Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
planespot wrote:That photo was added 9 years ago. The rules for double and a lot of other criteria weren't the same as they are now.
airkas1 wrote:.
I've corrected the details for the go2sky Boeing 737, thanks.
seahawk wrote:Is it not bad style to demand the deletion of photos of other photographers?
airkas1 wrote:Which is our thought as well and the reason that both images will stay in the DB.
Catalin81 wrote:No, you did not get it. I give examples of images that should not be accepted, and should be rejected for various reasons, for which the pictures loaded by me have been rejected. And now I come and I ask giving examples, why different images are not rejected as in my case, perhaps other photographers. Now you got it ?
seahawk wrote:Is it not bad style to demand the deletion of photos of other photographers?
seahawk wrote:Again and that helps you how? Your pics are still rejected and another photographer gets a pic deleted that had been in the db for 9 years?
Catalin81 wrote:No, you did not get it. I give examples of images that should not be accepted, and should be rejected for various reasons, for which the pictures loaded by me have been rejected. And now I come and I ask giving examples, why different images are not rejected as in my case, perhaps other photographers. Now you got it ?