Re: Banner News question

Hi,

It's been added. You are welcome to contact us by using the Contact function of the website to remind us for faster responding next time.

Regards,
Harry

Re: American Airlines Fleet - 2023

For people who want evidence on the N750AN thing: Here is the original pics I believe you can look up yourself :) https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/1/94834_1090324679.jpg https://cdn.jetphotos.com/full/1/37801_1090324526.jpg There's a screenshot from Ins which use these shots as reference for the hoax...

Re: American Airlines Fleet - 2023

For people who want evidence on the N750AN thing:

Here is the original pics I believe you can look up yourself

Re: wiggys photos

Hey Wiggy,

Merry Christmas ! Sorry for the late reply as we are working on the queue lately. Regarding the photos you posted above, Single Prop* I prefer slightly CCW Rotate, and Qantas LINK looks compressed to me

Regards,
Harry

Re: Pre-Screening feedback Rpd14

rpd14 wrote:

Hi guys
I need your feedback again for my photo


Is this passable ? Thanks in advance
Cheers

Re: Builder Field Issues

Hello dear A388, I and we sincerely apologize to the inconvenience made to you. Info - Builder rejection will not be given alone, it will be given along with some other existed problems. Sometimes we see Builder Info in the wrong place but if the picture is fine we will just go ahead and accept. I k...

Re: My JPEGs look better than my RAW files

Most of time JPEG does look better than RAW, however JPEG won't have too much space for you to do editing via whatever software you use especially for some extreme photographing conditions which include night shots, poor light, hard weather situation, and etc.. For me I always take Best Quality RAW ...

Re: One word answer rejections

Hi Dave,

Just FYI, you can always find personal message from us via the Email we sent to you after our Rejection. You won't be able to find the message through Photo Corner though.

Regards,
Harry

Re: Camera Settings

Why not make the settings for Camera settings Standard. I'm not sure which part are you referring to, but I am guessing that you are talking about the EXIF showing option above the Watermark tab. From my personal opinion is that sometimes some people don't want to show the details of equipment of s...

Re: wiggys photos

Hey Wiggy, Since I am not using my screening monitor right now, my opinions could be limited for your reference. As far as I can tell based on your posted above, I would suggest to try smaller size rather than size larger than 1600px because some detailed parts look tad blurry on my side at this siz...

Re: Is blurriness the only problem here?

Sup ! I dont know how it will look like when you use a uploading size because your current size is original size I believe, and you should judge it from our angle which is checking your pic in uploading size since we can't access your original pic. IMO, the pic is also underexposed and soft. There's...

Re: I really thought this photo would be accepted (it wasn't)

Hi, IMO, the overall quality for this pic is insufficient at this size. It could be improved by using smaller size like 1200px with more sharpness. Smaller size could also reduce the visual effect of heat haze (if any). For this one, I only see obvious "Blurry" , "Soft" and "...

Re: Depriorized pics although not in db already

Hi,
If you are referring to this one then I believe it's been added successfully as Priority.

Re: Sony aps-c or full frame

It depends on your need I would say. As hoons90 mentions if you take daytime photos most of the time, APSC would be a nice choice for spotting aircraft, but FF do can provide much better quality photos. IMO, I would use Sony FF like A7 iii and its replacement A7 IV since I am also considering to rec...

Re: Photo(s) that made you go WOW!

Re: Post-screening questions

Hi, The rejected one does look slightly underexposed even without checking the histogram. If you want a more subjective reference you can check histogram but don't rely too much on it. Just a reference. Besides, I would suggest you to try adjust "Level" in Photoshop or whatever softwares y...

Re: Is it good enough?

Hey Andy,

Sharpness loosk not bad to me although I would increase slightly for it. Hwoever, the major problem should be the cropping issue because the whole aircraft is not centered at all. Right hand side has too much empty space.

Regards,
Harry

Re: Screening advice

Hello Iain,

Sorry for the late reply. We couldn't access large size photos you posted like this. Please try another method to post photos. We would be glad to help you !

Regards,
Harry

Re: Compression rejection

Hi Andy, I can't access to the photo you posted above. One of the ways to recognize the compression is to check if there's "Pixel" feeling or effect on the photos. Typically can be observed in the sky and some colorful areas. You can experiment this by saving an identical photo with differ...

Re: Pre-screening photo

Ditto with Karl's opinions.

Re: bnoble feedback

Thanks Harry! Just to be sure, I selected night shot and special paint, am I missing anything? No need for "Night/Dusk/Dawn" category for this case. Sunlight situation looks pretty enough from the picture you showed. Only need to select the "Colorful/Special Paint" from the cate...

Re: Rejection Reason Flat

Brightness looks passable for me, but I do agree with another two on Low Contrast and Oversharpened. Adding slightly more contrast would be better and some jaggy can be seen surround the windows and edges of fuselage.

Re: bnoble feedback

Looks nice for me.Just ensure you enter correct info and select appropriate category for it when upload

Regards,
Harry

Re: Prescreening - PHXA332

Agree with Tim's point.

Re: What can I check Airline ? and advise

Hi, Your link probably would not work for us in here since the link will take us to our own Photo Corner Page. Your photo should be "Untitled" first and then follow its real owner "Korean Air." Since there is no specific title on the aircraft body, the first airline should always...

Re: reasons for rejection

Hello !

CW rotation means that your current one needs some CW (Clockwise) rotation. Reason(s) for "Motive" should be explained in "Personal Message" which which will be shown in your Email !
Hope that helps!

Sincerely,

Re: Re-upload rejection - how to handle this

Hi Jalap ! You can always use the "Reupload" function which can be easily found in "Photo Corner" ---> "Accepted" ---> "Photo you want to switch"---> "Reupload" to replace the current ACCEPTED photo with another better one. Follow the instructions sh...

Re: bnoble feedback

I would do so although the second one does look marginal at quality respect ( Sky has bit of noisy ). The first one (71), I can't recognize obvious borders and heat haze.

Regards,
Harry

Re: Pre-screen Various Images

F-16C : Agree with Tim's point on soft. The whole aircraft looks very soft especially the areas beside cockpit cover. Hard to get a pass IMO. F18C : Crop should be fine. Sharpness looks marginal but passable for me. If it still gets Soft this time, I would highly recommend you to apply a small size ...

Re: bnoble feedback

I just took a look at it. The body looks blurry and oversharpened at some parts as well due to blurry. Probably would be better with a better angle in this series.

Regards,
Harry

Re: bnoble feedback

6160563: Overall looks ok for me. There is a bird-like thing above the aircraft, which would be better to be removed IMO. Since it's hard to be recognized even in some large screen. Probably would lead to Dirty Rejection. 6160565: A visible dirty circle spot in the upper left corner. Otherwise, look...

Re: Pre-screening good or need to fix?

Hi Sorry for the late reply. Firstly, the crop looks really iffy for me as I am not a fan of this kind of crop because it looks not really balanced in genearl although it is close to Example 22c. I won't recommend this crop, IMO. There are also some other issues as well. Reflections on the body due ...

Re: Pre-screening good or need to fix?

I can't access to the later two links you posted ;D
Could you please check it again ?

Regards,
Harry

Re: Pre-screening for musicman4327

Hi Stuart ! Sorry for the late reply for your thread. Here're my opinions for them : N624XA : CW rotation needed (Using consturctions outside airport) ; Too low in frame (Too much space on the upper frame) ; Could be slightly brighter. N542NM: Vignettings from left and right side ; Slightly low in f...

Re: Post Screening - Rejection - Too Distant With Empty Space

OK, sorry for delayed reply, a couple of family events over the weekend. Re-uploaded using the photo from the previous link without watermark. I saw it, but that won't work at this size honestly. 1920px requires very high quality from many aspects. Would be better at a smaller size like 1300px - 14...

Re: Color has changed on photo I uploaded and was accepted.

Hi, This is a common issue (Not a Bug) about the color file used when you edit your photos. You would be better to use sRGB file rather than RGB file when edit your photos and ready to upload to Web. Since most Webs will not show real color of the photo (like this case). We, screeners, can't see thi...

Re: Post Screening - Rejection - Too Distant With Empty Space

Well, it is better than the previous version, but I still think that you left too much unnecessary upper empty sky. Replacing those sky areas with the bottom areas would be better IMO. Regards, You mean like this? https://flic.kr/p/2jDg872 Yes with appropriate size and quality, this is much better :D

Re: Post Screening - Rejection - Too Distant With Empty Space

Well, it is better than the previous version, but I still think that you left too much unnecessary upper empty sky. Replacing those sky areas with the bottom areas would be better IMO.

Regards,

Re: Post Screening - Rejection - Too Distant With Empty Space

OK I couldn't wait... retrying and link to new upload is here: https://www.airliners.net/user/photo-corner/photo/6141783 Please let me know if that is more what you had in mind? Thanks Charlie. Hey Charlie, The link you posted is for your own Photo Corner, which will lead us to our own Photo Corner...

Re: Post Screening - Rejection - Too Distant With Empty Space

Hey Charlie, This photo has been through four of us in the process, and each of us agrees that this is a nice one with beautiful sunshine, but the upper frame is too empty since the sky doesn't have too many interesting things there. I would agree what JakTrax talked about above. You can also try to...

Re: Pre-screening

Hi Yousaf, Sorry for the latre reply for your previous post. I'm not a fan of the angle of the BMX, but that one looks fine for me. It would be better to give a slightly tighter crop. For BLZ, it looks tad low contrast for me and the bottom has bit of magenta cast. Plz also ensure you insert sRGB co...

Re: Heat Haze - Mirage F1

Hi, For heat haze, if the heat haze effect on the aircraft is visible and obviouse enough in large size image,we will mostly reject that. Some severe and obvious heat haze would be rejected directly. Some minor heat haze in original photo can be seen but after editing and re-size processes cannot be...

Re: Photos Not Uploading

Hi Len,

Sorry for the inconvenience. We have already added this one for you again. Photo shown normally right now ; )

Re: Pre-screening

Looks not bad at this size for me ; )

Cheers,

Re: bnoble feedback

That one looks pretty soft for me especially the nose gear area. Besides, it also looks low contrast and underexposed for me probably due to the poor weather situation I guess. If you want to make adjustments on it, ensure don't make more noise in sky.

Re: bnoble feedback

Hi, I actually deleted that photo, but it would be helpful if you could check 6107693, Thanks! Would like to confirm if it's Cessna 608A taken at JXN ? Although it's ok to do so, highly recommend you to post links in the threads so that everyone can provide their thought on it if you like ! Since w...

Re: Pre-screening

Anything which requires fixing? https://i.ibb.co/JkxshCM/IMG-8652-Edit-AP-BGK-1600-x-1067.jpg This one is very low contrast obviously I think. I can see slight heat haze along with the top edge of the aircraft in this case, and the size is too large to satisfy this standard in this case as well. So...

Re: Pre-screening

https://i.ibb.co/SKXTTcZ/IMG-8300.jpg Is this worth occupying an upload slot? The quality for this one is veyr marginal I think. There's a obvious flares from light in the background above the nose of the aircraft.Looks some cw rotation might be needed as well. A little bit right in frame since the...

Re: bnoble feedback

Hi Brandy,

Could you please share a link of the corresponding photo to us here ? I can't access to the photo you mentioned above. Thanks.

Sincerely,

Re: Post-Screening: WithaK

Cathay 748F looks ok for me in terms of sharpness at this size.
For Qantas, I agree with Tim's opinions that it has sligly soft, but frame is fine IMO.

Rgrds,
Harry