User avatar
jelpee
Crew
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:05 am

Definitely has a pink cast, but passable for me for late day lighting. If you don't already do so, it helps to include a comment to the screeners about color casts due to early or late day lighting. Sometimes one can tell due to angle of the shadows, but on this one, it's not so obvious. As I said, the image is passable for me...you could try an appeal on this one.

Cheers,

Jehan
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:05 pm

Good feedback Jehan, it was accepted after appeal. Thanks.
 
User avatar
jelpee
Crew
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Feb 14, 2017 12:07 am

Yes, I see that it was added on appeal. Glad it worked out!

Jehan.
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:18 am

Hi, this one was rejected for too much contrast and oversharpened. I agree contrast is a bit high but it gives an impression of the light at that time of the day. Should I indeed lower the contrast (because I had a similar photo lately rejected for low contrast). And which parts are oversharpened?

Image
 
JKPhotos
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:03 pm

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Mar 01, 2017 11:00 am

Hi Stefan,
oversharpening seems pretty minor to me, visible on the smaller titles but otherwise I struggle to see it.
But for my personal liking the shot is way too contrasty, so I agree with the rejection. It is very "black" as it is if you see what I mean, would look better with less contrast, surely lightening the midtones would help.
Generally the angle is problematic with the sun coming from the back, something side-on or more form the back would be more suited for this light.

Julien
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Mar 02, 2017 5:10 pm

Thanks Julien,

I think you are right and I should improve the image. I`ll re-upload it.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Mar 11, 2017 3:39 pm

Hello guys, I now improved the image by reducing the contrast. But now it`s rejected for red color cast and soft front. I appreciate the personal comment from the screener but it sounds a bit strange that now it`s suddenly soft. And the red color cast is due to the low light/end of the day if you ask me. Is it worth to try an appeal or should I fix it? If you click on the photo below you can see it real size.
Image
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Posts: 274
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Mar 11, 2017 4:12 pm

spompert wrote:
Hello guys, I now improved the image by reducing the contrast. But now it`s rejected for red color cast and soft front. I appreciate the personal comment from the screener but it sounds a bit strange that now it`s suddenly soft. And the red color cast is due to the low light/end of the day if you ask me. Is it worth to try an appeal or should I fix it? If you click on the photo below you can see it real size.
Image

Hello,I looked your photo just now and i don't consider that it is soft i think the sharpen is ok for me ...and also should be passable..but i am not sure the color problem.If it was taken under the low light situation i think it could be passable....but i am not Screener so i don't know their standard and i haven't uploaded the low light photos yet so not sure it . :?
Cheers,
Junjie LEE
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
jelpee
Crew
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Mar 11, 2017 9:24 pm

Stefan,

Due to the angle of the light, this image has an underexposed appearance to it especially with the nose and cockpit windows in the shadows. Sharpness seems OK on the full sized image. The image has a yellow cast to it but that is acceptable for me given the time of day. The image could use some CW rotation though: The light pole on the left as well as the tower on the right appear to be leaning to the left.

Jehan
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Mar 30, 2017 7:06 pm

Is this one really soft? Which parts exactly?
Image
 
JKPhotos
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:03 pm

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Apr 04, 2017 8:08 pm

Hi Stefan,

sharpening seems okay to me.

Julien
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5566
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Apr 04, 2017 8:28 pm

I wouldn't say it's soft.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Apr 05, 2017 7:59 pm

Thanks, I`ll try an appeal this time.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Apr 05, 2017 8:43 pm

This one was rejected for soft. At last the lightning seems to be passable but which parts should be sharpened more?
Image
 
User avatar
jelpee
Crew
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri Apr 07, 2017 2:09 am

The tail looks a little soft, but is acceptable for me. It is worth an appeal.

Jehan
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Apr 20, 2017 9:52 am

Hi there, I was able to make a banking shot for the first time. It was rejected for low contrast and noise (in the air the screener told me). Now it has been rejected again for quality, noise and underexposed. The quality gives me an idea that it`s not salvageable. Is this right? I am hoping it can be added so hopefully the noise is the only problem now. Hope to hear from you. Thanks.

Image
 
JKPhotos
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:03 pm

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Apr 20, 2017 11:14 am

Hi Stefan,

I am not on my editing monitor, so I can't judge quality properly. Quality doesn't automatically mean that it isn't salvagable and without seeing the original that would be hard to tell generally unless a shot is really bad.
What I can say is that the sky is definitely grainy.
If you want to send me the original I can have a look and try an edit. It is a nice shot!

See you
Julien
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5566
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:26 pm

Hi Stefan,

Like Julien said, the sky is definitely noisy. Exposure is fine for me. Unfortunately I also agree that the quality is marginal. It looks a bit hazed/OS, especially towards the rear.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:17 am

Thanks both! Julien had a look at the original and thinks it might have a chance. So we'll keep trying. Greets
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 257
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:46 am

Another banking shot, this time a 777-200. It was rejected for noise and oversharpened. The oversharpened was not mentioned before and I didn`t really sharpen it after resizing. Which parts should be taken care of? I see a little on the cheatline but it looks minor (and before not seen by the other screener also). And the noise I thought I had removed it as much as I could. When equalized I can`t see that much in the air. So any ideas, appeal has a chance? Greets

Image
 
User avatar
airkas1
Crew
Posts: 5566
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:58 pm

Quality looks kinda marginal to be honest. It looks slightly oversharpened in general, maybe a bit hazed in areas. But the fuselage from the engine forward looks soft.
Airliners.net Crew - Head Photo Screener

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos