Pre-screening ---Harry

HarryLi · Thu Jun 08, 2017 12:05 pm

airkas1 wrote:
I would probably let the wingview go. And yes, the EK is slightly overexposed and I think it will look better when toned down a little.

Thank you Kas , i will let it go. And the EK i would try to revise.

Cheers,
Harry

HarryLi · Sat Jun 10, 2017 1:38 pm

Hello guys,
I finished a QR 77F just now and not pretty sure about it so hope you guys can show your opinions here.
Thank you for your valuable time.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... be42c80ad0

Cheers,
Harry

HarryLi · Sat Jun 10, 2017 4:02 pm

Ah... and this time ... more photos need your advice as these photos were taken in a bad weather so not sure .
Thanks a lot again !!
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4907c4cff2 (SZ A320)
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 510b7bc90b (TG A330 )
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 612665462d (CUA B738)
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... aba0cee4f6 (CZ B-2787)
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... bda3539dc8 (TK 77W)
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... bde9d27e5b (SH B767)
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a47ee40c47 (CZ B-2736)

YQZ380 · Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:13 am

Hi Harry,

QR 777F: Grainy sky
SZ A320: Front portion of windows a little soft
TG A330: Seems okay
CUA 738: A little overexposed, otherwise okay
CZ B-2787: Soft towards the front
TK 77W: A tad overexposed, grainy sky
SH 767: Reddish cast, grainy sky
CZ B-2736: A little overexposed

Cheers,
Yang

HarryLi · Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:01 am

Thank you Yang,
I revised SH 767 AND TK is it better or ok ?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d0d09e9766
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 79a97f0217

I think the SKY of the QR is ok and not sure about SZ A320, CUA i think should be ok maybe. The exposure of B-2736 might be ok but now sure about sharpness of B-2787. So hope can get more opinions ~~~ Anyway thanks Yang.
Cheers,
Harry

HarryLi · Sun Jun 11, 2017 8:39 am

2 more added ~
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a780c82c6f
&
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a38fd086a7

Actually i will see the Histogram Graph so .. it doesn't show that these are Overexposure i think should be ok ?

82029 · Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:02 am

HarryLi wrote:
2 more added ~
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a780c82c6f
&
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a38fd086a7

Actually i will see the Histogram Graph so .. it doesn't show that these are Overexposure i think should be ok ?

Press the ALT key when you move the Levels sliders and you'll see where there is overexposure/overcontrast it's really handy and I use it all the time.

HarryLi · Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:07 am

DM wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
2 more added ~
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a780c82c6f
&
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a38fd086a7

Actually i will see the Histogram Graph so .. it doesn't show that these are Overexposure i think should be ok ?

Press the ALT key when you move the Levels sliders and you'll see where there is overexposure/overcontrast it's really handy and I use it all the time.

Sounds like a good way. I will have a try later. Thanks.

HarryLi · Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:24 am

DM wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
2 more added ~
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a780c82c6f
&
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a38fd086a7

Actually i will see the Histogram Graph so .. it doesn't show that these are Overexposure i think should be ok ?

Press the ALT key when you move the Levels sliders and you'll see where there is overexposure/overcontrast it's really handy and I use it all the time.

You mean recognize contrast and exposure from level ? Could u tell me detail ? I am not familiar with it. Thanks.

82029 · Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:25 am

HarryLi wrote:
DM wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
2 more added ~
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a780c82c6f
&
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a38fd086a7

Actually i will see the Histogram Graph so .. it doesn't show that these are Overexposure i think should be ok ?

Press the ALT key when you move the Levels sliders and you'll see where there is overexposure/overcontrast it's really handy and I use it all the time.

Sounds like a good way. I will have a try later. Thanks.

Yes it's a very good way as you'll know exactly when the image is beginning to become overexposed/overcontrast. When you get the levels adjusted perfectly it will look like when you took the picture! Sometimes you can adjust the levels and have small amounts of overexposure and overcontrast but you don't really want to blow it out. When you press the ALT key and adjust the levels you don't really want the white points (right slider) to go beyond a little red/yellow and the black points (left slider) to go much beyond light blue. Preferably when you adjust the levels you shouldn't be clipping (blowing out with too much exposure/contrast) any areas but if you have too then don't go too much beyond red/yellow with the white points and light blue with the dark points.

82029 · Mon Jun 12, 2017 7:33 am

HarryLi wrote:
DM wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
2 more added ~
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a780c82c6f
&
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a38fd086a7

Actually i will see the Histogram Graph so .. it doesn't show that these are Overexposure i think should be ok ?

Press the ALT key when you move the Levels sliders and you'll see where there is overexposure/overcontrast it's really handy and I use it all the time.

You mean recognize contrast and exposure from level ? Could u tell me detail ? I am not familiar with it. Thanks.

Yes, the levels tool is basically an adjustable histogram.

When you press and hold the ALT key while moving the sliders you'll be able to see when you start clipping (overexpose/overcontrast) the image. It's a handy tool!

HarryLi · Mon Jun 12, 2017 1:21 pm

DM wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
DM wrote:

Press the ALT key when you move the Levels sliders and you'll see where there is overexposure/overcontrast it's really handy and I use it all the time.

You mean recognize contrast and exposure from level ? Could u tell me detail ? I am not familiar with it. Thanks.

Yes, the levels tool is basically an adjustable histogram.

When you press and hold the ALT key while moving the sliders you'll be able to see when you start clipping (overexpose/overcontrast) the image. It's a handy tool!

Thanks DM ! It is indeed a good way i have tried it. I will practice more and see the result . Very appreciate.

HarryLi · Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:20 pm

I used that way to edit this one , what do you think ?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... dfb8537d2e

Cheers,
HARYY

airkas1 · Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:34 pm

A bit bright, but otherwise ok. Maybe tone down the hightlight a litte.

HarryLi · Mon Jun 12, 2017 3:43 pm

airkas1 wrote:
A bit bright, but otherwise ok. Maybe tone down the hightlight a litte.

What about now ?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3e0ed92722
Besides, if you are free would u please share your opinions on the photos that i posted before ?

Cheers,
Harry

82029 · Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:39 pm

HarryLi wrote:
DM wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
You mean recognize contrast and exposure from level ? Could u tell me detail ? I am not familiar with it. Thanks.

Yes, the levels tool is basically an adjustable histogram.

When you press and hold the ALT key while moving the sliders you'll be able to see when you start clipping (overexpose/overcontrast) the image. It's a handy tool!

Thanks DM ! It is indeed a good way i have tried it. I will practice more and see the result . Very appreciate.

No problem! :biggrin:

HarryLi · Fri Jun 16, 2017 5:04 pm

Hello, guys
I edited a EY A346 just now ...
But not pretty sure about this one , so appreciate your opinions here ! Thank you for your time !
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 0f02846339

Cheers,
Harry

airkas1 · Tue Jun 20, 2017 9:14 pm

Shanghai, Turkish & China Airlines looks bit bright
China Eastern -800 looks overexposed
China Eastern -700 looks fine
The EY looks hazed unfortunately (and a bit bright).

HarryLi · Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:30 am

airkas1 wrote:
Shanghai, Turkish & China Airlines looks bit bright
China Eastern -800 looks overexposed
China Eastern -700 looks fine
The EY looks hazed unfortunately (and a bit bright).

Thanks Kas !
I have edited one more and i like this sunlight very much ! Would u please give me some advice ? Thanks.

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 0f120172a3

Cheers,
Harry

HarryLi · Sun Jun 25, 2017 9:55 pm

HarryLi wrote:
airkas1 wrote:
Shanghai, Turkish & China Airlines looks bit bright
China Eastern -800 looks overexposed
China Eastern -700 looks fine
The EY looks hazed unfortunately (and a bit bright).

Thanks Kas !
I have edited one more and i like this sunlight very much ! Would u please give me some advice ? Thanks.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 0f120172a3

Cheers,
Harry

I am not quite sure about the color and the brightness.

YQZ380 · Mon Jun 26, 2017 9:50 am

HarryLi wrote:
airkas1 wrote:
Shanghai, Turkish & China Airlines looks bit bright
China Eastern -800 looks overexposed
China Eastern -700 looks fine
The EY looks hazed unfortunately (and a bit bright).

Thanks Kas !
I have edited one more and i like this sunlight very much ! Would u please give me some advice ? Thanks.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 0f120172a3

Cheers,
Harry

This one looks okay to me. Nice shot by the way!

Cheers,
Yang

airkas1 · Mon Jun 26, 2017 10:05 am

Titles seem a little soft, but otherwise nice!

HarryLi · Mon Jun 26, 2017 10:11 am

YQZ380 wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
airkas1 wrote:
Shanghai, Turkish & China Airlines looks bit bright
China Eastern -800 looks overexposed
China Eastern -700 looks fine
The EY looks hazed unfortunately (and a bit bright).

Thanks Kas !
I have edited one more and i like this sunlight very much ! Would u please give me some advice ? Thanks.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 0f120172a3

Cheers,
Harry

This one looks okay to me. Nice shot by the way!

Cheers,
Yang

Thanks Yang !

HarryLi · Mon Jun 26, 2017 10:12 am

airkas1 wrote:
Titles seem a little soft, but otherwise nice!

Thank you for your opinion Kas !

But ... i think the sharpness should be ok ? :?:

Not very serious i mean.

airkas1 · Mon Jun 26, 2017 11:13 am

I don't know, I'm not saying it without reason

HarryLi · Mon Jun 26, 2017 1:02 pm

airkas1 wrote:
I don't know, I'm not saying it without reason

Aha ~ I see

HarryLi · Tue Jun 27, 2017 11:56 am

Hi , i edited some photos and i am not pretty sure about the sharpness of two of them ~
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f412456874
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... e184507505

Hope get your valuable opinions here ~
Cheers,
Harry

len90 · Tue Jun 27, 2017 7:21 pm

They look borderline OS and might be a bit too bright. Borderline OS on the registration and titles to be specific, but I don't think that is something that should get them bounced. The 738 may be a bit OS on the leading edge of the wing as well.

HarryLi · Wed Jun 28, 2017 1:32 pm

len90 wrote:
They look borderline OS and might be a bit too bright. Borderline OS on the registration and titles to be specific, but I don't think that is something that should get them bounced. The 738 may be a bit OS on the leading edge of the wing as well.

Thank you for your reply Len, i have used eraser to erase some parts which looks OS like also include wings and i think the Reg maybe is ok i guess ... because when i erase that part it seems become soft.

HarryLi · Thu Jun 29, 2017 12:14 pm

Adding one more 787 here ~

:
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 5943646195

HarryLi · Thu Jun 29, 2017 1:18 pm

And... 2 CZ :
https://www.airliners.net/user/photo-cor ... to/4438237
https://www.airliners.net/user/photo-cor ... to/4438235

310815 · Fri Jun 30, 2017 8:21 am

The 787 is soft, especially towards the front and the sky grainy.

The other 2 links refer to your photographers Corner and can't be viewed.

HarryLi · Fri Jun 30, 2017 9:09 am

JKPhotos wrote:
The 787 is soft, especially towards the front and the sky grainy.

The other 2 links refer to your photographers Corner and can't be viewed.

Oops , sorry for the wrong links.
imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/3/2/4438237.jpg?v=v484ba4fa92f
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... b2915ee775

YQZ380 · Fri Jun 30, 2017 3:49 pm

Agree with JK on the grainy sky for the 787. The A319 and A320 need some CCW rotation, and the A320 also has a grainy sky.

HarryLi · Wed Jul 05, 2017 3:41 pm

Hello, guys
I got one rejected photo just now and i don't consider that it has the following issues.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 536c696241

Reasons :
1. Low in Frame
2. Low contrast

I think it has enough contrast and also it is not low in frame.

Appreciate your opinions here < and i am waiting for the appeal result.

Cheers,
Harry

YQZ380 · Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:24 pm

I agree that it is not low in frame, in fact, I think it is slightly on the higher side of the frame. Regarding the low contrast part, the wheels are dark enough, but I have gotten this rejection a few times when the background is slightly hazy or if the lighting is flat, which seems to be the case here.

HarryLi · Thu Jul 06, 2017 2:25 pm

YQZ380 wrote:
I agree that it is not low in frame, in fact, I think it is slightly on the higher side of the frame. Regarding the low contrast part, the wheels are dark enough, but I have gotten this rejection a few times when the background is slightly hazy or if the lighting is flat, which seems to be the case here.

Thank you for your comment Yang. I am waiting for the Appealing decision now. If they reject me i will not upload it again as the bad weather i don't want to spend too much time for it . Just as a collection.~

Thank you.
Cheers,
Harry

len90 · Thu Jul 06, 2017 4:47 pm

Harry, that image is not really low in frame. Contrast is fine as judged by the tires. Those are nicely black.

