Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
airkas1 wrote:Priority add after -1 HQ = Photo has been SO'd by the first screener and got direct added by a second (or third, fourth, etc.) screener.
JK wrote:Is there also a screening que where you can see when your picture is being screened ???
firefly_cyhz wrote:Question, little off topic...anyone know how to delete a photo from the queue? Accidentally added the same one twice.
firefly_cyhz wrote:Question, little off topic...anyone know how to delete a photo from the queue? Accidentally added the same one twice.
HarryLi wrote:If my photo my got HQ1 and is waiting for the second screener .How long should i wait?
airkas1 wrote:HarryLi wrote:If my photo my got HQ1 and is waiting for the second screener .How long should i wait?
Anywhere from a few minutes to a day or 2-3. Depends on when a screener decided to work on the HQ1.
unattendedbag wrote:I notice that, currently in the queue, there are a few days with <75 photos "in screening". 3 days, in fact, have photos in some sort of "limbo" while screeners continue to work on subsequent days.
Why are screeners continuing to screen new photos when these photos have been "in screening" for 3 days or more? There is no indication that they have been left for the head screeners.
airkas1 wrote:Those are the photos that have been SO'd or HQ1'd. So one screener passed judgement on those and the photo are now waiting for another screener to look at the photos. But the first screener just continues to screen other photos.
unattendedbag wrote:I understand the process that a photo may need a second look by a separate screener. I, however, thought a screener not associated with the first judgement and not training would take a look at the SO'd and HQ1'd photos before continuing to screen new photos.
Prior to this update, I had never seen chunks of photos from multiple days sit in the queue waiting for a second look. I would figure a "second opinion" screener would screen the SO and HQ1 photos before "new" or "unscreened" photos. Is that not how it works?
unattendedbag wrote:Does a photo of a 'new airline' get priority screening? I don't see where it says that in the "Priority Screening Guidelines".
airkas1 wrote:Sorry, didn't see this before.
In short: yes.
As far as I know, the priority guidelines do state that new airlines get priority screening. I will double-check later.