neutrino wrote:Dutchy wrote:I would like to end this with a glass of whisky
Singleton?
We'll see what mr. Spyhunter will bring me
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
neutrino wrote:Dutchy wrote:I would like to end this with a glass of whisky
Singleton?
Spyhunter wrote:My analysis of the MH370 shootdown, so far as I know, has been accepted behind the scenes by the Australian
Spyhunter wrote:Thank you Seahawk, for the compliment, even if I detect a slight back-handed element! I suspect however that Captain Dubois was pretty smart too - not hing I've seen or read leads me to doubt either his professionalism or his abilities as a pilot.
Spyhunter wrote:That's just for public consumption, 777! If you believe Peking they actually buy into the Anthropgenic Global Warming Hypothesis!
China is a major Australian export partner and I think the largest customer for Aussie minerals. Of course Canberra is going to pretend the aircraft is missing.
They are not however going to waste a lot of resources on the SIO search. They scaled down their search involvement after I tipped them off about the Chinese shoot-down of MH370 and Tony Abbott verified my intel with Razak. Malaysia is a ChiCom client state - they aren't going to do anything.
seahawk wrote:Question 1 is easy.
The Chinese and the DVD had ships in place that fished out all debris which was later planted in the Indian Ocean.
Spyhunter wrote:777 Jet: we are going over old ground!
Spyhunter wrote:As I have pointed out before there WAS wreckage in the South China Sea search area which I am satisfied was identified by Boeing as coming from a 777. With a steep dive angle we would not expect to see significant amounts of wreckage on the ocean surface.
There is no audit trail linking any of the IO wreckage to 9M-MRO and none of that wreckage was found in the primary search area. There is also no explanation for the delay in finding this wreckage, other than it was dumped many months after the shoot-down. In particular there is no explanation for the lack of satellite imagery showing this wreckage on the ocean surface, other than it was never there.
The aggressor state, the People's Republic of China, has numerous 777 aircraft on its registry. No checks have been done, or could be done, to determine what parts if any have been stripped from these aircraft, nor are Boeing denying that they supplied replacement parts.
I am confident to a moral certainty that the PLA Navy shot down flight MH370 over the South China Sea.
For those new to the discussion the reasons I reject the SIO theory, inter alia, are that:
(1) The aircraft was observed on Vietnamese civil and military radar performing radical manoeuvres over the South China Sea consistent with missile evasion.
(2) Malaysia is effectively a Chinese client state and would be expected to participate in the cover-up of a mass-murder by the PLA Navy.
(3) No Mayday signal was transmitted from the aircraft, consistent with radio jamming, probably by another aircraft.
(4) The crew were competent and loyal. There is no reason to suppose that they would divert from their flight plan.
(5) The aircraft was not observed making a transit of the Malay Peninsula by Malaysian civil radar.
(6) The incident was within range of the USS Pinckney's search radar. Had the aircraft flown across the Malay Peninsula such a manoeuvre would have been observed in the CIC on board the Pinckney and also by satellite.
(7) The US Administration at the time was a corrupt, Democratic administration close to China, to the point of exporting American jobs to China and tolerating Chinese currency manipulation. The Democratic president was also compromised by intelligence files stolen by the Chinese agent Edward Snowden. He also lacked moral fibre, with respect, and would not have been expected to condemn an incident of mass-murder by the Chinese Navy in the way that say President Reagan condemned the Soviet Union over the shoot-down of KAL007.
(8) The aircraft was not observed on Indonesian civil or military radar.
(9) The predicted course for the aircraft brought it within range of operational, upgraded Indian military radar systems in the Andaman Islands and within search radar range of Indian Navy warships. No Indian naval or military system detected MH370 in Indian airspace, yet it had to transit Indian airspace in order to reach the SIO.
(10) The aircraft was not detected by the RAAF's Jindalee long-range radar system, ruling out a transit of the Northern Indian Ocean.
(11) The published fuel figures are inconsistent with the fuel reserves policy adopted by Malaysian Airlines at a time of high Jet A1 prices.
(12) Even on the published fuel figures the aircraft did not have sufficient endurance to reach the primary SIO search area, based on the disputed ping evidence, had it flown its published route to the alleged Deviation Point, performed the radical manoeuvres observed near the DP and dog-legged around Sumatra, which it would have to have done, as we know it did transit Sumatra. This discredits the pig evidence and
(13) No wreckage was found in the SIO, even using military side-scan sonar.
seahawk wrote:The plane was shot down by a submarine launched missile in the SCS.
Spyhunter wrote:Those of us who possess the gift of high intelligence have a duty to use it, for the common good. My aim is quite simple - I want this war crime exposed, I want the criminals and state responsible held to account and I don't want to see any more airliner shoot-downs.
