blacksoviet wrote:How much range would a 748 have if you gave it a 744 fuselage?
Is this end of year burst of delivery activity common for the two big companies, A & B? Both OEMs often see delivery surges in the final weeks of the year. How much of this late in the year activity is driven by numbers? What part of "endoftheyearitis" is involved here? Well the OEMs ...Jump to post
I would go for an A350-1000LR ACJ if offered, as when you are hitting 18-20 hour flight times you will really notice the lower cabin alt/higher humidity that the composite frame brings. I presume Boeing won’t find a way to do that in the aluminium tube, but if they do they can take my money! Higher...Jump to post
I’m curious what 77x variants this is referring to: GE also plans to develop versions of the turbofan with 102,000lb-thrust and 93,000lb-thrust, according to regulatory filings with the FAA. Those engines could power other 777X variants. The 102k model might be for airlines like Lufthansa who are n...Jump to post
Dang. My partner has an ACJ A350 on order. Are there any real advantages for this? The Airbus already fit our king sized bed, and another for the pets. As a tall solo sleeper, I prefer a California King, myself, and like to have the headboard against the window belt for the natural light when I rea...Jump to post
WIederling wrote:Randy Boeing and his PR backoffice isn't really the source for any balanced or even god forbid neutral information. Try again.
The KC-46A completed its Phase II receiver testing down at Edwards AFB earlier this week and this seems to be enough for the USAF to issue the Military Type Certificate which would allow deliveries, both now penciled in by the end of the month. In other KC-46A news, Japan has signed for the second (...Jump to post
I’m a bit surprised given how far along the program is that we haven’t seen photos of a full cabin mock-up. Does anyone have any idea if one exists and if so when we’ll get a look at it? https://www.flickr.com/photos/flyvertosset/16029027004/in/album-72157648577103403/ https://runwaygirlnetwork.com...Jump to post
The GE9X has completed static testing and the initial flight testing so the next step will be to mate the engines to the 777X flight test frames. As such, they should be ready when Boeing wants them. As for the windows, as of last year Boeing noted that dimmable windows would be a customer option, a...Jump to post
seabosdca wrote:That picture is from today, post-painting. It sure doesn't look like any previous ROK color scheme - it's very "generic BBJ," with gray and black swoops.
Is this one still going to the ROK? That looks to still be the plan. It was delivered to Boeing Business Jets in 2015 and then transferred to the Bank of Utah. It was undergoing conversion by Korean Airlines into a VIP frame at Moses Lake before moving in earlyNovember to San Bernardino for paintin...Jump to post
To others:. DHL buying used A330Fs was an opportunity to purchase at a discount. And they are also still taking used 767s, as well, so it is not like DHL has "abandoned" the 767 in favor of the A330. Instead they are using both together, each according to their strengths within their netw...Jump to post
Would a 330neoF actually burn less fuel per trip than a 767F ? The 767 is considerably lighter than a 330, so even with the older tech engines, I am skeptical that the 330neo F would burn less fuel per trip. The longer the trip, the more the A330neo's fuel efficiency advantage should come to the fo...Jump to post
Question: Suppose you want to move freight in units larger than a 737F, and smaller than a 777F. Further, suppose you want a lower fuel burn than any plane who's engines were designed pre-1981. What would you suggest? Well the CFM56-2 engine on the DC-8 Super 70 series freighters was designed in 19...Jump to post
And vs the 767F, other operational and capital/infrastructural costs make the A330F less economical than the 767F. Eg. Ramp space and airport fees. I don't see how you can know that. Neither of us has enough data to be sure. But an A330ceo has a lower CASM in the passenger use than a 767, and an A3...Jump to post
I did a search of the internet using the search term "Concorde Freighters" and found nothing pointing to Air India or South African Airways using the plane in a freighter role.If they had, I'm confident the a.net photographers would have provided us with a ton of pictures because those wo...Jump to post
The main difference to the A330Fceo could be the 251 t MTOW. An increase of 18 t, while OEW could increase by 8 t or less. I expect there is nothing structural preventing Airbus from raising the A330-200F's MTOW to between 242,000 and 251,000kg if there is a desire from current or potential custome...Jump to post
But freighters often fly fewer hours per day, and therefore save less fuel per day. But some (a few) freighters are utilized enough to make the savings worthwhile. I expect the majority of those frames are the smaller turboprop and narrowbody frames as opposed to the larger widebodies like the 767/...Jump to post
Freighters often do much shorter trips with fuel stops as they are heavily loaded. :yes: Freighters likely seldom go out with full tanks as they are most-effective when loaded to near MZFW, which limits how much remaining of the MTOW can be used for fuel tankage. The 747-400ER and 747-8 could do As...Jump to post
bigjku wrote:I don’t expect a 787F unless they stretch and up MTOW.
If you want to generate premium freight margins, frequency, frequency, frequency. If you are busy consolidating 103t, you are a margin bottom feeder. Better to operate a couple of NB freighters, and drop some customers. But does that kind of daily freight O&D demand exist to fill a 737 or A320 ...Jump to post
This is what Delta will order to replace their 767 fleet. Does you expect this A330NEO Regional to have legitimate, bi-directional 5,500sm range? If not it won't replace 763 nor 764ERs. DL has "full MTOW" A330-900neos to replace the 767s doing those missions. The A330-900neo Regional can ...Jump to post
The USAF has confirmed that the 27 October delivery goal was not achieved and is not committing to a 2018 EIS though that still appears to be the goal. The USAF does not require the CAT-1 deficiencies to be addressed prior to accepting delivery, but Boeing is operating under the assumption they will...Jump to post
I would not be surprised if the reason Airbus did not go with adding two additional doors like Boeing did is because they cannot afford to lose the floorspace due to the A320 being two meters shorter than the 737-8. We also need to remember that the 200-seat MAX variant is specifically designed for ...Jump to post
lightsaber wrote:Boeing needs a (777) conversion program.
The later said "We have ordered 20 aircraft and firmly reserved 14 more (reconfirmable)" . :yes: In September 2013, the Lufthansa AG Board "committed" to 34 frames (of which 20 were firm orders via a transfer of deposits from their 20 747-8 Purchase Options) with up to an additi...Jump to post
I will never ever step into any plane that is made in china. Look at MA60 case. Even for free.. I suggest think carefully about A320s and 737s... as some are assembled in China.... and some of those are flying for non-Chinese airlines. :) Airbus has an A320 Final Assembly Line in China and until re...Jump to post
Presumably, if another carrier orders the A338 and wants delivery soon after certification, Airbus can oblige by completing the initial airframes in advance :?: Probably not due to the lead time on parts for an aircraft and available near term production slots If those parts are interchangeable wit...Jump to post
So it seems the model that many have been working from, a smooth KC-Y follow-on contract that would have no choice but be for more KC-46s, is dead, at least in the minds of current Air Force planners. Many of us (myself included) were under the impression that KC-Y and KC-Z would be larger transpor...Jump to post
Sounds like a loose-loose situation. If i was an airline ordering, hearing something like that would just made me to conclude our negotiations with a zero total of orders. It depends on how serious the customer was and what conditions they were expecting in their RFP, including pricing, financing, ...Jump to post
It may be hard to find the records; but, I think that Boeing also increased their estimated yearly delivery estimate to include the expected McD production. Had Airbus done the same they would have changed their projected to 818, adjusted up by 18 due to the inclusion of the acquired A220. That is ...Jump to post
Regarding NH, if they are under a Rolls-Royce TotalCare agreement, then RR might be handling all their inspections. Even if NH is responsible for some or all inspections, they would be doing it based on the intervals provided to them by Rolls-Royce and those intervals were too long based on the corr...Jump to post
So according to the article, Airbus will be adding 18 A220 deliveries to their 2018 guidance. Wikipedia says that 38 CSeries/A220 frames have been delivered by the end of September 2018. So Airbus is only claiming a subset of the total number of deliveries. Airbus took formal majority control of the...Jump to post
Would it not have been cheaper/quicker to up production and supply brand new engines to all affected frames? I imagine there are some long-lead-time items that make quickly scaling complete engine production a long-term process. I do expect Rolls and the supplier(s) of the affected components have ...Jump to post
I remain of the opinion that when Boeing discusses seating, they are using their 1980s era OEM standards and not current hard product offerings from suppliers. So "245" seats would be equivalent to the 767-300ER: 24 First Class at 2x2x2 with 38" pitch and 224 Economy at 2x3x2 with 32...Jump to post
I remain of the opinion that when Boeing discusses seating, they are using their 1980s era OEM standards and not current hard product offerings from suppliers. So "245" seats would be equivalent to the 767-300ER: 24 First Class at 2x2x2 with 38" pitch and 224 Economy at 2x3x2 with 32&...Jump to post
When I was a kid (many decades ago) I built a pretty large airport using large sheets of plywood in our unfinished basement. The runway was around four meters long with a parallel taxiway using Christmas lights for night operations. We used model railroad lights to illuminate the tarmac and decent-s...Jump to post
Or as one poster has suggested Airbus should have and still could re-wing and downsize the 330, opposite ala 777X. It would likely be a little larger than the NSA as the 350 is versus the 787. Not a perfect competitor but nicely between the 321 and the 350 - another failed 1500 models sold. LOL Air...Jump to post
The DC-XX / ATMR concept had a cabin width of 173in (439cm) that was designed around 2+2+2 but could support 2+3+2 with similar comfort as the 767 at 2+4+2. So I am guessing that is the minimum we're looking at. It was also supposed to weigh less than the 757-200 due to a smaller wing with an area o...Jump to post
Dimmable windows was a gimmick but folding wingtips is an even bigger gimmick. I'm not saying that there's no place for folding wings, but just the tips is ridiculous. If you're gonna fold the wings do it right. When they figure out how to fold half the wings, that will be revolutionary technology....Jump to post
I can easily see Boeing trading seat width for the comfort of an extra aisle. And if the pre-launch focus links passenger comfort to the volume of overhead bins, I am always sceptical. So yes, I would not be surprised to see them go below 17". Boeing would only trade it if airlines demanded it...Jump to post
A "tight 8" means a 767 cross section at minimum and while this plane does seem to be designed around being a true 767 successor, the world's majors all appear to have set a minimum width of 17 inches / 43 centimeters so I expect that even if Boeing does with a 767 cross-section in the mai...Jump to post
And the new delay was due directly to the lack of the MTC, which is not ready due to the STC having taken longer than the USAF expected. So sounds like once the USAF issues the MTC, deliveries can commence even if there remain deficiencies to be corrected.Jump to post
I-DUPA was an MD-11C combi, not an MD-11CF. It is mis-tagged.
It was converted in 2005 to a pure freighter.
https://www.planespotters.net/airframe/ ... o/XdDntBkM
Reading the quote...posted, it states rather clearly that Boeing is presenting the airlines with a blank sheet of paper, asking them what they'd like. That's pretty much as far removed from payload/range charts, performance numbers, timelines and what have you, as it gets. And the bit about 'schedu...Jump to post