berari wrote:Is it just me or does it make the aircraft and livery look friendlier? Like a smiling 737.
BC77008 wrote:It's been discussed here and there, but it hasn't rightfully gotten its own thread on here. I think the swoop does wonders for the livery and I hope that this is part of a new trend and they will eventually carry it out to all aircraft. I think even the ERJ-145 would look nifty with a swoop.
DeltaRules wrote:berari wrote:Is it just me or does it make the aircraft and livery look friendlier? Like a smiling 737.
It distances them a bit from "We're technically United but want you to think Continental because people liked them better so we slapped United titles on their planes and called it a livery".
berari wrote:DeltaRules wrote:berari wrote:Is it just me or does it make the aircraft and livery look friendlier? Like a smiling 737.
It distances them a bit from "We're technically United but want you to think Continental because people liked them better so we slapped United titles on their planes and called it a livery".
Do people even remember Continental anymore? Times have changed, ship has sailed, even the United folks should move beyond the Continental days.
Varsity1 wrote:berari wrote:DeltaRules wrote:
It distances them a bit from "We're technically United but want you to think Continental because people liked them better so we slapped United titles on their planes and called it a livery".
Do people even remember Continental anymore? Times have changed, ship has sailed, even the United folks should move beyond the Continental days.
They need a new brand. I don't advocate brand changes for the sake of brand changes (like LH) but UA really needs to turn a page on it's identity.
berari wrote:Varsity1 wrote:berari wrote:
Do people even remember Continental anymore? Times have changed, ship has sailed, even the United folks should move beyond the Continental days.
They need a new brand. I don't advocate brand changes for the sake of brand changes (like LH) but UA really needs to turn a page on it's identity.
What's wrong with its identity? Is it that its employees are not being unified as a result of a merger, or is it a customer perception issue?
Do people even remember Continental anymore? Times have changed, ship has sailed, even the United folks should move beyond the Continental days.
gatibosgru wrote:Any little bit helps
Aptivaboy wrote:Do people even remember Continental anymore? Times have changed, ship has sailed, even the United folks should move beyond the Continental days.
Yes, people do. I am officially in denial. I do not recognize the merger. I am stuck in the past. Continental still flies. Bring back the meatball!
Okay, meds taking effect. Calling down, soothing, pupils undilating... Ah... All better.
berari wrote:Is it just me or does it make the aircraft and livery look friendlier? Like a smiling 737.
Varsity1 wrote:berari wrote:DeltaRules wrote:
It distances them a bit from "We're technically United but want you to think Continental because people liked them better so we slapped United titles on their planes and called it a livery".
Do people even remember Continental anymore? Times have changed, ship has sailed, even the United folks should move beyond the Continental days.
They need a new brand. I don't advocate brand changes for the sake of brand changes (like LH) but UA really needs to turn a page on it's identity.
berari wrote:DeltaRules wrote:berari wrote:Is it just me or does it make the aircraft and livery look friendlier? Like a smiling 737.
It distances them a bit from "We're technically United but want you to think Continental because people liked them better so we slapped United titles on their planes and called it a livery".
Do people even remember Continental anymore? Times have changed, ship has sailed, even the United folks should move beyond the Continental days.