Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
flyguy84 wrote:Are you referring to Thursday 1/17? That was operated by a -9, 3909.
flyguy84 wrote:Are you referring to Thursday 1/17? That was operated by a -9, 3909.
DylanHarvey wrote:flyguy84 wrote:Are you referring to Thursday 1/17? That was operated by a -9, 3909.
UA2 on 1/17, FR24 shows that N26909 did the honors in 16hrs 44 mins.
flyguy84 wrote:Ah ok, that explains it. Do you know how many seats were blocked on the outbound from SFO? SIN-SFO probably didn't have heavy restrictions as the jet stream is strong, but the outbound maybe 2 rows in Y blocked?Are you referring to Thursday 1/17? Aircraft was downgraded due to 789s out of service. This causes a weight restriction. Flight cancelled and operated as 2809 for passenger reaccomodation.
DylanHarvey wrote:flyguy84 wrote:Ah ok, that explains it. Do you know how many seats were blocked on the outbound from SFO?Are you referring to Thursday 1/17? Aircraft was downgraded due to 789s out of service. This causes a weight restriction. Flight cancelled and operated as 2809 for passenger reaccomodation.
DylanHarvey wrote:So my question is, how much range is added with these premium heavy configs in UA and QF 787's, as opposed to the brochure config?
RyanairGuru wrote:I thought that a 788 doing SFO-SYD was impressive
RyanairGuru wrote:Back in December a 788 was subbed SFO-SYD-SFO due to a 789 going tech. I thought that a 788 doing SFO-SYD was impressive, but that's nothing compared to SFO-SIN!
flyguy84 wrote:DylanHarvey wrote:flyguy84 wrote:Ah ok, that explains it. Do you know how many seats were blocked on the outbound from SFO?Are you referring to Thursday 1/17? Aircraft was downgraded due to 789s out of service. This causes a weight restriction. Flight cancelled and operated as 2809 for passenger reaccomodation.
Look at the United app and see how many open seats there were.... a lot!
RyanairGuru wrote:Back in December a 788 was subbed SFO-SYD-SFO due to a 789 going tech. I thought that a 788 doing SFO-SYD was impressive, but that's nothing compared to SFO-SIN!
DylanHarvey wrote:flyguy84 wrote:Ah ok, that explains it. Do you know how many seats were blocked on the outbound from SFO? SIN-SFO probably didn't have heavy restrictions as the jet stream is strong, but the outbound maybe 2 rows in Y blocked?Are you referring to Thursday 1/17? Aircraft was downgraded due to 789s out of service. This causes a weight restriction. Flight cancelled and operated as 2809 for passenger reaccomodation.