jelpee wrote:Re. the B727, needs a little more brightness (check right side of histogram) and IMO a touch of sharpening and some noise reduction in the shadow areas. Should be OK then.
Jehan
See if looks better now
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
jelpee wrote:Re. the B727, needs a little more brightness (check right side of histogram) and IMO a touch of sharpening and some noise reduction in the shadow areas. Should be OK then.
Jehan
airkas1 wrote:Still looks like a blurry original to me, which can't be fixed.
airkas1 wrote:The E550(?) looks nice and passable for me.
The B737 is a bit low in frame, cyan and soft. But all issues seem fixable.
airkas1 wrote:The engine close-up will likely get rejected for motive, as the crop isn't that great.
The Sideral looks a bit underexposed still, there is room for extra brightness on the right side of the histogram. The moest right value to 240 or so. I also forgot to mention that it has a 'spot' in the sky in front of the tail. Better to remove that to avoid the dirty rejection. Sorry I missed that in the previous edit as well. Otherwise it looks ok to me.
vcruvinel wrote:Sharpness is ok?
airkas1 wrote:vcruvinel wrote:Sharpness is ok?
Yes.
airkas1 wrote:The engine close-up will likely get rejected for motive, as the crop isn't that great.
The Sideral looks a bit underexposed still, there is room for extra brightness on the right side of the histogram. The moest right value to 240 or so. I also forgot to mention that it has a 'spot' in the sky in front of the tail. Better to remove that to avoid the dirty rejection. Sorry I missed that in the previous edit as well. Otherwise it looks ok to me.
HarryLi wrote:VC-1 looks bit of OS to me.
Helicopter : You can give it more sharpen. It seems soft toward the whole body and the tail i think.And the tail also looks bit of Blurry to me maybe due to soft.
Tail shot looks better than another 2.
Cheers,
Harry
airkas1 wrote:FAB is blurry and yellow.
TAM needs some +10 contrast, some brightness from the right sid eof the histogram (value 240ish). Looks alright otherwise.
HarryLi wrote:Regarding to the TAM the latest one, the color seems weird. I assume that you took it with a glass in front of you. Adjusting the tone might be better i think.
HarryLi wrote:Hi,
I am not talking about the the plane's color is weird i mean the whole picture seems bit of green than normal i think. Especially the white part of the aircraft seems strange.And the saturation is ok i think. I did a quick editing for it here is :
You can compare it to yours.
Cheers,
Harry
airkas1 wrote:That image is very blurry and will not make it.
airkas1 wrote:That one is also blurry and soft, sorry.
airkas1 wrote:B727: slightly blurry, CCW and double with the closeup?
GOL: low contrast.
A320: cyan cast and oversharpened.
Overview: blurry, motive (left aircraft blocked), will not make it.
HarryLi wrote:Sideral : seems blurry to me.
GOL+ : The contrast seems could be more i think and the front gear letters and REG in the body seem to be blurry i think.
LATAM A320 : The purple fringe of it is serious and obvious and some parts seem to be OS to me.
The last one : The whole photo seems Blurry especially the plane and the light stick. Besides, the color of it looks weird. I think is too red or magenta.The color issue should be easy to deal with.
Cheers,
Harry
airkas1 wrote:No, different day is not double.
http://vcruvinel.com/fotos/PR-VBM/PR-VBM2.jpg
HarryLi wrote:http://vcruvinel.com/fotos/PR-VBM/PR-VBM2.jpg
The contrast of this one seems better than before ( I think there is little bit space could be increased).But i think the sharpness is marginal You can wait more replys !
Cheers,
Harry
airkas1 wrote:Contrast is better. Sharpening is not an issue for me, but now that I look again it's a little bright.
airkas1 wrote:The Eurowings could use a bit more contrast, but looks passable otherwise
GOL is a bit bright, but otherwise nice. The Avianca seems to suffer a bit from heathaze, as the whole aircraft has a sort of blurrish feeling to it.
HarryLi wrote:Hello,
I have compared the Eurowings to the another one that you posted before. I didn't see any significant changes and i think it still needs some contrast.
GOL looks better than the last one.
Avianca still looks bit of Heat Haze i think especially the tail.
Not quiet sure , it looks a little bit Heat Haze to me.
Cheers,
Harry