• 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri Aug 11, 2017 9:09 am

airkas1 wrote:
KE: soft fuselage
Rest looks ok

SQ: seems ok
KE: soft front fuselage
OZ: soft front fuselage

Hello Kas,
The SQ got rejected with ... Blurry & Soft also with Common. Well, i indeed can not see Blurry and soft here. And the quality or light condition isn't bad i can't figure out where is the problem.... :confused: :| Hope the appealing result could be ok. Is it really have these issues ??? :snooty:
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 299252e28e
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat Aug 12, 2017 5:34 pm

Hi guys, i edited some photos just now , and these 3 i am not pretty sure.Thus, appreciate your opinions. ;)

https://www.flickr.com/photos/153041003 ... ed-public/ ( Austrian B772 )

https://www.flickr.com/photos/153041003 ... ed-public/ ( Asiana A333 )
[ This one was considered soft toward fuselage last time by Kas here ,so this is the Revision ]

https://www.flickr.com/photos/153041003 ... ed-public/ ( CA B757F )
[ Regarding to this one, i am not quite sure about the sharpness , the tail seems soft due to Glare i think but not sure. All of the photos of this aircraft have glare so this one should be the best one . :ill: ]

Thank u for your time ! :D

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue Aug 15, 2017 11:48 pm

Hello guys , i got some rejected recently and some of them i am confusing.

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d6810425a1
[ MU A332 , It was rejected with CCW Rotation &Color. Also , the screener left a message said that " Yellow/green ". Well, but in my screen,no matter phone or Computer i can't see any color problem..]

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... b120fa98e7
[Delta A332 . Reasons : 1.CCW Rotation 2. Blurry 3. OS. To be honest, i can't see any blurry from it even in the origin one i can't see.]

The above 2 pics are waiting to the Appealing Result.

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d48d3508d4
[KE B744. Finally, it also was rejected with Soft and after appealing also is soft and plus Common to me. I think the sharpness of it is ok. ]

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f72e12fd43
[MU A333. Reason : CCW Rotation. After appealing : CCW Rotation. ]

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... b5e5543cd5
[EY B789. Reason : Soft. I haven't appeal it yet.]

According to the above pics ,one of the biggest problems for me is the Level problem, i used the same standard and same way to adjust level of the photos which were taken from the same place and some of them were accepted. And i also checked the database for some photos which come from same spotting location and i don't think they have big issue. :?
Like this one :

I edited this one with same way and standard to adjust level.
Thus, appreciate your opinions here. If u agree with the decisions. Would you please tell me what reference can be the best choice for me to adjust level ? :worried:
Thank you very much !! :)

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
len90
Posts: 1067
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:26 am

MU332: agree with the CCW. What I am using is the vertical lines of the building (window lines). Those look like .25 - .5 degrees off. As for the color cast, not seeing that on my display.
DL332: Looks like a blurry with OS to compensate. You have the original or a full size to share? The level on this one is not really that bad. Vertical lines on the building seem to line up.
KE 744: sharpen the windows from the wing on back, nose of the plane and cockpit windows. The rest looks passable for sharpness. I seriously hate the "common" rejection reason as it serves no purpose on its own.
MU333: Level can be judged by the above stated method
EY789: I don't see it as soft.

Your accepted Hainan photo, might actually need a slight CCW as well. Could be screener variances.
Len90
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:40 am

len90 wrote:
MU332: agree with the CCW. What I am using is the vertical lines of the building (window lines). Those look like .25 - .5 degrees off. As for the color cast, not seeing that on my display.
DL332: Looks like a blurry with OS to compensate. You have the original or a full size to share? The level on this one is not really that bad. Vertical lines on the building seem to line up.
KE 744: sharpen the windows from the wing on back, nose of the plane and cockpit windows. The rest looks passable for sharpness. I seriously hate the "common" rejection reason as it serves no purpose on its own.
MU333: Level can be judged by the above stated method
EY789: I don't see it as soft.

Your accepted Hainan photo, might actually need a slight CCW as well. Could be screener variances.

Thank u for your instruction Len. Very appreciate :D. I will re-edit them later and show the result here again. Thanks.
Well , this is my first time went to this location for spotting so no experience here. :eyebrow:
Yeah , I agree with u that ...the "Common" reason has no purpose. I got it for twice recently.

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:00 am

Finally , after appealing the Delta A332 was rejected with Soft and CCW Rotation.
Here is the revision of Delta A332 : http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... ba35052829
And here is KE B744 Revision : http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3ebbe6f322
KE 744 last time edited version : http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d48d3508d4
Which one is better ? :roll:

Thanks again ! ;)

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
len90
Posts: 1067
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Thu Aug 17, 2017 3:26 am

DL332: still looks identical to the reject on level. Borderline OS to me on the titles.
KE 744: window line looks better now.
Len90
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5874
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Thu Aug 17, 2017 11:58 am

I don't see a difference in the KE.
The Delta still looks like it needs CCW. The bottom of the plane seems a bit hazed actually?
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:26 pm

airkas1 wrote:
I don't see a difference in the KE.
The Delta still looks like it needs CCW. The bottom of the plane seems a bit hazed actually?

:o I didn't add too much to it as i afraid it becomes OS. But is it passable ? :?: To be honest , the sharpness is ok to me.
Regarding to the Delta ....i think it indeed needs some CCW i will edit it later.
Here is the origin one of Delta A332 : https://www.flickr.com/photos/153041003 ... ed-public/
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 531
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Thu Aug 17, 2017 2:22 pm

And i re-edited the EY B789 today as the last one was rejected with Soft finally.Thus , i changed another one to edit.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 9ff1079268
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
YQZ380
Posts: 476
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:20 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri Aug 18, 2017 3:40 pm

Both edits of the KE 744 look passable to me. Agree with Kas that the Delta still needs CCW rotation, while the front of the jet is slightly oversharpened.

airkas1 wrote:
The bottom of the plane seems a bit hazed actually?


Judging from the original, I do not think the bottom of the plane is heat hazed. However, the gear does seem to have some jaggies surrounding them, and I have had non-heat hazed shots rejected due to oversharpening.

The EY 789 seems good to me.

Cheers,
Yang
Life is like an airliner; if you try to climb too much, you will stall.
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5874
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:23 pm

The EY is a little HIF for my taste, but otherwise I fully agree with Yang.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: HarryLi and 2 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos