Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR

 
chiraagnt
Topic Author
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 5:38 am

Battle of the Hubs: SIN and HKG

Wed Aug 16, 2017 2:09 pm

Hey guys,

SIN and HKG used to be known as the go-to transit airports when it came to Asian Destinations from afar like Europe/USA/Africa. Understandably the ME3, LCCs and Chinese Airlines have affected the dynamics of the airlines operating out of the hubs, like SQ (mainline keeps on showing deteriorating profits) and CX (which reported another loss just today). As per my understanding, it seems that the ME3 are hurting SQ more for Europe bound traffic and the Chinese Airlines for CX are hurting their USA bound traffic.

How about the hubs themselves? Both airlines define the viability of their hubs in the long run and while the airports themselves show traffic increasing YoY, will both hubs be able to weather the storm and remain hubs in the future? Both airports serve cities of small populations but large populations nearby (ASEAN for SIN and China for HKG).

Just wanted to get peoples' 2 cents on this. Cheers!
 
WPvsMW
Posts: 2252
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:30 pm

Re: Battle of the Hubs: SIN and HKG

Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:23 pm

IMO, intra-Asian traffic at SIN and HKG will soon predominate over TPAC and other intercontinental traffic. SIN and HKG don't have the O&D catchment to remain major connecting hubs in the face of the CN carriers, the ME3, and LCCs serving Asian destinations directly. CAN's growth has come at HKG's (and CX's) expense. In a way... it's the final knell for those former British colonies as Tier 1 players in aviation. The former colonies will be relegated to roles proportional to their O&D catchment; harbors are different, so their importance in shipping shouldn't decline as rapidly.
 
Armaghman
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 8:34 pm

Re: Battle of the Hubs: SIN and HKG

Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:45 pm

WPvsMW wrote:
IMO, intra-Asian traffic at SIN and HKG will soon predominate over TPAC and other intercontinental traffic. SIN and HKG don't have the O&D catchment to remain major connecting hubs in the face of the CN carriers, the ME3, and LCCs serving Asian destinations directly. CAN's growth has come at HKG's (and CX's) expense. In a way... it's the final knell for those former British colonies as Tier 1 players in aviation. The former colonies will be relegated to roles proportional to their O&D catchment; harbors are different, so their importance in shipping shouldn't decline as rapidly.



Has anyone hit stats on intra Asia traffic. Certainly an interesting viewpoint which I can see logic of. I know personally when I lived in China I used both hkg and sin for going to Indonesia and other points. Challenge for SIN is so far south that makes not as much sense as for example BKK. For HKG great point for their Taiwan Japan and Korean customers especially with Dragonair.

Unfortunately for both the Chinese carriers jumped on the Australia NZ market so not much opportunity to pick up the loss Europe ANz trade. SIN still has good traffic ex India given the distance the stop still makes sense as little direct flights.
 
airbazar
Posts: 11449
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:12 pm

Re: Battle of the Hubs: SIN and HKG

Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:51 pm

SIN has an advantage that HKG doesn't which is a lack of viable competition in the ASEAN region which is an area of about 600 million people, while HKG faces direct competition not just from other hubs in the region but from p-2-p routes being started by Chinese carriers that bypass HKG all together. Having said that, Southeast China is such a huge market and Honk Kong such an important business center, that it's viability and importance will always be relevant.
 
winginit
Posts: 3080
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 9:23 pm

Re: Battle of the Hubs: SIN and HKG

Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:01 pm

airbazar wrote:
SIN has an advantage that HKG doesn't which is a lack of viable competition in the ASEAN region which is an area of about 600 million people, while HKG faces direct competition not just from other hubs in the region but from p-2-p routes being started by Chinese carriers that bypass HKG all together. Having said that, Southeast China is such a huge market and Honk Kong such an important business center, that it's viability and importance will always be relevant.


The hub itself (referring to HKG specifically) will of course always remain relevant, but what will shape it (and SIN) is how the fortress carrier deals with the pressures that have been brought up in this thread. CX's financial results this week were, to be frank, abysmal, and how they pivot going forward (especially since it doesn't yet appear as though their restructuring is working) will in many ways shape the airport and its network and even facilities down the road. SQ is actively taking the low cost plunge albeit via subsidiaries, and it's likely at this point that CX needs to start quickly executing a similar strategy.
 
WPvsMW
Posts: 2252
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:30 pm

Re: Battle of the Hubs: SIN and HKG

Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:46 pm

A possible scenario: HKG becomes the LCC hub of Asia... by reduced landing fees, just to keep the lights on. It's better placed as an intra-Asian pivot than SIN is. HKG has a large infrastructure that could become a movie set unless Plan B works, Plan A being ignoring the disintermediation of HKG for intercontinental routes by (i) P2P routes and (ii) growth of PEK, CAN, PVG, ICN, and KUL for connections to/from cities without P2P service.

Putting aside free-market dynamics, there's the added dimension of the Northern Capital playing favorites.
 
zakuivcustom
Posts: 3980
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 3:32 am

Re: Battle of the Hubs: SIN and HKG

Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:57 pm

A possible scenario: HKG becomes the LCC hub of Asia... by reduced landing fees, just to keep the lights on. It's better placed as an intra-Asian pivot than SIN is. HKG has a large infrastructure that could become a movie set unless Plan B works, Plan A being ignoring the disintermediation of HKG for intercontinental routes.


Really?

YoY traffic keep increasing, the airport is busy enough that a 3rd runway is in the talk, and you need LCCs just to "keep the lights on"?

Seriously, HKG has tons of O&D as-is and it's certainly not going to become a CVG or MEM or STL (The population of HKG alone is almost as much as those three MSAs combined, BTW).
 
Armaghman
Posts: 129
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 8:34 pm

Re: Battle of the Hubs: SIN and HKG

Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:07 pm

Had a look at some stats and these 2 articles help with some great background

Singapore growth - importance of China!
https://centreforaviation.com/insights/ ... wth-329264

Analysis of Inchein airport and difficulty of growing transit market.

https://centreforaviation.com/insights/ ... 030-274544

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos