LotmaniaK photos

LotmaniaK · Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:09 am

Hi Im a complete rookie in case of night photos and interior photos. Could someone who had experience give me opinion about this photos and should I upload them ? Thanks.
An 2

https://flic.kr/p/N3jhFS https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

MiG 29

https://flic.kr/p/N3jhqw https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

DHC-1 Chipmunk

https://flic.kr/p/N3jham https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

EC135

https://flic.kr/p/NdxTGa https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

https://flic.kr/p/N3jgQJ https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

Robinson R22

https://flic.kr/p/N3jepm https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

LotmaniaK · Thu Oct 20, 2016 8:30 pm

2 more waiting for opinion:

IMG_2234m5M https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

IMG_2266m5M https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

airkas1 · Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:54 am

AN2: Could use a bit more brightness (except the plane, otherwise it will be overexposed).
MiG29: Looks slightly high in frame, but otherwise passable.
DHC1: Fuselage & wing look a litte blurry/out of focus. Needs ssome more brightness (same as the AN2).
EC35: Needs more brightness, smaller size would be better.
EC35: Blurry/out of focus.
R22: Looks passable (new to the DB).

DHL: Looks passable, but quite a tight crop on the left side.
ICE: Needs to be brighter.

LotmaniaK · Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:42 pm

MiG 29 accepted: https://www.airliners.net/photo/Poland-A ... 29/4033143
Thanks for your help Kas

LotmaniaK · Sat Oct 29, 2016 1:33 pm

Few more waiting for opinion:

A340

IMG_4166Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
A319

IMG_4010Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
A319

IMG_3899Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
A310

IMG_3922Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
A330

IMG_3870Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
Gulfstream V

IMG_3843Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
A319

IMG_3494Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

airkas1 · Wed Nov 02, 2016 10:45 am

LotmaniaK wrote:
MiG 29 accepted: https://www.airliners.net/photo/Poland-A ... 29/4033143
Thanks for your help Kas

Excellent!

A340 (German): Oversharpened, CCW, marginal quality.
A319 (Azerbaijan): Oversharpened.
A319 (Slovak): Distance, quality.
A310 (Spain): Oversharpened-ish, CCW, marginal quality.
A330 (Turkish): Cheatlines oversharpened.
GLF4 (USA): Distance, blurry, quality.
A319 (Czech): Blurry, low contrast-ish, quality.

LotmaniaK · Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:37 pm

Please give me opinion on this Air China 747

IMG_0480Maksym25 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

airkas1 · Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:22 pm

The aft section is a bit blurry and needs some CW. Also a common frame I think.

LotmaniaK · Fri Nov 04, 2016 7:56 pm

TS-11 Iskra

IMG_6684Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
Mi-2

IMG_6601Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

LotmaniaK · Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:05 am

One more waiting for opinion:
AFO

IMG_4273Maksym545454545M45 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

LotmaniaK · Fri Nov 11, 2016 10:28 am

Two more:
787

IMG_7281Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

F100

IMG_6423Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

LotmaniaK · Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:12 am

One more:
F100

IMG_7916Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

spompert · Sun Nov 13, 2016 10:37 am

Hello, the last one I would say looks a bit out of focus/soft or even blurry. The three above look a bit soft and grainy. I would say not good enough to upload without a bit more editing. There is also a very tight crop for the LOT and the USAF has a bit loose crop

airkas1 · Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:15 pm

Iskra: Passable-ish.
Mi-2: I would personally try to put more green in it, to counter the magenta color. Softish due to blurryish, quality looks 50-50.
AF1: Noisy, oversharpened, distance.
B787: Looks ok, although the crop on the right side is very tight.
F100: Blurry, quality.
Cabin: Blurry, quality.

LotmaniaK · Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:52 pm

Thanks Kas and spompert. One more:
Dassault Falcon 50EX

IMG_2762Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

Kaphias · Wed Nov 16, 2016 5:51 pm

LotmaniaK wrote:
Thanks Kas and spompert. One more:
Dassault Falcon 50EX

Very low in frame, also looks soft/blurry but my judgement of that shouldn't be trusted...

LotmaniaK · Wed Nov 16, 2016 10:59 pm

Thanks Kaphias. What about this photo ? Would it be rejected for motive ?
A330

IMG_5679Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/

LotmaniaK · Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:01 pm

Hello, today I got this two photos rejected for:
Oversharpened
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 94e851135a
Noise
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 90d3a852e6
Please tell me If I can improve quality of these photos and give them a second chance, thanks.

trevisan26 · Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:18 pm

About the engine shot, try to include the whole landing gear on the right and crop a little more on the left side to avoid the foreground distractions. Looks dark also. Cant comment about sharpness.

TNT shot I can see some grainy on the sky and I would remove the airplane in the background, in some cases you can get a dirty rejection.

Regards

LotmaniaK · Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:04 pm

Another five photos rejected :
Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f24d817b51
Low contrast & Overexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 01c0ce639b
Low contrast & Overexposed
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... afa6e22a37
Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 34f90bf723
Oversharpened & Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3708967eb3

Any opinions about this photos ? How can I improve them ?

len90 · Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:38 am

ANA Dreamliner: definitely low contrast. Adjusting the contrast may fix that exposure.
Eurowings 320: Same as ANA
LH 321: Maybe appearing soft due to the sun glare line. Not really sure with my display I am on.

