strfyr51
Posts: 3671
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Thu Feb 07, 2019 4:08 am

I'm not sue about American. I can't for the life of me figure out what they're looking for. Ever since United bought the Pan-AM Pacific division American and Now Delta seem to have made pretty much Half-ASS efforts in the region While United has been like a "Truculent Turtle" going about their Business. American especially has pretty much Hit or miss there. While Delta Pretty much Frittered away their stake they got from Northwerst in that region. I ised to pull into Narita and it ;looked like a parking lot of 747's there. It was sure impressive looking out the terminal window. Since Narita opened It's a bit less chaotic but it is busy, I don't think they ever put their effort into a west coast hub for Asia Service.
 
FSDan
Posts: 2401
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Thu Feb 07, 2019 6:24 am

AA would need to submit a new route application if they want to move either ORD-PEK or ORD-PVG to another U.S.-China route, correct? Hence their comment in the DL HND-gateway-moving application about how they agree, given the same freedom is applied to China authorities?

If that wasn't the case, I wonder if they'd be interested in moving ORD-PVG to PHL-PEK instead, and bringing back ORD-PEK (both on the 788)... With the new CZ codeshare, PEK has much better potential as a gateway to the rest of China for AA.
This is my signature until I think of a better one.
 
Ishrion
Posts: 491
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:17 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:54 am

Has there been any update with what AA is going to do to the slots? They've got about 2 and a half months before the dormancy ends. Does this mean they have until then to make a decision or they have to start flying on June 30th?
 
jbs2886
Posts: 2047
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:07 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Wed Apr 17, 2019 2:43 am

Ishrion wrote:
Has there been any update with what AA is going to do to the slots? They've got about 2 and a half months before the dormancy ends. Does this mean they have until then to make a decision or they have to start flying on June 30th?


Dormancy end means they have to start flying, but AA said they will announce by then their plan.
 
User avatar
janders
Posts: 781
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2017 4:27 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Wed Apr 17, 2019 5:01 am

Well AA is not selling either ORD-PEK-PVG nonstop as far as the scheduled go out into Q1 2020 while NRT remains 3x weekly.

Doubtfull imo they come back atleast this year as it would be hard to market from scratch from this late stage.
"We make war that we may live in peace." -- Aristotle
 
chonetsao
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:55 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:54 am

FSDan wrote:
AA would need to submit a new route application if they want to move either ORD-PEK or ORD-PVG to another U.S.-China route, correct? Hence their comment in the DL HND-gateway-moving application about how they agree, given the same freedom is applied to China authorities?

If that wasn't the case, I wonder if they'd be interested in moving ORD-PVG to PHL-PEK instead, and bringing back ORD-PEK (both on the 788)... With the new CZ codeshare, PEK has much better potential as a gateway to the rest of China for AA.


1, Any EAST COAST USA (that includes PHL,MIA,JFK) to CHINA route is not going to happen with AA.
2, 788 is the wrong aircraft for USA-CHINA route. That is because 788 only has 20J seats now. With all other carrier have more premier seats on the market (think UA/DL and not mentioning Chinese carriers like CA/MU), AA can not command J revenue nor be able to get big contract like UA with Apple, thus doomed to failure. If the routes are restarted, the minimum aircraft requirement would be 789/772. But that would mean the route might go to 4/5 weekly instead of daily. One has to give.
3, PVG is a much better market than PEK for US carriers due to commerce. PVG is more likely to survive due for the demand. PEK's premium passengers are restricted to domestic carriers due to government contract rules which is a big advantage for CA/MU/CZ. US carriers has to rely heavily on USA originated premium demand (it does not mean that there is no other premium demand from PEK for US carriers, here I am just trying to say that PEK suits China originated premium pax better due to its political environment, which is way bigger proportion of premium traffic).
4, CZ's PKX hub would not happen until 2022. The reason is that, according to CAAC's plan, the move from PEK to PKX would be gradual during 5 IATA seasons. There was a document online about the move. I think the gradual movement means CZ can only move 10% or so of its flight in 2019, and the rest would happen during 2020 Spring/Summer season. So CZ would not be able to have a PEK nor PKX hub ready until the earliest winter 2021/spring 2022. That would make AA's corporation with CZ very tricky. Do AA stay in PEK or move with CZ? For the first 2 years, a split operation of CZ in Beijing would not help AA's routes at all.

My personal guess is that AA will use the MAX fleet ground as an excuse to ask for further dormant until August this year. And it is possible that under pressure AA will have to restart the route for August until further notice.
 
jfk777
Posts: 6898
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:23 pm

AA needs to do something in Chicago, maybe they should ditch Peking and fly to Shanghai, like they did when they started flights from ORD to China. Peking came years after they were already flying to PVG.
 
tpaewr
Posts: 682
Joined: Sat May 19, 2001 9:01 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Wed Apr 17, 2019 1:55 pm

jfk777 wrote:
AA needs to do something in Chicago, maybe they should ditch Peking and fly to Shanghai, like they did when they started flights from ORD to China. Peking came years after they were already flying to PVG.


I can tell you UA is thrilled with AA decline in ORD and will do nothing to make said return easy.
 
c933103
Posts: 3619
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 7:23 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Tue May 21, 2019 2:51 pm

China Daily claims AA consider resume flying the two routes in near future.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201905/2 ... bcc20.html
This is a placeholder.
 
FSDan
Posts: 2401
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Tue May 21, 2019 4:09 pm

c933103 wrote:
China Daily claims AA consider resume flying the two routes in near future.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201905/2 ... bcc20.html


With a more developed relationship with CZ, I could see AA being more successful with ORD-PKX on the next attempt (assuming they get favorable slot times). Probably better to at least try once more rather than let that authority pass to a competitor.

I'm still interested to see if they restart ORD-PVG (where CZ is much smaller). If they've been getting grief from their Chicago-based corporate customers, they might. Otherwise, I wonder if they'd apply to move that authority to a different route (LAX-CAN, PHL-PKX, etc.). The danger with that move would be that it would probably trigger another proceeding, and we already know DL and UA have their eyes on additional PVG flights (from MSP and EWR, respectively).
This is my signature until I think of a better one.
 
Ishrion
Posts: 491
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:17 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Tue May 21, 2019 4:13 pm

FSDan wrote:
c933103 wrote:
China Daily claims AA consider resume flying the two routes in near future.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201905/2 ... bcc20.html


With a more developed relationship with CZ, I could see AA being more successful with ORD-PKX on the next attempt (assuming they get favorable slot times). Probably better to at least try once more rather than let that authority pass to a competitor.

I'm still interested to see if they restart ORD-PVG (where CZ is much smaller). If they've been getting grief from their Chicago-based corporate customers, they might. Otherwise, I wonder if they'd apply to move that authority to a different route (LAX-CAN, PHL-PKX, etc.). The danger with that move would be that it would probably trigger another proceeding, and we already know DL and UA have their eyes on additional PVG flights (from MSP and EWR, respectively).


I believe AA already applied to move PEK/PVG slots but was rejected by the DOT
 
tphuang
Posts: 2728
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2017 2:04 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Tue May 21, 2019 4:26 pm

The entire situation is ridiculous. ORD-PKX isn't going to solve any problems for them. ORD-PKX-Middle of China is a seriously low yielding market. And PKX is going to be a lower yielding airport than PEK. If AA isn't ready to loose money on ORD-China market, it needs to just quit rather than "holding" or "consider resuming".
 
jbs2886
Posts: 2047
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 9:07 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Tue May 21, 2019 4:34 pm

Ishrion wrote:
FSDan wrote:
c933103 wrote:
China Daily claims AA consider resume flying the two routes in near future.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201905/2 ... bcc20.html


With a more developed relationship with CZ, I could see AA being more successful with ORD-PKX on the next attempt (assuming they get favorable slot times). Probably better to at least try once more rather than let that authority pass to a competitor.

I'm still interested to see if they restart ORD-PVG (where CZ is much smaller). If they've been getting grief from their Chicago-based corporate customers, they might. Otherwise, I wonder if they'd apply to move that authority to a different route (LAX-CAN, PHL-PKX, etc.). The danger with that move would be that it would probably trigger another proceeding, and we already know DL and UA have their eyes on additional PVG flights (from MSP and EWR, respectively).


I believe AA already applied to move PEK/PVG slots but was rejected by the DOT


No. UA and DL asked for frequencies to be moved. AA said they intended to announce a plan by the end of June 2019.
 
FSDan
Posts: 2401
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Tue May 21, 2019 5:19 pm

Ishrion wrote:
FSDan wrote:
c933103 wrote:
China Daily claims AA consider resume flying the two routes in near future.
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201905/2 ... bcc20.html


With a more developed relationship with CZ, I could see AA being more successful with ORD-PKX on the next attempt (assuming they get favorable slot times). Probably better to at least try once more rather than let that authority pass to a competitor.

I'm still interested to see if they restart ORD-PVG (where CZ is much smaller). If they've been getting grief from their Chicago-based corporate customers, they might. Otherwise, I wonder if they'd apply to move that authority to a different route (LAX-CAN, PHL-PKX, etc.). The danger with that move would be that it would probably trigger another proceeding, and we already know DL and UA have their eyes on additional PVG flights (from MSP and EWR, respectively).


I believe AA already applied to move PEK/PVG slots but was rejected by the DOT


They applied for the long term ability to move their China frequencies around as needed without further proceedings, similar to how DL asked to be able to move their HND gateways around as needed without further proceedings. The DOT said no to both requests. But AA didn't apply to move their ORD-PEK/PVG frequencies to any other U.S.-China routes in particular.
This is my signature until I think of a better one.
 
User avatar
janders
Posts: 781
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2017 4:27 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 4:22 am

President Robert Isom denies any plans to resume China service from Chicago.

American Airlines does not have plans in the near future to resume its flights from Chicago to Beijing and Shanghai, President Robert Isom said at the Wolfe Annual Global Transportation Conference.
A Chinese press report this week said American was considering resuming the two routes in the near future, although there was no direct quote stating as such.


http://www.orientaviation.com/articles/ ... resumption
"We make war that we may live in peace." -- Aristotle
 
User avatar
LAXintl
Topic Author
Posts: 23487
Joined: Wed May 24, 2000 12:12 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 2:57 pm

Considering how terrible this flying allegedly did per AA's own words, nothing really has changed even in the CZ partnership that would turn its fortunes around.

Don't think filling the plane was the issue for AA, its more to do with dynamics of market pricing which today still remains quite low and would lead to ongoing red ink.
Doubt AA is willing to carry such large loss leader routes without one heck of offsetting benefit.
From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
 
FSDan
Posts: 2401
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 3:23 pm

janders wrote:
President Robert Isom denies any plans to resume China service from Chicago.

American Airlines does not have plans in the near future to resume its flights from Chicago to Beijing and Shanghai, President Robert Isom said at the Wolfe Annual Global Transportation Conference.


So at this point is there basically guaranteed to be another proceeding to allocate AA's two tier-1 frequencies? I'd assume that even if AA wanted to start other routes to tier-1 cities, the DOT would make into a competition with UA and DL involved...
This is my signature until I think of a better one.
 
Prost
Posts: 2357
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:23 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 4:41 pm

It would be interesting to have open skies with between the US and PRC to see what routes are actually worthwhile to peruse.
 
User avatar
Polot
Posts: 9187
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 3:01 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 4:47 pm

FSDan wrote:
janders wrote:
President Robert Isom denies any plans to resume China service from Chicago.

American Airlines does not have plans in the near future to resume its flights from Chicago to Beijing and Shanghai, President Robert Isom said at the Wolfe Annual Global Transportation Conference.


So at this point is there basically guaranteed to be another proceeding to allocate AA's two tier-1 frequencies? I'd assume that even if AA wanted to start other routes to tier-1 cities, the DOT would make into a competition with UA and DL involved...

It’s only a competition if other airlines want the open frequencies. If AA (or UA, or DL) applies and no one challenges then the DOT will gladly give the requester the frequencies- the DOT does not force airlines to bid in competition for things they don’t want.

With all the China changes in the past couple of years I am completely lost on where things stand now. Have AA’s frequencies already been re-allotted? How many Chinese Tier 1 frequencies are open?
 
chonetsao
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:55 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 4:48 pm

LAXintl wrote:
Considering how terrible this flying allegedly did per AA's own words, nothing really has changed even in the CZ partnership that would turn its fortunes around.

Don't think filling the plane was the issue for AA, its more to do with dynamics of market pricing which today still remains quite low and would lead to ongoing red ink.
Doubt AA is willing to carry such large loss leader routes without one heck of offsetting benefit.


It is very sad, but I don't think AA:
1, had the right plane for ORD-China roures
2, knew how to deal with Chinese market
3, had the vision or resource to improve its market pisition
4, had the patience to fortify its routes

Plus, I think the loss of Kirby to UA is a great defeat. No one in LUS management is capable to save AA on ORD- China routes. The one may had the ambition is still hiding among the lower management level and it would take another decade before the clueless LUS management to go, and by then I think the whole AAs China route is already lost to DL and UA.
 
Prost
Posts: 2357
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:23 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 4:50 pm

American has 787-8s, if that isn’t a good plane for the market then I guess the market shouldn’t be flown.
 
jfk777
Posts: 6898
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 5:39 pm

Prost wrote:
American has 787-8s, if that isn’t a good plane for the market then I guess the market shouldn’t be flown.


The issue is not the 787-8 , its the AA 787-8, having only 20 J class and 28 Y + seats. The AA 787-8 fleet need to have many more J class seats because economy yields to China are lousy. The AA 787-9 have too few J class seats too, they only have 30 Business Class seats when United have 48. AA needs to reconfigure their 787 fleet with more premium seats. The seating configuration of an A330 should not be the same as a 787 since the 787 flies far longer routes. AA should be able to fly to China from Chicago.
 
FSDan
Posts: 2401
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 5:27 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 5:59 pm

Polot wrote:
FSDan wrote:
janders wrote:
President Robert Isom denies any plans to resume China service from Chicago.

American Airlines does not have plans in the near future to resume its flights from Chicago to Beijing and Shanghai, President Robert Isom said at the Wolfe Annual Global Transportation Conference.


So at this point is there basically guaranteed to be another proceeding to allocate AA's two tier-1 frequencies? I'd assume that even if AA wanted to start other routes to tier-1 cities, the DOT would make into a competition with UA and DL involved...

It’s only a competition if other airlines want the open frequencies. If AA (or UA, or DL) applies and no one challenges then the DOT will gladly give the requester the frequencies- the DOT does not force airlines to bid in competition for things they don’t want.

With all the China changes in the past couple of years I am completely lost on where things stand now. Have AA’s frequencies already been re-allotted? How many Chinese Tier 1 frequencies are open?


UA's extra EWR-PVG frequency request and DL's MSP-PVG request were both sidelined by the DOT because they were requesting the frequencies for summer 2020 and the DOT didn't want to award anything that far ahead. If I remember correctly, DL's proposed flight was going to use a frequency vacated by UA's canceled GUM-PVG service, and UA was asking to use AA's unused frequencies for their 2nd EWR-PVG flight. So including AA's unused PEK/PVG frequencies, I believe there are 3 pairs of tier-1 frequencies on the table right now.
This is my signature until I think of a better one.
 
Prost
Posts: 2357
Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:23 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 6:01 pm

DL was going to use the unused HA slots as well, DL was able together 7 frequencies not reliant on AA.
 
chonetsao
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:55 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 6:25 pm

jfk777 wrote:
Prost wrote:
American has 787-8s, if that isn’t a good plane for the market then I guess the market shouldn’t be flown.


The issue is not the 787-8 , its the AA 787-8, having only 20 J class and 28 Y + seats. The AA 787-8 fleet need to have many more J class seats because economy yields to China are lousy. The AA 787-9 have too few J class seats too, they only have 30 Business Class seats when United have 48. AA needs to reconfigure their 787 fleet with more premium seats. The seating configuration of an A330 should not be the same as a 787 since the 787 flies far longer routes. AA should be able to fly to China from Chicago.


That is very correct. The problem is AA's B788 has too few business class seats. AA can sell plenty Y seats to tour groups, but to help yield, AA needs to match the premium capacity to the dominant carrier on this route in order to compete efficiently. AA's B788 is good for secondary European summer routes or Latin America truck routes that does not warrant a B772 or premium heavy B789 (comparatively speaking), but it is a very wrong plane for Asia.

I think AA wants to fly its LAX-HND new slot in B788. I think that would end in failure too. The original 28J B788 is easier to handle in a market like this. 20J B788 is not competitive for USA-Asia route when other airlines are using 48J birds or 30J birds.
 
airzona11
Posts: 1428
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2014 5:44 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 7:08 pm

chonetsao wrote:
jfk777 wrote:
Prost wrote:
American has 787-8s, if that isn’t a good plane for the market then I guess the market shouldn’t be flown.


The issue is not the 787-8 , its the AA 787-8, having only 20 J class and 28 Y + seats. The AA 787-8 fleet need to have many more J class seats because economy yields to China are lousy. The AA 787-9 have too few J class seats too, they only have 30 Business Class seats when United have 48. AA needs to reconfigure their 787 fleet with more premium seats. The seating configuration of an A330 should not be the same as a 787 since the 787 flies far longer routes. AA should be able to fly to China from Chicago.


