apodino
Topic Author
Posts: 3308
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:11 am

Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Wed Nov 07, 2018 9:21 pm

In a case where Democrats actually drew congressional lines to favor them, a federal court rules that Maryland's congressional map unconstitutionally favors Democrats and must be redrawn.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/federal-judges-throw-out-marylands-congressional-voting-map/2018/11/07/91a06834-e2be-11e8-b759-3d88a5ce9e19_story.html?utm_term=.8bf0dc287ff0

This is an interesting case, because Democrats are in a pickle here. They dont want to redraw the districts, but if they appeal to the Supreme Court and win, that would also uphold Gerrymandering in much less friendly territory, such as WI and NC. I do want the Court to rule on this eventually personally.

Thoughts?
 
User avatar
CarlosSi
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2017 8:29 pm

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Wed Nov 07, 2018 9:38 pm

Austin is terribly gerrymandered; each district has about 700 thousand people (changes with increasing population), last night we had ONE Democratic seat for the Austin metro (of about 2 million) which are shared with large portions of rural Texas, I imagine largely resulting in an unfair and unrepresentative outcome of the district. It’s bogus. Maybe 2 would’ve been fine, but just 1 seat? I imagine it’s not just austin that’s largely liberal, no? Or maybe I’m mistaken and Georgetown/Temple are more awfully conservative.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... 8-midterms

Despite an overwhelming amount of voters in my side of town supported Siegel, he lost to McCaul.

Thankfully, give and take...

Unfortunately how can you decide who is going to be non-partisan when making the map? Clearly those in power are going to do whatever they can to “choose their voters”, and claims for a certain mapping can be bogus and upheld in the end.
 
User avatar
trpmb6
Posts: 1426
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 5:45 pm

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Wed Nov 07, 2018 9:50 pm

As was posted in another thread this week; sometimes gerrymandering makes sense. Sometimes it's unfair to one side or another. I feel like the more districts that are needing to be divided, the harder it gets too. You end up having to split down a single street in places like california where your neighbor across the street gets to put a different campaign sign in their yard than you do. It's really weird to think that someone you probably identify pretty well with would have someone totally different representing them.

I'm pretty happy with how Kansas is divided. I suspect others may not be. But at the very least I don't find it to be very gerrymandered one way or the other. They just kind of fit into place due to the population centers being separated fairly well.
 
User avatar
Dutchy
Posts: 6865
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:25 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Wed Nov 07, 2018 10:55 pm

Why can't this redrawing of districts because of shifting populations be handled by civil servants without any party affiliation. Leaving it to politicians will lead to the current situation in the US.
Many happy landings, greetings from The Netherlands!
 
GalaxyFlyer
Posts: 1514
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 4:44 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:15 pm

First, districts is a political decision and as a famous Democrat said, “elections have consequences”. Second, expand the house to 1 representative for each 250,000 persons; make them more representative of tighter knit districts and dilute the power of any individual. Civil servants, in your mind, don’t have agendas—bull cookies. They have interests like every voter and politician.

GF
 
DiamondFlyer
Posts: 2900
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:42 pm

Dutchy wrote:
Why can't this redrawing of districts because of shifting populations be handled by civil servants without any party affiliation. Leaving it to politicians will lead to the current situation in the US.


Because there is no such thing, especially after a certain phoney in chief said "elections have consequences". 2009-2017 did more to polarize this country than anything since the civil war.
From my cold, dead hands
 
Pyrex
Posts: 4387
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:24 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:55 pm

Dutchy wrote:
Why can't this redrawing of districts because of shifting populations be handled by civil servants without any party affiliation. Leaving it to politicians will lead to the current situation in the US.


Yes, I am sure there are tons of civil servants with no pay affiliation. That is why Washington DC and the surrounding suburbs reliably vote more than 90% Democrat.
Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
 
User avatar
Tugger
Posts: 8389
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:38 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Thu Nov 08, 2018 12:00 am

DiamondFlyer wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Why can't this redrawing of districts because of shifting populations be handled by civil servants without any party affiliation. Leaving it to politicians will lead to the current situation in the US.


Because there is no such thing, especially after a certain phoney in chief said "elections have consequences". 2009-2017 did more to polarize this country than anything since the civil war.

Yes, the Republican's did really work to divide didn't they. And Trump is a result of that. As a Republican I watched as they stated clearly their goal was for the president to fail. And they refused to work with the president or reach across the aisle or if they di htey were attacked and castigated for doing so.

They taught the Dems well on this. Sadly.

The fact is the two sides will need to figure out a way to work together again, but I don't see that happening for years. This idea that "one side" can or should control has been proven to be a recipe for failure and is bad for the nation and its people.

As to gerrymandering, I am hopeful that there will someday be a change. No place will be perfect but I think 9 member boards 3, 3, and 3 or 4, 4, and 1 woudl be best to work them out and address the issue.

Tugg
I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
 
FreequentFlier
Posts: 953
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 4:30 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Thu Nov 08, 2018 12:09 am

Dutchy wrote:
Why can't this redrawing of districts because of shifting populations be handled by civil servants without any party affiliation. Leaving it to politicians will lead to the current situation in the US.


It’s been gradually heading in that direction through voter referendums, not through votes from politicians. Politicians are not typically eager to relinquish their own power and gerrymandering in no exception.
 
DiamondFlyer
Posts: 2900
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Thu Nov 08, 2018 1:19 am

Tugger wrote:
DiamondFlyer wrote:
Dutchy wrote:
Why can't this redrawing of districts because of shifting populations be handled by civil servants without any party affiliation. Leaving it to politicians will lead to the current situation in the US.


Because there is no such thing, especially after a certain phoney in chief said "elections have consequences". 2009-2017 did more to polarize this country than anything since the civil war.

Yes, the Republican's did really work to divide didn't they. And Trump is a result of that. As a Republican I watched as they stated clearly their goal was for the president to fail. And they refused to work with the president or reach across the aisle or if they di htey were attacked and castigated for doing so.

They taught the Dems well on this. Sadly.

The fact is the two sides will need to figure out a way to work together again, but I don't see that happening for years. This idea that "one side" can or should control has been proven to be a recipe for failure and is bad for the nation and its people.

As to gerrymandering, I am hopeful that there will someday be a change. No place will be perfect but I think 9 member boards 3, 3, and 3 or 4, 4, and 1 woudl be best to work them out and address the issue.

Tugg


The quickest and most viable path to making gerrymandering useless, is more than 2 major political parties. Unfortunately, the system won't allow that to happen.
From my cold, dead hands
 
GalaxyFlyer
Posts: 1514
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 4:44 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Thu Nov 08, 2018 2:06 am

As a Republican I watched as they stated clearly their goal was for the president to fail. And they refused to work with the president or reach across the aisle or if they di htey were attacked and castigated for doing so.


Then surely you noticed Pres. Obama telling the Republicans “elections have consequences” and refused to deal with them on PPACA. And more Republicans voted to confirm Kagan and Soto Ayer than Democrats for Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

GF
 
johnboy
Posts: 2778
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 1999 9:09 pm

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Thu Nov 08, 2018 2:24 am

GalaxyFlyer wrote:

Then surely you noticed Pres. Obama telling the Republicans “elections have consequences” and refused to deal with them on PPACA. And more Republicans voted to confirm Kagan and Soto Ayer than Democrats for Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

GF


Hmmm. I sure seem to remember Democrats holding lots of meetings on the PPACA, and Republicans refusing to participate.

Perhaps in the other dimension in which you’re living things transpired differently.
 
User avatar
WarRI1
Posts: 12029
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 10:51 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Thu Nov 08, 2018 2:24 am

GalaxyFlyer wrote:
As a Republican I watched as they stated clearly their goal was for the president to fail. And they refused to work with the president or reach across the aisle or if they di htey were attacked and castigated for doing so.


Then surely you noticed Pres. Obama telling the Republicans “elections have consequences” and refused to deal with them on PPACA. And more Republicans voted to confirm Kagan and Soto Ayer than Democrats for Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

GF


Could it be that both Republican nominees were much more hard dedicated Conservatives than the Democrats were Liberal? Unable to bend or compromise. Maybe????
It is better to die on your feet, than live on your knees.
 
c933103
Posts: 2836
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 7:23 pm

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:31 am

The entire ISA was gerrymandered to have excessive amount of state for flyovers anyway... Despite political alignment of those places have shifted over the era but those states still remain..
 
User avatar
einsteinboricua
Posts: 6691
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:11 pm

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Fri Nov 09, 2018 11:39 am

Unruly activist judges ruling against the will of the people when they clearly voted for this map!

Oh...we can't use this argument? I thought this was the line when same sex marriage bans were being struck down...

In all seriousness, I'm glad the map was struck down. This was clearly gerrymandered. There's no reason for the odd shapes. At issue is MD-6 which stretches from the western salient and was redrawn to incorporate more of the DC suburbs. If I'm glad when maps in NC and FL are struck down, I should be equally glad when blatant Democrat maps are also struck down, especially if they serve no purpose (i.e. none of the districts' shapes are to encompass minorities).
"You haven't seen a tree until you've seen its shadow from the sky."
 
User avatar
Tugger
Posts: 8389
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:38 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Fri Nov 09, 2018 4:16 pm

The important thing about this ruling is the acceptance of the right to freedom of association as a reason to address gerrymandering. Courts have often avoided "political" redrawing and only focused on ones that involved race etc.

In its ruling Wednesday, the three-judge panel declared the district unconstitutional and found that the state intended to lessen the influence of GOP voters by replacing them with Democrats in violation of the First Amendment right to political association.


