The Washington Post addresses one of everyone's favorite topics as of late.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/dr- ... 17eda5164d
WSJ: "While United does carry a disproportionate number of the animals who die on planes, the airline says the disparity results from one simple variable: United accepts higher-risk dog breeds that other major U.S. carriers do not allow."
Interesting read, if one actually *reads* it (an unheard of concept for many around here) and gives you a whole perspective on travel with pets in its entirety.
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AAPilot48Heavy, af773atmsp, airbusA346, AirbusOnly, ANZDC10, ausinTex, ba319-131, bgm, Bing [Bot], blockski, Catastrophe90, CLEaviation1995, cmaviation07, COflyerBOS, dcajet, diamondchap, F14TCT, flyoregon, freakyrat, icareflies, jameijeirasc, JAmie2k9, jetBlue, jockcranley, JoshP1, kavok, Lark, latinaviation, LAXdude1023, majano, mattyfitzg, Maurooo21, morrisond, NMo900, PepeTheFrog, plinytheelder, praunda, ro318, SailorHiker, seansasLCY, Strawberry, StTim, TangoandCash, TheDeputy, United857, zuckie13 and 309 guests