American Eagle News and Discussion Thread

flightsimer · Wed Mar 14, 2018 4:52 pm

Well as I had previously said was possible.

Hilton Head will be flown by Republic, at least in partial, starting in July.

KCaviator · Wed Mar 14, 2018 7:20 pm

flightsimer wrote:
Well as I had previously said was possible.

Hilton Head will be flown by Republic, at least in partial, starting in July.

I would think that after the runway extension is completed, this route will be transferred to PSA CRJ-700s.

cheapgreek · Wed Mar 14, 2018 7:38 pm

KCaviator wrote:
flightsimer wrote:
Well as I had previously said was possible.

Hilton Head will be flown by Republic, at least in partial, starting in July.

I would think that after the runway extension is completed, this route will be transferred to PSA CRJ-700s.

I don't see how either aircraft could fly from HHH with its present runway. I read where the runway extension will be done in July, thereby allowing the E175 to start service and I expect weight restrictions being summertime.

KCaviator · Wed Mar 14, 2018 7:47 pm

cheapgreek wrote:
KCaviator wrote:
flightsimer wrote:
Well as I had previously said was possible.

Hilton Head will be flown by Republic, at least in partial, starting in July.

I would think that after the runway extension is completed, this route will be transferred to PSA CRJ-700s.

I don't see how either aircraft could fly from HHH with its present runway. I read where the runway extension will be done in July, thereby allowing the E175 to start service and I expect weight restrictions being summertime.

The 175 can do it, although it's going to have a max takeoff weight of somewhere around 65,000 lbs. That's a payload of approximately 15,000 lbs. That's going to be roughly 50 pax and 40 bags after fuel.

*Disclaimer: I quickly looked up these numbers in the performance manual; they're not hard numbers and there could be errors. This is ISA + 15, dry runway, and no alternate. Once you add an alternate and wet runway things are going to get messy real quick.

jgcotter · Tue Mar 20, 2018 1:12 pm

E145 N906AE is en route from MQT to RIC for transfer from Envoy to Piedmont. 41 E145s on property now at Piedmont.
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N906AE

aaflyer222 · Sun Mar 25, 2018 4:14 am

dh3 n326en and n328en have been at sby for weeks. any idea of the status of these aircraft?

jgcotter · Mon Mar 26, 2018 2:38 pm

CR7 N530EA is en route from MQT to DAY for transfer from Envoy to PSA. 38 CR7s on property now at PSA.
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N530EA

jgcotter · Mon Mar 26, 2018 2:52 pm

aaflyer222 wrote:
dh3 n326en and n328en have been at sby for weeks. any idea of the status of these aircraft?

Parked and waiting for return to lessor, June timeframe IIRC.

aaflyer222 · Tue Mar 27, 2018 7:18 pm

jgcotter wrote:
aaflyer222 wrote:
dh3 n326en and n328en have been at sby for weeks. any idea of the status of these aircraft?

Parked and waiting for return to lessor, June timeframe IIRC.

will piedmont park any other dh3 before the end of all dash flying?

jgcotter · Tue Mar 27, 2018 9:35 pm

E145 N651AE is en route from MQT to RIC for transfer from Envoy to Piedmont. 42 E145s on property now at Piedmont.
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N651AE

TXRoadMan · Sat Mar 31, 2018 2:31 pm

There are at least 5 unpainted E140s floating around. (4 were at DFW B gates yesterday and one was in the maintenance/spares area on the SW B ramp.) I'm a bit surprised that AA/MQ did not plan to have these painted after they left ABI, but at least the interiors are redone. (Though the unpainted one I rode on Tuesday was so fresh, you could still smell the coin mat adhesive.)

cheapgreek · Sat Mar 31, 2018 5:51 pm

TXRoadMan wrote:
There are at least 5 unpainted E140s floating around. (4 were at DFW B gates yesterday and one was in the maintenance/spares area on the SW B ramp.) I'm a bit surprised that AA/MQ did not plan to have these painted after they left ABI, but at least the interiors are redone. (Though the unpainted one I rode on Tuesday was so fresh, you could still smell the coin mat adhesive.)

Are any E-140's going to PDT? I get conflicting replies saying yes or no.

brooklynchris13 · Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:47 pm

TXRoadMan wrote:
There are at least 5 unpainted E140s floating around. (4 were at DFW B gates yesterday and one was in the maintenance/spares area on the SW B ramp.) I'm a bit surprised that AA/MQ did not plan to have these painted after they left ABI, but at least the interiors are redone. (Though the unpainted one I rode on Tuesday was so fresh, you could still smell the coin mat adhesive.)

There is at least one unpainted E140 that is NYC based- it made a trip to CMH yesterday from LGA, N853AE. I have seen nothing about any 140s going to Piedmont, I do not think they will be around long enough and it seems Piedmont has found the right pace for taking on the transfers. I do not know if they could effectively take on that much more flying quickly. With the transfers of the CR7s to PSA, MQ would appear to be a better fit for keeping on the 140s.

cheapgreek · Sun Apr 01, 2018 12:40 am

brooklynchris13 wrote:
TXRoadMan wrote:
There are at least 5 unpainted E140s floating around. (4 were at DFW B gates yesterday and one was in the maintenance/spares area on the SW B ramp.) I'm a bit surprised that AA/MQ did not plan to have these painted after they left ABI, but at least the interiors are redone. (Though the unpainted one I rode on Tuesday was so fresh, you could still smell the coin mat adhesive.)

There is at least one unpainted E140 that is NYC based- it made a trip to CMH yesterday from LGA, N853AE. I have seen nothing about any 140s going to Piedmont, I do not think they will be around long enough and it seems Piedmont has found the right pace for taking on the transfers. I do not know if they could effectively take on that much more flying quickly. With the transfers of the CR7s to PSA, MQ would appear to be a better fit for keeping on the 140s.

Speaking with a Piedmont base manager, the fleet is expected to grow to 70 frames. The old Piedmont had about 60 Dash's in the fleet and that was before the merger with Allegheny.

CcrlR · Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:39 am

TXRoadMan wrote:
There are at least 5 unpainted E140s floating around. (4 were at DFW B gates yesterday and one was in the maintenance/spares area on the SW B ramp.) I'm a bit surprised that AA/MQ did not plan to have these painted after they left ABI, but at least the interiors are redone. (Though the unpainted one I rode on Tuesday was so fresh, you could still smell the coin mat adhesive.)

They will be repainted eventually. MQ did not want to take it out of service any longer than it had to after being in storage and going through heavy check.
N834AE hasn't been painted yet. It is flying around with no logo on the tail after EVA Air hit it at ORD years ago.

TXRoadMan · Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:41 pm

CcrlR wrote:
They will be repainted eventually. MQ did not want to take it out of service any longer than it had to after being in storage and going through heavy check.
N834AE hasn't been painted yet. It is flying around with no logo on the tail after EVA Air hit it at ORD years ago.

I know they will be repainted, but MQ has presumably known the reactivation schedule (replacing the ZW CR2s and PT E145 transfers, among other reasons) for some time. And I also know that ABI has a fixed throughput. But why not move the schedule to the left by a week or two, enough to allow them to go to AMA/ROW after they leave ABI? I did give thought to the fact that they want to shake them down in service first, but that was dashed by my coin mat adhesive experience earlier this week. (And that may have been an anomaly. Perhaps it was replaced quickly at DFW or something.)

OTOH, maybe there's a reason why I don't work for MQ and they know exactly what they are doing...

aaflyer222 · Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:32 pm

CcrlR wrote:
TXRoadMan wrote:
There are at least 5 unpainted E140s floating around. (4 were at DFW B gates yesterday and one was in the maintenance/spares area on the SW B ramp.) I'm a bit surprised that AA/MQ did not plan to have these painted after they left ABI, but at least the interiors are redone. (Though the unpainted one I rode on Tuesday was so fresh, you could still smell the coin mat adhesive.)

They will be repainted eventually. MQ did not want to take it out of service any longer than it had to after being in storage and going through heavy check.
N834AE hasn't been painted yet. It is flying around with no logo on the tail after EVA Air hit it at ORD years ago.

other than n834ae and n853ae, what other e140 are still in old american paint?

TXRoadMan · Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:52 pm

aaflyer222 wrote:
other than n834ae and n853ae, what other e140 are still in old american paint?

I saw 800 and 833 at DFW. (Was on 800, 833 was next door on the stinger.) I also got a partial, either 815 or 816. (I'm sure about the 81 part, just not sure about the last digit. It was hard to make out in the evening twilight.) I didn't get a good enough look at the other two to make out the numbers.

jgcotter · Mon Apr 16, 2018 10:24 pm

E145 N621AE ferried from ABI to RIC this morning for transfer from TSA to Piedmont. 43 x E145 on property now at Piedmont.
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N621AE

Runway28L · Tue Apr 17, 2018 3:35 am

TXRoadMan wrote:
aaflyer222 wrote:
other than n834ae and n853ae, what other e140 are still in old american paint?

I saw 800 and 833 at DFW. (Was on 800, 833 was next door on the stinger.) I also got a partial, either 815 or 816. (I'm sure about the 81 part, just not sure about the last digit. It was hard to make out in the evening twilight.) I didn't get a good enough look at the other two to make out the numbers.

N826AE still has old paint as of April 11th.

448205 · Tue Apr 17, 2018 5:48 am

Why is TSA transferring jets to PDT? Was this planned???

jgcotter · Tue Apr 17, 2018 1:27 pm

Varsity1 wrote:
Why is TSA transferring jets to PDT? Was this planned???

Yes, TSA has operated 15 AA-owned planes and two TSA-owned planes for American Eagle out of DCA for quite a while, under a fee for departure contract. (Similar to the Compass-operated E-175s.) One more AA-owned plane, N614AE, will transfer from TSA to Piedmont later this month. My understanding is that all 15 TSA jets will be gradually transferred to Piedmont.

448205 · Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:17 pm

jgcotter wrote:
Varsity1 wrote:
Why is TSA transferring jets to PDT? Was this planned???

Yes, TSA has operated 15 AA-owned planes and two TSA-owned planes for American Eagle out of DCA for quite a while, under a fee for departure contract. (Similar to the Compass-operated E-175s.) One more AA-owned plane, N614AE, will transfer from TSA to Piedmont later this month. My understanding is that all 15 TSA jets will be gradually transferred to Piedmont.

WOW! I had no idea!

DiamondFlyer · Tue Apr 17, 2018 4:49 pm

Varsity1 wrote:
jgcotter wrote:
Varsity1 wrote:
Why is TSA transferring jets to PDT? Was this planned???

Yes, TSA has operated 15 AA-owned planes and two TSA-owned planes for American Eagle out of DCA for quite a while, under a fee for departure contract. (Similar to the Compass-operated E-175s.) One more AA-owned plane, N614AE, will transfer from TSA to Piedmont later this month. My understanding is that all 15 TSA jets will be gradually transferred to Piedmont.

WOW! I had no idea!

Yeah, I don't think it's been announced anywhere to be honest. I follow the regional carriers very closely, and while I assumed that TSA would give up the AA owned 145's (much like Compass will with the 175's), it hadn't been officially announced publicly anywhere as far as I can tell.

448205 · Tue Apr 17, 2018 6:10 pm

DiamondFlyer wrote:
Varsity1 wrote:
jgcotter wrote:
Yes, TSA has operated 15 AA-owned planes and two TSA-owned planes for American Eagle out of DCA for quite a while, under a fee for departure contract. (Similar to the Compass-operated E-175s.) One more AA-owned plane, N614AE, will transfer from TSA to Piedmont later this month. My understanding is that all 15 TSA jets will be gradually transferred to Piedmont.

WOW! I had no idea!

Yeah, I don't think it's been announced anywhere to be honest. I follow the regional carriers very closely, and while I assumed that TSA would give up the AA owned 145's (much like Compass will with the 175's), it hadn't been officially announced publicly anywhere as far as I can tell.

I wonder if TSA will shink or if the X-Jet 145XR deliveries from UA will offset that.

aaflyer222 · Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:52 am

Varsity1 wrote:
DiamondFlyer wrote:
Varsity1 wrote:

WOW! I had no idea!

Yeah, I don't think it's been announced anywhere to be honest. I follow the regional carriers very closely, and while I assumed that TSA would give up the AA owned 145's (much like Compass will with the 175's), it hadn't been officially announced publicly anywhere as far as I can tell.

I wonder if TSA will shink or if the X-Jet 145XR deliveries from UA will offset that.

are any more mq e145 going to piedmont, or only tsa aircraft now?

