tommy1808 wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

culminated in the illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign.

which never happend bzw, in case you haven´t noticed that.

best regards
Thomas

aviationaware wrote:

culminated in the illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign.

aviationaware wrote:

tommy1808 wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

culminated in the illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign.

which never happend bzw, in case you haven´t noticed that.

best regards
Thomas

"Trump should be happy the FBI was spying on his campaign". - Obama's Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.

Are you still arguing that this didn't happen? You are fighting a losing battle.

2122M wrote:

Trump has a habit of making things up.

2122M wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

tommy1808 wrote:

which never happend bzw, in case you haven´t noticed that.

best regards
Thomas

"Trump should be happy the FBI was spying on his campaign". - Obama's Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.

Are you still arguing that this didn't happen? You are fighting a losing battle.

Wrong on Clapper. He never said that. Trump said that Clapper said that, but believe it or not Trump has a habit of making things up.

Below are just a couple of source that contain what Clapper actually said. Will you read them?

aviationaware wrote:

2122M wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

"Trump should be happy the FBI was spying on his campaign". - Obama's Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.

Are you still arguing that this didn't happen? You are fighting a losing battle.

Wrong on Clapper. He never said that. Trump said that Clapper said that, but believe it or not Trump has a habit of making things up.

Below are just a couple of source that contain what Clapper actually said. Will you read them?

Let's not be holier than the pope. Clapper didn't say they spied on Trump, he just said they planted an informer. Well, as far as I am concerned, an informer is a spy. I know Clapper disagrees and so do you probably, but I guarantee you, make a poll (not saying why you are asking) of the general population and ask them if they think an informer is the same as a spy. They will overwhelmingly say yes, because there is only a difference to those trying to rescue Obama's and his cronies' sinking boat.

aviationaware wrote:

2122M wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

"Trump should be happy the FBI was spying on his campaign". - Obama's Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper.

Are you still arguing that this didn't happen? You are fighting a losing battle.

Wrong on Clapper. He never said that. Trump said that Clapper said that, but believe it or not Trump has a habit of making things up.

Below are just a couple of source that contain what Clapper actually said. Will you read them?

Let's not be holier than the pope. Clapper didn't say they spied on Trump, he just said they planted an informer. Well, as far as I am concerned, an informer is a spy. I know Clapper disagrees and so do you probably, but I guarantee you, make a poll (not saying why you are asking) of the general population and ask them if they think an informer is the same as a spy. They will overwhelmingly say yes, because there is only a difference to those trying to rescue Obama's and his cronies' sinking boat.

aviationaware wrote:

but I guarantee you, make a poll (not saying why you are asking) of the general population and ask them if they think an informer is the same as a spy. They will overwhelmingly say yes, because there is only a difference to those trying to rescue Obama's and his cronies' sinking boat.

aviationaware wrote:

Let's not be holier than the pope. Clapper didn't say they spied on Trump, he just said they planted an informer. Well, as far as I am concerned, an informer is a spy. I know Clapper disagrees and so do you probably, but I guarantee you, make a poll (not saying why you are asking) of the general population and ask them if they think an informer is the same as a spy. They will overwhelmingly say yes, because there is only a difference to those trying to rescue Obama's and his cronies' sinking boat.

aviationaware wrote:

Let's not be holier than the pope. Clapper didn't say they spied on Trump, he just said they planted an informer. Well, as far as I am concerned, an informer is a spy. I know Clapper disagrees and so do you probably, but I guarantee you, make a poll (not saying why you are asking) of the general population and ask them if they think an informer is the same as a spy. They will overwhelmingly say yes, because there is only a difference to those trying to rescue Obama's and his cronies' sinking boat.

aviationaware wrote:

It's not a conspiracy theory if it's true. Then it's just a conspiracy. The Obama administration weaponized the state and its agencies against political opponents. It started with the tea party and culminated in the illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign. Hell has to freeze over before I pay money to any company doing business with such a Nixonian figure.

aviationaware wrote:

I don't know how you people manage to be so narrow minded. He infiltrated the campaign. If you say it was for the purpose of spying on Trump, of investigating the Russia hoax, of stealing paperclips. What difference does it make? None, that's what.

