Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
anshabhi wrote:Airlines like AI spend huge amount of money in training their pilots (say, for B787) and they should get some service out of that investment.
atcsundevil wrote:One year seems very excessive, in my opinion. I'm not aware of any carrier or country which requires its pilots to give anything close to one year of advanced notice of their intentions to resign. I would understand imposing certain restrictions if they're under contract and are working to fulfill training requirements, but if this is an across-the-board requirement to give 6-12 months notice regardless of time in service with the carrier, then that's completely ridiculous. They need to find ways to entice their pilots to stay by offering them benefits, not by legally preventing them from seeking other opportunities.
lightsaber wrote:Why are there not clawback provisions for training? But not a year. A pilot will be harassed to reconsider with that huge timeframe.
Lightsaber
SamYeager2016 wrote:Let me guess. AI is seeing a large outflow of pilots and has complained. The government can't make the regulation AI specific so they've hit all the airlines.
kjeld0d wrote:SamYeager2016 wrote:Let me guess. AI is seeing a large outflow of pilots and has complained. The government can't make the regulation AI specific so they've hit all the airlines.
Why not put the entire government out to tender? Have EK take over on a management contract!
berari wrote:lightsaber wrote:Why are there not clawback provisions for training? But not a year. A pilot will be harassed to reconsider with that huge timeframe.
Lightsaber
Weren't there instances where you had the ME3 also paying the clawback $ as part of poaching?
