User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

LotmaniaK photos

Sat Oct 15, 2016 10:09 am

 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Oct 20, 2016 8:30 pm

 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Oct 23, 2016 9:54 am

AN2: Could use a bit more brightness (except the plane, otherwise it will be overexposed).
MiG29: Looks slightly high in frame, but otherwise passable.
DHC1: Fuselage & wing look a litte blurry/out of focus. Needs ssome more brightness (same as the AN2).
EC35: Needs more brightness, smaller size would be better.
EC35: Blurry/out of focus.
R22: Looks passable (new to the DB).

DHL: Looks passable, but quite a tight crop on the left side.
ICE: Needs to be brighter.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Fri Oct 28, 2016 6:42 pm

MiG 29 accepted: http://www.airliners.net/photo/Poland-A ... 29/4033143
Thanks for your help Kas :)
 
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Nov 02, 2016 10:45 am

LotmaniaK wrote:
MiG 29 accepted: http://www.airliners.net/photo/Poland-A ... 29/4033143
Thanks for your help Kas :)

Excellent!


A340 (German): Oversharpened, CCW, marginal quality.
A319 (Azerbaijan): Oversharpened.
A319 (Slovak): Distance, quality.
A310 (Spain): Oversharpened-ish, CCW, marginal quality.
A330 (Turkish): Cheatlines oversharpened.
GLF4 (USA): Distance, blurry, quality.
A319 (Czech): Blurry, low contrast-ish, quality.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:37 pm

Please give me opinion on this Air China 747
ImageIMG_0480Maksym25 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Nov 03, 2016 10:22 pm

The aft section is a bit blurry and needs some CW. Also a common frame I think.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:05 am

 
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:12 am

 
User avatar
spompert
Posts: 269
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Nov 13, 2016 10:37 am

Hello, the last one I would say looks a bit out of focus/soft or even blurry. The three above look a bit soft and grainy. I would say not good enough to upload without a bit more editing. There is also a very tight crop for the LOT and the USAF has a bit loose crop
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue Nov 15, 2016 3:15 pm

Iskra: Passable-ish.
Mi-2: I would personally try to put more green in it, to counter the magenta color. Softish due to blurryish, quality looks 50-50.
AF1: Noisy, oversharpened, distance.
B787: Looks ok, although the crop on the right side is very tight.
F100: Blurry, quality.
Cabin: Blurry, quality.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:52 pm

Thanks Kas and spompert. One more:
Dassault Falcon 50EX
ImageIMG_2762Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
 
User avatar
Kaphias
Posts: 527
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:29 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Nov 16, 2016 5:51 pm

LotmaniaK wrote:
Thanks Kas and spompert. One more:
Dassault Falcon 50EX

Very low in frame, also looks soft/blurry but my judgement of that shouldn't be trusted...
Matthew
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Nov 16, 2016 10:59 pm

Thanks Kaphias. What about this photo ? Would it be rejected for motive ?
A330
ImageIMG_5679Maksym1 https://www.flickr.com/photos/143850971@N07/
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:01 pm

Hello, today I got this two photos rejected for:
Oversharpened
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 94e851135a
Noise
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 90d3a852e6
Please tell me If I can improve quality of these photos and give them a second chance, thanks.
 
User avatar
trevisan26
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 3:31 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:18 pm

About the engine shot, try to include the whole landing gear on the right and crop a little more on the left side to avoid the foreground distractions. Looks dark also. Cant comment about sharpness.

TNT shot I can see some grainy on the sky and I would remove the airplane in the background, in some cases you can get a dirty rejection.

Regards
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:04 pm

 
len90
Posts: 1038
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:38 am

ANA Dreamliner: definitely low contrast. Adjusting the contrast may fix that exposure.
Eurowings 320: Same as ANA
LH 321: Maybe appearing soft due to the sun glare line. Not really sure with my display I am on.
Len90
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:50 pm

Thanks len90, any opinions about Siberia and British ?
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Fri Mar 10, 2017 11:17 am

S7: Blurry/soft, quite bright and quality is marginal.
ANA: Low contrast & soft. Disagree on overexposed.
Germanwings: Blurry/soft, low contrast. More contrast might fix the exposure.
LH A321: Blurryish/softish, marginal quality.
BA: Titles look oversharpened.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:20 pm

Any opinions about this engine pick ?


