This night photo of B787 was rejected for Soft & Underexposed :
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 88551d3e0f
Is this new edited version better ?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 315bdd171b
Re: LotmaniaK photos
I am a Warsaw Spotter, my photos : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=16 ... =viewCount 
Re: LotmaniaK photos
Exposure in the second image looks better. Tough call on sharpening... I would wait for someone else to comment.
Greetings from KPIT! Check out my photos here: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=45 ... teAccepted
Re: LotmaniaK photos
New one is better in terms of both issues, but also on the yellow side for my liking.
My photos: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=6827
Re: LotmaniaK photos
The 787 was rejected again for the same reasons.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 315bdd171b
New edit with increased exposure and sharpness :
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 3ddc7bac75
Also I'd like some comments on those recent rejections :
Blurry & Noise & Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 8879a8a079
Blurry & Noise & Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 57c863f3ce
Noise & Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... d6c9a3be3e
Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 8c637b888b
Thank you in advance for your help.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 315bdd171b
New edit with increased exposure and sharpness :
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 3ddc7bac75
Also I'd like some comments on those recent rejections :
Blurry & Noise & Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 8879a8a079
Blurry & Noise & Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 57c863f3ce
Noise & Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... d6c9a3be3e
Underexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 8c637b888b
Thank you in advance for your help.
I am a Warsaw Spotter, my photos : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=16 ... =viewCount
Re: LotmaniaK photos
Lot B787: Looks a bit OS to me but since the last one was rejected for soft, idk how that could be rejected for OS. Exposure looks ok to me.
C-FENY: Nose area is borderline. I'd say soft at best.
N906DL: Front half of the aircraft looks blurry. Also, seems like there's some sort of blotching near the tail(?)
C-FPDN: Could be brighter
C-GSJB: Same as above^
For the last 4, noise on the aircraft itself isn't too bad, but I would add another 5-10% on the AC A320. The rest I would add some NR to the background.
C-FENY: Nose area is borderline. I'd say soft at best.
N906DL: Front half of the aircraft looks blurry. Also, seems like there's some sort of blotching near the tail(?)
C-FPDN: Could be brighter
C-GSJB: Same as above^
For the last 4, noise on the aircraft itself isn't too bad, but I would add another 5-10% on the AC A320. The rest I would add some NR to the background.
Greetings from KPIT! Check out my photos here: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=45 ... teAccepted
Re: LotmaniaK photos
In case of sharpness I have prefered the rejected one. Two more night photos that I would like feedback on :
An-26
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 02386d4217
B787
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... c3bfb88405
An-26
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 02386d4217
B787
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... c3bfb88405
I am a Warsaw Spotter, my photos : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=16 ... =viewCount
Re: LotmaniaK photos
Both of An26 and B787 are blurry and soft to me, especially the B787.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount 
Re: LotmaniaK photos
I need some feedback on this one :
787
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... f478b36108
Thank you in advance.
787
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... f478b36108
Thank you in advance.
I am a Warsaw Spotter, my photos : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=16 ... =viewCount
Re: LotmaniaK photos
Looks a little out of focus and soft on the nose and wing and windowline, but otherwise nice.
My photos: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=6827
Re: LotmaniaK photos
Another night shot I would like some comments on :
737 BBJ
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 9bd1f8090d
737 BBJ
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 9bd1f8090d
I am a Warsaw Spotter, my photos : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=16 ... =viewCount
Re: LotmaniaK photos
I would appreciate some feedback on this photo of A340 :
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... b9ba079e10
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... b9ba079e10
I am a Warsaw Spotter, my photos : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=16 ... =viewCount
Re: LotmaniaK photos
LotmaniaK wrote:I would appreciate some feedback on this photo of A340 :
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... b9ba079e10
For me little bit soft on the doors plane. Cheers
My Airliners.net photo collection : https://www.airliners.net/search?user=1 ... lay=detail
Re: LotmaniaK photos
Quality is passable, but definitely high in frame. The houses don't add enough motivation for the off-center.
My photos: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=6827
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests