SRQLOT wrote:There is enough money coming in short term that those managers/directors are making their money before they bail out!!!
Right, so this problem will be isolated, inspections done and doors fixed. But what about the massive unanswered question left hanging - what else has Boeing's "quality control" regime missed? I know I'll not be getting on one for a good few years from now till they prove themselves. [No d...
Jump to postAnd a closer view of a typical plug installation from the outside: That panel gapping looks worse than the door on my old '84 Camaro... :ill: Wow, what units do they use to measure their tolerances, refrigerators per football field? In line with the Imperial system that no-one else uses, they use &...
Jump to postThis is going to hit BA hard. Not as bad as the other 2 max crashes but a bit less similar. They only positives is no one died and it was on a Friday evening after markets are closed for a weekend. BA don't operate MAX's, indeed they haven't operated any 737s since the old London Gatwick ones went ...
Jump to postImage of the framing of the plug area (when a door is installed) with the sidewall panel removed: https://i.ibb.co/FqftvMC/Boeing-737-MAX-9-800x534.jpg Source: https://samchui.com/2024/01/06/alaska-airlines-b737-max-lost-exit-door-in-flight-rapid-decompression/ Given this, and the photos of the fai...
Jump to postOn the whole subject of the EICAS lite - if Boeing have been feeding congress a whole load of bull "it can't be done, and we'd know, we're the experts" - then it turns out that a back committe request has shown, yes, it very much CAN be done with (relatively) little effort, then one could ...
Jump to postOne more thing: would this have even been a noteworthy event had the aircraft been anything but a MAX? If you don't know why the failure occurred - and therefore the potential envelope of failure, then yep. Its newsworthy. If there was, and just pulling something out of thin air here, some kind of ...
Jump to postNot to put a fork in this deal, but what happens if the FAA does not certify the Max 10 by the end of the year? Is the deal contingent on this? There is a lot of speculation out there, if Boeing does not get the waiver, the program will be cancelled due to excessive cost increases and delays for th...
Jump to postAirbus and RR would happily re engine. If EK paid them enough.
Of course, talk is cheap. So Tim clark will moan and gurn, but won't actually do anything of substance.
Someone is regretting not opening their wallet a bit more when Airbus and RR were offering the 380neo. When did Airbus and RR offer this A380neo? Offering maybe too strong a word. It's not as if there was a final formal design to offer. But a modified 380 with either derivative engines off 330neo o...
Jump to postDirect knowledge. Well, ever so slightly removed as I wasn't actually on the shop floor myself.
But yeah - all the SAC fuse were rubbish. They just couldn't get a handle on it at all.
fcogafa wrote:So they are made in Morocco, then sent to Belfast then to Montreal or Mobile?
It'll cost them much more now than a new build frame. The new build frame could have included further wing tweaks for cd reduction as well.
Jump to postFuel didn't come from the overhead bins. There is no way for it to get there. Don't play into the drama that the media is conjuring up. Chances of fuel ever leaking from the cwt into the fuselage then somehow running up to the crown are remote all right. Chances of a leak from the hydraulics or mor...
Jump to postSomeone is regretting not opening their wallet a bit more when Airbus and RR were offering the 380neo. Unsure if Airbus would bother unless EK are gonna cover full R&T costs as well as the bulk of lost opportunity costs of any A350 stretch. Although against that, they do like to keep design engi...
Jump to postDevilfish wrote:However, what advantage would the ex-QR birds give PR if the airline still had to spend a lot of money to make those airworthy again Fine if it's only cosmetic defects
The fuselages ended up *all* being made in Belfast. After a lot of effort on BBDs end, the quality of Chinese made fuselages were not improving so they gave up. Not one Chinese fuselage ended up on an aircraft afaik. Moving that out of Belfast will, after initial teething, free up floor space for mo...
Jump to postNovel aircraft are of absolutely no use to the Ukrainians right now. Expecting pilots to get the best out of their combat systems when reaction times of seconds count is ludicrous. First priority is deny the RuAF easy access to the airspace. A supply of Crotales, Rapiers and Starstreaks should do th...
Jump to postDrones shouldn't wasted on trucks. They would obviously save them for more high value targets. There is no higher value target than a fuel truck when it looks like your enemy's logistics are causing them trouble. Hit one fuel truck, you might reduce a squadron of tanks to becoming a static display.
Jump to postMake an actual prediction (if you want). Who will control a majority of Ukraine a month from now? I predict the large country with the large army and the large population, and that seems a very easy prediction. Define your interpretation of "control". I wonder if you're being pedantic. If...
Jump to postkitplane01 wrote:Make an actual prediction (if you want). Who will control a majority of Ukraine a month from now? I predict the large country with the large army and the large population, and that seems a very easy prediction.
Politics aside, the most suitable aircraft for Canada defending its airspace is undoubtedly the..... MiG-31
Of course, politically that is a no-go for a thousand reasons.
There is more hydrogen in a litre of water than there is in a litre of liquid hydrogen!
Jump to postIt has been stated that Boeing assessed the likelihood of the pilots as not taking appropriate corrective action as a 1-in-150 risk, which combined with the small fleet size of the 737Max permitted Boeing to proceed without grounding the fleet. Also quite efficient with the truth. Perhaps Boeing pu...
Jump to postBut then again, neither the FAA nor Boeing thought that with a derivative airplane with a proven safety record, and one where the engineers were endeavoring to minimize change such that new training would not be required, would need to utilize such guidance. Err, wot? The only people that knew the ...
Jump to postOh, and every single member of the Boeing board at the time should now be in jail.
If white collar crime continues to go unpunished, then there is no reason to expect any change in behaviour.
When the 77W retirements start we will see if they choose a smaller aircraft or a 4% larger one. It will be very interesting to see. Of course, we'll need more visibility of where performance of both airframes sit relative to one another. 789 vs A359 would indicate that airlines are happy to take o...
Jump to postThe Engineers on the 777X are NOT the same Engineers on the 737Max. And they won't be the same nor the Management that oversaw the 737Mx program, And? that's if the project management team even still Works FOR Boeing. From what has been uncovered by the 737MAX debacle, the engineers had their hands...
Jump to postThe 777X exceeds the box limit when it doesn't matter - and falls within the box limit when it does.
Jump to postDoing it for a living, even winning awards, does not mean you're good at it. Plenty of managers win tons of money before high-tailing it ahead of catastrophic failure. Assumptions can be eliminated. Plenty of work in the financial world has proven this over and over again. No, I don't assume the tr...
Jump to postThe post above prompted a thought about shrinking to profit. Without turning this into an A vs. B - the risk exposure to Norwegian would have been much reduced if they could have ordered the A321XLR when formulating their business plan. Obviously its irrelevant to DY now - but the XLR might be the a...
Jump to postVSMUT wrote:They pushed the 777X into the dead VLA territory by doing that.
I agree. Most engineers will tell you most automated test suites are garbage. Testers tend to get rewarded in proportion to the number of tests they generate, so they tend to do countless variations on themes rather than doing more themes because that's the easy way to make the numbers look good. M...
Jump to postSigh, nope. You, have, it, backwards. Start FROM the goal/outcome, prove the mathematical requirements to reach the goal, and then implement a system aligned/compliant to the math. That leaves no assumptions. That's the difference between a REAL process engineer and an outdated old guard who can't ...
Jump to postStTim wrote:I have totally lost track of what he is trying to argue. I follow no logical thread in any of the posts so far.
Why are you continually going on about random systems?!? There is nothing random about it. Furthermore, you again demonstrate your failure to understand the implications of testing, blind or otherwise. You have ASSUMED that by training someone - they then are able to react as you ASSUME when that tr...
Jump to postThere almost certainly are issues - but these data are far too coarse to confidently confirm the extent of that.
Jump to postStTim wrote:If the system is untestable should it be anywhere near a plane?
Faulting Boeing for undertesting an impossible to test system is ridiculous. You have to make some assumptions about human behavior in that scenario, and those assumptions have to be the outcome basis of training. Now, Boeing ROYALLY screwed up pilot training, so you got me there, but the rest of y...
Jump to postNope, putting process before maths is a surefire path to failure. You match the process to the math. You match your manufacturing to your design. What a load of ____. If folks don't test to ensure their assumptions are correct - that says more about the standards of their work and the accepted stan...
Jump to postYour trust and feelings on the matter are immaterial. Can you look at the math and prove it's faulty? Can you look at the materials and manufacturing processes behind the base parameters of the math and prove they don't meet spec? If not, you don't get a seat at the table to say they can't do their...
Jump to postP&W need to get their existing house in order first before looking at adding an extension. GTF problems need to be sorted, and fixes need to prove themselves over time. If Airbus do an A322, or if P&W can do a thrust bump for the 321XLR, then they can creep the existing GTF a little. As for ...
Jump to postEtheereal wrote:Prost wrote:The DC9-30 was the first plane I worked back in 1989, and dammit, it’ll be the last one I work in 15 years!
What does that mean?
There are a number of component problems, which are not unusual with a new program. However, the supply chain is unable to keep up with spares and there does not appear to be a plan to redesign parts to improve reliability. Some fundamental problems that larger, mature programs aren’t facing. There...
Jump to postHow many city pairs would an XLR open compared to a Max9? If there is no tangible additions, then paying the premium for an XLR doesn't stack up. An A321N might - if it delivers better performance over the existing mission set of Alaska. edit: Can the 737-10 reliably do west coast from ANC? [can the...
Jump to postIf the slide's figures are accurate (and I'm doing the math correctly), Aeroflot is assuming a higher average speed for the MC21 by about 55 kilometers/hour to get its superior GASK figure. Is that realistic? CFRP wing spar enables thinner wing with lower critical Mach number. Entirely realistic :b...
Jump to postImagine if another 737 were to crash as a result of a design or manufacturing fault shortly after the RTS? Confidence in the model - and in the company - would be shattered. While the latter would be repairable, the former probably wouldn't. A USA government funded agency charged with safety of the...
Jump to postOr find a better way to weave the tape to prevent delamination at lower thickness... Good luck with that! Mitsubishi's already working on this for a future MRJ. They're looking to cut 30% off the required thickness. Having worked with Mitsubishi on MRJ - thankfully briefly - I'd advise you don't ho...
Jump to posthttps://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news ... ty-upgrade
GE reckons the gap to -1000 pkC is 3-3.5%.
GE reckons the gap to -1000-TEN is 1.5%.
Given the GEnx is already 2% more efficient then the Trent 1000 TEN (see Air New Zealand) and is still awaiting PIPs from the GE9X program, it wouldn't be a tough target for GE at all. That's 4-5% better fuel burn in total if not more. Do you have a link please? https://www.flightglobal.com/fleets/...
Jump to post