What is the ratio of international vs. domestic traffic ( movements and pax ) at major airports around the world
I would think JFK or LAX or MIA leads for U.S.
How about DEN / ATL / ORD / DFW / SFO ?
LHR / FRA / AMS / CDG etc.
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
I know for certain that DEN doesn't have much of an int'l network compared to other airports, so it's bound to have a lower percentage.
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
ASQ400 wrote:I know for certain that DEN doesn't have much of an int'l network compared to other airports, so it's bound to have a lower percentage.
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
Same for AMS, not domestic routes anymore (I was on the last one in 2007/8)
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Quick hack together of some data from the US. This is 2015; matching up the busiest US airports with the top 40 international gateways from the FAA.
Code: Select all
2015 Airport Passenger Traffic
Airport Total Pass Intl Pass Pct Intl
JFK 56,827,154 29,444,711 51.8%
MIA 44,350,247 19,987,903 45.1%
IAD 21,498,902 6,967,269 32.4%
EWR 37,494,704 11,516,634 30.7%
LAX 74,937,004 20,123,662 26.9%
HNL 19,869,707 4,968,744 25.0%
IAH 43,023,224 10,177,441 23.7%
SFO 50,057,887 10,755,078 21.5%
FLL 26,941,671 4,914,796 18.2%
ORD 76,949,504 11,550,286 15.0%
BOS 33,515,905 4,962,048 14.8%
PHL 31,444,403 4,005,232 12.7%
MCO 38,727,749 4,608,549 11.9%
DFW 64,074,762 7,580,093 11.8%
ATL 101,491,106 10,879,232 10.7%
SEA 42,340,537 4,351,801 10.3%
DTW 33,440,112 3,272,803 9.8%
LAS 45,443,900 3,395,993 7.5%
MSP 36,582,854 2,584,226 7.1%
CLT 44,876,627 2,993,807 6.7%
LGA 28,437,668 1,835,307 6.5%
PHX 44,003,840 2,290,889 5.2%
DEN 54,014,502 2,147,491 4.0%
BWI 23,823,532 937,527 3.9%
SAN 20,081,258 750,805 3.7%
TPA 18,815,425 642,893 3.4%
MDW 22,221,499 758,155 3.4%
PDX 16,850,952 574,436 3.4%
SNA 10,180,258 275,237 2.7%
SLC 22,152,498 479,523 2.2%
DCA 23,012,191 380,739 1.7%Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Dutchy wrote:ASQ400 wrote:I know for certain that DEN doesn't have much of an int'l network compared to other airports, so it's bound to have a lower percentage.
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
Same for AMS, not domestic routes anymore (I was on the last one in 2007/8)
What route was the last domestic route in the Netherlands?
-
- lancelot07
- Posts: 1078
- Joined:
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
rw774477 wrote:What is the ratio of international vs. domestic traffic ( movements and pax ) at major airports around the world
I would think JFK or LAX or MIA leads for U.S.
How about DEN / ATL / ORD / DFW / SFO ?
LHR / FRA / AMS / CDG etc.
a fairly irrelevant statistic, since it depends exclusively on the size of the "country" of the airport and on the definition of domestic/international. Is domestic in Europe:
a.) within a certain country?
b.) within the EU?
c.) within the Schengen area?
or b.)+c.) combined ?
You could do the same in the USA between statewide and nationwide traffic.
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Bostrom wrote:Dutchy wrote:ASQ400 wrote:I know for certain that DEN doesn't have much of an int'l network compared to other airports, so it's bound to have a lower percentage.
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
Same for AMS, not domestic routes anymore (I was on the last one in 2007/8)
What route was the last domestic route in the Netherlands?
Groningen - Eelde Airport (GRQ) - Schiphol (AMS) and then on to London City with VLM, my only Fokker 50 flight to date.
Went from Utrecht to Eelde by car, left at 5 o'clock. Flew to AMS, went to work in Haarlem at 9, left Haarlem at 4 by train to Eelde and took the car back home, I was home at ten or so
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Not sure if ARN is considered a major airport, but here are the 2016 data:
Passengers: 21% domestic (5.3 million), 79% international (19.4 million)
Cargo: 2% domestic (1,632 t), 98% international (75,756 t)
Mail: 42% domestic (7,969 t), 58% international (10,869 t)
Landings: 29% domestic (33,566), 71% international (82,079) (excluding GA and military aircraft).
Passengers: 21% domestic (5.3 million), 79% international (19.4 million)
Cargo: 2% domestic (1,632 t), 98% international (75,756 t)
Mail: 42% domestic (7,969 t), 58% international (10,869 t)
Landings: 29% domestic (33,566), 71% international (82,079) (excluding GA and military aircraft).
-
- FromCDGtoSYD
- Posts: 1038
- Joined:
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
ICN only has 3 domestic routes : TAE, PUS and CJU. In total they represent about 500,000 passengers annually.
Incheon is at 57,765,397. So yeah, a pretty big chunk of it is international.
Incheon is at 57,765,397. So yeah, a pretty big chunk of it is international.
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Dutchy wrote:Bostrom wrote:Dutchy wrote:
Same for AMS, not domestic routes anymore (I was on the last one in 2007/8)
What route was the last domestic route in the Netherlands?
Groningen - Eelde Airport (GRQ) - Schiphol (AMS) and then on to London City with VLM, my only Fokker 50 flight to date.
Went from Utrecht to Eelde by car, left at 5 o'clock. Flew to AMS, went to work in Haarlem at 9, left Haarlem at 4 by train to Eelde and took the car back home, I was home at ten or so
Was the flight faster or slower than the train? Do you know when the last domestic flight that wasn't a tag on to an international flight closed?
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Bostrom wrote:Dutchy wrote:Bostrom wrote:
What route was the last domestic route in the Netherlands?
Groningen - Eelde Airport (GRQ) - Schiphol (AMS) and then on to London City with VLM, my only Fokker 50 flight to date.
Went from Utrecht to Eelde by car, left at 5 o'clock. Flew to AMS, went to work in Haarlem at 9, left Haarlem at 4 by train to Eelde and took the car back home, I was home at ten or so
Was the flight faster or slower than the train? Do you know when the last domestic flight that wasn't a tag on to an international flight closed?
Much slower off course. But you have to go to and from the airport. The public train system in the Netherlands is excellent and there aren't many people whom commute between Groningen and Amsterdam I guess. No demand for domestic flights. 2 hours from the center of Groningen to the center of Amsterdam, or 1,5 hours from the center of Eindhoven to the center of Amsterdam. So why take a flight? I know that after the War there were numerous of domestic flights, don't know when they stopped, can't be much later than 1975 or so.
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
KEF isn't a major airport but it is an interesting case of an airport that is exclusively international by design in a country that does have some domestic flying. KEF now has a "domestic" route to AEY but it is only meant for connections to international flights. You can not book only the KEF-AEY leg.
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
ASQ400 wrote:I know for certain that DEN doesn't have much of an int'l network compared to other airports, so it's bound to have a lower percentage.
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
EY flies AUH-DXB.
Not major, but RUN & ZSE are 100% international.
-
- FromCDGtoSYD
- Posts: 1038
- Joined:
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Breathe wrote:EY flies AUH-DXB.
Not major, but RUN & ZSE are 100% international.
If you count RUN - PAR as being internation you can add PTP and FDF to that list
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Breathe wrote:ASQ400 wrote:I know for certain that DEN doesn't have much of an int'l network compared to other airports, so it's bound to have a lower percentage.
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
EY flies AUH-DXB.
Not major, but RUN & ZSE are 100% international.
Google says otherwise. What's your source for the AUH-DXB flight's existence?
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Breathe wrote:EY flies AUH-DXB
Uh... no they don't
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Two different/opposite pictures at Istanbuls two Airports in 2016.
Istanbul Atatürk IST
Total 60.415.470
Intl. 41.281.937 68.3%
Dom. 19.133.533 31.7%
Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen SAW
Total 29.667.853
Intl. 9.471.592 31.9%
Dom. 20.196.261 68.1%
Istanbul Atatürk IST
Total 60.415.470
Intl. 41.281.937 68.3%
Dom. 19.133.533 31.7%
Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen SAW
Total 29.667.853
Intl. 9.471.592 31.9%
Dom. 20.196.261 68.1%
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Breathe wrote:ASQ400 wrote:I know for certain that DEN doesn't have much of an int'l network compared to other airports, so it's bound to have a lower percentage.
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
EY flies AUH-DXB.
Not major, but RUN & ZSE are 100% international.
Fun fact: No they don't.
-
- PatrickZ80
- Posts: 5801
- Joined:
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Dutchy wrote:Same for AMS, not domestic routes anymore (I was on the last one in 2007/8)
There are still some domestic flights in the Netherlands, but they're not seperately bookable. I'm talking about Transavia making hops between multiple Dutch airports before or after their final destination. In Belgium there are no domestic flights at all (although Belgium does have multiple airports).
Smallest country I could find that has domestic flights which are actually bookable is Denmark. Copenhagen is therefor not entirely international.
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
If somebody flies LAS-LAX-NRT are both legs part of an Intl journey or just the second?
rw774477 wrote:What is the ratio of international vs. domestic traffic ( movements and pax ) at major airports around the world
I would think JFK or LAX or MIA leads for U.S.
How about DEN / ATL / ORD / DFW / SFO ?
LHR / FRA / AMS / CDG etc.
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
PatrickZ80 wrote:Dutchy wrote:Same for AMS, not domestic routes anymore (I was on the last one in 2007/8)
There are still some domestic flights in the Netherlands, but they're not seperately bookable. I'm talking about Transavia making hops between multiple Dutch airports before or after their final destination. In Belgium there are no domestic flights at all (although Belgium does have multiple airports).
I interpreted domestic as bookable, but yes some do these hops.
As for smallest country, I can imagine that some small island nations will have domestic flights, which are smaller than Denmark.
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Dutchy wrote:PatrickZ80 wrote:Dutchy wrote:
As for smallest country, I can imagine that some small island nations will have domestic flights, which are smaller than Denmark.
What about the largest country w/o domestic flights?
Uruguay?
Sierra Leone?
Ghana?
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
ASQ400 wrote:I know for certain that DEN doesn't have much of an int'l network compared to other airports, so it's bound to have a lower percentage.
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
I thought there is some flight between DXB and AUH?
SIN is obvious for having basically 100% int't departure but some designated "international" airports in Asian cities probably has very high int'l passenger % as well - e.g. ICN or TPE
HKG is weird... 100% of passengers go thru immigration but a significant portion of flights are domestic flights to other Chinese airports.
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
bzcat wrote:ASQ400 wrote:I know for certain that DEN doesn't have much of an int'l network compared to other airports, so it's bound to have a lower percentage.
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
I thought there is some flight between DXB and AUH?
SIN is obvious for having basically 100% int't departure but some designated "international" airports in Asian cities probably has very high int'l passenger % as well - e.g. ICN or TPE
HKG is weird... 100% of passengers go thru immigration but a significant portion of flights are domestic flights to other Chinese airports.
HKG is weird because of the whole One China/Two Systems arrangement
-
- Wednesdayite
- Posts: 413
- Joined:
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
.
Quoted stats for DEN, but just seen they were already listed.
Quoted stats for DEN, but just seen they were already listed.
-
- LamboAston
- Posts: 697
- Joined:
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
bzcat wrote:ASQ400 wrote:I know for certain that DEN doesn't have much of an int'l network compared to other airports, so it's bound to have a lower percentage.
Some airports (such as DXB and SIN) are 100% int'l due to lack of domestic traffic existing.
On the other side of that coin are the numerous airports with no int'l service, like ETH
I thought there is some flight between DXB and AUH?
SIN is obvious for having basically 100% int't departure but some designated "international" airports in Asian cities probably has very high int'l passenger % as well - e.g. ICN or TPE
HKG is weird... 100% of passengers go thru immigration but a significant portion of flights are domestic flights to other Chinese airports.
Nope, EY run a bus service with a flight number. Just like some TGV trains in France have flight numbers.
Re: Percentage of Int'l traffic at major airports.
Montreal-Trudeau (YUL) for 2016, 38.77% domestic, 61.23% Transborder (USA) & International
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 32Bit, 4l4R1, 727tiger, Aero747, Airpacific767, Airspotterone, AIRTRANSAT767, andrewtwentytwo, anymaninfc, ArjenterAvest, ATLgaUSA, atsiang, ausinTex, Aviationanalysi, axio, bayside319, BlueTrue, bridge29, DAIGV, David_itl, Deltran757, dk44, dstblj52, EastCoastWing, FARmd90, GalaxyFlyer, GCT64, Gfgdfgv, glbltrvlr, hbernal1, HotelWhiskey, jamsco99, jbs2886, Kiwings, kriskim, Lennundus, LH982, lippaim, LUKAS10, MAH4546, masi1157, Mexicana757, NMo900, Noshow, oakleaf1, panamair, Piepilot, PSU.DTW.SCE, PW100, qf15, RB211trent, shamrock350, sirloin, SRQKEF, StTim, sunking737, teachpdx, TexasAirCorp, ThunderDome, timberwolf24, Tolbs, tpaewr, urbanflyer, windian425, Zbogart757 and 337 guests