• 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 9
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri May 05, 2017 1:49 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Centering is fine. Any lower will be low in frame.

:covereyes: ,yes i think is fine. And i am considering to upload it again. Is it worth uploading again ?
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri May 05, 2017 1:59 pm

Well, it's already been through the appeal, so nothing to do about it.
So I would just re-edit it and lower it a bit. Not by a lot, but by enough that it won't be seen as a reupload without change.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri May 05, 2017 2:42 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Well, it's already been through the appeal, so nothing to do about it.
So I would just re-edit it and lower it a bit. Not by a lot, but by enough that it won't be seen as a reupload without change.

All right ,i re-edited it just now. Here is the comparison. What do you think ?

1. Rejected just now
Image

2. Re-edited just now
Image

:confused:
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri May 05, 2017 3:51 pm

You didn't place it lower, it's still more or less the same centering.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri May 05, 2017 4:02 pm

airkas1 wrote:
You didn't place it lower, it's still more or less the same centering.

So... what about this one ?
Image
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri May 05, 2017 5:03 pm

Yes, should be ok.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri May 05, 2017 9:51 pm

[*]
airkas1 wrote:
Yes, should be ok.

That's good ! Thank you kas ! ;)
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat May 06, 2017 1:18 pm

I edited a Window shot just now. Is it ok ?
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 92fea5c054
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat May 06, 2017 2:29 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Yes, should be ok.

Hello Kas, i have a photo which rejected by screener just now and the screener gave me only one reason ----- Soft
But i don't think it is soft. Is it worth appealing ?
http://www.airliners.net/user/photo-cor ... to/4346263

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat May 06, 2017 5:39 pm

The wingview looks ok (if it's not a double). For the rejected photo - you linked to the photo corner instead of the photo.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat May 06, 2017 5:48 pm

airkas1 wrote:
The wingview looks ok (if it's not a double). For the rejected photo - you linked to the photo corner instead of the photo.

Oops ! Sorry about that . :shock:
Here is the correct link : http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 388df6ba5d
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat May 06, 2017 6:39 pm

It's oversharpened, not soft.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat May 06, 2017 6:44 pm

airkas1 wrote:
It's oversharpened, not soft.

:knockout: All right. I think I'd better re-edited it again. Thanks for your reply.
Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat May 06, 2017 6:51 pm

[*]
airkas1 wrote:
It's oversharpened, not soft.

What do you think about this A330 ? It is in High Quality Queue now.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 37fbc508c7
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Mon May 08, 2017 4:54 pm

Hi guys, i edited some old photos that i took 2 years ago. Is it ok ?
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d750a77f3f (SQ A333)

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 445a7db0f3 (MD A343)

Appreciate your opinions here ! :)

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
len90
Posts: 1067
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Mon May 08, 2017 9:46 pm

Harry,

The A330 the screeners agreed with my thinking and it was accepted.

The two year old photos was that the same equipment you are using now? Colors just don't look nearly as good.
SQ 330: Slight CCW rotation. Maybe like 0.25-0.50. May have a color cast there, just something looks off about that white
MD 343: Might also benefit from a slight 0.25 CCW rotation.

Sharpness and grain I can't judge on the current display I am using.
Len90
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 09, 2017 3:18 am

len90 wrote:
Harry,

The A330 the screeners agreed with my thinking and it was accepted.

The two year old photos was that the same equipment you are using now? Colors just don't look nearly as good.
SQ 330: Slight CCW rotation. Maybe like 0.25-0.50. May have a color cast there, just something looks off about that white
MD 343: Might also benefit from a slight 0.25 CCW rotation.

Sharpness and grain I can't judge on the current display I am using.

Hi, Len
Yeah, as you said, i used different camera before.I used 400D 2yrs ago but now i am using 5D2 and 700D . The color indeed seems strange but i am trying my best to revise it. Thank you for your advice i will make some ccw for them later.
Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 09, 2017 7:04 am

I re-edited the MD A343 again. The color seems better than before .
Is it ok ?
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... ef7825a14f
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
len90
Posts: 1067
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 09, 2017 3:30 pm

That equipment change makes a big difference. Colors are night and day between your two set-ups. Looks a bit better. Just wonder if it is still a little too dark/contrasty.
Len90
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 09, 2017 3:46 pm

len90 wrote:
That equipment change makes a big difference. Colors are night and day between your two set-ups. Looks a bit better. Just wonder if it is still a little too dark/contrasty.

Yes, the quality of the photo has changed a lot . So i seldom to edit old photos . I am not sure about the exposure either. :beady:
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Wed May 10, 2017 11:11 am

HarryLi wrote:
I re-edited the MD A343 again. The color seems better than before .
Is it ok ?
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... ef7825a14f


Can anyone give more advice ? :mrgreen:
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
jelpee
Crew
Posts: 380
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat May 13, 2017 4:07 pm

Color looks OK to me, but quality is very poor.