Image
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:05 pm

Quality isn't that good, feels left in frame and not that appealing to me personally.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Posts: 455
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Apr 06, 2017 3:21 pm

Yeah i agree with Kas .. The quality of the whole picture seems not pretty good. Besides, i think the Left side Space is smaller than the right.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
len90
Posts: 1038
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:17 pm

Definitely agree on the composition right now with the centering. Wonder if the quality is just more of a victim of the lighting conditions at the time of the picture.
Len90
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Apr 09, 2017 1:31 pm

Thank you all for feedback. What about this photo ?

Image
 
User avatar
spompert
Posts: 269
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sun Apr 09, 2017 9:11 pm

To me it does not look balanced with a lot of space on the left side. Would be better if you include the whole engine and/or wing.
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Fri Apr 14, 2017 7:37 pm

Thanks spompert. What about this wing view ?

Image
 
User avatar
spompert
Posts: 269
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:44 am

Hi, I would say the wing is a bit dark and the furthest background is very low in contrast. You might improve by choosing more 2:3 or 3:4 ratio so you can clip some air. Doing this you might be able to improve the contrast of the landscape and brighten the wing a bit more without overexposing other parts of the photo. Better to resize to 1200px. Greets
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Mon Apr 17, 2017 11:30 am

Wingview 1) Yellow, noisy, small window reflection underneath the engine
Wingview 2) Noisy, better in 3:4 crop to eliminate 'dead' sky. Contrast is ok for me
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Mon Apr 17, 2017 3:59 pm

Second version

Image
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:08 pm

Got this photo rejected today, any thoughts ?

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 16b1f98eaa
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Apr 19, 2017 3:14 pm

Definitely looks blurry, sorry.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Apr 19, 2017 7:08 pm

Thanks Kas, and what about second version of Nordica CRJ wing view photo ? Is it better than the first one ?
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Apr 19, 2017 8:44 pm

Better than the first one yes. In a smaller size than you linked, I think it could be passable. For portrait photos, I usually do 1024px on the long size (1200 if quality is exceptional).
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Apr 20, 2017 2:24 pm

Two more photos :

Image

Image
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:10 pm

Both are oversharpened and not great quality. Doubtful they will get accepted, sorry.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:32 am

2 more rejected :
- Overexposed
- Oversharpened
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f994f0aca2
- Soft
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3743a092a5
Are they fixable or not ?
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Posts: 455
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat Apr 22, 2017 7:08 am

LotmaniaK wrote:
2 more rejected :
- Overexposed
- Oversharpened
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... f994f0aca2
- Soft
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 3743a092a5
Are they fixable or not ?

Both of them i think can be fixable.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat Apr 22, 2017 8:02 am

2 more photos :

Image

Image
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:33 pm

One more :

Image
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Mon Apr 24, 2017 10:27 am

EK: should be fixable
ANA: looks a bit blurry. Don't think it's fixable by adding more sharpening.
El Al: blurry, oversharpened, quality.
SAS: oversharpened, quality.
El Al: blurry, oversharpened, quality.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Apr 26, 2017 9:51 am

Wing view accepted :D , thanks for advice.

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Nordica/ ... 24/4327781

Next photos for judgement :

Image

Image

Image

Image
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Posts: 455
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Wed Apr 26, 2017 11:13 am

The first one seems grainy.
The second one and the final one i guess a little bit OS.
A321 is better than others but still OS i think.
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:35 am

Thanks Harry. 6 more photos ...

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Posts: 455
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:27 pm

The first one i think is ok.
The second one looks a little fine.
The third one is ok for me.
Forth: Ok for me.
KLM : Ok for me.
The final one, i think a little bit OS i think. Especially the wing has a little jaggy i guess.
And i recommend that you use another compressing way.If you use PS when you change the size , the ps will auto choose Auto Mode, but i usually choose another one i don't know what is the name in your version because i use Chinese Version i remember it should be the second one in the list.I think that way can improve Picture Quality.
Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
LotmaniaK
Topic Author
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:19 pm

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:21 am

Thanks for the tip Harry. 4 more .....

Image

Image

Image

Image
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: LotmaniaK photos

Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:13 pm

PC12: marginal quality, doubt it will get in.
The AC's are a bit marginal, could go either way. They seem to be a sort of mix of slight noise/blurry/oversharpened.

BA: oversharpened
LO: oversharpened
W6: oversharpened
LO: marginal
KL: marginal
Nordica: sharpish at the titles, somewhat marginal

AF: passable
LO: bit oversharpened
EK: oversharpened
W6: not great, but maybe passable
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: n94504 and 2 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos