Airliners.net

spompert

Re: Priority Screening Inconsistency

PanAm_DC10 wrote:
Hello Stefan

A first visit applies and your image has been screened. Sorry for our error

Paul

Thank you!

spompert

Re: Priority Screening Inconsistency

Hello there, I added a photo of a new airline visit to Schiphol (ID: 6797803) but somehow it was deprioritized. According the rules I still believe it should be screened as priority. Or am I missing some new rules perhaps? Greets Stefan

Jump to post

spompert

Re: wiggys photos

They both look high in frame and oversharpened to me. And the first one needs CW rotation.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

jelpee wrote:
Looks soft overall at this size. At 1600 pixels or larger, the screeners look for near flawless images. I think one more pass of sharpening should work.

Jehan

Thanks Jehan!

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 7bfc3b815c

spompert

Re: Post-screening questions

Are we looking at the same photo, the KLM 772? I don`t see anything that has to do with right in frame. It looks only a tight crop on the right side to me or not cropped even with the left side, but not really a problem if you ask me.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thanks, I agree on the heathaze but perhaps given that this shot is not the standard side-on shot (with one aircraft as main subject) I am hoping some slight haze is acceptable.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Hello everybody, this photo was rejected for blurry. The original looks okay to me so I`m a bit surprised. Can someone tell me where it`s blurry exactly? I also might try to reduce the size of the photo and start all over to see if it`s fixable. The other fact that makes it a bit hard to accept is t...

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Hard to get reedits accepted after first rejection

dutchspotter1 wrote:
Curious why the blocked nosegear and engine wasn't mentioned as a rejection reason.

I believe towing trucks are allowed to block parts of the plane as long as they are towing the aircraft actively. I read the upload guide lately because I had a similar issue and remembered this. Greets

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Reject - soft

Not really no

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Reject - soft

The windowline looks a bit soft to me.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

The latest version was accepted in the end Thanks for the feedback

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thanks for the advice everybody. I agree there is some heathaze in the original especially in the far distance. I was able to shoot again and edited a new original. Is this any better? This original is sharper overall. Thanks https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/5/3/1/6011135.jpg?v=v41c133...

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Hi Stefan, Honetly,I do not recognize neither oversharpend nor overexposed from it. Exposure looks fine for me. Sharpness looks bit soft for me but not bad. That's my point of view. Regards, Hmm, I also thought it looked better than told. It was rejected by priority screener. So does that mean appe...

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Hello, I am trying to get a photo accepted of a couple of B777`s on the Schiphol runway but somehow it gets rejected for overexposed and oversharpened. I really can`t see the overexposed parts. The original is more underexposed than overexposed if I look at it. There are small glares on the rear of ...

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Hi Harry, sorry I didn`t tell it earlier but it has already been fixed. In the sitewide-forum I posted something about it. Anyway thanks a lot!

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Site wide issues at the moment

PanAm_DC10 wrote:
Hello Stefan

Both screened thank you. I did notice the queue is a little longer than usual so we are now making an effort to reduce it

Regards

Paul

Thanks Paul

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Site wide issues at the moment

Hello spompert Can you let me know the photo ID numbers and I will take a look for you. Hello roadrunner As Johnkrist noted you are the only one to report this. Please contact us at support@airliners.net and we will look into this for you. If you have any screenshots they would be helpful Thank you...

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Site wide issues at the moment

I'm experiencing very long queue times for appealing photos. Longer than one week. I posted this in the feedback forum but no response. Anybody knows if there is some issue with the appeal process as well? Thanks

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Still nothing on the appeal queue. Is there some problem going on? Are others also experiencing long waiting times. Appeal photo now one week in the queue. Looks like there is some technical problem. Should I withdraw the photos from the queue? Hope to hear something. Thanks a lot. Stefan

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Hello I have two photos in the appeal queue. One of them is now almost five days in the queue. Is there just a longer queue than normal or is there some error perhaps? Thanks Stefan

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Post-screening HBZER

Hello, unfortunately there's no way of getting this accepted. There's strong sunlight from the other side (backlit). First of all try to take photos in good conditions (sunny, not too far, etc.) It will make it easier to edit and get it accepted on Anet.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Hello, had this photo rejected for blurry, oversharpened and underexposed. https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/2/3/5822323.jpg?v=v44accea62e6 Strangely enough the original looks not blurry but sharp enough to edit. I find the other rejecting reasons a bit harsh. Maybe a smaller size wil...

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Pre-screening, please.

Still halos around the plane and oversharpened. There is no use in uploading if you aks me. What is your editing process? The halos mostly appear with lifting shadows, don`t you see them? How did you sharpen the plane? I might be wrong but I can see a lot of jaggies all around.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Pre-screening, please.

Strong vignetting, halos (around the tail and above front fuselage), still a bit yellow to me, oversharpened and too loose crop.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Pre-screening, please.

Hello, photo is oversharpened, white border below, over edited sky/artifacts/unnatural looking sky, too loose crop, noisy in the shadow areas like under the wings, yellow cast.
Greets Stefan

Jump to post

spompert

Re: General announcements & discussions

airkas1 wrote:
Hi all,

As you probably noticed, newly added photos aren't showing. We're aware and hoping for a fix as soon as possible. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Not sure but it looks like this is happening again, at least with my accepted photo.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Post-Screening photos - fsx98

Yes agree. It has something to do with layers/flattening in PS(E). It happened to me before once.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Post-Screening photos - fsx98

There`s a border of slightly darker pixels (1 pixel wide) around the frame. For me only visible by zooming in.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... a162195608

I agree the light is not very favorable. But I managed to get other shots in same conditions accepted so was wondering what you think.

spompert

Re: Pre-screening: JakTrax

To me it looks okay

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Pre-screening Rene Wendt

It looks like the exposure is not good (cloudy). With the bright background it will be hard to fix. Also the fuselage is grainy. I don`t think it`s possible to get this to an acceptable level. But maybe others think otherwise...greets Stefan

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Is the upload queue broken?

Hello, I uploaded some photos quite a while ago but they are not showing in the queue. Saying screening, pending, possessing. Will the photos be repaired later, anyone else with this issue? Greets

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Pre Screen Feedback Please

HI Chris,

To me it looks like there is a lot of heathaze in general. Not only from the engines but also around the front of the aircraft, clearly visible to me. I would say this photo is not fixable.

Greets Stefan

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Is the Canon EF-S 55-250 IS STM as good as the reviews claim?

Stefan, for what's it worth I think you can get acceptances / acceptable shots with every DSLR lense outthere. I don't think it's the point for Karl, that does not even upload at the moment. The question is more: will these shots have sufficient quality for someone that is used to an L-Lense qualit...

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Is the Canon EF-S 55-250 IS STM as good as the reviews claim?

Hi Karl, I used this lens four quite a while before I upgraded to a L-lens. If I was you I would definitely buy it. Very good quality, cheap and light. Only some vignetting at 250mm at F8 and higher. But I got hundreds of photos accepted with this lens easily. Good luck. Stefan

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thanks Julien, good to know. I think I leave the photo for what is is.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thanks Jehan,

It would be nice to get some additional feedback indeed. I am considering to appeal it and see how the head screeners look at it.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Hi Jehan. No the motive was the problem. This was the personal note: "Sorry, motive doesn't work. We consider this an unmotivated crop." I first though okay probably not the right angle/motive but still wondering if it`s really that unaccaptable.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

This photo was rejected for unmotivated crop: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/1/1/5743113.jpg?v=v4c3b8c5b9db I agree the crop is not standard but was hoping it would be a nice addition. I choose this angle because it shows the nose and people queing to get in. I was thinking the peo...

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

That's a long list, get it. Thanks for replying.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Hi, it looks my appeal of photo ID: 5725559 is somehow taking much longer than normal. Any idea if it will be seen soon? Just curious. Thanks Stefan

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Thanks

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Still undecided which one to choose. Probably the one with the stairs has greater chance to get accepted? Or is there leniancy towards blockage with not standard shots in hangars, etc?

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Since you posted here, I'm not going to reply to your E-mail anymore. The 2 photos both seem like the upper deck/cockpit are out of focus. I don't know for sure why it was deprioritized, but it does kinda make sense. Nowhere does it show any festivities and it could be any other non-prio worithy ev...

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

Hi, I attended a special KLM event yesterday and made two possible shots of a KLM B747. I have two questions about it. Do they make a chance? There are obstructions but perhaps due to the circumstances (inside a hanger and people visiting the plane) it is allowed? Also I clicked the priority box bec...

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Received An Email From Emirates

I have given permission to airliners multiple times now and never asked for compensation. I don`t think there`s a chance of getting something in return and for me it was enough to get the exposure and views. Felt really rewarding to get the attention for my photos.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Have quality standards changed on here recently?

What I don`t get is that the shot of D-ABUM gets so many views (80k) compared to other shots of it (couple of hundred). Am I missing something, but it looks like an ordinary shot of this plane.

Jump to post

spompert

Re: pre-post screening spompert

The photo is in the appeal queue now for more than a week. I hope it can be seen by a screener soon or is there some update maybe? Thank you!

Jump to post

spompert

Re: Rejected for distance

I agree there is a bit more space around the plane than normally. I would crop a bit tighter and yes it`s easy to improve.

Jump to post

Search found 509 matches