Yeah right....The US will NEVER attack NK because NK does not have any profit like Oil and Opium unlike Iraq and Afghanistan.
It will never happen. Trust me.
Secondly, NK is a very poor country and they do not have any missiles as a threat to the US and nearby US bases. I do not see any money coming in from a poor country like NK. They don't have the cash to do so.
The US is more focused on the Middle East, because of oil and opium, to them, that's more of a gain than attacking NK.
This has been going on for almost 10 to 20 years that NK will attack the US. The world is still spinning and there is nothing to talk about here. An attack from NK will NEVER happen, it is all a show.
So people, lets move on and forget about it.
NK can make threats, but if there is no action, then it is useless.
A lot of very flawed thinking there....
No NK does not have oil, however, nothing causes an uptick in a Presidents popularity like wagging a war following an attack on US citizens
Yes the NK is a poor country, however, they do have the money to develop missile systems and nukes to go on them, the missile part has been demonstrated already.
But now the US has a President in the White House that seems to be egging them on, two blowhards shouting threats at each other.
Yes NK can make threats and jump and down and not a whole lot will come from it, but it only take one mistake and all hell will break lose.
Nothing is going to come out of this ordeal with NK.
I am pretty sure Kim knows that the US has missile defenses spread across mainland North America and the Pacific.
He would be too dumb to start anything.
And besides, NK is too poor of a nation to have nuclear missiles. And likely they do not have one. Its all made up by the media.
If you all think I am wrong, please do so and explain where the cash flow is coming from in order to fund these NK missile programs?
As posted before, let me stress this one more time by saying that NK does not have any commodities like oil and opium unlike Iraq or Afghanistan and this is the reason that the US did not decapitate the NK leader. If we did it to UBL, why not Kim?? Can someone explain that to me as well?
There is NO EXCUSE as to why the US is unable to track down Kim. We have the technology and satellites to do so. So why not track down his compound?
The US has let it be known that there are THAD systems dotted all around the region.
And again, the people are poor, the country compared to a 1st world country is poor, but they have enough to develop nukes and weapons systems to carry them.
Why not take out Kim ? comparing a guy hiding in a compound in Pakistan to the head of a country is one heck of a leap, plus, the ramifications for taking out OBL were no where near the magnitude for taking out a sitting head of a country, even NK's.
NK sell's it's weapons systems to other countries, they have developed one hell of a money laundering scheme and yes, they sell drugs and natural resources, mostly being sold to China...
I have to figure SK politicians are going nuts right now trying to get some calm and order, the last thing they need is a war to break out to the north, it would leave SK in ruin...
And yes, I can believe that behind the scenes the US and China are talking, neither wants to get into a war with the other, the economics of it would cause massive damage to both countries. The question is of course, would China stand by and watch or would they get involved ?