Jehan
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 16, 2017 7:42 am

jelpee wrote:
Color looks OK to me, but quality is very poor.

Jehan

Thanks Jehan ! I have deleted it from the queue. I agree with you that the quality is much lower than now. Maybe is because the old camera and the CMOS has become old.

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 16, 2017 7:46 am

I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Thu May 18, 2017 3:10 pm

Hello guys, i edited a lovely special livery today and i love it very much.And this is my first time to see maybe is the last time because i heard that it will over soon.

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 961ce72d7a

The light is a little harsh but i think is ok. Is it passable ? Appreciate your opinions here !
Thank u for your time .

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
len90
Posts: 1067
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri May 19, 2017 1:32 am

Lots of pictures...

EY A332: may be a bit OS on the tail and blurry on the window line... could just be the sun glare on it
IL-96s: IF both were taken around the same time they differ a lot in contrast and color. 96022 might be a bit low on contrast and over exposed
HU 789: Fine
HU 789 Kung Fu: Fine
SQ 388: Okay.
FX MD11: Okay
SAS 340: Low in frame
JAL 763: Looks to just be not of as good quality. That's tough lighting.
Len90
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Fri May 19, 2017 11:14 am

len90 wrote:
Lots of pictures...

EY A332: may be a bit OS on the tail and blurry on the window line... could just be the sun glare on it
IL-96s: IF both were taken around the same time they differ a lot in contrast and color. 96022 might be a bit low on contrast and over exposed
HU 789: Fine
HU 789 Kung Fu: Fine
SQ 388: Okay.
FX MD11: Okay
SAS 340: Low in frame
JAL 763: Looks to just be not of as good quality. That's tough lighting.


Yeah, more than before this time. And i agree with your opinions and i have re-edited the SAS and 2 IL-96s. Would u please help me have a look again? Thank you for your time again.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7bb0eec8e9 (SAS A343)

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... c1695150c3 (RA-96022)

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 9e069dc32d (RA-96021)

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat May 20, 2017 12:41 pm

I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Mon May 22, 2017 11:00 am

A343: Look ok.
IL96 (22): Nice, but a bit high in frame.
IL96 (21): Looks ok.
A330: Looks ok.
A319: Looks ok.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Mon May 22, 2017 3:05 pm

airkas1 wrote:
A343: Look ok.
IL96 (22): Nice, but a bit high in frame.
IL96 (21): Looks ok.
A330: Looks ok.
A319: Looks ok.


Hello Kas,
Long time no see. I have re-edited the IL96 (22). Do you think is better or ... ?

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f07f61c237

Thanks for your opinion.
Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Mon May 22, 2017 3:42 pm

Yeah, it should be ok.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Mon May 22, 2017 3:43 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Yeah, it should be ok.

That's great ! Thanks a lot kas!
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Wed May 24, 2017 3:28 pm

airkas1 wrote:
Yeah, it should be ok.

Hello Kas,
Would u please help me have a look these 2 ?
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 10cd319411

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 22f329efd5

Thanks~
Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Wed May 24, 2017 3:55 pm

The 737 looks passable.
The 767 is soft, oversharpened and hazed. I would let that one go.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Wed May 24, 2017 4:05 pm

airkas1 wrote:
The 737 looks passable.
The 767 is soft, oversharpened and hazed. I would let that one go.

Well~ maybe is time to let it go ... last time screener rejected me with haze too ~~~~
What about this ? The window shot ~ I posted here last time but screener rejected me with quality and screener recommended me that to use smaller size so i use 1200px instead of 1500px.
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 5c2c790536

Thank you for your valuable time !!! :)

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sat May 27, 2017 12:26 pm

Hi guys, i try another one of this : http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... c037d73fcb

Is it ok ?

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 30, 2017 1:37 am

airkas1 wrote:
A343: Look ok.
IL96 (22): Nice, but a bit high in frame.
IL96 (21): Looks ok.
A330: Looks ok.
A319: Looks ok.

Hello Kas, both of the night shot has screened. The A319 has accepted by screener but the oneworld A330 was rejected with OS & Noise but i don't think it has this issue. Is it worth appealing ? :confused:

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
len90
Posts: 1067
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 30, 2017 2:47 am

HarryLi wrote:
Hi guys, i try another one of this : http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... c037d73fcb

Is it ok ?

Cheers,
Harry

To me it still looks like quality issues persist.
Len90
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 30, 2017 3:49 am

len90 wrote:
HarryLi wrote:
Hi guys, i try another one of this : http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... c037d73fcb

Is it ok ?

Cheers,
Harry

To me it still looks like quality issues persist.

:( what a pitty.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 30, 2017 10:40 am

- The A330 is not OS for me, noisy isn't that bad.
- I would let the B767 go. Light is quite marginal and just not a super shot in total. I would wait for better circumstances to shoot it in.
- The wingview looks passable.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 30, 2017 10:48 am

airkas1 wrote:
- The A330 is not OS for me, noisy isn't that bad.
- I would let the B767 go. Light is quite marginal and just not a super shot in total. I would wait for better circumstances to shoot it in.
- The wingview looks passable.

Got it Kas, many thanks for you ! And i appealed that photo just now , waiting for the decision now.

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 30, 2017 11:46 am

airkas1 wrote:
- The A330 is not OS for me, noisy isn't that bad.
- I would let the B767 go. Light is quite marginal and just not a super shot in total. I would wait for better circumstances to shoot it in.
- The wingview looks passable.

Hi, Kas
Sorry to disturb again. I edited some photos recently but some of them i am not pretty sure if they can be passable so would you please help me have a look ? Thank you for your valuable time !
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... aa1c1c3afa (CUA B738)

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 99e15cc92f (CA B738)

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4e682870e3 (UNI-TOP AB6 )

Best wishes,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue May 30, 2017 2:15 pm

HarryLi wrote:
airkas1 wrote:
- The A330 is not OS for me, noisy isn't that bad.
- I would let the B767 go. Light is quite marginal and just not a super shot in total. I would wait for better circumstances to shoot it in.
- The wingview looks passable.

Hi, Kas
Sorry to disturb again. I edited some photos recently but some of them i am not pretty sure if they can be passable so would you please help me have a look ? Thank you for your valuable time !
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... aa1c1c3afa (CUA B738)

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 99e15cc92f (CA B738)

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4e682870e3 (UNI-TOP AB6 )

Best wishes,
Harry

And here is one more :
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... a2aac8b47c
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sun Jun 04, 2017 2:20 pm

airkas1 wrote:
- The A330 is not OS for me, noisy isn't that bad.
- I would let the B767 go. Light is quite marginal and just not a super shot in total. I would wait for better circumstances to shoot it in.
- The wingview looks passable.

:confused: Hi, Kas . The wingview was rejected by screener with Blurry only this reason. But i didn't see Blurry even the original photo i didn't see it .
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 5c2c790536
I think this one can be passable. I appealed it just now.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:46 pm

airkas1 wrote:
- The A330 is not OS for me, noisy isn't that bad.
- I would let the B767 go. Light is quite marginal and just not a super shot in total. I would wait for better circumstances to shoot it in.
- The wingview looks passable.

I received the appeal decision just now. The HS still rejected me with Blurry and left a personal message. He said that : the background is blurry. :crying:
I really don't understand why it is not allowed. Is it now allow ?
And this is my second time to upload this one , last time the screener and HS told me that soft told me to use smaller size would be ok so i used 1200px and now become Blurry ? Background Blurry ?
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Tue Jun 06, 2017 3:57 pm

I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Wed Jun 07, 2017 12:06 pm

I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Wed Jun 07, 2017 5:32 pm

CUA: passable for me
CA: soft windowline, otherwise OK
UNI: not super, but passable for me

EK: bit on the bright side

Wingview: as long as the subject (a wing for example) is sharp, we generally don't reject for a blurry ground scene. Except when it just creates a messy photo and it looks ugly (I've had that happen to me before).

CUA: same photo as posted earlier...
CA: same photo as posted earlier...
CH: heathaze, oversharpened

SU: passable
Mahan: bit oversharpened
Dragonair: passable
CZ: passable
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Topic Author
Posts: 622
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Thu Jun 08, 2017 2:52 am

airkas1 wrote:
CUA: passable for me
CA: soft windowline, otherwise OK
UNI: not super, but passable for me

EK: bit on the bright side

Wingview: as long as the subject (a wing for example) is sharp, we generally don't reject for a blurry ground scene. Except when it just creates a messy photo and it looks ugly (I've had that happen to me before).

CUA: same photo as posted earlier...
CA: same photo as posted earlier...
CH: heathaze, oversharpened

SU: passable
Mahan: bit oversharpened
Dragonair: passable
CZ: passable

Thank you for your reply Kas. You mean the EK is a little bit overexposed? And i wonder that is it worth uploading the wingview again ?
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 6020
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: Pre-screening ---Harry

Thu Jun 08, 2017 10:09 am

I would probably let the wingview go. And yes, the EK is slightly overexposed and I think it will look better when toned down a little.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
  • 1
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 9

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos