steman
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2000 4:55 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Thu May 18, 2017 11:51 am

seahawk wrote:
steman wrote:
The Tornado is compatible with US atomic weapons and it´s been so since the beginning. So is the SEAD role. These are not the discriminating factors that will make the F-35 the only option for the Luftwaffe.


They are, because with the Tornado the partner nations were all user of US atomic weapons. Be it through owning some themselves or been given access to them in case of war. So the integration of the necessary equipment and the testing were part of the development and part of a huge combined purchase.

Today it is different. First the theoretical production run of a partnership with France and Sweden would hardly reach 300 (I personally would rather guess less than 200 for all 3 nations combined) frames combined, while the Germans would need to get US approval for the atomic weapons integration and would need to pay for it, while maybe needing 80 (or more like 50) frames. And in addition to needing US approval the French and Swedes would also need to agree to Germany using the design for that role. When it comes to SEAD it is not much different. Neither Sweden nor France have a suitable weapons system. The US has.

I am not a fan of the F-35, but for German needs when it comes to replacing the remaining Tonkas, it is an obvious choice.



I understand and I agree with you. I´m just concerned that Europe is losing the know how necessary to develop indigenous advanced military programs and will have to rely even more on the US to maintain a credible defense. This was ok during cold war times but in my opinion this is just dangerous now.
At least they should start working on a Typhoon replacement and try and involve UK, Italy, Spain and possibly even France. It will be then possible to make it a fully multi role platform capable of replacing air defence as well as attack aircrafts in all partner nations. But they have to start soon because it´s going to take at least 20 years to make it fly operationally. The technical capability is still mostly there. It´s the political will that is lacking.
 
User avatar
seahawk
Posts: 5506
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Thu May 18, 2017 11:58 am

YIMBY wrote:
seahawk wrote:
Spain is practically out, as they have clearly stated that the next fighter would not only replace the Hornets but also the Harriers of the Armada. Add the fact, that Germany needs a plane compatible with US atomic weapons and also for the SEAD role it becomes clear that F35 it is.


No, it is far from clear. Selecting a military plane is never a purely technical case, but there are always subtle political dimensions included (and in many parts of the world a lot of corruption, hopefully not here). It may be even a personal issue, and given how much Trump has humiliated Merkel, it would be very hard for her to accept a major deal with the US, unless Trump makes some major concessions. Of course, it may take so much time to finish the deal that neither of them would remain in office.


I seriously hope Germany is above that. The system that matches the needs of the armed forces and offers the best combination of low price and low development risk, should be chosen, regardless of any feeling of politicians that might be hurt. And considering that Germany has bought C-130s and looks set to buy CH-47 or CH-53, I think Trump so far had no influence.

steman wrote:
seahawk wrote:
steman wrote:
The Tornado is compatible with US atomic weapons and it´s been so since the beginning. So is the SEAD role. These are not the discriminating factors that will make the F-35 the only option for the Luftwaffe.


They are, because with the Tornado the partner nations were all user of US atomic weapons. Be it through owning some themselves or been given access to them in case of war. So the integration of the necessary equipment and the testing were part of the development and part of a huge combined purchase.

Today it is different. First the theoretical production run of a partnership with France and Sweden would hardly reach 300 (I personally would rather guess less than 200 for all 3 nations combined) frames combined, while the Germans would need to get US approval for the atomic weapons integration and would need to pay for it, while maybe needing 80 (or more like 50) frames. And in addition to needing US approval the French and Swedes would also need to agree to Germany using the design for that role. When it comes to SEAD it is not much different. Neither Sweden nor France have a suitable weapons system. The US has.

I am not a fan of the F-35, but for German needs when it comes to replacing the remaining Tonkas, it is an obvious choice.


I understand and I agree with you. I´m just concerned that Europe is losing the know how necessary to develop indigenous advanced military programs and will have to rely even more on the US to maintain a credible defense. This was ok during cold war times but in my opinion this is just dangerous now.
At least they should start working on a Typhoon replacement and try and involve UK, Italy, Spain and possibly even France. It will be then possible to make it a fully multi role platform capable of replacing air defence as well as attack aircrafts in all partner nations. But they have to start soon because it´s going to take at least 20 years to make it fly operationally. The technical capability is still mostly there. It´s the political will that is lacking.


I fully agree. The replacement of EF, Rafale and Gripen should be a joint European program. (not that I believe this would happen)
 
TheSonntag
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 7:23 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Thu May 18, 2017 12:26 pm

Well maybe times are not so bad for a new project. The Eurofighter was threatened from the beginning because it was developed at the end of the cold war so budget and political constraints were an issue. Now there is a new understanding of an european defense need and Merkel and Macron try to find new fields for cooperation post Brexit. The UK could see its participation as foot in the door.

I fail to see Sweden in that Picture but there certainly is a need for such a project.

Also the germans traditionally dislike one Engine Planes.
 
User avatar
Slug71
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:08 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Thu May 18, 2017 4:53 pm

I wonder why countries shopping for fighters aren't looking at the F/C-31. At least the frame. Put some F414 engines and electronics of their choice on there, should be a good fighter.
 
steman
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2000 4:55 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Fri May 19, 2017 6:51 am

Slug71 wrote:
I wonder why countries shopping for fighters aren't looking at the F/C-31. At least the frame. Put some F414 engines and electronics of their choice on there, should be a good fighter.


Because the Chinese will never let you have their frame and slap your own engine on it. Because the cost of such operation it´s almost as high as developing a new frame from scrap. It´s not just about swapping engine and replacing some electronic boards. Because buying fighters from China is still not a politically acceptable option for European Countries and I think the cost of introducing a fighter designed with very different philosophy and systems into a Nato Air Force would be prohibitive.
In my opinion there are only two options for the replacement of the Luftwaffe Tornado: buy the F-35 or develop a new design. As interim one could consider a new version of the Typhoon, dedicated to strike and air-to-ground roles.
 
columba
Topic Author
Posts: 5087
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:12 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Fri May 19, 2017 7:35 am

steman wrote:
Slug71 wrote:
. As interim one could consider a new version of the Typhoon, dedicated to strike and air-to-ground roles.

Or the Super Hornet.....
It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
 
steman
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2000 4:55 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Fri May 19, 2017 8:01 am

columba wrote:
steman wrote:
Slug71 wrote:
. As interim one could consider a new version of the Typhoon, dedicated to strike and air-to-ground roles.

Or the Super Hornet.....


Well, in that case the whole argument of trying not to rely on US products would be moot. Then better get some F-35s and work on a future generation to replace them in 20/30 years.
 
User avatar
Aesma
Posts: 9199
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:14 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Fri May 19, 2017 1:26 pm

Slug71 wrote:
I wonder why countries shopping for fighters aren't looking at the F/C-31. At least the frame. Put some F414 engines and electronics of their choice on there, should be a good fighter.


First, is it for sale ?

The F-22 wasn't.
New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
 
User avatar
Slug71
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:08 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Fri May 19, 2017 3:47 pm

Aesma wrote:
Slug71 wrote:
I wonder why countries shopping for fighters aren't looking at the F/C-31. At least the frame. Put some F414 engines and electronics of their choice on there, should be a good fighter.


First, is it for sale ?

The F-22 wasn't.


IIRC, the export variant is dubbed the F-60.
 
YIMBY
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2016 4:32 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Fri May 19, 2017 6:39 pm

seahawk wrote:
YIMBY wrote:
seahawk wrote:
Spain is practically out, as they have clearly stated that the next fighter would not only replace the Hornets but also the Harriers of the Armada. Add the fact, that Germany needs a plane compatible with US atomic weapons and also for the SEAD role it becomes clear that F35 it is.


No, it is far from clear. Selecting a military plane is never a purely technical case, but there are always subtle political dimensions included (and in many parts of the world a lot of corruption, hopefully not here). It may be even a personal issue, and given how much Trump has humiliated Merkel, it would be very hard for her to accept a major deal with the US, unless Trump makes some major concessions. Of course, it may take so much time to finish the deal that neither of them would remain in office.


I seriously hope Germany is above that. The system that matches the needs of the armed forces and offers the best combination of low price and low development risk, should be chosen, regardless of any feeling of politicians that might be hurt. And considering that Germany has bought C-130s and looks set to buy CH-47 or CH-53, I think Trump so far had no influence.


If any country, the German can separate the feelings from rational decisions. Nevertheless, the politicians have to take into account the feelings of the voters.
You know certainly better than me how well they have succeeded in previous projects (Tornado, Typhoon, A400 etc).

In all other countries, feelings do matter. You might take Canada as an example of a very civilized country that has it very hard to separate facts from feelings, or maybe they do have justified reasons to play games.

More than feelings, however, it is about trust. You have to trust that your supplier will give you support at the crisis, that you will be able to do all necessary maintenance and updates when you need to do, and that no representative of the other party will reveal confidential data to third parties. Certainly nobody trusts Trump on this. Fortunately Trump is not a dictator of the US but has to obey the laws, though he has enough power to hurt and delay any deal or operation to complicate the lives of other parties.
 
User avatar
seahawk
Posts: 5506
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sat May 20, 2017 9:01 am

Considering how baldy the latest Airbus projects did, I think buying from Lockmart is easier to sell at the moment. And as the planes would most likely come from the Italian final assembly and that there will be complete overhaul facility in Europe, I think is easier than suggesting another Airbus project at the moment.
 
WIederling
Posts: 4058
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon May 22, 2017 6:54 am

seahawk wrote:
Considering how badly the latest Airbus projects did, I think buying from Lockmart is easier to sell at the moment.


That was the objective of the press attention lavishly spent on the European public.
See Ms. Lügenulla Leyen's gyrations on a range of alleged "defective" military procurements.

The hard reality is slightly different.

Then Europe has decidedly different objectives in general politics than the US.
( The biggest supporters of terrorism ( US, SA, Israel, ..) are currently in a communist kissing spree while exchange expensive gifts.)

Europe is well served to limit procurement from a source that is well known to change loyalties on a whim.
Murphy is an optimist
 
User avatar
seahawk
Posts: 5506
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon May 22, 2017 7:59 am

Changes little in regard to the technical problems of the NH90 / A400.
 
User avatar
Aesma
Posts: 9199
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:14 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon May 22, 2017 8:13 am

The F-35 project isn't well known for being on time and on budget...
New Technology is the name we give to stuff that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams
 
ThePointblank
Posts: 2866
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:39 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon May 22, 2017 10:06 am

Aesma wrote:
The F-35 project isn't well known for being on time and on budget...

By the time a German order comes along, the F-35 would be fairly mature and in full production.
 
User avatar
seahawk
Posts: 5506
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon May 22, 2017 11:12 am

Aesma wrote:
The F-35 project isn't well known for being on time and on budget...


But Germany is not asking Lockmart to develop a F-35 for them, they are looking at buying examples that are developed.
 
tommy1808
Posts: 6391
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 3:24 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon May 22, 2017 11:15 am

seahawk wrote:
Aesma wrote:
The F-35 project isn't well known for being on time and on budget...


But Germany is not asking Lockmart to develop a F-35 for them, they are looking at buying examples that are developed.


Access to source code will be the interesting question, won´t buy anything containing black box avionics.

best regards
Thomas
Times are changing: 70 years ago the USA went to war to defeat the Nazis, now they elect them to run their country.
 
TheSonntag
Posts: 4386
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 7:23 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon May 22, 2017 11:39 am

The F-4 Phantoms in Germany were bought in the early 1970s, at a time when the US was already thinking about phasing them out and replacing them. They were only planned as an interim solution. This interim solution lasted more than 40 years.
 
User avatar
seahawk
Posts: 5506
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon May 22, 2017 11:49 am

tommy1808 wrote:
seahawk wrote:
Aesma wrote:
The F-35 project isn't well known for being on time and on budget...


But Germany is not asking Lockmart to develop a F-35 for them, they are looking at buying examples that are developed.


Access to source code will be the interesting question, won´t buy anything containing black box avionics.

best regards
Thomas


Says who?
 
User avatar
Zkpilot
Posts: 3983
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:21 pm

Re: RE: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Wed May 24, 2017 2:55 am

ZaphodHarkonnen wrote:
The problem with lots of 'cheap' stuff is that its so much easier to swat out of the sky. Let's say you have a dozen F-22s in the air. Cheap would be a bunch of older F-16s. How man F-16s are those F-22s going to take out before even one F-16 gets close to one of the F-22s?

If you then put the avionics to a comparable level suddenly those 'cheap' aircraft are not that much cheaper as most of the costs are in the avionics.

So you then turn around and say that only one F-16 needs to get through to the airbase to make life difficult for those F-22s? Well the same applies in reverse. And in the age of mass cruise missile spam it's even easier to hit anything that looks like an airstrip and make life difficult.

Personally I think many countries haven't got out of the way of thinking when aircraft were being made obsolete at an obscene rate. During the early jet age just how many designs were being developed and brought into service before being retired only a decade later? Really the focus should be put into more risk sensible development. Like when you build a new airframe put existing avionics into it. Then after that's in production iterate the avionics to take full advantage of the airframe. More Hornet to Super Hornet jumps instead of Eagle to Raptor.

Or you have a couple of high end fighters backed by a bunch of cheaper ones.... the high end fighter flys ahead of the other ones picks up the enemy and directs the cheaper fighters to engage with long range missiles. So for half the cost you can negate the advantage or match the cost and overwhelm with numbers.

For this however UAV are going to be the future - why risk a pilot on a bombing run?
57 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
 
YIMBY
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2016 4:32 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Wed May 24, 2017 6:19 am

For which missions exactly a remodified Typhoon would not be sufficient?

Long-range low-altitude strike to a high-thread zone in developing countries?
 
Ozair
Posts: 1663
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Wed May 24, 2017 9:26 am

tommy1808 wrote:

Access to source code will be the interesting question, won´t buy anything containing black box avionics.

best regards
Thomas

For what purpose? I can already tell you Germany wouldn't get source code access. If the intent is to integrate weapons then the F-35 will have UAI by the time Germany could be a customer. If the intent is EW then the open architecture allows for this to be done without access to source code, as is being done by the IDF.
 
petertenthije
Posts: 3405
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2001 10:00 pm

Re: RE: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Thu May 25, 2017 7:57 am

Zkpilot wrote:
Or you have a couple of high end fighters backed by a bunch of cheaper ones.... the high end fighter flys ahead of the other ones picks up the enemy and directs the cheaper fighters to engage with long range missiles. So for half the cost you can negate the advantage or match the cost and overwhelm with numbers.

If you only need a platform for your long range missiles, then you might as well skip the low end fighters entirely and strap the missiles onto the cheapest platform you can find. Whether that be UAVs, 737s, C-130s, An-2s or Piper Cubs.
Attamottamotta!
 
aviationaware
Posts: 1635
Joined: Mon May 19, 2014 12:02 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Thu May 25, 2017 11:22 am

tommy1808 wrote:
Access to source code will be the interesting question, won´t buy anything containing black box avionics.


Germany is relying on strategy consultants (McKinsey and other college kids) to help make procurement decisions. If you think black boxes will deter any procurement decision, you might want to reconsider.
 
columba
Topic Author
Posts: 5087
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:12 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sat Sep 30, 2017 7:08 pm

Germany is also interested in the F15 and F18:

http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... 7a474.html
It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
 
Ozair
Posts: 1663
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:39 am

columba wrote:
Germany is also interested in the F15 and F18:

http://www.stltoday.com/business/local/ ... 7a474.html

Have to give them credit for doing their due diligence on investigating all the options. Not sure though that either is a good option going forward.

If Germany does go for an interim aircraft does anyone see Germany running this as a competition or expect it to be sole sourced?
 
LightningZ71
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:59 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 6:19 am

Well, the F-15SA is a pretty good replacement for the Tornados as it is fully capable of fulfilling all of the roles it was used for. While I wish that Boeing had progressed farther with the Silent Eagle concept, I don't think that it's worth the money. As for the F-18, The Advanced concept was shelved, but they might offer the Block III to Germany. In my humble opinion, the Block III Superhornet will likely be the better value buy for them as it should be the cheapest one to get.
 
steman
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2000 4:55 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 8:09 am

If the Luftwaffe is really considering an interim model to replace the Tornado till the new project with France becomes available, why not considering the Rafale too? It can certainly do the same things an F-18 or F-15 can do and I doubt it will be more expensive. It is a proven a/g platform and it will strengthen the relationship with France.
 
User avatar
Dutchy
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:25 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 8:37 am

Doesn't make real sense to me, if they choose either the F-15 or F/A-18E/F as an interim replacement. If the F-35 was chosen, I would understand, more new capabilities than the other products but for the others, they might as well expand the capabilities of the Typhoon, makes more rational sense since they already operate quite a fleet of that one.
Many happy landings, greetings from The Netherlands!
 
Ozair
Posts: 1663
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 9:27 am

LightningZ71 wrote:
Well, the F-15SA is a pretty good replacement for the Tornados as it is fully capable of fulfilling all of the roles it was used for. While I wish that Boeing had progressed farther with the Silent Eagle concept, I don't think that it's worth the money.

Nor does the mission type envisioned for the Silent Eagle really correspond to the requirements of a Tornado replacement. Boeing went as far as they could with the SE concept before it became financially nonviable, they simply couldn't find a customer.

LightningZ71 wrote:
As for the F-18, The Advanced concept was shelved, but they might offer the Block III to Germany. In my humble opinion, the Block III Superhornet will likely be the better value buy for them as it should be the cheapest one to get.

The only benefit that may come from a SH would be a duel buy of Growlers to replace the EA capabilities of the Tornado ECR. The SH is shorter ranged than both the F-35 and F-15 as well as carrying the least payload.

steman wrote:
If the Luftwaffe is really considering an interim model to replace the Tornado till the new project with France becomes available, why not considering the Rafale too? It can certainly do the same things an F-18 or F-15 can do and I doubt it will be more expensive. It is a proven a/g platform and it will strengthen the relationship with France.

A Rafale would be a bad idea given the Luftwaffe already operates a fleet of Eurofighters. Rafale offers little if any capability improvement while introducing a whole additional type to the fleet that has no commonality with current aircraft nor the weapons Germany operates.

Dutchy wrote:
Doesn't make real sense to me, if they choose either the F-15 or F/A-18E/F as an interim replacement. If the F-35 was chosen, I would understand, more new capabilities than the other products but for the others, they might as well expand the capabilities of the Typhoon, makes more rational sense since they already operate quite a fleet of that one.

Agree, while I would love to see Germany order the F-35 acquiring more Eurofighters would be the right move.
 
steman
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2000 4:55 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 9:46 am

Ozair wrote:

A Rafale would be a bad idea given the Luftwaffe already operates a fleet of Eurofighters. Rafale offers little if any capability improvement while introducing a whole additional type to the fleet that has no commonality with current aircraft nor the weapons Germany operates.


Isn´t the Rafale compatible with NATO armaments? And I thought it is well more advanced than the Typhoon in terms of air-to-ground capabilities, which is what it would be required to do as Tornado replacement.
I don´t know how many Typhoons the Luftwaffe has received but I recall that the original plan (already cut from the very first unrealistic requirement) was for 180 examples, of which 140 firm, to be used for the air defence role and a further 40 to be ordered at a later date as ground attack platform. But I don´t know how fare ahead is the development of the a2g capability of the Typhoon and if it could effectively replace the Tornado in this role.
 
Ozair
Posts: 1663
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 10:21 am

steman wrote:
Isn´t the Rafale compatible with NATO armaments?

You can generally stick anything on an aircraft as long as you are willing to pay the integration costs which includes both software integration and flight carry and release dynamics. You would need to do that for all current German air to air missiles except the Meteor and almost all A2G munitions.

steman wrote:
And I thought it is well more advanced than the Typhoon in terms of air-to-ground capabilities, which is what it would be required to do as Tornado replacement.

There is little difference today between a new production Eurofighter and a Rafale in the ground attack role bar the AESA radar and the Eurofighter is getting that shortly.
steman wrote:
I don´t know how many Typhoons the Luftwaffe has received but I recall that the original plan (already cut from the very first unrealistic requirement) was for 180 examples, of which 140 firm, to be used for the air defence role and a further 40 to be ordered at a later date as ground attack platform. But I don´t know how fare ahead is the development of the a2g capability of the Typhoon and if it could effectively replace the Tornado in this role.

Apparently 125 delivered by Nov 2016. Some info on future Eurofighter development below.

