airkas1 wrote:They look OK for me Stefan.
@ PABlokhin, please start your own feedback thread if you wish to ask for feedback.
Thanks for the feedback, I have tried an appeal then. Greets
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
airkas1 wrote:They look OK for me Stefan.
@ PABlokhin, please start your own feedback thread if you wish to ask for feedback.
dutchspotter1 wrote:Top of fuselage and top of engine look overexposed. Noise seems acceptable. Sharpness is not too bad, but I would add some sharpness on the right engine and "Boeing 787-8" titles.
I would say the main problem is quality, because heathaze is visible (mainly top of the fuselage, leading edge right wing and also the left wing).
jelpee wrote:I would have called a "Motive" rejection on this on account of too many obstructions to the aircraft. Also even though you have included the tower (right side of the frame), there is too much dead space between the last aircraft and the tower. If there were no obstructions to the aircraft, that would be a Motice rejection for me as well/
Cheers,
Jehan
airkas1 wrote:It's probably still in the appeal queue and just hasn't been processed yet. What's the ID?