Hi,
Here are five more images. Please advise if there is any chance of acceptance.
Aircrane engine/rotorhead closeup https://www.dropbox.com/s/66fzf01o9hq9c ... 4.JPG?dl=0
Aircrane https://www.dropbox.com/s/xuaks7uom9j71 ... 4.JPG?dl=0
Embraer Phenom ( Motive is to include hole of horizontal stabiliser) https://www.dropbox.com/s/vm9o5ctyon50t ... 4.JPG?dl=0
Grand Caravan https://www.dropbox.com/s/d5hnlj7yp6hpj ... 8.JPG?dl=0
Fairchild FA227 https://www.dropbox.com/s/9p704bbteqgvx ... 8.JPG?dl=0
Peter.
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Re: Five images for critique
1: That would get a motive rejection which is not fixable.
2: Somewhat low in frame, the tailrotor is cut off (motive), blurryish/soft, very marginal quality.
3: Blurry, noise, quality
4: Yellow cast, noisy, quality
5: Noisy, oversharpened reg. and titles, quality.
I also notice your photos are quite square most of the time. They would benefit from a 3:2 or 16:9 crop in my opinion, as that eliminates 'dead' sky/ground.
2: Somewhat low in frame, the tailrotor is cut off (motive), blurryish/soft, very marginal quality.
3: Blurry, noise, quality
4: Yellow cast, noisy, quality
5: Noisy, oversharpened reg. and titles, quality.
I also notice your photos are quite square most of the time. They would benefit from a 3:2 or 16:9 crop in my opinion, as that eliminates 'dead' sky/ground.
Re: Five images for critique
Thanks kas, apart from a few 16:9 I have normally been using 4:3 (1024x768). 16:9 does lend itself more to an aircraft shape.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests