Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
UGA777 wrote:It seems like Delta is removing more widebodies than adding in the last year or two? Hope that trend doesn't continue. I flew a 767-400 from Den-Atl yesterday and was such a nice flight compared to the cramped 739s I usually get.
777Mech wrote:1701 has completed mods and is now a 76Z https://fr24.com/DAL28/10bc7a60
hkcanadaexpat wrote:777Mech wrote:1701 has completed mods and is now a 76Z https://fr24.com/DAL28/10bc7a60
That was fast! Two weeks for the prototype... I presume the other ones will take 7-10 days so should be done in quick order prior to summer heavy schedule. Interesting that the seats were stripped in SBD and cargo'ed over. No heavy check obviously combined with the mods. 1 down. 13 to go. Thanks for keeping us in the loop!
777Mech wrote:hkcanadaexpat wrote:777Mech wrote:1701 has completed mods and is now a 76Z https://fr24.com/DAL28/10bc7a60
Right on! At last check they were looking to have 7 frames done by the summer schedule and they'll take a break. Look for 1602 to be the next one in around the 24th!
davescj wrote:777Mech wrote:hkcanadaexpat wrote:
Right on! At last check they were looking to have 7 frames done by the summer schedule and they'll take a break. Look for 1602 to be the next one in around the 24th!
What is the difference between the other 767 and the 76Z? I looked on the DL website, they seemed basically the same. Since the plan is to move to the suites that are on the A350, why not do those modifications at the same time?
SELMER40 wrote:The Ts have 208 seats and are used long range, the Ls have 211 seats and the Zs have 226 seats. The Ts and Ls have 9 rows of Delta One and the Zs have 7 rows of Delta One. 8 seats out and 23 seats in - an addition of 15 seats per frame..
audidudi wrote:The plan to install the D1 suites on the B763ER fleet hasn't even been announced, and I doubt that it will ever happen! Even the B764s may not get them!
davescj wrote:777Mech wrote:hkcanadaexpat wrote:
Right on! At last check they were looking to have 7 frames done by the summer schedule and they'll take a break. Look for 1602 to be the next one in around the 24th!
What is the difference between the other 767 and the 76Z? I looked on the DL website, they seemed basically the same. Since the plan is to move to the suites that are on the A350, why not do those modifications at the same time?
UGA777 wrote:It seems like Delta is removing more wide bodies than adding in the last year or two? Hope that trend doesn't continue. I flew a 767-400 from Den-Atl yesterday and was such a nice flight compared to the cramped 739s I usually get.
hkcanadaexpat wrote:D1 Suites on the 764 has been confirmed. Mods will begin in Spring 2019.
MSPNWA wrote:hkcanadaexpat wrote:D1 Suites on the 764 has been confirmed. Mods will begin in Spring 2019.
Where? Internally? Because publicly this has not even been mentioned let alone confirmed. All I've ever read about it has been unsubstantiated rumors.
wjcandee wrote:What is being done to the 767-400s at ILN? Looks like they turn around in about 2 weeks each.
777Mech wrote:Confirmed internally. Really doesn't make sense to put out a presser to just say the 764 is getting the new D1. Most pax have no idea what they're on anyways.
MSPNWA wrote:777Mech wrote:Confirmed internally. Really doesn't make sense to put out a presser to just say the 764 is getting the new D1. Most pax have no idea what they're on anyways.
That would be very unlike DL, and it's clear that they don't agree with your line of thinking. They like to announce and promote any new product as soon as possible, and the new seats have been one of those products. Hence it's hard to believe that it's a done deal internally without even a mention of it externally.
777Mech wrote:Why good does it do to announce it 1.5 years earlier before the first frame is scheduled to be completed? I've seen the scope of work with my own eyes, You'll just have to settle for your external announcement in the fall.
beertrucker wrote:The other thing is not so muuch about being on time as it is about DL181. I know when I booked tickets i got Comfort plus on the 763. Now the one i booked on delta shows the lavs in the front of C+. However seatguru shhows a diffrent configured 767 for that flight. Is this just a mix up in seatguru or should i exect to have to have our seats moved cause of a diffrent configured 763? I not sure where to look this kind of info up. Thanks. and yes sorry it is kinda related to my post about this before.
777Mech wrote:Why good does it do to announce it 1.5 years earlier before the first frame is scheduled to be completed? I've seen the scope of work with my own eyes, You'll just have to settle for your external announcement in the fall.
deltal1011man wrote:.
hkcanadaexpat wrote:Noteworthy Aircraft Activity 3/19
332: unscheduled upgrade from MD88 on DTW-ATL route - aircraft repositioning (N851NW)
332: unscheduled upgrade from MD88 on ATL-DTW route - aircraft repositioning (N854NW)
davescj wrote:hkcanadaexpat wrote:Noteworthy Aircraft Activity 3/19
332: unscheduled upgrade from MD88 on DTW-ATL route - aircraft repositioning (N851NW)
332: unscheduled upgrade from MD88 on ATL-DTW route - aircraft repositioning (N854NW)
What would be the purpose of this? It would seem as if you were moving identical aircraft around.
MSPNWA wrote:777Mech wrote:Why good does it do to announce it 1.5 years earlier before the first frame is scheduled to be completed? I've seen the scope of work with my own eyes, You'll just have to settle for your external announcement in the fall.
