HarryLi wrote:

First one is China Southern A388 in Sydney :

HarryLi wrote:

Second is a Flight Deck photo this is my first time upload this kind of photo :

HarryLi wrote:

And finally is window view , also is my first time

HarryLi wrote:

And here is another one.This one i am not sure about the sharpeness.

airkas1 wrote:

CZ A380: looks passable.
Cockpit: outside OE and the center console & steering columns look a litte blurry.
Wingview: I think the exposure of the wing is passable, although the ground below could be a bit brighter maybe.
Malaysian: titles & tail look a little jaggy.
Hainan: looks ok.

vikkyvik wrote:

HarryLi wrote:

First one is China Southern A388 in Sydney :

Overexposed, soft, high in frame.

HarryLi wrote:

Second is a Flight Deck photo this is my first time upload this kind of photo :

The overexposed outside really detracts from the photo in my opinion. I don't know how A.net will see it, as they sometimes allow that.

HarryLi wrote:

And finally is window view , also is my first time

Wing is overexposed. Looks OK to me otherwise.

HarryLi wrote:

So I just need to use eraser to clean up the jaggy in the tail and titles and it can be passable right ( Malaysian) ?

airkas1 wrote:

HarryLi wrote:

So I just need to use eraser to clean up the jaggy in the tail and titles and it can be passable right ( Malaysian) ?

Correct.

HarryLi wrote:

Hey guys, i got a VN 332 Skyteam today. Is it passable?

HarryLi wrote:

HarryLi wrote:

Hey guys, i got a VN 332 Skyteam today. Is it passable?

.0.0. Hi again. I want to have a try to upload a big size photo (1500*1000).And here is . This is my first time upload such a big photo to A.net.Hope you guys can give some opinions! Thank you very much.

airkas1 wrote:

The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

airkas1 wrote:

The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

airkas1 wrote:

The Malaysian looks fine.
The Vietnam needs a bit of CCW (indicated by the light pole) and the titles are soft.

HarryLi wrote:

Hi everyone ,
I got a Kuwait Air force C-130J this afternoon and it is very rare to see C-130 in Guangzhou also this is the Kuwait Air Force C130 first time come to Guangzhou.So i very hope this photo can be accepted by screener in other word your opinion also very important for me.I don't know if this can be passable ?

Cheers,
Junjie Li

airkas1 wrote:

CZ A330: Could be a little sharpend ideally, but I probably wouldn't reject it for it as it currently us. However, in my opinion it still needs CCW.
C-130: Looks a little OS at the front & titles. Perhaps a little blurryish, but I'd say passable.

Small note in general; please don't quote full pictures. It clutters the thread, which makes it a little hard to get a good oversight.

airkas1 wrote:

Looks somewhat hazed. Titles, tail, registration look a bit jaggy.

airkas1 wrote:

Yeah, give that a try.

airkas1 wrote:

I don't know, you didn't link it
(Just posting the link will be sufficient)

airkas1 wrote:

Hehe, no problem!
The photos look exactly the same to me though. How are you using the eraser?

airkas1 wrote:

Hehe, no problem!
The photos look exactly the same to me though. How are you using the eraser?

airkas1 wrote:

It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

airkas1 wrote:

It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

airkas1 wrote:

It looks very soft due/heathazed. I wouldn't hold my breath for this one unfortunately.

airkas1 wrote:

All 4 look fine to me. Nice work

airkas1 wrote:

All 4 look fine to me. Nice work

HarryLi wrote:

Which is better ?

HarryLi wrote:

I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

airkas1 wrote:

HarryLi wrote:

Which is better ?

I like the first one better.

You mean the first one in 37# or the first photo in 36# ? I prefer the first one in 37# actually because i took this photo in the sunset so the airplane body has a little yellow...not nature i think.So i revise the color to be more white...What do you think ?

HarryLi wrote:

I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

Not bad, but high contrast and jaggy cheatlines.

airkas1 wrote:

HarryLi wrote:

Which is better ?

I like the first one better.

HarryLi wrote:

I uploaded another special livery today how's that ?

Not bad, but high contrast and jaggy cheatlines.

airkas1 wrote:

Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

airkas1 wrote:

Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

airkas1 wrote:

Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

HarryLi wrote:

airkas1 wrote:

Reply #37, first photo is better.
The second one looks more yellow and I prefer the color to be cooler. So I pick #2. But both should be passable. So up to your preference really.

Hi Kas,
I uploaded a Thai B744 today and here is the photo how's that ?

airkas1 wrote:

QF: still a bit high contrast
TG: looks fine

airkas1 wrote:

QF: still a bit high contrast
TG: looks fine