Re: Pictures saving as webml instead of jpeg

What do you mean? I can see them as JPG. This is what I do. - Open the large version of an image. As a self-plug, https://www.airliners.net/photo/Wideroe/Embraer-190-E2-STD-ERJ-190-300STD/5765695/L - Right click on the image, then "Copy Image Address". - Click on the URL bar on your browse...

Re: Photo(s) that made you go WOW!

real or fake photo? Look up at upper level last left door with big double windows. All A380 dont have double window only one small window on each door. see this 5730829 Maybe the screener didnt see it before accept it. It already accept it few days ago. I have never considered the possibility of cl...

Re: Russian military aircraft always featured on front page

Photos are sorted only by views. If Russian military aircraft get more views than other types they will get to the front page. No bias, just what the users like and click.

Re: Would this get rejected?

I think it would. Mainly because of the jetbridge blocking the nose of the first aircraft.

Re: sRGB/Color problems on accepted images

Hi,

Yes, you can use the reupload to replace files with the right color profile. Just please make sure to reupload images in the exact same dimensions, as otherwise the photos get stretched and look quite horrible.

Cheers,
Miguel

Re: Screening issues

Look at the details on the Saab. Look at the registration, the lines below it, the exhaust pipe of the engines, wheels, windows, etc. All of those show thin light halos and jagged edges. That is the oversharpening. Now compare that with the LH and with the Iraqi. If you see all three the same, maybe...

Re: Have quality standards changed on here recently?

NwaAviator wrote:

I think so, looking at fr24 and saw a shot that was cropped horribly with one wing totally missing with the top of the fuselage. I guess it just depends on the screener.

Re: Have quality standards changed on here recently?

It is indeed too blurry and was accepted by mistake. The photographer has been notified already and the shot will be removed.

I have to agree that the angle and the motive are great, but in this case the quality just isn't there.

Cheers,
Miguel

Re: Reject - User clarification

Credit where credit is due. Seen the raw files, clearly no cloning was done. Apologies for the mistake, Christian.

Cheers,
Miguel

Re: Reject - User clarification

Hi Christian,

It would be great if you could share the RAW files with us. Easiest would be to upload them to dropbox - or similar - and then please send me the links to miguel1982 [at] airliners.net. I will take a look.

All the best,
Miguel

Re: Update - Punch List of Bugs, Errors, Requests

I can't update my email address. I realised I wasn't getting screener emails today so I checked and my email address for some reason was one I have not used in a decade and know I've changed... Tried to change it, but when I do the email confirmation I get a 404 error. Missed screener email because...

Re: How do screeners determine level?

clickhappy wrote:

It appears the original issue has been reuploaded, but it is still unlevel and now it's LIF

Re: Non-priority photos skipping ahead in queue

They would qualify, yes. Would be even better if you could add a caption describing what's the ocasion, as most likely we would not be aware of the circumstances.

Cheers,
Miguel

Re: Frankfurt (FRA) Terminal Photography

In terminal 1 I would recommend the area around gate A28 and the new Z pier (gates A50 - A69) if you are in the Schengen area. From there the only option to get to the viewing deck is to go landside and take the bus to terminal 2 as the skylink train is closed at the moment.

Re: "This value is already used"

Shouldn’t the “Aircraft Manufacturer Filter Enabled” be set to “Yes”? I guess setting it to “No” makes the site try to insert new values in the database, and that fails as the value already exists. Just a guess on my side.

Re: Unifying airline/aircraft/airport names in photo search

Unification / Standarization of duplicated entries is high on the priority list, but at this point is just not possible for the editors to do such batch processing. As soon as the tools are ready - no idea when - I am sure they will clean up duplicates as quickly as possible.

Cheers,
Miguel

Re: Rejection Appeal without any comment + feedback

Hi Roberto,

Was a mistake by the screener that handled the appeal. Ticked the wrong box. Should have been "Underexposed" instead of "Personal Message".

All the best,
Miguel

Re: Photo(s) that made you go WOW!

No words needed.

Re: Photo(s) that made you go WOW!

As the title of this thread says, these last three that Kas posted made me go WOW!.

Re: General announcements & discussions

Counters are already looking better and more consistent!

Re: Cloning

Do you really see no difference in the lower-left corner of these two photos?? https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/7/7/7/5320777.jpg?v=v454bae02442 https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/3/6/2/5116263.jpg?v=v404ef7d8c12 Go ahead, open them in two browser tabs and switch between th...

Re: Soft image

Looks slightly blurry or out of focus. Whenever that happens, finidng the right amount of sharpening is just impossible. Maybe you have a sharper one from the same sequence?

Re: Double or not

According to the rules it is, but you probably didn't want to hear that.

Re: Photo(s) that made you go WOW!

Re: 502 Server Error

18:53 CET (16:53 GMT), lots of thumbnails missing. Also some larger photos. Reloading of pages sometimes makes the missing images appear.

Re: Photo Deprioritized!

Hi,

I can't see how the tail art is any different from this other shot of yours, accepted 11 days ago:

Re: Oversharpened without applying sharpness

Agree, both seem soft to me, no oversharpening to be seen. The MD80 looks heat hazed as well.

Re: Oversharpened without applying sharpness

Canon cameras (I guess Nikon too, but don't know for sure) apply some amount of sharpening in-camera to the RAW images. It varies from barely appreciable in some models to really disturibing in others (6D). Luckily it is one of the parameters of what Canon calls "Picture Style" so you can ...

Re: Post screening Solro

Uploading both shots would be considered double. I personally would go with the second one, as the crop on the first one leaves me wanting to see more.

Re: Best dslr for night photography

dpreview.com and the-digital-picture.com have image quality comparison tools, where you should be able to compare the both of them at different ISOs. Likely not a world of difference between them, I would say.

Re: Pre Screening Please

Can't speak for Kas, but for me it looks perfeclty good now.

Re: AirAsia FD528 360 degrees circle en route today and yesterday

Could be to wait if they had to be in a certain point at a certain time and were too early. Just a guess.

Re: Pictures accepted

Sometimes some photos take a bit longer to be processed. Now it is there:

Re: Pre Screen Feedback Please

Hi Chris, I think that by cropping tighter you won't lose any significant feature of the clouds or background, so I would go for that.

Cheers,
Miguel

Re: RAM 787 hits parked TK 777 at IST

From the images posted from Flightradar, it's pretty clear that the RAM aircraft wasn't using the correct taxiway centreline.

Re: Frankfurt airport being evacuated right now

We don't know if it happens elsewhere but goes unnoticed...

Re: Frankfurt airport being evacuated right now

A person went through the security control without being screened. Happened a couple of hours ago, operations are already returning to normal.

Re: Why so many LAX Overhead Pics?

If you encounter such examples, please feel free to use the "Correction" button (right side, right below the photo) to correct the category.

Thanks!

Re: Are the motives and crop on these photos acceptable?

Agree to what DL747 says, please keep all your requests in one topic. My take, only about cropping and motives. 1. Point of attention is the waving pilot, this is a Motive rejection. From the Acceptance guide : "Close up cockpit shots with the only reason for the shot being showing pilots wavin...