Spyhunter wrote:No, they can't move mountains!
Only if you refuse to accept the customary reading of Matthew 17:20.
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
Spyhunter wrote:No, they can't move mountains!
Spyhunter wrote:I hope nobody is flying to Pyongyang in the next few weeks! Should be able to avoid a war, and if there is one it should be conventional only, with a win for the Good Guys. Thankfully, with President Trump in power, there won't be a silly Eisenhower-style truce.
BobPatterson wrote:Spyhunter wrote:No, they can't move mountains!
Only if you refuse to accept the customary reading of Matthew 17:20.
Dutchy wrote:BobPatterson wrote:Spyhunter wrote:No, they can't move mountains!
Only if you refuse to accept the customary reading of Matthew 17:20.
This is the Bible I guess, hopefully, you are not a person whom takes this book literary, now do you?
BobPatterson wrote:Dutchy wrote:BobPatterson wrote:Only if you refuse to accept the customary reading of Matthew 17:20.
This is the Bible I guess, hopefully, you are not a person whom takes this book literary, now do you?
Hopefully? Why would you have hopes about what someone else thinks about scripture?
Is your "hope" similar to that mentioned in Hebrews 11:1 ?
In any event, I have several times reported that I am an agnostic.
Dutchy wrote:BobPatterson wrote:Dutchy wrote:
This is the Bible I guess, hopefully, you are not a person whom takes this book literary, now do you?
Hopefully? Why would you have hopes about what someone else thinks about scripture?
Is your "hope" similar to that mentioned in Hebrews 11:1 ?
In any event, I have several times reported that I am an agnostic.
why quote the scripture then. You got me confused
BobPatterson wrote:LOL, as they say in the Netherlands... uitgeluld. (I won't translate literally, suffice to say no you've got a good point )The scriptures are no more crazy as hypotheses than some of the stuff I've seen posted by Spyhunter and other conspiracy "theorists".
Spyhunter wrote:Responding to 777 Jet, the situation is escalating, but I don't think hostilities will resume. Sanctions will bite a bit harder,but won't work, Trump can't resume hostilities unless there's an Act of War, and I think Pyongyang will stick to the war of words. It's not a stable situation however.
If war comes its more likely to be conventional.
777Jet wrote:I'd also like to see NK's rockets / ICBMs get shot down, especially anything flying towards Japan...
Spyhunter wrote:The ATSB report is junk
N14AZ wrote:That's all? Such a simple explanation?
Spyhunter wrote:The ATSB report is junk - they can come up with as many search areas as they like, but they aren't going to find the plane in the Indian Ocean! I query the good faith of ATSB - they must know by now she went down in the SCS.
WIederling wrote:Performance of all the Anti *BM thingies is rather unreliable.
Imagine the "egg on face" effects if Trump goes for having an NK missile shot down without success.
Then most of the path is in space. Taking down an NK missile by the US in space would open
the path for "anyone" taking down US assets in orbit.
777Jet wrote:I believe that attempting to shoot down an ICBM, possibly with a nuclear warhead on it and launched from a country who has threatened to turn your country into a sea of fire, heading your way as a self defence measure does not all of a sudden open the path for anyone to take down your assets (especially non-military) in orbit. Are countries just supposed to sit back and wait until they get nuked first before it becomes fair game to defend yourself?
WIederling wrote:What is your position on up-arming of countries that are threatened by the US?
Spyhunter wrote:Any report suggesting the SIO is junk - the plane's in the South China Sea!
Spyhunter wrote:There is still no answer to the arguments I and others have been putting forward.
Spyhunter wrote:Malcolm Turnbull and I have issues.
Spyhunter wrote:Interesting,wasn't aware that the Malaysian consul had been taken out!
9MMPQ wrote:Slightly worried here you were not aware.
9MMPQ wrote:When do you expect to break the real location of MH370 to the rest of the world ?
neutrino wrote:Humans are not infallible. Even the best would at times, rare as it might be, miss something somewhere.
neutrino wrote:But still a human nonetheless
Spyhunter wrote:Interesting,wasn't aware that the Malaysian consul had been taken out! With official cover-ups we often find secondary assassinations. Raza may have discovered that the wreckage was a phoney.
Looked at the ATSB Final Report on 370. It's Janet & John nonsense. It effectively confirms that 370 didn't go down over the SIO - the search was thorough and exhaustive, and found zilch.
Spyhunter wrote:Raza may have discovered that the wreckage was a phoney.
Spyhunter wrote:370 didn't go down over the SIO - the search was thorough and exhaustive, and found zilch.
BlueberryWheats wrote:Raza finds out about the conspiracy and winds up dead, and you've been spouting it all over this forum for months and not so much as a single hair on your head comes to harm.
Spyhunter wrote:MH370 lies on the floor of the South China Sea, slightly off her flight-path, i.e. beneath where she was shot down.
777Jet wrote:Is there anybody out there who agrees with you?
scbriml wrote:777Jet wrote:Is there anybody out there who agrees with you?
Are you serious? The evidence presented is overwhelming, any jury would be convinced.
Dutchy wrote:Do I detect a slightly sarcastic tone here?
scbriml wrote:Dutchy wrote:Do I detect a slightly sarcastic tone here?
To quote Francis Urquhart - you might very well think that, I couldn't possibly comment.
scbriml wrote:Dutchy wrote:Do I detect a slightly sarcastic tone here?
To quote Francis Urquhart - you might very well think that, I couldn't possibly comment.
Spyhunter wrote:Lots of people agree with me inside the Intel Community, plus the Chinese and Australian governments, and probably the Malaysian as well!
The SIO theory is a load of Janet and John nonsense. It's strictly for public consumption only, bit like man-made global warming.
From the way that you're all having a go at me anyone would think the plane had been found! All we have is an assortment of bits which could have come off any old 777. No bodies, no hull, no engines, no Mayday call, no reliable data transfer from the plane - it's hopeless.
The SIO search was pretty thorough, and a complete and shameful waste of time and public money. The Chinese shot the plane down, and it's on the floor in the SCS.
seahawk wrote:It was on the ocean floor, All larger parts have been salvaged today.
seahawk wrote:No, it was the Chinese navy with the DVD.
Spyhunter wrote:Lots of people agree with me inside the Intel Community, plus the Chinese and Australian governments, and probably the Malaysian as well!
Spyhunter wrote:From the way that you're all having a go at me anyone would think the plane had been found! All we have is an assortment of bits which could have come off any old 777. No bodies, no hull, no engines, no Mayday call, no reliable data transfer from the plane - it's hopeless.
Spyhunter wrote:The SIO search was pretty thorough, and a complete and shameful waste of time and public money.
Spyhunter wrote:TThe Chinese shot the plane down, and it's on the floor in the SCS.
Spyhunter wrote:Ah, but there's been no serious search of the SIO, 777 Jet! She won't be in one piece, she went in fast and steep, hence only one bit of wreckage on the surface.
Lots of things get covered up - look at the Las Vegas shootings. Two shooters, minimum, cross-fire, with a belt-fed 30 ca. and all the media talk about is Paddock!
777Jet wrote:Any company offering a 'no find no fee' proposal must be pretty confident in the area they will be searching...