Image
 
steman
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2000 4:55 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 11:04 am

According to what Ozair reported, I honestly don´t see the rationale behind the interest in the F-15/F-18. Just get more Typhoons, you also get to build them in Germany preserving German and European jobs and keeping the IM-EX balance positive.
 
User avatar
keesje
Posts: 10122
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2001 2:08 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:26 pm

A European longer range 2 seat stealthy attack aircraft would make sense. Maybe a beefed up stealthy Rafale combined with unmanned platforms. Maybe the french develop the first, the Germans the UAV. Multinational proved costly & slow.
"Never mistake motion for action." Ernest Hemingway
 
ThePointblank
Posts: 2866
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:39 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:32 pm

steman wrote:
According to what Ozair reported, I honestly don´t see the rationale behind the interest in the F-15/F-18. Just get more Typhoons, you also get to build them in Germany preserving German and European jobs and keeping the IM-EX balance positive.

It could be that the Germans are less than happy about the Eurofighter due to a number of quality control problems, and operational cost.
 
columba
Topic Author
Posts: 5087
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:12 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 4:35 pm

Just to clarify: The Eurofighter will be replaced with the new French/German fighter.
The Tornado needs replacement much sooner. The Tornado is used as ground attack aircraft, it is part of the nuclear sharing with the US (a role the Eurofighter will never fulfill), naval bomber and ECR aircraft.

The F35 and F18 Super Hornet would make the most sense as a Tornado replacement. The F18 would make the most sense for me as it can replace the ECR and former navy Tornados.
It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
 
User avatar
Slug71
Posts: 450
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:08 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 5:16 pm

I highly doubt Germany will be any American fighter. I'll be very surprised if they do.
 
Ozair
Posts: 1663
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Sun Oct 01, 2017 9:20 pm

columba wrote:
Just to clarify: The Eurofighter will be replaced with the new French/German fighter.

May be replaced. It is early days yet and there is no agreement on a joint project, just some proposals to study potential joint requirements.

columba wrote:
The Tornado needs replacement much sooner. The Tornado is used as ground attack aircraft, it is part of the nuclear sharing with the US (a role the Eurofighter will never fulfill), naval bomber and ECR aircraft.

If that role is essential to Germany then a life extension of the Tornado or a US aircraft are the only options.
columba wrote:
The F35 and F18 Super Hornet would make the most sense as a Tornado replacement. The F18 would make the most sense for me as it can replace the ECR and former navy Tornados.

Only if they buy Growlers. The US has only exported dedicated EW aircraft to the UK and Australia, their two closest allies, so I'm not sure a Growler export to Germany is a certainty. F-35 will have no export restrictions and has the sensors, systems and future weapons to operate in an ECR role.
 
tommy1808
Posts: 6391
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 3:24 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon Oct 02, 2017 5:45 am

Ozair wrote:
If that role is essential to Germany then a life extension of the Tornado or a US aircraft are the only options.


By the time the Tornado will need replacement, nuclear weapons will have the same status as chemical and biological weapons, and being able to carry them will be irrelevant.
International law is directly applicable in Germany, any purchase of nuclear delivery able systems will be stopped by courts.

Best regards
Thomas
Times are changing: 70 years ago the USA went to war to defeat the Nazis, now they elect them to run their country.
 
WIederling
Posts: 4058
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 2:15 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:21 am

Slug71 wrote:
I highly doubt Germany will be any American fighter. I'll be very surprised if they do.


von der Leyen will try to go there. No idea about the future shelf life of Ms v.d.L.
( a rather unpleasant individual, willing to conjure up lies to push her agenda, unwilling to accept topic education.
spending largish amounts from her budget for PR to make her dysfunctional ministerial activities look good. )
Murphy is an optimist
 
tommy1808
Posts: 6391
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 3:24 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:28 am

WIederling wrote:
a rather unpleasant individual, willing to conjure up lies to push her agenda, unwilling to accept topic education.


to give an example of how honest that person is, she once claimed, while trying to justify internet censorship, that Child Porn is legal in India.

best regards
Thomas
Times are changing: 70 years ago the USA went to war to defeat the Nazis, now they elect them to run their country.
 
Ozair
Posts: 1663
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:00 pm

tommy1808 wrote:
Ozair wrote:
If that role is essential to Germany then a life extension of the Tornado or a US aircraft are the only options.


By the time the Tornado will need replacement, nuclear weapons will have the same status as chemical and biological weapons, and being able to carry them will be irrelevant.
International law is directly applicable in Germany, any purchase of nuclear delivery able systems will be stopped by courts.

Best regards
Thomas

Perhaps, but as of today the legal position of NATO nuclear sharing is both reasonably vague and clear. At least clear enough to current non nuclear European Governments that provide military aircraft with the specific intent to support NATO Nuclear sharing. That may certainly change in the future and if so great but until then Germany maintains a capability that will almost certainly have to be politically ended before the military remove the requirement.
 
User avatar
Dutchy
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:25 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:20 pm

Ozair wrote:
tommy1808 wrote:
Ozair wrote:
If that role is essential to Germany then a life extension of the Tornado or a US aircraft are the only options.


By the time the Tornado will need replacement, nuclear weapons will have the same status as chemical and biological weapons, and being able to carry them will be irrelevant.
International law is directly applicable in Germany, any purchase of nuclear delivery able systems will be stopped by courts.

Best regards
Thomas

Perhaps, but as of today the legal position of NATO nuclear sharing is both reasonably vague and clear. At least clear enough to current non nuclear European Governments that provide military aircraft with the specific intent to support NATO Nuclear sharing. That may certainly change in the future and if so great but until then Germany maintains a capability that will almost certainly have to be politically ended before the military remove the requirement.


Why doesn't allow America to hang those bombs under the Eurofighter platform as they did with the Tornado? Pure commerce I guess? Forcing European Air Forces to buy American: Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, Italy, Turkey.
Many happy landings, greetings from The Netherlands!
 
Ozair
Posts: 1663
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:38 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Mon Oct 02, 2017 9:44 pm

Dutchy wrote:
Why doesn't allow America to hang those bombs under the Eurofighter platform as they did with the Tornado? Pure commerce I guess? Forcing European Air Forces to buy American: Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, Italy, Turkey.

Typically the requirement to carry a US nuclear weapon requires additional command and control systems installed in the aircraft as well as additional fail safes on weapon delivery. Not sure how well these can be retro-fitted to existing aircraft.
 
RJMAZ
Posts: 138
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:54 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:18 am

The manufacturers of the Eurofigher, Gripen and Rafale could easily combine to develop a 5th generation stealth multi role aircraft.

Avionics and software has overtaken the airframe and engines as the most difficult and costly part of a new fighter development.

Using off the shelf avionics and software would allow a new aircraft to be developed swiftly and on a budget.

The airframe itself using modern CAD design would be easy to develop. An airframe 20 years ago would take 5 years of research and 5 years of prototype testing/redesign. Today that 10 year development would take less than a year. Look at Boeing's clean sheet trainer.

Making it VLO stealth is now relatively easy. Planform alignment and computer simulation has come along way in 10 years since the F-35 was developed.

Engines are also simple. Adding new core, hot end cooling to the current Rafale or Eurofighter engines would add a 20% thrust improvement in the same weight/size. Put standard engines in the prototype.

Something with dimensions and weights exactly half way between the F-35 and F-22 would be ideal.

The aircraft could be firing missiles and dropping bombs within 5 years of contract sign.
 
User avatar
Dutchy
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:25 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:54 am

I admire your optimism, I do not share it however. What you describe is kind of the Chinese way I guess.
Many happy landings, greetings from The Netherlands!
 
angad84
Posts: 1923
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:04 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:13 am

RJMAZ wrote:
The manufacturers of the Eurofigher, Gripen and Rafale could easily combine to develop a 5th generation stealth multi role aircraft.

Avionics and software has overtaken the airframe and engines as the most difficult and costly part of a new fighter development.

Using off the shelf avionics and software would allow a new aircraft to be developed swiftly and on a budget.

The airframe itself using modern CAD design would be easy to develop. An airframe 20 years ago would take 5 years of research and 5 years of prototype testing/redesign. Today that 10 year development would take less than a year. Look at Boeing's clean sheet trainer.

Making it VLO stealth is now relatively easy. Planform alignment and computer simulation has come along way in 10 years since the F-35 was developed.

Engines are also simple. Adding new core, hot end cooling to the current Rafale or Eurofighter engines would add a 20% thrust improvement in the same weight/size. Put standard engines in the prototype.

Something with dimensions and weights exactly half way between the F-35 and F-22 would be ideal.

The aircraft could be firing missiles and dropping bombs within 5 years of contract sign.

I'm with you on most of this except the last bit. No way anyone can build and field a 5th gen platform in five years, regardless of tech readiness levels.
 
User avatar
seahawk
Posts: 5506
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 am

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Wed Oct 04, 2017 7:53 am

Dutchy wrote:
Ozair wrote:
tommy1808 wrote:

By the time the Tornado will need replacement, nuclear weapons will have the same status as chemical and biological weapons, and being able to carry them will be irrelevant.
International law is directly applicable in Germany, any purchase of nuclear delivery able systems will be stopped by courts.

Best regards
Thomas

Perhaps, but as of today the legal position of NATO nuclear sharing is both reasonably vague and clear. At least clear enough to current non nuclear European Governments that provide military aircraft with the specific intent to support NATO Nuclear sharing. That may certainly change in the future and if so great but until then Germany maintains a capability that will almost certainly have to be politically ended before the military remove the requirement.


Why doesn't allow America to hang those bombs under the Eurofighter platform as they did with the Tornado? Pure commerce I guess? Forcing European Air Forces to buy American: Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, Italy, Turkey.


You can hang the weapons under an European plane, the Tornado showed this. However you pay for the complete integration and certification.
 
rheinwaldner
Posts: 1329
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:58 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:04 am

Dutchy wrote:
Ozair wrote:
tommy1808 wrote:

By the time the Tornado will need replacement, nuclear weapons will have the same status as chemical and biological weapons, and being able to carry them will be irrelevant.
International law is directly applicable in Germany, any purchase of nuclear delivery able systems will be stopped by courts.

Best regards
Thomas

Perhaps, but as of today the legal position of NATO nuclear sharing is both reasonably vague and clear. At least clear enough to current non nuclear European Governments that provide military aircraft with the specific intent to support NATO Nuclear sharing. That may certainly change in the future and if so great but until then Germany maintains a capability that will almost certainly have to be politically ended before the military remove the requirement.


Why doesn't allow America to hang those bombs under the Eurofighter platform as they did with the Tornado? Pure commerce I guess? Forcing European Air Forces to buy American: Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, Italy, Turkey.

Can French nuclear technology be ruled out for EU Air Forces? As far I can see, they have all it needs...
 
parapente
Posts: 1866
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:42 pm

Re: Germany Considers Tornado Replacement

Wed Oct 04, 2017 9:17 am

I would have thought that the obvious things to do would be what has already been suggested both in the article and here.
1.Extend the life of the existing Tornados a little.They certainly appear to be still very capable today (Syria/Iraq)
2.Use the Typhoon.It is becoming very quickly a very capable ground attack aircraft and as. Stated will soon have an absolute state of the art new radar -and yes already has a 2 seater version if required.
Failing that the stealthy F35 is a superlative bomb truck!

What Perhaps they should do is join forces with UK/France/both of a stealthy unmanned vehicle going forwards.No rush - a 10 year + development timetable.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: TEALflyer and 2 guests

Popular Searches On Airliners.net

Top Photos of Last:   24 Hours  •  48 Hours  •  7 Days  •  30 Days  •  180 Days  •  365 Days  •  All Time

Military Aircraft Every type from fighters to helicopters from air forces around the globe

Classic Airliners Props and jets from the good old days

Flight Decks Views from inside the cockpit

Aircraft Cabins Passenger cabin shots showing seat arrangements as well as cargo aircraft interior

Cargo Aircraft Pictures of great freighter aircraft

Government Aircraft Aircraft flying government officials

Helicopters Our large helicopter section. Both military and civil versions

Blimps / Airships Everything from the Goodyear blimp to the Zeppelin

Night Photos Beautiful shots taken while the sun is below the horizon

Accidents Accident, incident and crash related photos

Air to Air Photos taken by airborne photographers of airborne aircraft

Special Paint Schemes Aircraft painted in beautiful and original liveries

Airport Overviews Airport overviews from the air or ground

Tails and Winglets Tail and Winglet closeups with beautiful airline logos