Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
mham001 wrote:A history lesson for you. We were told in the 1960's that we needed to make fewer babies. There were too many people in the world and not enough water, resources, etc, etc. It was a major drive to limit population growth. In large part, whites responded, blacks and latinos, not so much.
NOW, the very same people are telling us we need to open the borders to any and every indigent that wants in and limiting that in any way is RACISM. On top of that, we need to give every brown, black and yellow person, and their offspring, Affirmative Action rights meant for descendants of black slaves. Rights that put them at the front of the line for education and employment opportunities.
Polot wrote:mham001 wrote:A history lesson for you. We were told in the 1960's that we needed to make fewer babies. There were too many people in the world and not enough water, resources, etc, etc. It was a major drive to limit population growth. In large part, whites responded, blacks and latinos, not so much.
NOW, the very same people are telling us we need to open the borders to any and every indigent that wants in and limiting that in any way is RACISM. On top of that, we need to give every brown, black and yellow person, and their offspring, Affirmative Action rights meant for descendants of black slaves. Rights that put them at the front of the line for education and employment opportunities.
No, NOW those are the very same people that want to "make America great again." Frequently known as baby boomers. Steve King is, surprise surprise, a member of that group.
mham001 wrote:
That crap is only going to fly so far.
Hillis wrote:.
Hillis wrote:This kind of talk is straight out of Nazi Germany and the belief in an "Aryan" race.
http://siouxcityjournal.com/news/state- ... a6d32.html
In other words, he wants only white babies to be born, not any of color, or of a religion beyond Christianity, or from outside Western Civilization. The guy should be wearing a white sheet, not a suit.
mham001 wrote:Hillis wrote:.
And despite all that blah, blah, blah, no other country on earth is willingly opening its doors, inviting all other cultures in and saying "here we are, overwhelm us, change us in any way you see fit". Well, outside of some 'guilty white' European countries.
And why should they? All other cultures are allowed their "pride", even more so once they arrive here, yet whites are told "pride" is racist, we need to step aside and give all brown, black and yellow special preference. Bullshit. ALL people have a say in their destiny - even white people. And I say this as a proud father of half-white children who will make it in this world without "special" preferences.
Hillis wrote:But you're on the wrong side of what the future will be. The white race's unchallenged dominance of this nation is over. As a white man, whose family came over here in the 1640's, I welcome that. You shudder in fear because of it.
pvjin wrote:White race will be over, not just their dominance. Stop hiding the fact you enjoy seeing people of white skin colour go extinct.
tommy1808 wrote:pvjin wrote:White race will be over, not just their dominance. Stop hiding the fact you enjoy seeing people of white skin colour go extinct.
1. There is no such things as a "White Race" as something that can go extinct, the concept is not applicable to homo sapiens sapiens. We are all genetically much to close. "Race" means basically culture.
2. All "Races" will disappear once racism is gone, interbreeding will level out differeces quite quickly. A world without races seems therefore highly desireable.
Of course those will be hard time for racists, but I am sure that lot will come up with something else.
Best regards
Thomas
tommy1808 wrote:pvjin wrote:White race will be over, not just their dominance. Stop hiding the fact you enjoy seeing people of white skin colour go extinct.
1. There is no such things as a "White Race" as something that can go extinct, the concept is not applicable to homo sapiens sapiens. We are all genetically much to close. "Race" means basically culture.
2. All "Races" will disappear once racism is gone, interbreeding will level out differeces quite quickly. A world without races seems therefore highly desireable.
Of course those will be hard time for racists, but I am sure that lot will come up with something else.
Best regards
Thomas
Hillis wrote:I'm white. I've been a member of the most powerful class of person ever to walk the planet, namely a white, American male. But unlike mham001, and, seemingly yourself, i am not filled with fear or anger or hatred because the time of the white male completely dominating the political, social and economic trajectory of this nation is coming to an end. I welcome it. I think we will be a far more equal, just nation when that happens. Mham001 is scared out of his gourd about it because he feels he's better than everyone who doesn't look, talk or pray like he does.
pvjin wrote:2. I don't see why a world with as little genetic and cultural variety as possible is so desirable. I find that highly boring, and it wouldn't really solve any problems as war and short sighted thinking are part of human nature.
MSPNWA wrote:. American was not built on widely differing cultures, and it will be destroyed if we create a melting pot of radically different ones..
mham001 wrote:A history lesson for you. We were told in the 1960's that we needed to make fewer babies. There were too many people in the world and not enough water, resources, etc, etc. It was a major drive to limit population growth. In large part, whites responded, blacks and latinos, not so much.
MSPNWA wrote:American was not built on widely differing cultures
LAX772LR wrote:MSPNWA wrote:American was not built on widely differing cultures
THAT is quite possibly the single most factually ignorant (in a long litany of utterly imbecilic) things I've ever heard you say... wow.
LAX772LR wrote:MSPNWA wrote:American was not built on widely differing cultures
THAT is quite possibly the single most factually ignorant (in a long litany of utterly imbecilic) things I've ever heard you say... wow.
afcjets wrote:
"In 1965, Congress passed the Immigration and Nationality Act, which did away with quotas based on nationality and allowed Americans to sponsor relatives from their countries of origin. As a result of this act and subsequent legislation, the nation experienced a shift in immigration patterns. Today, the majority of U.S. immigrants come from Asia and Latin America rather than Europe."
http://www.history.com/topics/u-s-immig ... efore-1965
Hillis wrote:
And THAT is why so many whites voted for Trump. Had all these immigrants been from Europe, even if they were illegal, you wouldn't hear a peep from whites, not one.
Hillis wrote:the political, social and economic direction of this nation.
afcjets wrote:The reason though is immigrants fleeing from poorer nations are more likely to use welfare programs
afcjets wrote:many Americans including myself do not want future Democrats
LAX772LR wrote:And yet you lack the mental wherewithal to figure out that your habit of being such insufferable assholes to those different than you, is what drives them to default to the Democrats/Left.
LAX772LR wrote:Heck, strict Muslims would be a natural fit for the GOP, especially the wealthy ones-- already believe in 99% of the same stuff, just call it different names.
LAX772LR wrote:afcjets wrote:The reason though is immigrants fleeing from poorer nations are more likely to use welfare programs
Until you realize that 1) they stay on it for a far shorter time than native-born USAmericans, and 2) they're TWICE as likely to start their own small business than native-born as well.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/0 ... 99719.html
afcjets wrote:LAX772LR wrote:And yet you lack the mental wherewithal to figure out that your habit of being such insufferable assholes to those different than you, is what drives them to default to the Democrats/Left.
How many Hispanic votes did Republicans pick up in the Presidential election after Reagan granted amnesty to 3.2 million in 1986?
afcjets wrote:LAX772LR wrote:Heck, strict Muslims would be a natural fit for the GOP, especially the wealthy ones-- already believe in 99% of the same stuff, just call it different names.
So should Mexicans, most are Christian morseo than White Americans and have strong family values and lower divorce rates too.
afcjets wrote:The word fleeing should have also been a reminder that is the type of immigrant I was referring to.
mham001 wrote:A history lesson for you. We were told in the 1960's that we needed to make fewer babies. There were too many people in the world and not enough water, resources, etc, etc. It was a major drive to limit population growth. In large part, whites responded, blacks and latinos, not so much.
LAX772LR wrote:afcjets wrote:LAX772LR wrote:And yet you lack the mental wherewithal to figure out that your habit of being such insufferable assholes to those different than you, is what drives them to default to the Democrats/Left.
How many Hispanic votes did Republicans pick up in the Presidential election after Reagan granted amnesty to 3.2 million in 1986?
And you're having trouble figuring out why?
If so, then you're just exemplifying my statement above......
LAX772LR wrote:afcjets wrote:The word fleeing should have also been a reminder that is the type of immigrant I was referring to.
Because "fleeing" connotes legal status, huh? Interesting.
I'm sure undocumented Latinos who've fled everything from the juntas, to the cartels, to the salvatrucha guerrilla conflicts; would be thrilled to know that.
Hillis wrote:mham001 wrote:Hillis wrote:.
And despite all that blah, blah, blah, no other country on earth is willingly opening its doors, inviting all other cultures in and saying "here we are, overwhelm us, change us in any way you see fit". Well, outside of some 'guilty white' European countries.
And why should they? All other cultures are allowed their "pride", even more so once they arrive here, yet whites are told "pride" is racist, we need to step aside and give all brown, black and yellow special preference. Bullshit. ALL people have a say in their destiny - even white people. And I say this as a proud father of half-white children who will make it in this world without "special" preferences.
You just don't get it. We ARE a nation of immigrants. You seem to think this nation is for whitebread only, and no one else. Immigration isn't a weakness for us, it's a strength. It's what makes us such a great country. What does the Statue of Liberty say? "Give me your tired, your poor, your hungry, your huddled masses, yearning to be free..."?
That's what the promise of America is-to be free. To escape war. To escape political, social or religous persecution. Our Founding Fathers and their ancestors came to these shores to flee those things. Is it, in your view, only legitimate if they're white? Most of the world isn't white, and that seems to escape you.
You know, when you resort to responding "blah, blah, blah", you're beaten. By doing that you concede that 1. you're a racist, and 2. that you have no real answers to what I said. You feel this nation is for whites only. That's overwhelmingly apparent in your posts. Why not be a man, and just say that?
But you're on the wrong side of what the future will be. The white race's unchallenged dominance of this nation is over. As a white man, whose family came over here in the 1640's, I welcome that. You shudder in fear because of it.