That is very correct. The problem is AA's B788 has too few business class seats. AA can sell plenty Y seats to tour groups, but to help yield, AA needs to match the premium capacity to the dominant carrier on this route in order to compete efficiently. AA's B788 is good for secondary European summer routes or Latin America truck routes that does not warrant a B772 or premium heavy B789 (comparatively speaking), but it is a very wrong plane for Asia.

I think AA wants to fly its LAX-HND new slot in B788. I think that would end in failure too. The original 28J B788 is easier to handle in a market like this. 20J B788 is not competitive for USA-Asia route when other airlines are using 48J birds or 30J birds.


Makes you wonder if they should shift flying to 772s?
 
B1168
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 10:26 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 7:49 pm

chonetsao wrote:
LAXintl wrote:
Considering how terrible this flying allegedly did per AA's own words, nothing really has changed even in the CZ partnership that would turn its fortunes around.

Don't think filling the plane was the issue for AA, its more to do with dynamics of market pricing which today still remains quite low and would lead to ongoing red ink.
Doubt AA is willing to carry such large loss leader routes without one heck of offsetting benefit.


It is very sad, but I don't think AA:
1, had the right plane for ORD-China roures
2, knew how to deal with Chinese market
3, had the vision or resource to improve its market pisition
4, had the patience to fortify its routes

Plus, I think the loss of Kirby to UA is a great defeat. No one in LUS management is capable to save AA on ORD- China routes. The one may had the ambition is still hiding among the lower management level and it would take another decade before the clueless LUS management to go, and by then I think the whole AAs China route is already lost to DL and UA.


That is a very true summary. I think I also need to add that AA also lack enforcement in China prior to 2016.
Above all, it is vital to understand that many TPAC from second tier Chinese cities are heavily subsidized and heavily affected 1st tier cities’ US traffic. On second tier cities, Chinese carriers own such an advantage that even UA dumped XIY and HGH, and will suffer in CTU in their foreseeable future.
AA also need a major rebranding. For example, they most definitely need a subfleet of 787s with more J; alongside, oasis project must be eliminated and a subfleet of A321neo with lie-flat breeds are needed for existing 757 replacement.
 
B1168
Posts: 464
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2018 10:26 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 7:50 pm

airzona11 wrote:
chonetsao wrote:
jfk777 wrote:

The issue is not the 787-8 , its the AA 787-8, having only 20 J class and 28 Y + seats. The AA 787-8 fleet need to have many more J class seats because economy yields to China are lousy. The AA 787-9 have too few J class seats too, they only have 30 Business Class seats when United have 48. AA needs to reconfigure their 787 fleet with more premium seats. The seating configuration of an A330 should not be the same as a 787 since the 787 flies far longer routes. AA should be able to fly to China from Chicago.


That is very correct. The problem is AA's B788 has too few business class seats. AA can sell plenty Y seats to tour groups, but to help yield, AA needs to match the premium capacity to the dominant carrier on this route in order to compete efficiently. AA's B788 is good for secondary European summer routes or Latin America truck routes that does not warrant a B772 or premium heavy B789 (comparatively speaking), but it is a very wrong plane for Asia.

I think AA wants to fly its LAX-HND new slot in B788. I think that would end in failure too. The original 28J B788 is easier to handle in a market like this. 20J B788 is not competitive for USA-Asia route when other airlines are using 48J birds or 30J birds.


Makes you wonder if they should shift flying to 772s?


Then they won’t fill the plane. ORD is a harsh market. If they regularly have 80% LF on DFW-PEK’s 788, they will be 1/3 empty on 772.
 
x1234
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 3:50 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 8:17 pm

Since PHL is a connecting hub if AA were smart they'd launch PHL-HKG (first) or PHL-PVG (second) or even PHL-PEK (third). AA simply needs to look a demographics in the USA and the majority of Asian businesses and travelers are located on the coasts. Since NYC is such a HUGE market they could launch from PHL and have the market to themselves. No need to compete with UA/MU/HU/CX in ORD or anywhere else. The reason LAX & DFW work is that LAX is a HUGE market and DFW is where the tech scene is in the USA (telecommunications, cell phones, etc.) which naturally have business to China and Asia attracting paid J.
 
jfk777
Posts: 6898
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 7:23 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Fri May 24, 2019 9:57 pm

x1234 wrote:
Since PHL is a connecting hub if AA were smart they'd launch PHL-HKG (first) or PHL-PVG (second) or even PHL-PEK (third). AA simply needs to look a demographics in the USA and the majority of Asian businesses and travelers are located on the coasts. Since NYC is such a HUGE market they could launch from PHL and have the market to themselves. No need to compete with UA/MU/HU/CX in ORD or anywhere else. The reason LAX & DFW work is that LAX is a HUGE market and DFW is where the tech scene is in the USA (telecommunications, cell phones, etc.) which naturally have business to China and Asia attracting paid J.


Those reasons are true, the main reason DFW to Asia works is that DFW is AA's mother hub and its biggest. There would be dark days at AA if AA couldn't make DFW to Asia work.
 
Ishrion
Posts: 491
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:17 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 1:35 am

airzona11 wrote:
chonetsao wrote:
jfk777 wrote:

The issue is not the 787-8 , its the AA 787-8, having only 20 J class and 28 Y + seats. The AA 787-8 fleet need to have many more J class seats because economy yields to China are lousy. The AA 787-9 have too few J class seats too, they only have 30 Business Class seats when United have 48. AA needs to reconfigure their 787 fleet with more premium seats. The seating configuration of an A330 should not be the same as a 787 since the 787 flies far longer routes. AA should be able to fly to China from Chicago.


That is very correct. The problem is AA's B788 has too few business class seats. AA can sell plenty Y seats to tour groups, but to help yield, AA needs to match the premium capacity to the dominant carrier on this route in order to compete efficiently. AA's B788 is good for secondary European summer routes or Latin America truck routes that does not warrant a B772 or premium heavy B789 (comparatively speaking), but it is a very wrong plane for Asia.

I think AA wants to fly its LAX-HND new slot in B788. I think that would end in failure too. The original 28J B788 is easier to handle in a market like this. 20J B788 is not competitive for USA-Asia route when other airlines are using 48J birds or 30J birds.


Makes you wonder if they should shift flying to 772s?


For starters, I don't believe AA operated the 788 with 20J and 28Y last year before it was cut. They just began reconfigurating the aircraft in September/October. So they had more J seats, yet failed.

The problem was the competition on ORD-China. There's UA on PEK/PVG, China Eastern on PVG, and Hainan on PEK and the upcoming CTU. AA had to sell cheap tickets in order to actually fill the plane, and lost money by doing so.

Cathay and United also fly ORD-HKG.

When the routes first began, they operated the 772s but downgraded once they received the 788s. That shows the premium seats weren't the problem with 16F and 37J seats...
 
HPAEAA
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 7:24 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 2:45 am

x1234 wrote:
Since PHL is a connecting hub if AA were smart they'd launch PHL-HKG (first) or PHL-PVG (second) or even PHL-PEK (third). AA simply needs to look a demographics in the USA and the majority of Asian businesses and travelers are located on the coasts. Since NYC is such a HUGE market they could launch from PHL and have the market to themselves. No need to compete with UA/MU/HU/CX in ORD or anywhere else. The reason LAX & DFW work is that LAX is a HUGE market and DFW is where the tech scene is in the USA (telecommunications, cell phones, etc.) which naturally have business to China and Asia attracting paid J.

If Connecting in Ord doesn’t work PHL has little to no chance.... ORDs catchment (Midwest +east coast) is larger than PHL (east coast - nyc traffic) for west bound flights and most of the east coast traffic has easy access to flights from NYC, WAS & BOS which offer non stops already on OALs (including CX & JAL)... PHL doesn’t have the traffic to support a single flight let alone 3.
1.4mm and counting...
 
acentauri
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:35 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 4:24 am

HPAEAA wrote:
x1234 wrote:
Since PHL is a connecting hub if AA were smart they'd launch PHL-HKG (first) or PHL-PVG (second) or even PHL-PEK (third). AA simply needs to look a demographics in the USA and the majority of Asian businesses and travelers are located on the coasts. Since NYC is such a HUGE market they could launch from PHL and have the market to themselves. No need to compete with UA/MU/HU/CX in ORD or anywhere else. The reason LAX & DFW work is that LAX is a HUGE market and DFW is where the tech scene is in the USA (telecommunications, cell phones, etc.) which naturally have business to China and Asia attracting paid J.

If Connecting in Ord doesn’t work PHL has little to no chance.... ORDs catchment (Midwest +east coast) is larger than PHL (east coast - nyc traffic) for west bound flights and most of the east coast traffic has easy access to flights from NYC, WAS & BOS which offer non stops already on OALs (including CX & JAL)... PHL doesn’t have the traffic to support a single flight let alone 3.