Gotta love that the governor also thought that politics would not be an issue to the courts.
In a deposition in the case, former governor Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, was blunt about the partisan mapmaking he oversaw, saying Democratic leaders intentionally redrew the districts to try to give their party an advantage.


Tugg
I don’t know that I am unafraid to be myself, but it is hard to be somebody else. -W. Shatner
 
apodino
Topic Author
Posts: 3308
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:11 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Fri Nov 09, 2018 4:49 pm

WarRI1 wrote:
GalaxyFlyer wrote:
As a Republican I watched as they stated clearly their goal was for the president to fail. And they refused to work with the president or reach across the aisle or if they di htey were attacked and castigated for doing so.


Then surely you noticed Pres. Obama telling the Republicans “elections have consequences” and refused to deal with them on PPACA. And more Republicans voted to confirm Kagan and Soto Ayer than Democrats for Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

GF


Could it be that both Republican nominees were much more hard dedicated Conservatives than the Democrats were Liberal? Unable to bend or compromise. Maybe????


What kind of rubbish is this? The truth is nobody really knows what these guys are going to be like when they get on the bench? I don't like the word compromise in the context of judicial nominees because there is no compromise on what the law says. The law either says something or it doesn't. Compromise is what happens when you make the laws. But when you interpret the laws, that's different. It either says something or it doesn't.

And in early oral arguments on one of Kavanaugh's first cases on the bench, he is hinting he is going to side with the Liberal wing of the court on a death penalty case. Just thought I would mention it.
 
User avatar
DocLightning
Posts: 21135
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:51 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:16 pm

If you can't win an election honestly, then you shouldn't be winning it. Good for the court. Just because I usually vote Democratic doesn't mean that I want my people to be gerrymandering. Democracy is not supposed to be partisan.
-Doc Lightning-

"The sky calls to us. If we do not destroy ourselves, we will one day venture to the stars."
-Carl Sagan
 
DiamondFlyer
Posts: 2900
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:50 pm

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:29 pm

DocLightning wrote:
If you can't win an election honestly, then you shouldn't be winning it. Good for the court. Just because I usually vote Democratic doesn't mean that I want my people to be gerrymandering. Democracy is not supposed to be partisan.


Of course not, but we don't live in a democracy, but rather a constitutional republic, which it seems like about 99% of the country has forgotten.
From my cold, dead hands
 
User avatar
einsteinboricua
Posts: 6691
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:11 pm

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Fri Nov 09, 2018 7:07 pm

DiamondFlyer wrote:
Of course not, but we don't live in a democracy, but rather a constitutional republic, which it seems like about 99% of the country has forgotten.

That's still not an excuse to attempt to subvert the will of the people by drawing districts that favor one party over another.
"You haven't seen a tree until you've seen its shadow from the sky."
 
WIederling
Posts: 6882
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Fri Nov 09, 2018 8:35 pm

DiamondFlyer wrote:
Tugger wrote:
DiamondFlyer wrote:

Because there is no such thing, especially after a certain phoney in chief said "elections have consequences". 2009-2017 did more to polarize this country than anything since the civil war.

Yes, the Republican's did really work to divide didn't they. And Trump is a result of that. As a Republican I watched as they stated clearly their goal was for the president to fail. And they refused to work with the president or reach across the aisle or if they di htey were attacked and castigated for doing so.

They taught the Dems well on this. Sadly.

The fact is the two sides will need to figure out a way to work together again, but I don't see that happening for years. This idea that "one side" can or should control has been proven to be a recipe for failure and is bad for the nation and its people.

As to gerrymandering, I am hopeful that there will someday be a change. No place will be perfect but I think 9 member boards 3, 3, and 3 or 4, 4, and 1 woudl be best to work them out and address the issue.

Tugg


The quickest and most viable path to making gerrymandering useless, is more than 2 major political parties. Unfortunately, the system won't allow that to happen.


The solution in Germany that makes adjusting voting districts less attractive is to fill up with extra representatives until the overall vote distribution is met. ( i.e. direct votes go first and then further places are filled from lists. )
Murphy is an optimist
 
User avatar
DocLightning
Posts: 21135
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 8:51 am

Re: Federal Court rules Gerrymandered Congressional Map Unconstitutional

Fri Nov 09, 2018 9:47 pm

DiamondFlyer wrote:
DocLightning wrote:
If you can't win an election honestly, then you shouldn't be winning it. Good for the court. Just because I usually vote Democratic doesn't mean that I want my people to be gerrymandering. Democracy is not supposed to be partisan.


Of course not, but we don't live in a democracy, but rather a constitutional republic, which it seems like about 99% of the country has forgotten.


We live in both.
-Doc Lightning-

"The sky calls to us. If we do not destroy ourselves, we will one day venture to the stars."
-Carl Sagan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BartSimpson, sabenapilot and 101 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos