User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Tue Apr 24, 2018 9:52 am

airkas1 wrote:
They look OK for me Stefan.

@ PABlokhin, please start your own feedback thread if you wish to ask for feedback.

Thanks for the feedback, I have tried an appeal then. Greets
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Apr 25, 2018 8:16 am

Great, both were accepted. Thanks
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri Apr 27, 2018 11:45 am

Rejected for noise, quality, soft and vignetting. The vignetting is very hard rejection if you ask me, barely visible, and it`s not even vignetting but just slightly darker clouds (checked the original, there`s no vignetting at all). Is the sky noisy or the plane itself? And quality? Bit sursprised as the original is very good quality. Love to hear from you, greetings
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... d3c402cd4a
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7273
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:44 pm

It's passable for me.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:50 pm

Okay Kas, I tried an appeal in this case
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Mon Apr 30, 2018 9:10 am

Great, accepted after appeal. Thanks
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat May 12, 2018 8:15 am

I have had a lot of rejections lately of photos I just can`t get right and would like your opinions about it. If a photo looks unfixable I would like to hear:

1. Rejected for Blurry-Compression-Dark-Soft-Low Contrast-Underexposed
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 67bb43b0c3

2. Rejected for Blurry-Colour-Compression-Quality-Soft-Noise-Underexposed
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 6ce739d673

3. Rejected for Dark-Soft-Low Contrast
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 09c0298ad8

4. Rejected for Noise-Underexposed
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 75945cceeb

5. Rejected for Dark-Oversharpened-Underexposed
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7b5e34e91d

6. Rejected for Oversharpened-Noise-Underexposed
http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 7aad854c47

Thanks!
 
User avatar
HarryLi
Screener
Posts: 945
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2015 9:51 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat May 12, 2018 8:40 am

Airport Overview : I'll let it go since the light condition is very poor and the quality of the whole picture looks poor too. Would be hard to make it i think.
D-AAAY : Sharpness of it looks ok to me. Do not see compression issue from it and the noise looks not bad i think. But the exposure and colour do have problem. Colour is too purple and reddish i think. And it could be brighter.
N669UA : Could be brighter and the also can has bit of morecontrast.Agree with soft.
D-AIHA : Agree with Underexposed but noise looks not bad to me.
PH-BFT : It does look bit of underexposed and dark but the sharpness is not OS to me but bit of soft to me.
KLM 777 : Looks underexposed. Noise looks ok to me. Do not see obvious OS from it .

Cheers,
Harry
I am a Guangzhou Spotter. My photos are here : http://www.airliners.net/search?user=20 ... =viewCount :D
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sun May 13, 2018 9:31 am

Thanks Harry, will try to see what I can fix.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri May 25, 2018 5:14 pm

Hello, this nose shot was rejected for motive (stairs). I agree they block the side but I was not trying to show that side. Being this more a shot from the front where the nose it more the subject can this motive rejection being discussed of no chance?

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 21c392ed98
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7273
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri May 25, 2018 8:52 pm

Unfortunately I agree with motive.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri May 25, 2018 10:46 pm

Okay, I understand, not a problem. Thanks for responding.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Jun 02, 2018 8:38 am

Hi, this one was rejected for blurry, noise, quality and overexposed.

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/air ... 28c9b2a028

I had a second look at the original photo and discovered some softness but not at all it`s blurry. So I don`t understand the blurry. Also overexposed it is not really right? Maybe some tiny parts at the engine for example but I don`t think that`s a problem. Noise is not more than usual. Which rejection reasons will stand you think and I have to work on? Thanks
 
dutchspotter1
Posts: 208
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 9:24 pm

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Jun 02, 2018 1:34 pm

Top of fuselage and top of engine look overexposed. Noise seems acceptable. Sharpness is not too bad, but I would add some sharpness on the right engine and "Boeing 787-8" titles.
I would say the main problem is quality, because heathaze is visible (mainly top of the fuselage, leading edge right wing and also the left wing).
NO URLS in signature
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sat Jun 02, 2018 7:55 pm

dutchspotter1 wrote:
Top of fuselage and top of engine look overexposed. Noise seems acceptable. Sharpness is not too bad, but I would add some sharpness on the right engine and "Boeing 787-8" titles.
I would say the main problem is quality, because heathaze is visible (mainly top of the fuselage, leading edge right wing and also the left wing).

Hi, thanks. I agree on the heathaze. I saw some in the original so I decided to edit in a smaller size. I still don`t really see the overexposure but to be sure I added a bit less brightness. Let`s see what happens. Greets
 
JKPhotos
Posts: 918
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:03 pm

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sun Jun 03, 2018 11:14 am

Hey Stefan,

the harsh light doesn't help. You either have an overexposed top or a dark fuselage. I would generally recommend to shoot there in times with lower sun (= winter only).
Otherwise the sky is quite blotchy / grainy. Sharpness seems allright to me.

I guess due to the first reasons it will be difficult to get in, so I wouldn't spend too much time on it.

Julien
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Nov 07, 2018 4:20 pm

Hello, some new rejections which I am not really sure about. Can somebody confirm or help me out a bit more:

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/5/8/8/5255885.jpg?v=v4da21999588
Rejected for oversharpened and high contrast

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/7/8/5255873.jpg?v=v48599b9e52b
Rejected for oversharpened and noise

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/9/6/8/5255869.jpg?v=v476f4db91a2
Rejected for oversharpened, high contrast and noise

Thanks
Stefan
 
User avatar
Runway28L
Posts: 1406
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 7:35 pm

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:39 pm

Top of the fuselage and parts of the tail are the biggest indicators of OS on all three IMO.

The two BA B772s, I'm seeing noise being an issue with the bottom part of the fuselage. Maybe a bit more NR could fix that problem.

Contrast looks a little high for the VS A333 IMO. Looks ok to me on G-YMME.
Greetings from KPIT! Check out my photos here: http://www.airliners.net/search?user=45 ... teAccepted
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7273
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Nov 08, 2018 10:47 pm

Virgin looks alright for me.
BA 777-1 doesn't look OS, but can slightly agree to blotchy-ish sky. Bit picky though. Please also check the sky above the left wing for a possible dust spot that I'm seeing.
BA 777-2 clearer case of blotchy sky, but not OS and contrasty for me.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri Nov 09, 2018 8:35 am

Thanks both, I will appeal the Virgin and fix the BA's with advice from both.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sun Dec 16, 2018 8:17 pm

Hi there, had a rejection for blurry and low contrast. I wonder what you think of it because the original was pretty okay. Thanks

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 3c238bdd66
 
User avatar
jelpee
Screener
Posts: 602
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sun Dec 16, 2018 10:06 pm

Blurry toward the front (nose and titles). Image looks hazy which likely makes it look flat.

Jehan
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7273
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Mon Dec 17, 2018 11:21 am

I tend to agree with Jehan.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Mon Dec 17, 2018 5:00 pm

Thank you
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Dec 19, 2018 7:49 pm

New rejection. Overexposed and noise. There is a small glare on the first door but I thought it would be acceptable. Noise is perhaps slightly visible in the air but is it unacceptable?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... c7e0dcc1e8

And this one for low in frame and soft. Technically it`s not low in frame (center is on the windowline and there is the tail in the upper half). Can somebody point out the soft parts, thank you
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 436ca9f68b

This was rejected for noise and underexposed. Light was low at the time. For this small size too much noise?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 01bdafd51e
 
User avatar
fsx98
Posts: 410
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:57 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Dec 19, 2018 9:23 pm

The Emirates A380 does look a bit overexposed to me; as for noise, I would further reduce noise in the sky.
The HOP ERJ looks soft on the Air France titles, as well as on the cockpit windows; I would apply an extra kick of sharpness for these areas; also a bit low in frame to me.
The Etihad A330 doesn't look underexposed to me, but I would wait for a few other screeners who might disagree on my opinion; sky looks noisy.
Aviation junkie + computer expert!
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7273
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:30 pm

EK isn't that overexposed.
HOP not that bad, but on the flat side.
EY seems passable.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Fri Dec 21, 2018 8:35 am

Thank you both
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Jan 17, 2019 10:04 am

Hello, this overview of some gates at Schiphol was rejected this morning for oversharpened, underexposed and motive. The first two I might be able to fix but I don`t understand the motive rejection. Anyone has ideas about this? Are the subjects to far away perhaps? Hopefully it is acceptable and I can start trying to fix the other issues.

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... c0676d2048
 
User avatar
jelpee
Screener
Posts: 602
Joined: Sat Jun 17, 2006 1:34 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thu Jan 17, 2019 1:40 pm

I would have called a "Motive" rejection on this on account of too many obstructions to the aircraft. Also even though you have included the tower (right side of the frame), there is too much dead space between the last aircraft and the tower. If there were no obstructions to the aircraft, that would be a Motice rejection for me as well/

Cheers,

Jehan
Airliners.net Crew - Photo Screener
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Sun Jan 20, 2019 7:12 pm

jelpee wrote:
I would have called a "Motive" rejection on this on account of too many obstructions to the aircraft. Also even though you have included the tower (right side of the frame), there is too much dead space between the last aircraft and the tower. If there were no obstructions to the aircraft, that would be a Motice rejection for me as well/

Cheers,

Jehan

I forgot to say thanks Jehan. I`ll leave the photo and move on to other shots, greets!
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Jan 30, 2019 4:52 pm

Hello all, this photo keeps getting rejected for magenta cast but to be honest I can`t really see it, somebody has advice which colors to change (red, blue or green) and how much? Thanks
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 9ccff8af7b
 
JakTrax
Posts: 4946
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:30 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:27 pm

I do see a slight pinkish hue (particularly in the grey part of the underside) but I've seen worse accepted. Removing just a touch of red should do it.

Karl
 
User avatar
airkas1
Head Screener
Posts: 7273
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 7:01 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Jan 30, 2019 6:43 pm

Add some green and it should be fine.
 
User avatar
spompert
Topic Author
Posts: 399
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:46 am

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Wed Jan 30, 2019 7:15 pm

Thanks Karl and Kas, adding green was not the first idea I had but it seems to work.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos