Regarding my two last rej, I explicity asked in the appeal to indicate me where signaled issue are eventually visibile ...
Head rej without any explanation, adding more questionable issue.
Very arrogant and opinionated behavieur.
Uploading and also discussing on photos composition and quality was a pleasure, without respect is becoming awful.
I'm not the only one that found screeners behavieur strange... uploading same jpg 2 times could have completely different result... this is a big issue and the numbers of A.net say that this is not a good way to works...
Sincerely
Federico!
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Re: HeadScr bad behavieur
Hi Federico,
First I just want to mention that perhaps the screener forgot or overlooked that part of the appeal message.
As for giving you the answer you're looking for:
Blurry, Quality, Underexposed: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 1304e7afc4
- The photo is most definitely underexposed as a whole.
- It's not super blurry, but the fuselage (windowline/titles) and tail look like it (thus poor quality). Perhaps haze plays a role in the cause.
Blurry, Oversharpened, Common, Quality, Underexposed: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... ca286f5dac
- The fuselage, titles, look oversharpened to compensate a slight blur (thus poor quality).
- It can use more brightness as a whole.
- Common, since there are over 100 photos of this aircraft in the database, so the quality needs to be top notch.
First I just want to mention that perhaps the screener forgot or overlooked that part of the appeal message.
As for giving you the answer you're looking for:
Blurry, Quality, Underexposed: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 1304e7afc4
- The photo is most definitely underexposed as a whole.
- It's not super blurry, but the fuselage (windowline/titles) and tail look like it (thus poor quality). Perhaps haze plays a role in the cause.
Blurry, Oversharpened, Common, Quality, Underexposed: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... ca286f5dac
- The fuselage, titles, look oversharpened to compensate a slight blur (thus poor quality).
- It can use more brightness as a whole.
- Common, since there are over 100 photos of this aircraft in the database, so the quality needs to be top notch.
Re: HeadScr bad behavieur
ricox wrote:Regarding my two last rej, I explicity asked in the appeal to indicate me where signaled issue are eventually visibile ...
Head rej without any explanation, adding more questionable issue.
Very arrogant and opinionated behavieur.
Uploading and also discussing on photos composition and quality was a pleasure, without respect is becoming awful.
I'm not the only one that found screeners behavieur strange... uploading same jpg 2 times could have completely different result... this is a big issue and the numbers of A.net say that this is not a good way to works...
Sincerely
Federico!
Both images are very dark. Look at the Levels histogram - all the peaks are on the left-hand side.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests