliners.net/photo/FedEx-F ... 22/5956733

yousaf465 · Mon Apr 13, 2020 8:11 am

Improved on crop and sharpening

Crosswindphoto · Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:59 am

Technically allowed yes, but it will usually draw a rejection as its not super pleasing to look at. It depends on the screener and the rarity of a photo.

Latest Edit: Overall the crop is better but still blurry for me.

Tim

yousaf465 · Mon Apr 13, 2020 11:16 am

Crosswindphoto wrote:
Technically allowed yes, but it will usually draw a rejection as its not super pleasing to look at. It depends on the screener and the rarity of a photo.

Latest Edit: Overall the crop is better but still blurry for me.

Tim

which parts are blurry?

yousaf465 · Mon Apr 13, 2020 11:52 am

Edited as required.

Crosswindphoto · Mon Apr 13, 2020 1:33 pm

The tail and titles seem blurry to me.

Tim

jelpee · Mon Apr 13, 2020 10:46 pm

Looks oversharpened. Jaggies visible in titles, landing gear, bottom of fuselage. Overall, a "crisp" feel to it.

Jehan

JakTrax · Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:48 pm

Surely that sunflash rear fuselage isn't an issue?! I can understand when it's at the forward fuselage over the titles (as in that FX 757 image) but sometimes you just can't avoid it if you want a side-on(ish) shot. In that QR shot it's in no way distracting.

Aside from the sharpening issues it would benefit from a slight contrast increase.

jelpee · Tue Apr 14, 2020 2:57 pm

[quote="JakTrax"]Surely that sunflash rear fuselage isn't an issue?! I can understand when it's at the forward fuselage over the titles (as in that FX 757 image) but sometimes you just can't avoid it if you want a side-on(ish) shot. In that QR shot it's in no way distracting.

The glare should not be an issue. I'd reject for glare if it obscures main titles, tail insignia. cockpit window, or the window line (typically it would be the entire window line). These would be considered major distractions to the image. In my view, the glare on the rear of the fuselage of this image does not rise to the level of a major distraction or detraction. Therefore, acceptable for me.

Jehan

yousaf465 · Wed Apr 15, 2020 1:46 pm

Any issues at this size?

yousaf465 · Thu Apr 16, 2020 12:49 pm

any comments on Kuwait 777 ?

JakTrax · Thu Apr 16, 2020 5:21 pm

Possibly a touch bright and lacking contrast.

yousaf465 · Thu Apr 16, 2020 7:42 pm

JakTrax wrote:
Possibly a touch bright and lacking contrast.

I can't understand this love of Dark with airliner photo website, I don't know why screener love underexposed photos.

yousaf465 · Thu Apr 16, 2020 7:43 pm

Here is another version of same aircraft.

JakTrax · Thu Apr 16, 2020 7:59 pm

Probably a bit too far the other way now. Didn't need much of a brightness reduction — mainly needed a contrast injection.

yousaf465 · Sat Apr 18, 2020 12:05 pm

Is it good enough crop for a banking aircraft ?

JakTrax · Sat Apr 18, 2020 3:45 pm

Motive doesn't work for me. I'd be surprised if acceptable here.

yousaf465 · Sat Apr 18, 2020 5:52 pm

Is this acceptable?

jelpee · Sat Apr 18, 2020 6:01 pm

Sorry but I see the following issues with QR Cargo A7-BFN:

Overexposed
Low contrast
Blurry
Magenta color cast
Dirty (unidentifiable item above the front of the fuselage).
Poor crop (wing tip cropped on left side): Either show entre wing, or crop close to engine on right side and the tail on the left side.

Regards,

Jehan

yousaf465 · Sat Apr 18, 2020 6:28 pm

jelpee wrote:
Sorry but I see the following issues with QR Cargo A7-BFN:

Overexposed
Low contrast
Blurry
Magenta color cast
Dirty (unidentifiable item above the front of the fuselage).
Poor crop (wing tip cropped on left side): Either show entre wing, or crop close to engine on right side and the tail on the left side.

Regards,

Jehan

Thanks for the detailed response. This will help me with editing any other frames from the same sequence.
Blurry at the tail ?
colour cast is due to the browser I think.
Dirty (unidentifiable item above the front of the fuselage).... That is a bird just like in the following photo. Also, I hadn't removed any dust spots.
My major issue is how should I crop it to be an acceptable crop.
This wasn't meant for upload to A.net.

Who is online

Popular Searches On Airliners.net