Deltabravo1123 · Sat Apr 21, 2018 8:42 pm

Is there any hope at all that some of these E140s will go to Piedmont, to compliment their E145s? Or are all of these already back in service with Envoy?

jworks158 · Sat Apr 21, 2018 9:09 pm

I apologize if I am behind on this, is there an tracking thread of the AE 135/140s coming back into the fleet. Also does anyone know what livery N809AE is in currently?

fdx320loader · Sat Apr 21, 2018 9:57 pm

DiamondFlyer wrote:
Varsity1 wrote:
jgcotter wrote:
Yes, TSA has operated 15 AA-owned planes and two TSA-owned planes for American Eagle out of DCA for quite a while, under a fee for departure contract. (Similar to the Compass-operated E-175s.) One more AA-owned plane, N614AE, will transfer from TSA to Piedmont later this month. My understanding is that all 15 TSA jets will be gradually transferred to Piedmont.

WOW! I had no idea!

Yeah, I don't think it's been announced anywhere to be honest. I follow the regional carriers very closely, and while I assumed that TSA would give up the AA owned 145's (much like Compass will with the 175's), it hadn't been officially announced publicly anywhere as far as I can tell.

Source?

bigb · Sat Apr 21, 2018 10:05 pm

fdx320loader wrote:
DiamondFlyer wrote:
Varsity1 wrote:

WOW! I had no idea!

Yeah, I don't think it's been announced anywhere to be honest. I follow the regional carriers very closely, and while I assumed that TSA would give up the AA owned 145's (much like Compass will with the 175's), it hadn't been officially announced publicly anywhere as far as I can tell.

Source?

Source are those that work within the AAG group. PDT are getting TSA birds, just like PSA are getting Envoys CR7s, and eventually the AA owned E175s at Compass will head back to Envoy. Just sit back and wait.

jgcotter · Sun Apr 22, 2018 12:58 am

jworks158 wrote:
I apologize if I am behind on this, is there an tracking thread of the AE 135/140s coming back into the fleet. Also does anyone know what livery N809AE is in currently?

The E140 thread is here: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1382661
I show N809AE in new livery operating out of LGA.

mhkansan · Wed Apr 25, 2018 8:10 am

ExpressJet CRJ-700 update!

N717EV completed the new interior works at GUS in Peru, Indiana. It is now flying for AA. It came thorough MHK two days ago and has the bright-LED lighting and power outlets through row 7. The other ExpressJet CRJs are some of the first off the line, originally flying for Horizon Air. They do not have these creature comforts. These aircraft have a much smaller aft cargo compartment. The lavatory seems to be much larger. I'd say its 2/3 the size of the older jets.
N718EV also completed the interior rework but flew to ATL on April 19th and hasn't flown since.
N720EV seems to be next and is at GUS since Monday night.

I think this is part of the 8 jets to come over to the AA operation this year.

jgcotter · Wed Apr 25, 2018 7:52 pm

Deltabravo1123 wrote:
Is there any hope at all that some of these E140s will go to Piedmont, to compliment their E145s? Or are all of these already back in service with Envoy?

I don’t believe any E140s are scheduled to go to Piedmont at this time. I currently show 36 x E140 in service with Envoy and another 7 in refurb, 2 at BNA and 5 at ABI, of the 49 being returned to service.

MLIAA · Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:46 am

Any word on what will happen to the rest of the -EV CRJ700s? I believe they are owned by ExpressJet but the AA agreement only allows for a handful.

freakyrat · Thu Apr 26, 2018 1:04 pm

MLIAA wrote:
Any word on what will happen to the rest of the -EV CRJ700s? I believe they are owned by ExpressJet but the AA agreement only allows for a handful.

I know that two of them are going to be flying the new routes between DFW, SBN and CLT starting June 7th

jgcotter · Thu Apr 26, 2018 3:37 pm

CR7 N519AE is en route from MQT to DAY for transfer from Envoy to PSA. 39 x CR7 on property now at PSA.
https://flightaware.com/live/flight/N519AE

bluefltspecial · Thu Apr 26, 2018 7:02 pm

FSDan wrote:
kcrwflyer wrote:
jgcotter wrote:
7 of the 21 E140s currently in service with Envoy are out of LGA. The remainder are out of DFW. Not sure if any will go to MIA or ORD, but I’m hearing some will go to CLT. This would mean MQ will open a CLT base.

Some of them are already showing up in CLT in the next few months. It looks like they're all being routed through cities that also have LGA service.. so if they rotate the planes in that way there's no real need to open any kind of base in CLT.

Taking a look at the April schedules (currently the farthest-out schedules that appear to be finalized), there are 11 ERD departures from CLT to SGF, LEX, GSO, FAY, HTS, ROA, and CHO. Aircraft are bridged between CLT and LGA via CHO, and possibly GSO (which has 2 RON aircraft from CLT and 1 from LGA). The CLT flying looks like it only requires 3 frames.

Oddly enough, I was looking at this a few days ago via flightaware and noticed that the flight times via CHO could be used as a bridge between CLT and LGA. I had been wondering with the CR9 ops last year on CLT-CHO being full if they would upgauge the CHO-LGA flights. Looks like this summer though, they will be down to a few two-cabin aircraft and the rest 50 seaters on the CLT-CHO route.

Slightly off topic, but with so many E140/145 ops going on, with Awac leaving and PDT growing would Envoy consider adding smaller regional bases like PDT used to have? Currently, I think PDT is down to just PHL and ROA, however Envoy - and correct me if I'm wrong, they only have NYC, DFW, ORD, and MIA? While useful during normal ops, I always thought it was a smart idea to give outstations with large number of flights a crew base so when one station is snarled with weather, you have crew that can be positioned in that aren't affected by said weather event...

jgcotter · Thu Apr 26, 2018 8:07 pm

bluefltspecial wrote:
FSDan wrote:
kcrwflyer wrote:

Some of them are already showing up in CLT in the next few months. It looks like they're all being routed through cities that also have LGA service.. so if they rotate the planes in that way there's no real need to open any kind of base in CLT.

Taking a look at the April schedules (currently the farthest-out schedules that appear to be finalized), there are 11 ERD departures from CLT to SGF, LEX, GSO, FAY, HTS, ROA, and CHO. Aircraft are bridged between CLT and LGA via CHO, and possibly GSO (which has 2 RON aircraft from CLT and 1 from LGA). The CLT flying looks like it only requires 3 frames.

Oddly enough, I was looking at this a few days ago via flightaware and noticed that the flight times via CHO could be used as a bridge between CLT and LGA. I had been wondering with the CR9 ops last year on CLT-CHO being full if they would upgauge the CHO-LGA flights. Looks like this summer though, they will be down to a few two-cabin aircraft and the rest 50 seaters on the CLT-CHO route.

Slightly off topic, but with so many E140/145 ops going on, with Awac leaving and PDT growing would Envoy consider adding smaller regional bases like PDT used to have? Currently, I think PDT is down to just PHL and ROA, however Envoy - and correct me if I'm wrong, they only have NYC, DFW, ORD, and MIA? While useful during normal ops, I always thought it was a smart idea to give outstations with large number of flights a crew base so when one station is snarled with weather, you have crew that can be positioned in that aren't affected by said weather event...

PDT is opening a CLT base July 1st, which may change the Envoy footprint there.

airtran737 · Thu Apr 26, 2018 8:24 pm

Deltabravo1123 wrote:
Is there any hope at all that some of these E140s will go to Piedmont, to compliment their E145s? Or are all of these already back in service with Envoy?

None of them will go Piedmont, it would make zero sense for them to be placed there. PDT would need to amend their manuals and training program, plus have it all approved by the FAA. It would be a waste of time and money to do so.

alasizon · Fri Apr 27, 2018 1:09 am

MLIAA wrote:
Any word on what will happen to the rest of the -EV CRJ700s? I believe they are owned by ExpressJet but the AA agreement only allows for a handful.

I'm assuming you are referring to the 22 or so that weren't placed with anyone after leaving DL? I haven't heard anything on them but I would assume they will end up with OO instead of EV.

DiamondFlyer · Fri Apr 27, 2018 1:45 am

alasizon wrote:
MLIAA wrote:
Any word on what will happen to the rest of the -EV CRJ700s? I believe they are owned by ExpressJet but the AA agreement only allows for a handful.

I'm assuming you are referring to the 22 or so that weren't placed with anyone after leaving DL? I haven't heard anything on them but I would assume they will end up with OO instead of EV.

Doubtful, unless the musical chairs continue at AA or UA. Delta is scoped out.

alasizon · Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:03 am

DiamondFlyer wrote:
alasizon wrote:
MLIAA wrote:
Any word on what will happen to the rest of the -EV CRJ700s? I believe they are owned by ExpressJet but the AA agreement only allows for a handful.

I'm assuming you are referring to the 22 or so that weren't placed with anyone after leaving DL? I haven't heard anything on them but I would assume they will end up with OO instead of EV.

Doubtful, unless the musical chairs continue at AA or UA. Delta is scoped out.

The EV birds are already shifting to OO beginning in June, I'm assuming EV is going to end up wholly-owned by UA so OO will shift all the CR7s to the OO certificate. AA can continue to accommodate more CR7s, pilots permitting, because AA has room on the small RJ front by reducing the ERD & CRJ ops.

DiamondFlyer · Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:57 am

alasizon wrote:
DiamondFlyer wrote:
alasizon wrote:

I'm assuming you are referring to the 22 or so that weren't placed with anyone after leaving DL? I haven't heard anything on them but I would assume they will end up with OO instead of EV.

Doubtful, unless the musical chairs continue at AA or UA. Delta is scoped out.

The EV birds are already shifting to OO beginning in June, I'm assuming EV is going to end up wholly-owned by UA so OO will shift all the CR7s to the OO certificate. AA can continue to accommodate more CR7s, pilots permitting, because AA has room on the small RJ front by reducing the ERD & CRJ ops.

OO is going to struggle to effectively staff just the 175 deliveries they're on the hook for at AS and DL, that to staff additional 700's is going to be next to impossible.

mhkansan · Fri Apr 27, 2018 4:01 am

alasizon wrote:
DiamondFlyer wrote:
alasizon wrote:

I'm assuming you are referring to the 22 or so that weren't placed with anyone after leaving DL? I haven't heard anything on them but I would assume they will end up with OO instead of EV.

Doubtful, unless the musical chairs continue at AA or UA. Delta is scoped out.

The EV birds are already shifting to OO beginning in June, I'm assuming EV is going to end up wholly-owned by UA so OO will shift all the CR7s to the OO certificate. AA can continue to accommodate more CR7s, pilots permitting, because AA has room on the small RJ front by reducing the ERD & CRJ ops.

AA's most recent contract considers jets smaller than 65 seats small RJ's. Conveniently, the ExpressJet CRJ-700s are configured with 65 seats, as opposed to the 70 seat OO config.

amcnd · Fri Apr 27, 2018 5:00 am

They have already started transferring 700’s. First one has all ready been added to the operation specs.. not sure how many of the 22 remaining will be coming to OO. Im guessing all. (Rumor XJT winding down the CRJ operation, in favor of 1 aircraft type/contract) No staffing problems on the OO side, as those 700’s mostly come online for fall flying...

DiamondFlyer · Sat Apr 28, 2018 2:18 am

amcnd wrote:
They have already started transferring 700’s. First one has all ready been added to the operation specs.. not sure how many of the 22 remaining will be coming to OO. Im guessing all. (Rumor XJT winding down the CRJ operation, in favor of 1 aircraft type/contract) No staffing problems on the OO side, as those 700’s mostly come online for fall flying...

No problem staffing the OO side? That's the best joke I've heard all year. OO is running crews ragged on scheduling on the CRJ, and the ERJ side is likely to be the same way by the end of the summer. They have little to offer in the recruiting department, with most regionals now paying more than OO.

amcnd · Sat Apr 28, 2018 5:59 am

Huge differance in what pilots think is adequate staffing , and what the company does. FA side is very well staffed... same with MX.

DiamondFlyer · Sat Apr 28, 2018 12:37 pm

amcnd wrote:
Huge differance in what pilots think is adequate staffing , and what the company does. FA side is very well staffed... same with MX.

Running crews to legal limits on flight hours isn't adequate staffing, no matter where you are.

amcnd · Sat Apr 28, 2018 1:39 pm

Never get close. The trips are to inefficient... thats the problem... they you end up with 89hrs and 11 days off. Because they tag a local to the day after a 4 day.. and 2 DH’s every trip. Block 16 paid 22.. when was the last time you saw a “Crew cancellation” on the cancellation report???? Not for a long time.....

redwingspilot · Fri May 04, 2018 5:19 pm

Per company newsletter:

American’s contracts with regional carriers ExpressJet and Trans States to end next year

In an effort to improve consistency for our customers and simplify our regional operation, we have decided not to renew our contracts with ExpressJet and Trans States when they expire in April 2019. The changes will not affect our capacity or service levels in any of our markets, and we will work closely with all impacted partners to ensure smooth and gradual transitions from ExpressJet and Trans States to other existing American Eagle partners. Once the wind-down of these agreements is completed, American will have seven regional partners, down from 10 we had at the beginning of this year.

Who is online

Popular Searches On Airliners.net