LotmaniaK · Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:50 pm

Thanks len90, any opinions about Siberia and British ?

airkas1 · Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:17 am

S7: Blurry/soft, quite bright and quality is marginal.
ANA: Low contrast & soft. Disagree on overexposed.
Germanwings: Blurry/soft, low contrast. More contrast might fix the exposure.
LH A321: Blurryish/softish, marginal quality.
BA: Titles look oversharpened.

LotmaniaK · Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:20 pm

Any opinions about this engine pick ?

airkas1 · Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:05 pm

Quality isn't that good, feels left in frame and not that appealing to me personally.

HarryLi · Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:21 pm

Yeah i agree with Kas .. The quality of the whole picture seems not pretty good. Besides, i think the Left side Space is smaller than the right.

len90 · Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:17 pm

Definitely agree on the composition right now with the centering. Wonder if the quality is just more of a victim of the lighting conditions at the time of the picture.

LotmaniaK · Sun Apr 09, 2017 1:31 pm

Thank you all for feedback. What about this photo ?

spompert · Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:11 pm

To me it does not look balanced with a lot of space on the left side. Would be better if you include the whole engine and/or wing.

LotmaniaK · Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:37 pm

Thanks spompert. What about this wing view ?

spompert · Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:44 am

Hi, I would say the wing is a bit dark and the furthest background is very low in contrast. You might improve by choosing more 2:3 or 3:4 ratio so you can clip some air. Doing this you might be able to improve the contrast of the landscape and brighten the wing a bit more without overexposing other parts of the photo. Better to resize to 1200px. Greets

airkas1 · Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:30 am

Wingview 1) Yellow, noisy, small window reflection underneath the engine
Wingview 2) Noisy, better in 3:4 crop to eliminate 'dead' sky. Contrast is ok for me

LotmaniaK · Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:59 pm

Second version

LotmaniaK · Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:08 pm

Got this photo rejected today, any thoughts ?

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 16b1f98eaa

airkas1 · Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:14 pm

Definitely looks blurry, sorry.

LotmaniaK · Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:08 pm

Thanks Kas, and what about second version of Nordica CRJ wing view photo ? Is it better than the first one ?

airkas1 · Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:44 pm

Better than the first one yes. In a smaller size than you linked, I think it could be passable. For portrait photos, I usually do 1024px on the long size (1200 if quality is exceptional).

LotmaniaK · Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:24 pm

Two more photos :

airkas1 · Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:10 pm

Both are oversharpened and not great quality. Doubtful they will get accepted, sorry.

LotmaniaK · Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:32 am

2 more rejected :
- Overexposed
- Oversharpened
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f994f0aca2
- Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3743a092a5
Are they fixable or not ?

HarryLi · Sat Apr 22, 2017 7:08 am

LotmaniaK wrote:
2 more rejected :
- Overexposed
- Oversharpened
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f994f0aca2
- Soft
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3743a092a5
Are they fixable or not ?

Both of them i think can be fixable.

LotmaniaK · Sat Apr 22, 2017 8:02 am

2 more photos :

LotmaniaK · Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:33 pm

One more :

airkas1 · Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:27 am

EK: should be fixable
ANA: looks a bit blurry. Don't think it's fixable by adding more sharpening.
El Al: blurry, oversharpened, quality.
SAS: oversharpened, quality.
El Al: blurry, oversharpened, quality.

LotmaniaK · Wed Apr 26, 2017 9:51 am

Wing view accepted

, thanks for advice.

https://www.airliners.net/photo/Nordica/ ... 24/4327781

Next photos for judgement :

HarryLi · Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:13 am

The first one seems grainy.
The second one and the final one i guess a little bit OS.
A321 is better than others but still OS i think.

LotmaniaK · Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:35 am

Thanks Harry. 6 more photos ...

HarryLi · Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:27 pm

The first one i think is ok.
The second one looks a little fine.
The third one is ok for me.
Forth: Ok for me.
KLM : Ok for me.
The final one, i think a little bit OS i think. Especially the wing has a little jaggy i guess.
And i recommend that you use another compressing way.If you use PS when you change the size , the ps will auto choose Auto Mode, but i usually choose another one i don't know what is the name in your version because i use Chinese Version i remember it should be the second one in the list.I think that way can improve Picture Quality.
Cheers,
Harry

LotmaniaK · Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:21 am

Thanks for the tip Harry. 4 more .....

airkas1 · Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:13 pm

PC12: marginal quality, doubt it will get in.
The AC's are a bit marginal, could go either way. They seem to be a sort of mix of slight noise/blurry/oversharpened.

BA: oversharpened
LO: oversharpened
W6: oversharpened
LO: marginal
KL: marginal
Nordica: sharpish at the titles, somewhat marginal

AF: passable
LO: bit oversharpened
EK: oversharpened
W6: not great, but maybe passable

Who is online

Popular Searches On Airliners.net