Let's see how Merriam Webster defines the word spy:
"one who keeps secret watch on a person or thing to obtain information"

You guys are embarrassing yourselves. He was so obviously a spy. If you can't see that take off the blindfolds.

LMP737 wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

It's not a conspiracy theory if it's true. Then it's just a conspiracy. The Obama administration weaponized the state and its agencies against political opponents. It started with the tea party and culminated in the illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign. Hell has to freeze over before I pay money to any company doing business with such a Nixonian figure.

Congratulations, you have the ability to repeat without question whatever you hear on talk radio and Fox News. Now all you have to do is provide actual evidence of it. And may I remind you just because Trump says it's true does not mean it's true. Especially given the fact he's a pathological liar.

texdravid wrote:

LMP737 wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

It's not a conspiracy theory if it's true. Then it's just a conspiracy. The Obama administration weaponized the state and its agencies against political opponents. It started with the tea party and culminated in the illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign. Hell has to freeze over before I pay money to any company doing business with such a Nixonian figure.

Congratulations, you have the ability to repeat without question whatever you hear on talk radio and Fox News. Now all you have to do is provide actual evidence of it. And may I remind you just because Trump says it's true does not mean it's true. Especially given the fact he's a pathological liar.

Congratulations you have the ability to regurgitate all of CNN and MSNBC and Democrat crazy lies.

And may I remind you just because Obama or another democrat says it’s true does not mean it’s true. Especially given the fact that they are inveterate liars and racists and unquestionably anti-American.

There, I fixed it for you.

On a broader note, make fun of my media and politicians, expect return fire. And double the amount.

James Clapper is one of those insane liars trotted out by the MSM. He is the personification of the deep state trying to sabotage the Trump presidency. He is completely a fraud. He and Adam Schiff need to get a room with a threesome with Comey.

texdravid wrote:

Congratulations you have the ability to regurgitate all of CNN and MSNBC and Democrat crazy lies.

There, I fixed it for you.

On a broader note, make fun of my media and politicians, expect return fire. And double the amount.

James Clapper is one of those insane liars trotted out by the MSM. He is the personification of the deep state trying to sabotage the Trump presidency. He is completely a fraud. He and Adam Schiff need to get a room with a threesome with Comey.

texdravid wrote:

And may I remind you just because Obama or another democrat says it’s true does not mean it’s true. Especially given the fact that they are inveterate liars and racists and unquestionably anti-American.

seb146 wrote:

The bottom line is: you righties do not care that Russia meddled in our elections and anyone investigating Russia meddling in our elections is anti-American.

texdravid wrote:

LMP737 wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

It's not a conspiracy theory if it's true. Then it's just a conspiracy. The Obama administration weaponized the state and its agencies against political opponents. It started with the tea party and culminated in the illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign. Hell has to freeze over before I pay money to any company doing business with such a Nixonian figure.

Congratulations, you have the ability to repeat without question whatever you hear on talk radio and Fox News. Now all you have to do is provide actual evidence of it. And may I remind you just because Trump says it's true does not mean it's true. Especially given the fact he's a pathological liar.

Congratulations you have the ability to regurgitate all of CNN and MSNBC and Democrat crazy lies.

And may I remind you just because Obama or another democrat says it’s true does not mean it’s true. Especially given the fact that they are inveterate liars and racists and unquestionably anti-American.

There, I fixed it for you.

On a broader note, make fun of my media and politicians, expect return fire. And double the amount.

James Clapper is one of those insane liars trotted out by the MSM. He is the personification of the deep state trying to sabotage the Trump presidency. He is completely a fraud. He and Adam Schiff need to get a room with a threesome with Comey.

2122M wrote:

He or she was not there to spy on Trump for the purpose of helping Clinton win the election (as Donald "the perpetual victim" Trump claims). He or she was there to gain information about how Russia was meddling in domestic elections.

seb146 wrote:

The bottom line is: you righties do not care that Russia meddled in our elections and anyone investigating Russia meddling in our elections is anti-American.

2122M wrote:

The fact is no-one was spying on Trump.

aviationaware wrote:

2122M wrote:

He or she was not there to spy on Trump for the purpose of helping Clinton win the election (as Donald "the perpetual victim" Trump claims). He or she was there to gain information about how Russia was meddling in domestic elections.

This is funny. The spy was only used because of the fake dossier, which was paid for by Clinton. The circle is complete. You know, what's really embarrassing is that despite all the cheating both against Bernie and Trump, Hillary still lost in the end because she was too tired or too stupid to go to Pennsylvania one more time.

seb146 wrote:

The bottom line is: you righties do not care that Russia meddled in our elections and anyone investigating Russia meddling in our elections is anti-American.

You know, I would. But unlike you, I have long since understood that the only Russian meddling in the election was a bunch of fake social media accounts with literally zero bearing. What's giving Russia the enormous influence over political life in the US is the liberals keeping this ridiculous fairytale alive that Trump was or is some type of Russian plant. That's what's making it double sad. Not only are you destroying the Republic, but you are also giving Russia what Putin wants. Disgraceful!

2122M wrote:

texdravid wrote:

LMP737 wrote:

Congratulations, you have the ability to repeat without question whatever you hear on talk radio and Fox News. Now all you have to do is provide actual evidence of it. And may I remind you just because Trump says it's true does not mean it's true. Especially given the fact he's a pathological liar.

Congratulations you have the ability to regurgitate all of CNN and MSNBC and Democrat crazy lies.

And may I remind you just because Obama or another democrat says it’s true does not mean it’s true. Especially given the fact that they are inveterate liars and racists and unquestionably anti-American.

There, I fixed it for you.

On a broader note, make fun of my media and politicians, expect return fire. And double the amount.

James Clapper is one of those insane liars trotted out by the MSM. He is the personification of the deep state trying to sabotage the Trump presidency. He is completely a fraud. He and Adam Schiff need to get a room with a threesome with Comey.

All that bluster aside. The fact is no-one was spying on Trump. He has no reason to suspect anyone was spying on him. And if anyone was spying on him, we would be hearing all about it today after Nunes and co met with the DOJ to discuss it.

And you don't have to like Clapper, but the quotes are there for you to read in full context and the fact is Trump lied about what Clapper said. There is no other was to view this. Clapper said, "We were investigating Russia", Trump said "Clapper admitted he was investigating me." Surely even you can see how this is a lie, right? Clapper admitted no such thing.

Finally, Obama hasn't said a peep about this, so I'm not sure why you are bringing him up. Clapper was brought into government by Bush Jr (a republican in case you forgot). Rosenstein is a republican, Mueller was appointed to his first US attorney job by your hero Reagan. This is not case of Democrats going after Republicans, this is all a case of level headed elected officials and government appointees from across the spectrum trying to use the system to do what the system was meant to do, and protect this country from enemies both foreign and domestic.

Now, I invite you to debate any of these facts, but debate them with facts, not name-calling and meaningless drivel. This board is tired of your constant, "Yea? well (insert democrat here) SUCKS!". make an argument you can be proud of.

2122M wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

2122M wrote:

He or she was not there to spy on Trump for the purpose of helping Clinton win the election (as Donald "the perpetual victim" Trump claims). He or she was there to gain information about how Russia was meddling in domestic elections.

This is funny. The spy was only used because of the fake dossier, which was paid for by Clinton. The circle is complete. You know, what's really embarrassing is that despite all the cheating both against Bernie and Trump, Hillary still lost in the end because she was too tired or too stupid to go to Pennsylvania one more time.

seb146 wrote:

The bottom line is: you righties do not care that Russia meddled in our elections and anyone investigating Russia meddling in our elections is anti-American.

You know, I would. But unlike you, I have long since understood that the only Russian meddling in the election was a bunch of fake social media accounts with literally zero bearing. What's giving Russia the enormous influence over political life in the US is the liberals keeping this ridiculous fairytale alive that Trump was or is some type of Russian plant. That's what's making it double sad. Not only are you destroying the Republic, but you are also giving Russia what Putin wants. Disgraceful!

You hear that Seb? Trump is kicking the free press out of public events, shrouding his finances in secrecy, surrounding himself with only his friends, shutting down dissenting opinion and interfering with our checks and balances. But it is you (and presumably me) who are destroying the republic by being unhappy in verified foreign interference in our elections.

(I'd like to add that I'm loving this Trumpian trend of ending a statement with one word and an exclamation mark. The Trumpettes are so enamored by everything he does they are starting to copy his writing style. Sad!)

LMP737 wrote:

seb146 wrote:

The bottom line is: you righties do not care that Russia meddled in our elections and anyone investigating Russia meddling in our elections is anti-American.

That's pretty much it in a nut shell. You know that if Bill and Chelsea Clinton had meet with a Russian national who said she had dirt on Trump and won the election guys like tex would be screaming from the rooftops about it. Lets be honest, the Republicans in congress would be drawing up articles of impeachment.

texdravid wrote:

2122M wrote:

texdravid wrote:

Congratulations you have the ability to regurgitate all of CNN and MSNBC and Democrat crazy lies.

And may I remind you just because Obama or another democrat says it’s true does not mean it’s true. Especially given the fact that they are inveterate liars and racists and unquestionably anti-American.

There, I fixed it for you.

On a broader note, make fun of my media and politicians, expect return fire. And double the amount.

James Clapper is one of those insane liars trotted out by the MSM. He is the personification of the deep state trying to sabotage the Trump presidency. He is completely a fraud. He and Adam Schiff need to get a room with a threesome with Comey.

All that bluster aside. The fact is no-one was spying on Trump. He has no reason to suspect anyone was spying on him. And if anyone was spying on him, we would be hearing all about it today after Nunes and co met with the DOJ to discuss it.

And you don't have to like Clapper, but the quotes are there for you to read in full context and the fact is Trump lied about what Clapper said. There is no other was to view this. Clapper said, "We were investigating Russia", Trump said "Clapper admitted he was investigating me." Surely even you can see how this is a lie, right? Clapper admitted no such thing.

Finally, Obama hasn't said a peep about this, so I'm not sure why you are bringing him up. Clapper was brought into government by Bush Jr (a republican in case you forgot). Rosenstein is a republican, Mueller was appointed to his first US attorney job by your hero Reagan. This is not case of Democrats going after Republicans, this is all a case of level headed elected officials and government appointees from across the spectrum trying to use the system to do what the system was meant to do, and protect this country from enemies both foreign and domestic.

Now, I invite you to debate any of these facts, but debate them with facts, not name-calling and meaningless drivel. This board is tired of your constant, "Yea? well (insert democrat here) SUCKS!". make an argument you can be proud of.

Yeah I am tired of your ceaseless liberal lies and constant trump is the downfall of civilization just because your candidate ran a terrible candidate and lost to trump, an easily beatable foe.

There is no evidence of anything and this is just a hobby horse for you liberals to snack on your Hillary’s defeat.

Finally, of course I am going to make comparisons. The democrats always get away with stuff because of media interference and cover. Lest I remind you the Chinese bought and paid for Clinton in 1996.

Spare me your indignation and being tiredly of not responding with facts. No, the “facts” are your Don Lemon/Clapper lies and even when I respond your ilk just says Troll!! You liberal leftists don’t want debate, you want your precious Anet liberal echo chamber where the rest of you guys and gals camp out.
Who made you the avatar of this board. Illl keep coming at you liberals with my posts. Deal with it

texdravid wrote:

2122M wrote:

texdravid wrote:

Congratulations you have the ability to regurgitate all of CNN and MSNBC and Democrat crazy lies.

And may I remind you just because Obama or another democrat says it’s true does not mean it’s true. Especially given the fact that they are inveterate liars and racists and unquestionably anti-American.

There, I fixed it for you.

On a broader note, make fun of my media and politicians, expect return fire. And double the amount.

James Clapper is one of those insane liars trotted out by the MSM. He is the personification of the deep state trying to sabotage the Trump presidency. He is completely a fraud. He and Adam Schiff need to get a room with a threesome with Comey.

All that bluster aside. The fact is no-one was spying on Trump. He has no reason to suspect anyone was spying on him. And if anyone was spying on him, we would be hearing all about it today after Nunes and co met with the DOJ to discuss it.

And you don't have to like Clapper, but the quotes are there for you to read in full context and the fact is Trump lied about what Clapper said. There is no other was to view this. Clapper said, "We were investigating Russia", Trump said "Clapper admitted he was investigating me." Surely even you can see how this is a lie, right? Clapper admitted no such thing.

Finally, Obama hasn't said a peep about this, so I'm not sure why you are bringing him up. Clapper was brought into government by Bush Jr (a republican in case you forgot). Rosenstein is a republican, Mueller was appointed to his first US attorney job by your hero Reagan. This is not case of Democrats going after Republicans, this is all a case of level headed elected officials and government appointees from across the spectrum trying to use the system to do what the system was meant to do, and protect this country from enemies both foreign and domestic.

Now, I invite you to debate any of these facts, but debate them with facts, not name-calling and meaningless drivel. This board is tired of your constant, "Yea? well (insert democrat here) SUCKS!". make an argument you can be proud of.

Yeah I am tired of your ceaseless liberal lies and constant trump is the downfall of civilization just because your candidate ran a terrible candidate and lost to trump, an easily beatable foe.

There is no evidence of anything and this is just a hobby horse for you liberals to snack on your Hillary’s defeat.

Finally, of course I am going to make comparisons. The democrats always get away with stuff because of media interference and cover. Lest I remind you the Chinese bought and paid for Clinton in 1996.

Spare me your indignation and being tiredly of not responding with facts. No, the “facts” are your Don Lemon/Clapper lies and even when I respond your ilk just says Troll!! You liberal leftists don’t want debate, you want your precious Anet liberal echo chamber where the rest of you guys and gals camp out.
Who made you the avatar of this board. Illl keep coming at you liberals with my posts. Deal with it

CCGPV wrote:

LMP737 wrote:

seb146 wrote:

The bottom line is: you righties do not care that Russia meddled in our elections and anyone investigating Russia meddling in our elections is anti-American.

That's pretty much it in a nut shell. You know that if Bill and Chelsea Clinton had meet with a Russian national who said she had dirt on Trump and won the election guys like tex would be screaming from the rooftops about it. Lets be honest, the Republicans in congress would be drawing up articles of impeachment.

Well duh. Its not about the actual crime or whatever. Its about doing whatever can be done to stall or derail the agenda of the sitting president. Doesn't matter how its done as long as its done. There will always be threads of shady behavior the other side latches onto regardless of who is President.

seb146 wrote:

CCGPV wrote:

LMP737 wrote:

That's pretty much it in a nut shell. You know that if Bill and Chelsea Clinton had meet with a Russian national who said she had dirt on Trump and won the election guys like tex would be screaming from the rooftops about it. Lets be honest, the Republicans in congress would be drawing up articles of impeachment.

Well duh. Its not about the actual crime or whatever. Its about doing whatever can be done to stall or derail the agenda of the sitting president. Doesn't matter how its done as long as its done. There will always be threads of shady behavior the other side latches onto regardless of who is President.

No. Before Obama, the thought was "we have to do what is right for our constituents. When Obama became president, the only thing that mattered was erasing him from history and making everyone believe that he was the worst ever. Now, that Russia actually did aid in getting this orange menace elected, it is simple gaslighting. There has been no actual, real politics from the right since GWB left office.

What is the Republican replacement for affordable health care?
What is the Republican replacement for clean environment?
What is the Republican replacement for good paying jobs?
What is the Republican replacement for Iran?
What is the Republican replacement for border security?
What is the Republican replacement for the soaring debt and deficit they caused?

EDIT:

How many indictments were handed down for all the Hillary investigations? How many indictments were handed down investigating Russia's involvement in getting tRump installed? tRump uses and unsecured iPhone but was screaming "LOCK HER UP!!!" over an "unsecured" private email server. But, you righties still think nothing is wrong with your orange god?

jetero wrote:

seb146 wrote:

CCGPV wrote:

Well duh. Its not about the actual crime or whatever. Its about doing whatever can be done to stall or derail the agenda of the sitting president. Doesn't matter how its done as long as its done. There will always be threads of shady behavior the other side latches onto regardless of who is President.

No. Before Obama, the thought was "we have to do what is right for our constituents. When Obama became president, the only thing that mattered was erasing him from history and making everyone believe that he was the worst ever. Now, that Russia actually did aid in getting this orange menace elected, it is simple gaslighting. There has been no actual, real politics from the right since GWB left office.

What is the Republican replacement for affordable health care?
What is the Republican replacement for clean environment?
What is the Republican replacement for good paying jobs?
What is the Republican replacement for Iran?
What is the Republican replacement for border security?
What is the Republican replacement for the soaring debt and deficit they caused?

EDIT:

How many indictments were handed down for all the Hillary investigations? How many indictments were handed down investigating Russia's involvement in getting tRump installed? tRump uses and unsecured iPhone but was screaming "LOCK HER UP!!!" over an "unsecured" private email server. But, you righties still think nothing is wrong with your orange god?

Oooooooooooo maybe MSP will answer. He LOVES questions.

seb146 wrote:

What is the Republican replacement for border security?

jetero wrote:

Stupid Obummer really sent the B Team.

aviationaware wrote:

seb146 wrote:

What is the Republican replacement for border security?

Oh, so now the Democrats are the party of border security? That's a shocker.

seb146 wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

seb146 wrote:

What is the Republican replacement for border security?

Oh, so now the Democrats are the party of border security? That's a shocker.

Prove they are not.

2122M wrote:

Where you are wrong is that the mission makes a huge difference. He or she was not there to spy on Trump for the purpose of helping Clinton win the election (as Donald "the perpetual victim" Trump claims).

tommy1808 wrote:

2122M wrote:

Where you are wrong is that the mission makes a huge difference. He or she was not there to spy on Trump for the purpose of helping Clinton win the election (as Donald "the perpetual victim" Trump claims).

I think the most clever part of the deep states action, like with the Steele dossier, was to keep it all secret until after the election, because we all know that is the best way to win an election.

Best regards
Thomas

aviationaware wrote:

tommy1808 wrote:

2122M wrote:

Where you are wrong is that the mission makes a huge difference. He or she was not there to spy on Trump for the purpose of helping Clinton win the election (as Donald "the perpetual victim" Trump claims).

I think the most clever part of the deep states action, like with the Steele dossier, was to keep it all secret until after the election, because we all know that is the best way to win an election.

Best regards
Thomas

They thought Hillary had the election in the pocket. They thought they didn't need it. They didn't want to make Hillary's victory less glorious than it was going to be.

After they found out that didn't work, they threw it all in in the hopes of causing impeachment or at the very least curtail Trump's presidency to one term. Well, number one didn't work and neither will number two. So much failure is astonishing. The Deep State is unwinding.

aviationaware wrote:

Meanwhile, Trump's approval ratings are getting better as people just don't seem to care about all the lies put out about him.

You people keep losing and are still doubling down on your deadbeat tactics. What the heck guys, go for it. Giving us another four years in which the country can be made better and turned around.

aviationaware wrote:

Meanwhile, Trump's approval ratings are getting better as people just don't seem to care about all the lies put out about him.

tommy1808 wrote:

his approval rating is in a getting worse phase.

aviationaware wrote:

Meanwhile, Trump's approval ratings are getting better as people just don't seem to care about all the lies put out about him.

You people keep losing and are still doubling down on your deadbeat tactics. What the heck guys, go for it. Giving us another four years in which the country can be made better and turned around.

aviationaware wrote:

seb146 wrote:

aviationaware wrote:

Oh, so now the Democrats are the party of border security? That's a shocker.

Prove they are not.

Lol, this is ridiculous. Most Democratic office holders are against protecting the border from illegal crossings, are in favor of sanctuary policies and a good chunk is even actively hindering ICE from doing their work. You know there are actual things about the Republican party where railing against them could gain you real support from people like me, like the fact that they are not at all fiscally conservative when it comes to spending.
But by coming out and proclaiming that Republicans are against border security and Democrats are for it, you are just raising suspicions that you are actually living in an insane asylum and somehow managed to smuggle in your smartphone.

aviationaware wrote:

So you think that border security does not extend to those already in the country illegally. Sorry, but the discussion is basically over at this point. You are insane. Totally nuts. of course sanctuary policies protect criminal aliens. As does catch-and-release, another beauty that Democrats are defending with all they've got.

What would linking give me? The only outlets that report those things are conservative outlets that you won't accept as a credible source anyway, even if there is a video showing the Democrat saying it.

The bottom line is this: Democrats don't want a border wall. They don't want ICE to do their job. At the same time, they are appointing illegal aliens to be public officials (happened in California the other day) and even want to grant them citizenship, which is a huge draw for more illegal aliens to come. So you have both an incentive to come and quasi-open borders if Democrats had their way. And you want to tell me Democrats are for border security? Get back into your straitjacket where you belong.

Millions of decent people who would never even get the idea of immigrating illegaly would give everything to be allowed to come to America. Give them a chance instead of advocating to let in the dregs. Got a job waiting for you and don't have a criminal record? Great, prove it and welcome, no further questions asked. No job and/or criminal past? Stay the fuck out.

/e uh look what I found you, your next Speaker of the House (if you get your way when hell freezes over in November) thanking illegal aliens for breaking the law:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4713541/ ... eaking-law

jetero wrote:

Stupid Obummer really sent the B Team.

aviationaware wrote:

So you think that border security does not extend to those already in the country illegally. Sorry, but the discussion is basically over at this point. You are insane. Totally nuts. of course sanctuary policies protect criminal aliens. As does catch-and-release, another beauty that Democrats are defending with all they've got.

What would linking give me? The only outlets that report those things are conservative outlets that you won't accept as a credible source anyway, even if there is a video showing the Democrat saying it.

The bottom line is this: Democrats don't want a border wall. They don't want ICE to do their job. At the same time, they are appointing illegal aliens to be public officials (happened in California the other day) and even want to grant them citizenship, which is a huge draw for more illegal aliens to come. So you have both an incentive to come and quasi-open borders if Democrats had their way. And you want to tell me Democrats are for border security? Get back into your straitjacket where you belong.

Millions of decent people who would never even get the idea of immigrating illegaly would give everything to be allowed to come to America. Give them a chance instead of advocating to let in the dregs. Got a job waiting for you and don't have a criminal record? Great, prove it and welcome, no further questions asked. No job and/or criminal past? Stay the fuck out.

/e uh look what I found you, your next Speaker of the House (if you get your way when hell freezes over in November) thanking illegal aliens for breaking the law:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4713541/ ... eaking-law

aviationaware wrote:

I presented you a head honcho. Do you in all honesty think I will comb the internet until I have found every prominent Democrat saying something stupid just to satisfy you? I have better things to do with my time.