In pursuit of these aims I am willing to endure as much abuse and mockery as is thrown at me.
Spyhunter wrote:Some on this thread are still resorting to mockery and ad hominem attacks. These are the weakest form of argument. It's one reason why mass-murder is so easy - people fall over themselves to swallow comforting official versions of events and the media round on anybody asking intelligent questions as conspiracy theorists, before going on to defend public authorities who build deathtraps and then don't put in fire precautions.
Spyhunter wrote:Preliminary views on the London fire,777: there was a large ISIS cell in the building, a terrorist attack was imminent,possibly on the crowds attending the Trooping of the Colour and some TATP being stored in a fridge cooked off,blowing out the windows. Fire then raced up the flammable external cladding, which was not designed to deal with an uncontained fire.
BlueberryWheats wrote:I'm curious as to which disasters were actually just accidents/mechanical failure and not some political set up.
Spyhunter wrote:So why are we losing so many wide-bodies?
BlueberryWheats wrote:If the DVD were all big and powerful like you say and with a particular flair for covering their tracks, surely they would have constructed a little accident for people who are spreading the fact that they were behind all of these events?
BlueberryWheats wrote:If the DVD were all big and powerful like you say and with a particular flair for covering their tracks, surely they would have constructed a little accident for people who are spreading the fact that they were behind all of these events?
seahawk wrote:BlueberryWheats wrote:If the DVD were all big and powerful like you say and with a particular flair for covering their tracks, surely they would have constructed a little accident for people who are spreading the fact that they were behind all of these events?
No need, as long as the majority sees those people as nut jobs it helps the DVD´s cause. I am sure the DVD has people here posting and making sure that the truths is not discovered by manipulating the context of the discussion. They might even support spyhunter to discredit him.
No need, as long as the majority sees those people as nut jobs it helps the DVD´s cause. I am sure the DVD has people here posting and making sure that the truths is not discovered by manipulating the context of the discussion. They might even support spyhunter to discredit him.
BlueberryWheats wrote:No need, as long as the majority sees those people as nut jobs it helps the DVD´s cause. I am sure the DVD has people here posting and making sure that the truths is not discovered by manipulating the context of the discussion. They might even support spyhunter to discredit him.
Spyhunter wrote:The DVD's Boris Laputin tried to assassinate me in 1999 and didn't do a very good job of it, obviously, for which he paid with his own life. Since then the DVD and GO2 have followed a tactic of trying to discredit me, undermine my income and keep me out of office. The problem is that the last attack was so crude it's threatening to blow up in their faces, big time.
Thanks for the comment, Braniff1!
Spyhunter wrote:The DVD's Boris Laputin tried to assassinate me in 1999 and didn't do a very good job of it, obviously, for which he paid with his own life. Since then the DVD and GO2 have followed a tactic of trying to discredit me, undermine my income and keep me out of office. The problem is that the last attack was so crude it's threatening to blow up in their faces, big time.!
Spyhunter wrote:The DVD's Boris Laputin tried to assassinate me in 1999 and didn't do a very good job of it, obviously, for which he paid with his own life. Since then the DVD and GO2 have followed a tactic of trying to discredit me, undermine my income and keep me out of office. The problem is that the last attack was so crude it's threatening to blow up in their faces, big time.
Thanks for the comment, Braniff1!
BlueberryWheats wrote:Spyhunter wrote:The DVD's Boris Laputin tried to assassinate me in 1999 and didn't do a very good job of it, obviously, for which he paid with his own life. Since then the DVD and GO2 have followed a tactic of trying to discredit me, undermine my income and keep me out of office. The problem is that the last attack was so crude it's threatening to blow up in their faces, big time.
Thanks for the comment, Braniff1!
Well, according to you they have quite a penchant for taking airliners from the sky. If any of this fantasy is at all real do you not think they could just target a commercial flight with you on board?
I suppose what I'm saying is that if the DVD are anywhere near as powerful as you make out, they would have no problem at all taking out particular people. Unless you're Superman. Wait... you're not Superman are you!?
BlueberryWheats wrote:Spyhunter wrote:The DVD's Boris Laputin tried to assassinate me in 1999 and didn't do a very good job of it, obviously, for which he paid with his own life. Since then the DVD and GO2 have followed a tactic of trying to discredit me, undermine my income and keep me out of office. The problem is that the last attack was so crude it's threatening to blow up in their faces, big time.
Thanks for the comment, Braniff1!
Well, according to you they have quite a penchant for taking airliners from the sky. If any of this fantasy is at all real do you not think they could just target a commercial flight with you on board?
Spyhunter wrote:...Amelia and Fred were shot down and captured by the Japanese.
Moose135 wrote:Spyhunter wrote:...Amelia and Fred were shot down and captured by the Japanese.
Certainly the Japanese were working for the DVD on that one, right?