The PHL/NYC air catchment is "Significantly" larger than ORD, so to assume it doesn't have the traffic is a bit far fetched. Also, AA ORD has been in downsize mode for some time. If the Company wanted to fly from PHL to China, they would simply set up the network to feed the flights and since AA doesn't even fly to China/HKG from NYC, IAD, or BOS, there would be zero East Coast network competition.
 
User avatar
seabosdca
Posts: 6374
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:33 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 4:54 am

Remember when US thought it was going to buy used 345s to operate PHL-PEK?
 
acentauri
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:35 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 5:26 am

seabosdca wrote:
Remember when US thought it was going to buy used 345s to operate PHL-PEK?

They actually got the award, but never followed through (twice), due to economic conditions. Here's 2 references.
https://www.aviationpros.com/home/news/ ... na-flights
https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/ ... ladelphia/
 
chonetsao
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:55 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 9:06 am

Ishrion wrote:
airzona11 wrote:
chonetsao wrote:

For starters, I don't believe AA operated the 788 with 20J and 28Y last year before it was cut. They just began reconfigurating the aircraft in September/October. So they had more J seats, yet failed.

The problem was the competition on ORD-China. There's UA on PEK/PVG, China Eastern on PVG, and Hainan on PEK and the upcoming CTU. AA had to sell cheap tickets in order to actually fill the plane, and lost money by doing so.

Cathay and United also fly ORD-HKG.

When the routes first began, they operated the 772s but downgraded once they received the 788s. That shows the premium seats weren't the problem with 16F and 37J seats...


That is right. When the route was dropped, B788 is still 28J.

Incidentally you mentioned 16F36J B722. As far as I know, ORD's China route performed very well with 16F37J B772.

Then the competition intensified with new entrant. What we are trying to say is, in this market condition, AA will not be able to compete with the 20J B788.
 
chonetsao
Posts: 227
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 3:55 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 9:12 am

acentauri wrote:
HPAEAA wrote:
x1234 wrote:
Since PHL is a connecting hub if AA were smart they'd launch PHL-HKG (first) or PHL-PVG (second) or even PHL-PEK (third). AA simply needs to look a demographics in the USA and the majority of Asian businesses and travelers are located on the coasts. Since NYC is such a HUGE market they could launch from PHL and have the market to themselves. No need to compete with UA/MU/HU/CX in ORD or anywhere else. The reason LAX & DFW work is that LAX is a HUGE market and DFW is where the tech scene is in the USA (telecommunications, cell phones, etc.) which naturally have business to China and Asia attracting paid J.

If Connecting in Ord doesn’t work PHL has little to no chance.... ORDs catchment (Midwest +east coast) is larger than PHL (east coast - nyc traffic) for west bound flights and most of the east coast traffic has easy access to flights from NYC, WAS & BOS which offer non stops already on OALs (including CX & JAL)... PHL doesn’t have the traffic to support a single flight let alone 3.

The PHL/NYC air catchment is "Significantly" larger than ORD, so to assume it doesn't have the traffic is a bit far fetched. Also, AA ORD has been in downsize mode for some time. If the Company wanted to fly from PHL to China, they would simply set up the network to feed the flights and since AA doesn't even fly to China/HKG from NYC, IAD, or BOS, there would be zero East Coast network competition.


I think you misunderstood 'catchment' area. I think HPAEAA is referring to 'transit flight [NETWORK] catchment' area. From ORD, AA's network covers the whole Midwest and east coast for connecting traffic. This is significantly larger (in terms of network opportunities) than PHL/NYC area. An originated flight from PHL can only attract a much smaller network area (i.e. Northeast and Carolinas).
 
HPAEAA
Posts: 1057
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 7:24 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 10:00 am

chonetsao wrote:
acentauri wrote:
HPAEAA wrote:
If Connecting in Ord doesn’t work PHL has little to no chance.... ORDs catchment (Midwest +east coast) is larger than PHL (east coast - nyc traffic) for west bound flights and most of the east coast traffic has easy access to flights from NYC, WAS & BOS which offer non stops already on OALs (including CX & JAL)... PHL doesn’t have the traffic to support a single flight let alone 3.

The PHL/NYC air catchment is "Significantly" larger than ORD, so to assume it doesn't have the traffic is a bit far fetched. Also, AA ORD has been in downsize mode for some time. If the Company wanted to fly from PHL to China, they would simply set up the network to feed the flights and since AA doesn't even fly to China/HKG from NYC, IAD, or BOS, there would be zero East Coast network competition.