In what time warp is next spring 1.5 years away? The correct question is why wouldn't they announce it. It makes no sense to not tell the public about a new and improved product coming in the future, particularly if it's actually a done deal with a tentative schedule. Airlines, particularly DL, do this. That's why it's worth questing. It would be a change of character if something this concrete wasn't announced.
Here's a reminder of when DL first told us about the 777 getting the new seats. And that isn't the most egregious example over the years.
https://news.delta.com/worlds-first-all ... -delta-onedeltal1011man wrote:.
I'll refer you to the link above for just one example of how you clearly don't know enough about DL to be making those statements about others.
777Mech wrote:hkcanadaexpat wrote:777Mech wrote:1701 has completed mods and is now a 76Z https://fr24.com/DAL28/10bc7a60
That was fast! Two weeks for the prototype... I presume the other ones will take 7-10 days so should be done in quick order prior to summer heavy schedule. Interesting that the seats were stripped in SBD and cargo'ed over. No heavy check obviously combined with the mods. 1 down. 13 to go. Thanks for keeping us in the loop!
Right on! At last check they were looking to have 7 frames done by the summer schedule and they'll take a break. Look for 1602 to be the next one in around the 24th!
FSDan wrote:777Mech wrote:hkcanadaexpat wrote:That was fast! Two weeks for the prototype... I presume the other ones will take 7-10 days so should be done in quick order prior to summer heavy schedule. Interesting that the seats were stripped in SBD and cargo'ed over. No heavy check obviously combined with the mods. 1 down. 13 to go. Thanks for keeping us in the loop!
Right on! At last check they were looking to have 7 frames done by the summer schedule and they'll take a break. Look for 1602 to be the next one in around the 24th!
It looks to me like at least 31 76Z frames are needed to operate the currently loaded June schedule (and that would be with 0 spares). I suppose they'll either switch a few routes back to the 76L configuration, or they're planning on converting a few more than 7 before summer. Currently loaded routes for these two types (looking at the week of June 18):
76L (at least 15 frames needed):
PDX-LHR (4x weekly)
LAX-JFK x1 (RON at LAX)
SLC-LHR
MSP-LHR
DTW-LHR (3x weekly)
DTW-CDG
DTW-FRA
DTW-MUC
CVG-CDG
ATL-FRA
RDU-CDG
EWR-CDG
JFK-GRU
JFK-FRA
BOS-LHR
76Z (at least 31 frames needed):
NRT-MNL (RON at MNL)
NRT-PDX
HNL-NRT
HNL-NGO
HNL-KIX
HNL-FUK
HNL-SLC
HNL-MSP
SEA-AMS x1
SFO-JFK x1 (RON at SFO)
LAX-JFK x1 (RON at LAX)
LAX-HNL x1 (RON at LAX)
SLC-CDG
SLC-AMS
IND-CDG
MCO-GRU
MCO-AMS
ATL-SCL
ATL-LIS
ATL-BRU
ATL-ZRH
PIT-CDG
JFK-ACC (5x weekly)
JFK-BRU
JFK-AMS x1
JFK-CPH
JFK-TXL
BOS-CDG
BOS-AMS x1
audidudi wrote:What about SEA>ICN, which is not listed? Will that still operate with a 76L?
Varsity1 wrote:Can the A350 fly ATL-JNB?
DeSpringbokke wrote:Varsity1 wrote:Can the A350 fly ATL-JNB?
The 280 tonne A350-900 can fly ATL-JNB and more importantly JNB-ATL nonstop. This is the aircraft most likely to replace the 77L on the route.
FSDan wrote:DeSpringbokke wrote:Varsity1 wrote:Can the A350 fly ATL-JNB?
The 280 tonne A350-900 can fly ATL-JNB and more importantly JNB-ATL nonstop. This is the aircraft most likely to replace the 77L on the route.
But DL does need to fly the 77Ls somewhere, and there probably aren't too many better candidates than ATL-JNB.
DeSpringbokke wrote:Varsity1 wrote:Can the A350 fly ATL-JNB?
The 280 tonne A350-900 can fly ATL-JNB and more importantly JNB-ATL nonstop. This is the aircraft most likely to replace the 77L on the route.
Varsity1 wrote:DeSpringbokke wrote:Varsity1 wrote:Can the A350 fly ATL-JNB?
The 280 tonne A350-900 can fly ATL-JNB and more importantly JNB-ATL nonstop. This is the aircraft most likely to replace the 77L on the route.
Does Delta have to 280T variant though?
FSDan wrote:I suppose they'll either switch a few routes back to the 76L configuration, or they're planning on converting a few more than 7 before summer. Currently loaded routes for these two types (looking at the week of June 18):
hkcanadaexpat wrote:FSDan wrote:I suppose they'll either switch a few routes back to the 76L configuration, or they're planning on converting a few more than 7 before summer. Currently loaded routes for these two types (looking at the week of June 18):
I think the answer sits somewhere in the middle. The prototype just finished and is now stretching its legs. DL probably didn't know for sure how long each would take until now so did a lot of "plugs" in the schedule between 76L and 76Z. I think we'll see the schedule now tighten up as they figure out how many they want/can complete pre-summer. In terms of routes, i'd look at SEA-AMS, SLC-CDG, ATL-SCL, ATL-BRU, JFK-ACC, JFK-BRU & BOS-CDG. There are all routes that are "migrating" from 76L to 76Z. Timing of those migrations likely to be adjusted to reflect conversion schedule.
A