Looks blurry and oversharpened, sorry.

airkas1 wrote:

Looks blurry and oversharpened, sorry.

It's ok Kas i will add it to my personal collection as the Reflection of the light and the BG is beautiful.And maybe the livery is going to disappear soon.
I edited another version of it which looks better i think. Would you please tell your thought ? Thanks !
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4e646d6a7f

Best wishes,
Harry

Unfortunately it looks hazed.

airkas1 wrote:

Unfortunately it looks hazed.

Well, maybe let it go ... let's see if i can see it again ~
What about this CZ Special Sticker ? It's the last one that i edited today , this year haha.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 46f1ec0047
Anyway ,thank you very much and merry christmas.

Cheers,
Harry

Hi Harrry,

Happy New Year! Re. the CZ Spcial stickers, the titles look blurry to me. May look fine at 1024 pixels.

Jehan

Hi, could these two pics pass the cut?
Thanks all

Andy, would be best to start a thread of your own rather than "hijack" Harry's.

Jehan

Hi guys,
I edited a BA 744 that i took few years ago in England. And hope can get your opinions on it as i really like the landscape of it !
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 29c21ab274
Thanks for your valuable time and happy new year !

Cheers,
Harry

HarryLi wrote:

Hi guys,
I edited a BA 744 that i took few years ago in England. And hope can get your opinions on it as i really like the landscape of it !
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 29c21ab274
Thanks for your valuable time and happy new year !

Cheers,
Harry

This one was rejected for "Soft" and "Underexposed" today.
I did a revision to it hope can get your opinions ! Thanks~
Revision : http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 03850ce3ed

Cheers,
Harry

Hello guys,
I edited some photos recently and hope can get your opinions ! Thanks.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... c173fff586 (Thai A333 )
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4a7e283dbd ( CX B748F )
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f0bd145637 ( JinAir B772)
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 41ea5de2e5 ( CX B748F)
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4909fb4d9f ( SWISS 77W)

Cheers,
Harry

Hello guys,
I chased a GEC MD11F this morning and finally got it. Hope can be accepted although the weather was not so great because it is rare to see MD11 especially Lufthansa cargo at the daytime and they are keep retiring some of it now. Thus, hope can hear from your opinions !! Thanks.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... c8e1730fb6
And also uploading another two :
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 6978c42809 (CX B772)
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7f5770dca5 (KE B738)
And revised one which was rejected by Underexposed :
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 01ac5109ae ( The latest one)
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4a7e283dbd ( The rejected one) ''

Cheers,
Harry

HarryLi wrote:

Hello guys,
I chased a GEC MD11F this morning and finally got it. Hope can be accepted although the weather was not so great because it is rare to see MD11 especially Lufthansa cargo at the daytime and they are keep retiring some of it now. Thus, hope can hear from your opinions !! Thanks.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... c8e1730fb6
And also uploading another two :
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 6978c42809 (CX B772)
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7f5770dca5 (KE B738)
And revised one which was rejected by Underexposed :
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 01ac5109ae ( The latest one)
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4a7e283dbd ( The rejected one) ''

Cheers,
Harry

I deleted the MD-11F from the queue for now as i really do not sure about it especially the exposure.

CX 777 looks a bit hazed, but passable for me
KE 738 fuselage looks a little soft
The CX 747 is better

airkas1 wrote:

CX 777 looks a bit hazed, but passable for me
KE 738 fuselage looks a little soft
The CX 747 is better

Thank you Kas
I edited another two today and hope can get your opinions and other guys' on it. Thank you for you and others' valuable time !
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7c063e476a ( United B744 )
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... e0889bd17d ( United B772 )
Besides, i added little bit sharpness to KE B738 , here is the result :
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 224769ef4c

Best wishes,
Harry

I added little bit more contrast to the United 744 as i think it deserves bit of more. And here is the latest version of it :
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 2aa93a8318 ( United 744 V2.0 )
Which one is better ? The last one or this one ?

Also hope get you guys opinions on this CZ 738 :
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d420a3988d

Thanks,

Cheers,
Harry

Hi guys,
I went to Hong Kong few days ago and got some shots there. Edited some today and hope can get some opinions from you guys. Thanks !!!
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... ea605dcbba ( TNT B747F )
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 165fd940c8 ( KALITTA B747F )
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... dd7f1ccff5 ( CLA B747F )
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d257b60eea ( CX B744F )
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3faea73d66 ( CX B77W )
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... ef597fbd1d (EVA B77W )

Cheers,
Harry

And this special livery of CI B738:
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3b71aab755

Just finished a Fedex MD-11F like this one very much due to the sunlight condition and it's MD11!!!
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4c62e1e23e

Hey guys,
Today got a very rare plane which is Egypt B772 Star Alliance ! It has stopped since 2015 and today was its first flight since 2015.
The weather was not as good as i expected before but i hope it can be accepted as it's meaningful to me and CAN. It's rare to see B772 of Egypt here.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 36b0d6d279
Hope can get your opinions !!! Thanks again !

Cheers,
Harry

CI: looks alright.
FX: a bit bright, but maybe passable.
MS: passable

airkas1 wrote:

CI: looks alright.
FX: a bit bright, but maybe passable.
MS: passable

Hi Kas, thank you for your opinions.
The MS was rejected for "Motive" yesterday and the PM says that there are too many fences which has over 1/3 of the whole picture. Then i re-crop it with 16:9.Here is the result :
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... b5c7944624

What do you think ?

And also hope can get your opinions on these two :
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 8424bb8529 ( FX 77F)
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 0ee158f4bd ( SQ 359 )

Thanks again!

Cheers,
Harry

MS: no problem for me.
The other 2 also look OK to me.

airkas1 wrote:

MS: no problem for me.
The other 2 also look OK to me.

Thank you Kas. I crop it with 16:9 in order to get "reupload" reason although both two reasons are ok to you.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... cce0209da4
Besides, the above one was rejected for Oversharpened and Blurry. But from the origin i don't see obvious blurry also in this version. Regarding to the OS, I also do not see Obvious jaggys there. What do you think ? I put it to appealing queue yesterday.

Sorry ... in order to avoid that reason.

Hi guys,
Hope can get your opiniosn on this Dash8 as i am not quiet sure if it looks ok ... Seldom edit propeller aircrafts :-\
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... ba77cd55a2

Looks passabe to me.