why sukhoi su37 does not use plasma-stealth ?
Moderators: richierich, ua900, PanAm_DC10, hOMSaR
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
because it does not exist/work? Has anyone seen or heard anything about it after that first much-hyped statement by some Ruskie official?
Sounded to me like "we can do better than you" without any substance.
Sounded to me like "we can do better than you" without any substance.
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
I think we are still confusing the Sukhoi SU-37 Terminator, evolution of the Su-35 Flanker with the Sukhoi S-37 Berkut where the S stands for Simonov, the designer of the prototype.
Ciao
Stefano
P.S.
Plasma stealth is a fake
Ciao
Stefano
P.S.
Plasma stealth is a fake
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
BECAUSE plasma techonolgy is still under development
BUT it is a question if there will be enaugh money for this ambitius project.
PLASMA wll reduce drag and 99% reduce radar croos section
cobra27
BUT it is a question if there will be enaugh money for this ambitius project.
PLASMA wll reduce drag and 99% reduce radar croos section
cobra27
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
Honorable
Thank u about your note but I'm quite well informed about difference between the super agile su-37 super flanker ( or terminator ) & s-37 berkut ( the golden eagle ).
If mig 35(1.42) could use it why shouldn't su-37 also
use it.
Best regards
Fireblade
P.S.
I'll send u some links by e-mail
Thank u about your note but I'm quite well informed about difference between the super agile su-37 super flanker ( or terminator ) & s-37 berkut ( the golden eagle ).
If mig 35(1.42) could use it why shouldn't su-37 also
use it.
Best regards
Fireblade
P.S.
I'll send u some links by e-mail
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
What u think could be an S-400 missile be
fit in to the su-37 armmament ( if they ever choose to produce the super flanker)?
fit in to the su-37 armmament ( if they ever choose to produce the super flanker)?
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
Fireblade,
thanks for the e-mail with links.
So now I would ask why a conventional although advanced design like the SU-37 should use plasma-stealth? It would be better fitted (if it exists and works) on a purposely built new design. The S-37 itself looks to me less advanced than the Flanker: look at its fuselage, it doesn't have the blended wing body of the Flanker. Its overall design seems to be thought only to experiment the Forward swept wing.
Ciao
Stefano
thanks for the e-mail with links.
So now I would ask why a conventional although advanced design like the SU-37 should use plasma-stealth? It would be better fitted (if it exists and works) on a purposely built new design. The S-37 itself looks to me less advanced than the Flanker: look at its fuselage, it doesn't have the blended wing body of the Flanker. Its overall design seems to be thought only to experiment the Forward swept wing.
Ciao
Stefano
-
- Guest
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
Jwenting,
YES! If you actually bothered to go to some airshow and not sit on your but and write retarded comments like that, which are dictated by your ignorance!!!
Regards,
BBC_CCCP
RUS AF RULES!!!
YES! If you actually bothered to go to some airshow and not sit on your but and write retarded comments like that, which are dictated by your ignorance!!!
Regards,
BBC_CCCP
RUS AF RULES!!!
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
Can you share the links with the rest of us, please?
As for puting S-400's on the SU-37, aren't they a little too big?
LY744.
As for puting S-400's on the SU-37, aren't they a little too big?
LY744.
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
Steman
I'm (mostly) agree with u but stealth could give su-37 a big advantage in a fight( hard to find ,hard to kill ) and with an inside weapons & S-400 would be unbeatable at less 4 a two decades.
Yours
Fireblade
I'm (mostly) agree with u but stealth could give su-37 a big advantage in a fight( hard to find ,hard to kill ) and with an inside weapons & S-400 would be unbeatable at less 4 a two decades.
Yours
Fireblade
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
LY744
I'm very sorry about the links so I'm proclame them now"
http://www.areonautics.ru/plasmamain.htm
http://www.aeronautics.ru/mig142article.htm.
And about S-400 it could be lanch from the air
so this is the longest range AA
Best regards
Fireblade
I'm very sorry about the links so I'm proclame them now"
http://www.areonautics.ru/plasmamain.htm
http://www.aeronautics.ru/mig142article.htm.
And about S-400 it could be lanch from the air
so this is the longest range AA
Best regards
Fireblade
RE: QuestionsAbout Su37?
Thanks a lot for the links!
So, the S-400 can be used as an AA missile, very interesting. Did they try launching it from a/c yet? Can't wait to see the results!
LY744.
So, the S-400 can be used as an AA missile, very interesting. Did they try launching it from a/c yet? Can't wait to see the results!
LY744.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests