Re: Accepted photo not appearing

It's showing now.

Re: Pre/Post Screening Input - Josh Frizzell

On first impression it look a little green/yellow-ish.

Re: Is this „group“ oversaturated?

Fully agree with you sovietjet, although I would like to keep up the high quality standards to a certain extent as this is what a.net is supposed to make it stand out of the rest and one of my main reasons for uploading here instead of on other sites, together with the convenience of uploading and s...

Re: Is this „group“ oversaturated?

In my view, this site was at its peak before social media platforms were ubiquitous on phones. It's also clear that far fewer shots are getting uploaded - a quick look at the queue shows 7,752 uploads, averaging just under 300 per day. Those photos are getting far fewer views and taking longer to g...

Re: Spare Space Above

I bet the developers were busy creating some space to add more ads.

Screening result emails

Hi all,

For some reason I am no longer receiving screening result emails. Has anybody else experienced the same in the last 1-2 weeks?

Re: Perfect photo conditions and 39 out of 40 rejected?!

sovietjet wrote:

It seems like when I open the photos on Flickr initially they are slightly "low-rez" blurry and then properly load to a good quality several seconds later.

Re: Perfect photo conditions and 39 out of 40 rejected?!

Many of us have been there and have felt the exact same frustration. However when looking at your photos on Flickr I do agree with the screeners. Looking at the tailnubmers/letters, roundels etc many of them seem blurry. I've had the same issue at Davis Monthan, even in November and January. While i...

Re: Increase in number of adverts in threads

If engangement/traffic is about the same, how does the new situation keep the lights on longer than the old situation? What's the difference?

Re: Increase in number of adverts in threads

VertScopeAdmin wrote:

We reviewed 30 and 60-day data and no significant changes in engagement or traffic.

Re: Increase in number of adverts in threads

With what exactly? Whatever happened to that review after the 30 days post-ad change rollout? Just another empty promise to keep us quiet for a while?

Re: Increase in number of adverts in threads

We are working to see if we can get a "First Class" or Premium/Plus membership setup here to avoid ads and support the community. ... Thank you for the feedback; I have shared it up the chain and will review the data after 30 days post-ad change rollout. We will review what options we hav...

Re: Screening Pending Processing

All uploaded photos are keeping "Screening Pending Processing" and seem not to be uploaded in fact. Someone else facing this? aantunes I'm having the same issue right now. Will this be solved automatically or do I need to delete them from the queue and re-upload? EDIT never mind, all seem...

Re: Motive and overexposed

Motive: clipped horizontal stabilizer (and wing). Had this issue in the past as well. You need to crop it closer to the fuselage or include the entire stabilizer.
Overexposed: don't see it either.

Re: Website Freezing on iPhone Safari Browser

I’m using an iPad and there are advertisements showing twice, once at the bottom of the screen which won’t go away unless I click on the “X”and the same one in the normal position between photos. This totally slows down the loading of the page and is becoming quite annoying. Can this be fixed pleas...

Re: Boeing 747-400 Fleet Movements / Write-Off / Retirements / Scrapping - 2023

TF-AKE is a/w as per photo on 08 Sep.

Re: Screened

It used to be 1-2 weeks tops, but the new normal seems to be around 3 weeks, despite the relatively low number of daily uploads (used to be 800-1000, now it's only around 300).

Re: Increase in number of adverts in threads

Unfortunately the sole purpose of ads is to distract you from the actual content on the page.

Re: Increase in number of adverts in threads

If that would also mean the developers get more funding to finally start working on the long list of existing bugs and new features, then count me in

Re: Increase in number of adverts in threads

So that's the only thing the developers are willing/able/allowing to do nowadays, harassing users with even more annoying ads that nobody in their right mind clicks on???

Re: 500 error pop ups

Any feedback yet on this issue from the devs?

Re: Post-screening questions

Thank you, I was under the impression that Double only applied for shots taken in the same sequence.

Re: Have quality standards changed on here recently?

I don't know the screener's email address as I don't know who screened this photo.
And how can other people learn from emails that only I would get from the screener? In the forum anybody can learn and discuss.

Re: Have quality standards changed on here recently?

Should this have been rejected for vignetting (or perhaps shooting through the fence)?

Re: Flood Lights = Automatic Overexposed?

Main issue here is the wet ramp which is causing white-outs. Quite different situation than most of your accepted shots (although personally I would reject some of these as well due to the white-outs).

Re: Settings for overcast skies?

I only use the OFF-setting on my camera

Re: Post-screening questions

Hi all, I just got an image rejected for double, even though they were clearly not taken in the same sequence but at different times of the day and at different locations. Can anybody please clarify the "double" rules? Rejected image: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/4/9/71...

Re: how to check on my pics still not screened.