HarryLi · Thu Jul 06, 2017 5:34 pm

len90 wrote:
Harry, that image is not really low in frame. Contrast is fine as judged by the tires. Those are nicely black.

Hello Len,
Thank you for your support and support. I have already appealed it and it seems that the 1st HS asked for second opinion. So ~ just waiting to see the result. Anyway thank you for your reply.

Cheers,
Harry

HarryLi · Tue Jul 11, 2017 10:40 am

Hi , guys
I got rejected of these 2 photos. And both of them were rejected with High In Frame. And the A319 also with Soft. Well, Soft i can accept but i don't consider that both of them are high in frame ?

Confused ~
Are they really high in frame ?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... e184507505 ( High in Frame )
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f412456874 ( High in Frame & Soft )

Cheers,
Harry

airkas1 · Tue Jul 11, 2017 1:38 pm

Neither is HIF and sharpness is passable for me.

HarryLi · Tue Jul 11, 2017 2:17 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Neither is HIF and sharpness is passable for me.

I agree with u. But both Screener and Head-screener rejected me with the same reason. :ouch:

I think i should upload them again?

Cheers,
Harry

len90 · Wed Jul 12, 2017 2:03 am

Hit the windows on the Airbus with some sharpening and that will be fine. As for the HIF... how were those judged? I usually look at a thumbnail version of the photo and both of these look fine.

HarryLi · Wed Jul 12, 2017 3:43 am

len90 wrote:
Hit the windows on the Airbus with some sharpening and that will be fine. As for the HIF... how were those judged? I usually look at a thumbnail version of the photo and both of these look fine.

Yeah, i am curious it too... it is not the first time they reject me with frame issue. Maybe they have different standard or way to judge ? :shock:

But it seems oki think.

HarryLi · Sun Jul 16, 2017 7:22 am

Hello, guys
It is too busy recently, and few days ago i got some free time to visit HK Airport and i edited 4 of them today. Appreciated your feedback !

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3652759daa ( GA A332 )

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 5a8c2d39ef ( GAA MD11F )

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7b90944886 ( Polar B748F ）

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7b0a39ca0f （Aero Logic 77F）

Thank you for your time ~

Cheers,
Harry

HarryLi · Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:56 am

And 2 more :
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... e6faaf4d8f ( KE 748 )

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f55675b631 ( CI A333 )

trevisan26 · Sun Jul 16, 2017 3:00 pm

Hum, what a coincidence. I was on the skydeck at HKG that exactly day (judging by the Global Africa Cargo, which is very rare at HKG and a nice catch, and other regs you photographed). Was talking with one local guy for maybe one hour, and there was another 2 groups of young spotters, were you with them or alone?

HarryLi · Sun Jul 16, 2017 3:34 pm

trevisan26 wrote:
Hum, what a coincidence. I was on the skydeck at HKG that exactly day (judging by the Global Africa Cargo, which is very rare at HKG and a nice catch, and other regs you photographed). Was talking with one local guy for maybe one hour, and there was another 2 groups of young spotters, were you with them or alone?

Oh no, i didn't go to the skydeck until 17:00. Before 17:00 i stayed at the terminal 1 "smoking area " which is closer to RWY 25L but the angle in Skydeck is better than here. ~~~I went to skydeck at 17:00 so were you there at that time ? :shock:

So surprised to meet u here haha

len90 · Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:47 am

CI A332: OS... pretty jagged at the nose. Excess sharpening to overcome a bit of blur?
Aero 77F: okay
Polar 748: Slight OS on titles
Africa MD11: okay
Gardua: okay
Korean: a little OS.. registration under the wing looks jagged to me. Bottom right of the sky is that smoke or cloud formation?

HarryLi · Mon Jul 17, 2017 3:06 am

len90 wrote:
CI A332: OS... pretty jagged at the nose. Excess sharpening to overcome a bit of blur?
Aero 77F: okay
Polar 748: Slight OS on titles
Africa MD11: okay
Gardua: okay
Korean: a little OS.. registration under the wing looks jagged to me. Bottom right of the sky is that smoke or cloud formation?

CI A332: OS... pretty jagged at the nose. Excess sharpening to overcome a bit of blur?

Yeah , in the original photo it indeed has a little blurry , well, it seems not work by using sharpen time to let it go i think.

Bottom right of the sky is that smoke or cloud formation?

Yeah, that part is cloud formation.

Who is online

Popular Searches On Airliners.net