And add to above, the "Builder" tag under aircraft info is also abused a lot (it's very often to see someone use this tag on modern airliners), I wonder will any of those wrong entries get removed from autocomplete?
Jump to postDo screeners ever look at the aircraft info part while screening? Not talking about the already widely existing "(WL)" or "SL" suffixes after aircraft types (and that might be editors' job to fix them) which are not actually used by A.net, but the one below really blows my mind.....
Jump to postJust out of curiosity, why the thumbnails are starting to have watermarks on them these days?
Jump to postPossibly slight micro-blur in parts but should be fixable. I'd expect the registration and '747' titles at the rear to look soft/blurry since there are very high contrast edges causing CA. More worrying is the level of noise, however. Karl I‘ll try a different sharpness & contrast setting for t...
Jump to postGenerally looks okay to me but there are small areas that for some reason appear soft/blurry. If you say the original is tack sharp you have your answer, however: it's obviously the edit. I've had it where pin-sharp photos have looked dodgy after processing and I have found that uploading at a larg...
Jump to postHi, I had a photo rejected twice for the reason of Blurry and I cannot see why. In the second rejection, the screener also commented "Portions of the AC are blurry and blurry is impossible to fix.", but under 100% view the original doesn't look blurry at all. Can someone point out the blur...
Jump to postIs there another site-wide issue going on rn? I'm at YYZ and many photos and thumbnails are not showing up for me. I also tried different ISPs but still didn't work.
Jump to postJust curious, if Boeing really wants to make a 767XF variant, why not do the same upgrade on the 767-200 at the same time to make it an NMA candidate? Since -200 is sort of still in production (KC-46), and the 2-3-2 config is great for long haul flight from a passenger's perspective. 200ER already h...
Jump to postFor North Asian carriers like EVA or ANA, North America West Coast like YVR, SFO (and LAX for ANA, maybe tough for TPE-LAX for EVA unless they limit some cargo loads) may be suitable. However, I suppose both ANA and EVA are going to use their Boing 787-10s predominantly for their intra-Asia and Oce...
Jump to postairkas1 wrote:Can I ask why you didn't use the autocomplete in the first place?
Here's another bug I met: If I select "COMAC" under "Manufacturer", there's no option of "COMAC C919" under "Generic Type". Therefore, I tried to create "COMAC C919" manually, but it says "This value is already used." Then I used autocomple...
Jump to postThere's still some thumbnail problems.
Check the photo below:
https://imgur.com/a/swLPlcI
So there's a CZ ST 772 photo in the search result of JA707A...
But after I clicked it, the photo is actually correct:
https://www.airliners.net/photo/All-Nip ... ER/2707449
airkas1 wrote:This has now been fixed.
Same here in Canada, got a lot of 500/502 errors these days when visiting Airliners.net.
Jump to postairkas1 wrote:What is the registration?
Hi, recently while uploading photos to A.net, I found a bug that prevented me from submitting: If I select "Boeing 737-89L" under "Version", the submission just keeps saying "Your form submission was incomplete. Please review the form and provide missing and/or correct inval...
Jump to postWhat's the correct version for the sharklet A320 in the photo database? There are so many different interpretation under "version" when uploading, like A320-XXX(WL), A320-XXXSL, etc. It really gets confusing and I can't find any topics related to this issue in the forum...
Jump to postGot a lot of Oversharpened as rejection reason these days as well, but I don't know why the photos were still being rejected for Soft after reducing the sharpness by not much.
Jump to postGood move by AC; a very fine aircraft. I doubt if they'll be the AB aircraft, as they're (mostly) -200s. I think they'll be looking for RR powered -300s. Cathay springs to mind? SN is getting retired CX/SQ 333s currently. Maybe AC can go for MU, because MU is retiring some 330s now (mainly 333s, so...
Jump to postFake news. 1. Someone works in MU has confirmed with recent flight crews to MAD that the hotel they stays does not match with the one in video. 1.1 The plugs in the room are not even in Spanish standard! "In a document that was allegedly compiled by the airline, the company denied that their em...
Jump to postHow does this effect the CS and E2? Hard to say at this point. Bombardier, Embraer, and to a lesser extent Mitsubishi are going to have some serious trouble if it affects them as well. https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/cseries-engines-not-afflicted-with-pw1100g-issues-445889/ Seems to be f...
Jump to postThis thread was posted in the Photography forum in January 2017: http://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1353727 It explains our policy on the Boeing customer codes, which seems to be the same as you mentioned above. And just a small correction, the screeners only screen photos and w...
Jump to postLast year I uploaded a 737-800 photo to the database. Later I noticed that the version under that photo says "Boeing 737-800", so I tried to correct the information to "Boeing 737-89P". However, after several trials, screeners never accepted my request. The photo is here: http://...
Jump to post