Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
HarryLi wrote:Hello,
I think it needs more contrast and ... a bit of Blurry i think.
Cheers,
Harry
WingsFan wrote:HarryLi wrote:Hello,
I think it needs more contrast and ... a bit of Blurry i think.
Cheers,
Harry
Where exactly is blurriness ? Would sharpening it slightly more help?
airkas1 wrote:B747: overexposed, blurry (titles, windows, aft fuselage), low contrast
B777: A bit bright, but otherwise not that bad
WingsFan wrote:airkas1 wrote:B747: overexposed, blurry (titles, windows, aft fuselage), low contrast
B777: A bit bright, but otherwise not that bad
Thanks kas!
I touched the 777 per your comments and submitted for upload. My first one, hopefully.
Do you now how long it typically takes these days for a review?
HarryLi wrote:I haven't used Nik Sharpen before . And when i edit photos of aircraft i only sharpen them by using the USM Sharpen or Smart Sharpen in Photoshop. I think they are enough ~ and i think these 2 functions is good enough ( I am not familiar to other sharpen tool ) .
Cheers,
Harry
WingsFan wrote:HarryLi wrote:I haven't used Nik Sharpen before . And when i edit photos of aircraft i only sharpen them by using the USM Sharpen or Smart Sharpen in Photoshop. I think they are enough ~ and i think these 2 functions is good enough ( I am not familiar to other sharpen tool ) .
Cheers,
Harry
Right. Even I used the nik sharpener for the first time. I guess I will stick to USM . What do you think about the P51 Mustang?
airkas1 wrote:The apache could work in a 3:4 ratio crop. A head-on and side-on is acceptable and would not get rejected for double.
HarryLi wrote:The Fedex has obvious Blurry. "The world on time" is blurry.