Thanks Evan and Jehan, here are re-edits of both. The WN is not blurry straight out of camera, there was slight NR used so it may be that. I attempted to increase sharpening on the titles slightly, while the T-38 has reduced overall sharpening. Thanks! 64-13247: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/...Jump to post
Tried to edit the previous post, but it appears I am a bit too late. Sorry for the unnecessary clutter, but here's a couple more for prescreening. Thanks! 64-13247 (Beale T-38): https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/5/8/5550851.jpg?v=v4ad84c10769 N8735L: https://imgproc.airliners.net/phot...Jump to post
Tiger is probably not worth even attempting an edit due to poor lighting conditions, the second aircraft (not good with vintage military types, sorry) is quite noisy and lacks the quality for that size. The light is also posing some issues as it has blown out the wing/fuselage.Jump to post
Update: rejected again "still quite soft" and now also low contrast. Kind of frustrated with the ever-changing reasons, and not really sure what to do since all I did was decrease brightness by 5 and add just a slight bit of sharpening. Frankly, I really don't see how/where its soft, there...Jump to post
Thanks Tim, I'm kind of with you on POWH frankly. Hopefully a screener could offer some guidance, it isn't the best shot, but with the new titles and rarity of the subject in this area of the world, I figured I'd go for it. MKZ was rejected only for soft, which I don't see as an issue, but color is ...Jump to post
Thanks Kas, and thank you for the kind words. Timing is everything! Included below is a re-edit of 737AT, and the G-POWH rejection I'm struggling with. It's been rejected twice for oversharpened and dark, the first one I could definitely see and it was not a great edit. I know the light is pretty di...Jump to post
Hey all, back with a few for pre-screening. Thanks in advance! N737AT: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/5/7/1/5544175.jpg?v=v4b02ddd108c USMC KC-130J: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/8/1/5544183.jpg?v=v42873987e21 VQ-BIN: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/...Jump to post
Re-edited AA got rejected for the exact same things. Some screener input would be appreciated, because for whatever reason I am struggling with this one.
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... 12ff1ee8d1
Hi, I don't have any of said photos accepted here, but if you look through the database, I'm sure you'd find several. That's probably your best bet to find what you're looking for.
So I've got 3 overexposed rejections and the AA was tossed for soft as well. Pretty confused how those are overexposed, I guess I can see some borderline soft areas on the AA. Thoughts? Thanks. PH-TFP: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/9/2/2/5527229.jpg?v=v4d933bd3858 N343RY: https://im...Jump to post
Sadly yes, I have taken a photo of the bird that crashed in ET302. I have photos of Lion's LQQ and LQR, but I did not get LQP on camera. Saw it flying in and out of BFI though.
Hi all, Unsure if this belongs in this forum or site-related, but given I found a thread from a few years ago on the same topic in this forum, here goes. I recently uploaded the first image of Air Europa's first MAX. As far as I'm aware, this should qualify for a banner, but I do not see one. Am I m...Jump to post
Hey all, back with a couple shots for prescreen. Running low on content with fewer MAX's to shoot, although hopefully that changes soon. CR2: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/0/2/5489201.jpg?v=v41354921ba3 C-32: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/5/9/1/5489195.jpg?v=v425b...Jump to post
Hi Kas, yes there is a bit of a grade on the runway, although very slight. This one got rejected for OS and CCW (again) and I have to be honest, I don't see either being a major issue. I guess I could see the titles being slightly OS but that's about all I can see, and that's nit picky. https://imgp...Jump to post
Thanks guys, I'll try a different frame instead. Here's two more level rejections I fail to see. CCW rotation is becoming awfully frustrating of late. The signpost on the freeway isn't a reliable reference as the freeway is on a slope, so if that's what they're using its not accurate. https://imgpro...Jump to post
Thanks for the help Jehan, bailed on the RAM since I wasn't happy with the quality and luckily caught it in better weather. Unfortunately, either I've forgotten how to level, or screeners are seeing something I'm not, because this was tossed for blurry/soft/needing CCW. Frankly, I see none of those ...Jump to post
Hey guys, little bit stuck with these. Initially the Aeromexico and Turkish were simply rejected for flat, which was obviously an issue, reuploaded and now Aeromexico is blurry/overexposed, Turkish is blurry/overexposed/noisy and RAM is blurry/oversharpened. Little confused how a pretty easily fixab...Jump to post
Thanks Evan, I was considering that too. I would've cropped it more similarly to the TUI but I thought chopping off the stripe would look silly. Just a personal preference. I'll wait for a screener's opinion before finalizing what I'll do. Happy New Year by the way!Jump to post
Thanks Evan, I decided to just decrease overall sharpening and they've been accepted. I am, however, a little confused with the low in frame on this one. It is nearly identical centering wise to my accepted TUI nose. Thoughts on this one? Rejected Norwegian: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airl...Jump to post
Thanks for the kind words gentlemen. I said I'd be back at the new year...I lied! :) Here's a couple oversharpened rejections that I'm not too sure about. They look alright to me, I guess I see a bit of jaggies on the WN reg but other than that I'm struggling to see the OS areas. Thoughts? Thanks! W...Jump to post
No prescreening in this post, but I'll have some after the holidays. I just wanted to extend a huge thank you to all who have helped me get to 200 acceptances. Screeners, members, crew, and anyone else not mentioned, thank you! I have learned a ton, advanced my skillset tremendously, made some fanta...Jump to post
Hey all, struggling to see the softness in this one. Rejected twice for soft, but now it looks OS in places rather than soft to me. Thoughts? Thanks!
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... d0f5126677
Hello fellow Nikonian, if you've got the 70-300 3.5-5.6 VR FX AF-P version I would honestly stick with that, it's a quality lens imo. It should be plenty capable of anet. Hell, the majority of my shots are with the cheapo 55-300, I just recently got the above 70-300. There's a lot more involved in s...Jump to post
So this got rejected for blurry, appealed, and rejected for "soft at best." I am thoroughly confused as to how this is blurry, and/or where it is soft. Any thoughts?
https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/ai ... ab6157ca92
Hi all, I've just attempted to upload a few images, and the image is refusing to upload after a few hours of loading time. I still have queue slots left, so it isn't that. I'm certainly uploading a jpeg so it isn't that. I've just recently experienced the issue and it is across multiple images in mu...Jump to post
Okay so due to the large number of posts I don't know if I missed anything, but here's feedback on the six linked images. Eyes are also very tired so might be missing things. N569JB: borderline OS in spots, feels a bit flat N461UA: blurry towards the rear, OS in areas probably to mask blur N698DL: O...Jump to post
Hi all, a few more for prescreening here. Thanks! VT-GHI: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/6/8/5267863.jpg?v=v4e364ea2d8d N409AS: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/6/8/5267867.jpg?v=v43ae7c39014 N342UP: https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/7/8/5267871.jpg?v...Jump to post
Evan, I doubt there is any fixing the first one due to the amount of heat haze. I'm assuming that was confusing wording and you meant both reasons for the second image. The first one is not going to be fixable, the second is. Also, crop factor doesn't affect aperture. If you have a cheaper lens, yo...Jump to post
Evan, I doubt there is any fixing the first one due to the amount of heat haze. I'm assuming that was confusing wording and you meant both reasons for the second image. The first one is not going to be fixable, the second is. Also, crop factor doesn't affect aperture. If you have a cheaper lens, you...Jump to post
Hi, cannot see the photo, best way to link those is to go to your rejected images, and hit copy image address, then paste that information here. However, in this case, it's not really necessary to see the image to directly answer your question. Common isn't really a rejection reason, but more of a w...Jump to post