I think you misunderstood 'catchment' area. I think HPAEAA is referring to 'transit flight [NETWORK] catchment' area. From ORD, AA's network covers the whole Midwest and east coast for connecting traffic. This is significantly larger (in terms of network opportunities) than PHL/NYC area. An originated flight from PHL can only attract a much smaller network area (i.e. Northeast and Carolinas).

@chonetsao - thank you for clarifying on my behalf, exactly.
Also from the east coast AA does have network connectivity to APAC (inc PRC/HKG) from BOS, JFK, EWR & IAD thanks to their JV with JAL and codeshare with CX. As recently as 2018 I saw AA pushing traffic into these flights vs their own metal from the east coast in J & Y.
1.4mm and counting...
 
jayunited
Posts: 2008
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:03 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 2:47 pm

Ishrion wrote:
For starters, I don't believe AA operated the 788 with 20J and 28Y last year before it was cut. They just began reconfigurating the aircraft in September/October. So they had more J seats, yet failed.

The problem was the competition on ORD-China. There's UA on PEK/PVG, China Eastern on PVG, and Hainan on PEK and the upcoming CTU. AA had to sell cheap tickets in order to actually fill the plane, and lost money by doing so.

Cathay and United also fly ORD-HKG.

When the routes first began, they operated the 772s but downgraded once they received the 788s. That shows the premium seats weren't the problem with 16F and 37J seats...


I see the point that your making, when AA first started nonstop service to China ORD was their only gateway later on AA added LAX-PVG, and AA has never been a strong player in China. When you have only 3 flights for example ORD-PVG, LAX-PVG and ORD-PEK its easy to fill up a 77E. AA probably was making money when ORD-China was their main gateway covering everything east of the Rockies. However I wonder if the problems AA began experiencing with their ORD-China flights were self inflicted with the addition DFW-China? Was ORD-China downguage and then suspension really caused by outside influences like UA and Chinese carriers subsequent entry into the ORD market? Or was was the downguage and suspension caused by the fact that AA had to siphon some of ORD's connecting traffic to make DFW-China work?
 
ILS28ORD
Posts: 157
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2017 2:08 pm

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 3:05 pm

My opinion all along as AA has cut INTL flying from ORD is that they just don't want ORD to work. They have a large feed of mainline and regional and refuse to connect pax through ORD onto long haul flights on their own metal. The new AA just doesn't want to. (Unless it's seasonal Europe) They prefer to force everyone through DFW. As said above, they could flow pax through whatever hub they want, and they chose DFW. If ORD-china yields are garbage, but you primarily fly connecting pax, who cares what kind of competition is on the route when the point of sale is outside of Chicago and AA is basically giving you a price with multiple hub connection options at that price. Ex. Wouldn't someone flying from BOS-HKG on AA get charged the same regardless of a connection at DFW or ORD, with ORD being less out of the way. How do yields affect anyone other than pax originating in Chicago?
 
Ishrion
Posts: 491
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 6:17 am

Re: UPDATED: AA drops ORD-PEK/PVG, reduces NRT

Sat May 25, 2019 8:55 pm

jayunited wrote:
Ishrion wrote:
For starters, I don't believe AA operated the 788 with 20J and 28Y last year before it was cut. They just began reconfigurating the aircraft in September/October. So they had more J seats, yet failed.

The problem was the competition on ORD-China. There's UA on PEK/PVG, China Eastern on PVG, and Hainan on PEK and the upcoming CTU. AA had to sell cheap tickets in order to actually fill the plane, and lost money by doing so.

Cathay and United also fly ORD-HKG.

When the routes first began, they operated the 772s but downgraded once they received the 788s. That shows the premium seats weren't the problem with 16F and 37J seats...


I see the point that your making, when AA first started nonstop service to China ORD was their only gateway later on AA added LAX-PVG, and AA has never been a strong player in China. When you have only 3 flights for example ORD-PVG, LAX-PVG and ORD-PEK its easy to fill up a 77E. AA probably was making money when ORD-China was their main gateway covering everything east of the Rockies. However I wonder if the problems AA began experiencing with their ORD-China flights were self inflicted with the addition DFW-China? Was ORD-China downguage and then suspension really caused by outside influences like UA and Chinese carriers subsequent entry into the ORD market? Or was was the downguage and suspension caused by the fact that AA had to siphon some of ORD's connecting traffic to make DFW-China work?


To be honest, the additional DFW-China flights could've caused AA's ORD-Asia demise.

In AA's last financial report for 1Q 2019, they said Asia flying was the most profitable I believe... most likely because they dropped 2 routes and cut a 4x frequency on NRT.

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos