Search found 167 matches

by ricox
Wed Jul 05, 2017 5:48 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Question of respect!
Replies: 6
Views: 1452

Question of respect!

Dear head screener, regard this pic and its rejection... http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/2/6/4425627.jpg?v=v46bfcaa3d02 2017-06-20 05:27 AM : Uploaded by photographer ricox 2017-07-04 07:42 AM : Screened Screener Decision: Rejected Soft High in Frame Underexposed 2017-07-04 11:50 AM ...

Jump to post
by ricox
Tue Jun 20, 2017 9:20 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Its happened again .. and it's not good
Replies: 4
Views: 1426

Re: Its happened again .. and it's not good

Just a personal guess, but might it be that the Screeners first check for the obvious flaws (centering, leveling, dirt spots), and then, if all that is ok, go into contrast, exposure, sharpness and so on? That would explain having a rejection for Leveling, and then once that's fixed, having it reje...

Jump to post
by ricox
Sat Jun 17, 2017 6:03 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Its happened again .. and it's not good
Replies: 4
Views: 1426

Its happened again .. and it's not good

http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/1/2/4403213.jpg?v=v4944bdcba2a This is the story of one of my pic rej ... 2017-05-23 10:47 AM : Uploaded by photographer ricox 2017-06-03 08:10 AM : Screened Screener Decision: Rejected CW Rotation 2017-06-03 08:55 AM : Appealed by photographer ricox ...

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon May 08, 2017 3:13 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox Pre-Screening
Replies: 19
Views: 2038

Re: ricox Pre-Screening

spompert wrote:
Nice photo, good to see it on the frontpage!


Thank's Stefan, sometimes is only a matter of luck, I could say it because nobody suffered injuries.
If you are in the right piace at the right time ... like your most viewed photo!! In your case there was also a very good photographer :-)
Bye.

Jump to post
by ricox
Sat May 06, 2017 7:10 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox Pre-Screening
Replies: 19
Views: 2038

Re: ricox Pre-Screening

airkas1 wrote:
Passable for me.


require a prioritry or no Kas?
Thank's

Jump to post
by ricox
Sat May 06, 2017 9:48 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox Pre-Screening
Replies: 19
Views: 2038

Re: ricox Pre-Screening

Thank's, cargo is uploaded succefully, imho is a bit overexp but .... Now my qustion is for this particular situation, an hely crashed (without injuries) I could take photos only in distance of the rescue .. is possible to use this kind of composition? http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/5...

Jump to post
by ricox
Sat Apr 29, 2017 3:42 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox Pre-Screening
Replies: 19
Views: 2038

Re: ricox Pre-Screening

OK, re starting from the raw, very few adjustment on exposure ...

Image

is this the right way?

Jump to post
by ricox
Fri Apr 28, 2017 10:04 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox Pre-Screening
Replies: 19
Views: 2038

Re: ricox Pre-Screening

[twoid][/twoid]Thank's a lot for your offers ... but I try again ... this is becoming a little war ... and I want to understand the right way ... now, in Italy is time to sleep good night... :faint:

Jump to post
by ricox
Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:26 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox Pre-Screening
Replies: 19
Views: 2038

Re: ricox Pre-Screening

Some times,
what seem a simple photo become a hell :shock:
Tried another editing ....

Image

could now have a chance?
Thank's again to everybody...

Jump to post
by ricox
Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:36 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox Pre-Screening
Replies: 19
Views: 2038

Re: ricox Pre-Screening

Ah .. no I left the sky as it was, I gave some light to the plane ... the sky is natural I'm afraid that if I give light to the sky I fall in banding issue :-(
I try....

Jump to post
by ricox
Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:06 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox Pre-Screening
Replies: 19
Views: 2038

Re: ricox Pre-Screening

Thank's for feed back...
what do you think about now?

Image

Thank's

Jump to post
by ricox
Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:05 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox Pre-Screening
Replies: 19
Views: 2038

ricox Pre-Screening

Hi guys, I had this http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/5/9/4330951.jpg?v=v4048b7d71f3 rej for: Banding Vignetting UnderExp After a deeply analisys on the works, equalizing limage level I could not find Band, but, this morning on teh site, moving up and down the pic on my screen I saw ....

Jump to post
by ricox
Fri Apr 21, 2017 10:56 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Post Scr Ricox
Replies: 1
Views: 1055

Post Scr Ricox

Hi all, this photo have a story: http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/2/0/4320021.jpg?v=v4668964077f was rej 2 times only for Cyan... today after two fix is become: Blurry Overexposed Soft High Contrast Noise is not the first time that I wrote about this scr behavieur, If you rej a pic wi...

Jump to post
by ricox
Thu Apr 20, 2017 12:35 pm
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Upload queue limits
Replies: 2
Views: 5089

Upload queue limits

Hi staff, probably I'm not so smart but this morning I was looking for upload queue limits table and I had some difficulties to find it. I purpose to make this information: Images in DB: 1-5: 2 5-10: 5 10-100: 10 100-500: 15 500-1000: 20 >1000: 40 easily accessible? Do you agree? I noticed also anot...

Jump to post
by ricox
Tue Apr 18, 2017 10:41 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Warried about personal message...
Replies: 3
Views: 2954

Warried about personal message...

Hi guy, both this images was rej for overshapening, after appeal rej motivation grew up and head say that is possible that my lens have a problem ... I'm quite warried .. what kind of problem could have my EF 100-400 IS II??? http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/9/8/4314893.jpg?v=v46aad44...

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon Apr 10, 2017 9:32 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Double G-EZPD in my db
Replies: 1
Views: 978

Double G-EZPD in my db

Hi stuff,
probably for my error I have 2 G-EZPD in my DB same day 04/06/2016 frame very smilar.
Could you be so kindly to remove the wrost one?
Thank's

Jump to post
by ricox
Thu Apr 06, 2017 6:28 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: HeadScr bad behavieur
Replies: 2
Views: 1406

HeadScr bad behavieur

Regarding my two last rej, I explicity asked in the appeal to indicate me where signaled issue are eventually visibile ... Head rej without any explanation, adding more questionable issue. Very arrogant and opinionated behavieur. Uploading and also discussing on photos composition and quality was a ...

Jump to post
by ricox
Sat Oct 08, 2016 4:54 am
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion
Replies: 2553
Views: 403438

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

I don't understand If developers/designers of this site have any problems... Since site was changed, one of the usual critics is the unused space in display photo info, forum thread etc etc, now after months of waiting, they come out with photo statistic table exactly in the same way!!! 10cm of unus...

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon Oct 03, 2016 6:12 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: I love this frame...
Replies: 4
Views: 2409

Re: I love this frame...

Thank's vik

Jump to post
by ricox
Sun Oct 02, 2016 6:44 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Try to do it better ;-)
Replies: 2
Views: 1886

Re: Try to do it better ;-)

https://www.airliners.net/photo/Alitalia ... /3915049/L few weeks ago was accepted... not right in frame .. but is the same crop and angle :roll: :roll: :roll:
-->

Ok kas,
but onestly, I repeat and repeatr that your way to screen have to be more standard,
this my https://www.airliners.net/photo/Alitalia ... /3915049/L few weeks ago was accepted... not right in frame .. but is the same crop and angle :roll: :roll: :roll:

Jump to post
by ricox
Sun Oct 02, 2016 6:32 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: I love this frame...
Replies: 4
Views: 2409

I love this frame...

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 970a08c3ec

Thank's everybody..
-->

... so I want to ask if is really heathaze visible to decide if put it in the trash or not...

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 970a08c3ec

Thank's everybody..

Jump to post
by ricox
Sat Oct 01, 2016 5:37 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Try to do it better ;-)
Replies: 2
Views: 1886

Try to do it better ;-)

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 4cf537ef97 2016-09-20 12:15 PM : Uploaded by photographer ricox 2016-09-30 11:43 PM : Screened Screener Decision: Rejected Oversharpened Quality Noise 2016-10-01 01:40 AM : Appealed by photographer ricox Photographer Comment: Quality not different from thi...

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon Sep 26, 2016 7:13 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: uff uff
Replies: 2
Views: 1872

uff uff

Hi to all, I need an opinion, this pic: http://www.airliners.net/user/photo-cor ... to/3983111 was rej for oversharpening, I appeal, and head say OK OK sharpening is OK but ... neen CW rotation, I check and re-check but I'm sure that ground is perfeclly levelled... and now? I have to do like some fr...

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon Sep 26, 2016 5:51 pm
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion
Replies: 2553
Views: 403438

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

Dear staff, it's a lot of monts since site was been "updated" :? . It's sad for me to see that this site, for photograper, had lost a lot of enjo :| y... I continue uploading here to don't lost a lot of work and in the hope that something change. For example, Photo statistic and Upload que...

Jump to post
by ricox
Thu Sep 22, 2016 2:10 pm
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Copyright bar
Replies: 2
Views: 1103

Copyright bar

https://www.airliners.net/photo/France-A ... /2837401/L
https://www.airliners.net/photo/France-A ... /2837379/L

there is no copyright bar ...
why?
-->

Sorry, in this my pics:

https://www.airliners.net/photo/France-A ... /2837401/L
https://www.airliners.net/photo/France-A ... /2837379/L

there is no copyright bar ...
why?

Jump to post
by ricox
Fri Sep 02, 2016 10:14 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Very disappointed with anonimus HS
Replies: 10
Views: 3472

Re: Very disappointed with anonimus HS

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 907683.jpg

...
-->

I come back from my holidays, only for opinion, this was the pic:

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/photos/air ... 907683.jpg

...

Jump to post
by ricox
Wed Aug 17, 2016 1:27 pm
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Number of views...
Replies: 16
Views: 2423

Re: Number of views...

Very sad....at this point I'm not sure that a.net could come back at Glorious time quickly...

Jump to post
by ricox
Wed Aug 17, 2016 6:50 am
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Number of views...
Replies: 16
Views: 2423

Number of views...

https://www.airliners.net/photo/Emirates ... 61/3917393

usually with this kind of pic I easily reach 1000 views, today I see a few more of 100???

Whats happen??
-->

On August 15th I had this pic

https://www.airliners.net/photo/Emirates ... 61/3917393

usually with this kind of pic I easily reach 1000 views, today I see a few more of 100???

Whats happen??

Jump to post
by ricox
Wed Aug 17, 2016 6:41 am
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Is there this photo or not?
Replies: 0
Views: 806

Is there this photo or not?

Hi,
I have this photo id: 3916623
Accepted, when I look for My photos in search engine, it doesn't displayed in my list...

Jump to post
by ricox
Sun Aug 14, 2016 6:59 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Very disappointed with anonimus HS
Replies: 10
Views: 3472

Re: Very disappointed with anonimus HS

...So what is the other flaw for which it was rejected? In this pic, as all other, I adjusted the shadows, and I got this: "Your image of I-TALY shows evidence of darkening/altering the sky which is prohibited editing and will lead to an upload suspension if repeated" let me say that when...

Jump to post
by ricox
Thu Aug 11, 2016 7:57 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Very disappointed with anonimus HS
Replies: 10
Views: 3472

Re: Very disappointed with anonimus HS

ptrjong wrote:
I-TALY has a civil registration and no military markings. Why should it be MILITARY?


Ask to Head screener... If you know a way to Who is the Head that rej photo...
Thank's

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon Aug 08, 2016 2:49 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Very disappointed with anonimus HS
Replies: 10
Views: 3472

Very disappointed with anonimus HS

I appealed a photo of I-TALY, I ask about category in this forum and a screener say to me GOV not MILITARY, now in appeal HS say MIL not GOV hey guys are we jocking?? Pheraps yes... I also took a Yellow ticket for enached shadows ... I'm sure that a screener Times ago say to me that was allowed. Ple...

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:51 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Military or Government??
Replies: 2
Views: 1388

Re: Military or Government??

Thank's

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:47 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Military or Government??
Replies: 2
Views: 1388

Military or Government??

I have a doubt for witch category is good for this:

Image

could anyone help me?
Thank's a lot

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon Aug 01, 2016 10:03 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Opinion on "blurry"
Replies: 5
Views: 1683

Re: Opinion on "blurry"

[quote="airkas1"
He is not a headscreener and everyone, including crew, gets photos rejected...[/quote]

Oh yes I made mistake, he's a screener ... anyway smiles stay for practical joke!
I know that the period is not one of the best for a.net crew but sometimes take it easy ...
bye

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon Aug 01, 2016 8:52 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Opinion on "blurry"
Replies: 5
Views: 1683

Re: Opinion on "blurry"

Dear all, .. Is this picture blurry but acceptable due to the news event or is this picture not blurry? ... For sure this picture is not perfect, but I think that due to the special Aircraft is acceptable, also I experience a lot of blurry rej, sometimes it depend on screener eyes.. pheraps a wrong...

Jump to post
by ricox
Mon Aug 01, 2016 5:48 am
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion
Replies: 2553
Views: 403438

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

Thank's ... but I don't understand why :?: ... So that's why we took the above mentioned steps. Ah :roll: ok, I take this opportunity to ask if there is a sort of timetable for this "to do thing": 1-Upload queue statistic. 2-Photo statistic. 3-If there is a way to fix quality of certain p...

Jump to post
by ricox
Sun Jul 31, 2016 9:58 pm
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion
Replies: 2553
Views: 403438

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

Thank's ... but I don't understand why :?:

Jump to post
by ricox
Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:05 am
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion
Replies: 2553
Views: 403438

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

Is no more possible to select Dark watermark ...

Jump to post
by ricox
Fri Jul 29, 2016 7:26 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: Rrejected for Halo
Replies: 4
Views: 1393

Re: Rrejected for Halo

Seems that you worked a lot around the tail and the top part of the fuselage with some kind of brush ...

Jump to post
by ricox
Sat Jul 23, 2016 8:35 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox rejections board ;-)
Replies: 26
Views: 3532

Re: ricox rejections board ;-)

... Conclusion: - We see the correct quality when screening. - Photo corner pages still need to be modeled after the public pages, but this will be fixed soon. I hope this takes any doubt away once and for all now... Yes ok thsnks, About raw uploded, can you see all defect caused rej? I need to und...

Jump to post
by ricox
Fri Jul 22, 2016 6:18 am
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Issues FAQ
Replies: 179
Views: 189159

Re: Issues FAQ

Hi all, we noticed that sometimes, for me especially in photo corner, whet I click on an uploaded photo to enlarge it, I got a 1920 x ... zoom despite original image was 1200 x or 1280 ... ususlly when it occours, you have in the address bar a filename end with http:// .....12.jpg example: http://im...

Jump to post
by ricox
Thu Jul 21, 2016 11:14 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox rejections board ;-)
Replies: 26
Views: 3532

Re: ricox rejections board ;-)

@Federico, please confirm that the 3 links I posted above are indeed the photos in their correct sizes. ... In my book that's: - blurry - heathazed - quality The third one is wrong on my browser, is showed in 1280 but original is 1200 other 2 seems ok for dimension but... Make attention to the seco...

Jump to post
by ricox
Thu Jul 21, 2016 10:16 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox rejections board ;-)
Replies: 26
Views: 3532

Re: ricox rejections board ;-)

http://www.jetphotos.net/photo/8327975

This is one of the three uploaded on other site without problem, this site is not so severe in screening but with defect showed before by "scbriml", they reject immediatly...

Jump to post
by ricox
Thu Jul 21, 2016 6:15 am
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion
Replies: 2553
Views: 403438

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

airkas1 wrote:
...3) This is on the list. Thanks for the screenshot, I'll add it to the entry.
...


WAO so fast this improvement, today Aircraft reg and SN info appears in the exact expected position... thank's a lot.

Jump to post
by ricox
Thu Jul 21, 2016 5:42 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox rejections board ;-)
Replies: 26
Views: 3532

Re: ricox rejections board ;-)

Another question on this one: All three of your images have horrible banding and highly pixelated skies... ...Because for me they are 1920x1080 and it's definitely not what he uploaded... EC-KQC for example was @1200*800, but if I eq it I had a different result .. ?!? http://imgproc.airliners.net/p...

Jump to post
by ricox
Wed Jul 20, 2016 12:38 pm
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox rejections board ;-)
Replies: 26
Views: 3532

Re: ricox rejections board ;-)

For sure 3 different reg...

Jump to post
by ricox
Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:31 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox rejections board ;-)
Replies: 26
Views: 3532

Re: ricox rejections board ;-)

Another question on this one: http://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/1/1/6/3884611-v2ceff2a58e9-12.jpg Screener Decision: Rejected Double - I have no one aircraft uploaded with this reg... is there another double possible cause? Oversharpened - Is sharpen in the same way of other uploaded pic...

Jump to post
by ricox
Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:07 am
Forum: Site Related
Topic: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion
Replies: 2553
Views: 403438

Re: Airliners.net Site Upgrade Announcement & Discussion

Pleased to see improvement, againg some suggestion: 1-Top 5 take a lot of space in home page, agree with Thiago. 2-Photo's thumbnail again too big imho. 3-Info in photo's thumbnail are ok in list view but missed in the other display mode ( aircraft reg or s/n). try to see below an example if is poss...

Jump to post
by ricox
Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:46 am
Forum: Photography Feedback
Topic: ricox rejections board ;-)
Replies: 26
Views: 3532

Re: ricox rejections board ;-)

Thank's guys

Jump to post

Go to advanced search